Movement affiliates' noticeboard
|←Wikimedia affiliation models||Movement affiliates' noticeboard||Archives→|
Movement affiliates' noticeboard. This is a message board for public notices and discussions regarding Wikimedia chapters, the Wikimedia Chapters Association, Wikimedia thematic organizations, Wikimedia user groups, and the Wikimedia Affiliations Committee. Please post your message at the bottom of the page and do not forget to sign it. Thank you.
Welcome to the |
Wikimedia chapters news and announcements
No chapters news at this time.
Wikimedia thematic organizations news and announcements
As the model of thematic organizations is new, there might be certain changes in policy, recommendations and best practices over time. Please have this page on your watchlist in order not to miss any announcements.
Wikimedia user groups news and announcements
"Achieving programmatic impact"
The daily shooting continues: once again, the WMF attacks affiliates (specifically, grantees) in an official document, accusing that «resources may not be effectively achieving programmatic impact [...] strong, demonstrated impact on our mission». I find it particularly weird in the context of an annual plan, which should be a way to reflect and plan rather than to assume you're doing well while all the others are wrong. --Nemo 06:24, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- That quote is taken from the (mandatory) response to the FDC's question "3. What are the risks or threats that could prevent your organization from achieving your proposed annual plan ...?", in the "Upcoming year's annual plan: strengths, opportunities and threats" section. If you find this "particularly weird", you should perhaps ask the FDC to drop this question or section, rather than blame the Foundation for answering it.
- Grantmaking work forms part of the four key programs listed in this draft annual plan, and the full first sentence that you are quoting from reads: "The bulk of Grantmaking resources may not be effectively achieving programmatic impact or supporting our online communities as most needed." That's not "accusing" any particular organization, merely acknowledging the danger that the work of this WMF department may not fully achieve its goal of funding activities that achieve such impact.
- It's super interesting that the mere mention of the possibility that there could be grantee organizations that do not spend the grant money well upsets you so much that you compare it to an attack by lethal firearms.
- Regards, Tbayer (WMF) (talk) 07:38, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
The Affiliations Committee is requesting comments on proposed best practices for Wikimedia user group logos. The committee will seek community input until Saturday, May 24, 2014. After considering the community's input, the Affiliations Committee will publish on Meta-Wiki guidelines for Wikimedia user group logos.
There is already a standard format used by chapters, and that format is being applied to thematic organizations as well. Chapters and thematic organizations have also worked with Wikimedia Foundation legal in the past on custom logos. Wikimedia user groups may also create custom logos, and the new trademark policy allows for logos to be based off the community or Wikimedia Foundation logos. However, there remains a question of the best practice for standard user group logos.
Please make any comments or ask any questions on Meta-Wiki at Affiliations Committee/RFCs/Wikimedia user group logos.
Thank you - Wikimedia Affiliations Committee