Grants:IEG/Committee/Workroom/Review/Scores
Now-selected proposals[edit]
Aggregated feedback from the committee for Build an effective method of publicity in PRChina[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 4 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 4 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 4 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 3 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 4 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 5 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 5 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 4 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 3 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 3 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 3 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 4 |
Comments from the committee:
|
Aggregated feedback from the committee for Consolidate wikiArS to involve art schools[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 4 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 4 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 3 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 4 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 5 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 4 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 3 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 4 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 3 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 3 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 2 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 3 |
Comments from the committee:
|
Aggregated feedback from the committee for Elaborate Wikisource strategic vision[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 4 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 4 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 3 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 3 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 3 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 3 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 3 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 4 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 4 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 4 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 4 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 4 |
Comments from the committee:
|
Aggregated feedback from the committee for MediaWiki data browser[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 3 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 4 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 3 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 4 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 4 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 3 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 3 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 4 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 3 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 3 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 3 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 3 |
Comments from the committee:
|
Aggregated feedback from the committee for Replay Edits[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 3 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 3 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 4 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 5 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 2 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 4 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 4 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 3 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 3 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 3 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 2 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 2 |
Comments from the committee:
|
Aggregated feedback from the committee for The Wikipedia Adventure[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 4 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 4 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 3 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 4 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 3 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 4 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 3 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 4 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 4 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 4 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 3 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 3 |
Comments from the committee:
|
Aggregated feedback from the committee for The Wikipedia Library[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 4 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 4 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 3 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 4 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 4 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 4 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 4 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 4 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 3 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 3 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 4 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 3 |
Comments from the committee:
|
Other[edit]
Aggregated feedback from the committee for A revival of Outreach to Increase Participation[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 4 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 3 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 2 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 4 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 3 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 4 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 3 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 4 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 2 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 2 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 3 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 3 |
Comments from the committee:
|
Aggregated feedback from the committee for Community engagement in Portugal[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 4 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 3 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 3 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 3 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 3 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 3 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 3 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 4 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 3 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 3 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 2 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 3 |
Comments from the committee:
|
Aggregated feedback from the committee for Convidando o Brasil[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 4 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 3 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 3 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 3 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 3 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 3 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 3 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 3 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 2 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 2 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 3 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 3 |
Comments from the committee:
|
Aggregated feedback from the committee for GIS and Cartography in Wikimedia[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 3 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 3 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 3 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 4 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 3 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 3 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 3 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 3 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 3 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 3 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 4 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 3 |
Comments from the committee:
|
Aggregated feedback from the committee for Mapping History: Revision History Visualizer and Improvement Suggester using Geo-Spatial Technologies[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 2 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 3 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 4 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 4 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 2 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 3 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 2 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 4 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 3 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 2 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 3 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 2 |
Comments from the committee:
|
Aggregated feedback from the committee for MediaWiki and Javanese script[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 4 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 3 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 3 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 3 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 3 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 4 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 4 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 4 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 3 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 3 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 4 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 4 |
Comments from the committee:
|
Aggregated feedback from the committee for More books in the Bashkir language at Wikisource[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 3 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 3 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 3 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 2 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 3 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 3 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 3 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 4 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 3 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 3 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 3 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 4 |
Comments from the committee:
|
Aggregated feedback from the committee for Studying content interest and editor engagement factors with new editors[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 4 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 3 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 3 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 3 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 2 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 4 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 3 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 4 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 2 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 3 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 3 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 4 |
Comments from the committee:
|
Aggregated feedback from the committee for TapAMap[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 3 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 3 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 4 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 3 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 2 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 4 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 3 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 4 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 3 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 2 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 3 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 3 |
Comments from the committee:
|
Aggregated feedback from the committee for Targeted recruitment of contributors[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 4 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 3 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 3 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 4 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 2 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 4 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 3 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 4 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 3 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 2 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 4 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 4 |
Comments from the committee:
|
Aggregated feedback from the committee for Wiki Makes Video[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 3 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 4 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 3 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 4 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 3 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 3 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 3 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 4 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 3 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 3 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 3 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 3 |
Comments from the committee:
|
Aggregated feedback from the committee for WikiNarratives[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 3 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 3 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 2 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 4 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 2 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 4 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 4 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 4 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 3 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 3 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 3 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 3 |
Comments from the committee:
|
Aggregated feedback from the committee for Wikipedia Massive Open Online Courses[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 4 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 4 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 3 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 3 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 3 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 3 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 3 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 4 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 4 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 4 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 4 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 3 |
Comments from the committee:
|
Aggregated feedback from the committee for Wikipedia on the Margins: Women, Minorities, and Philosophy[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 4 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 3 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 3 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 3 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 3 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 3 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 3 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 3 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 3 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 4 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 3 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 3 |
Comments from the committee:
|
Aggregated feedback from the committee for Writing Coaching for New Editors[edit]
Scoring criteria (see the rubric for background) | Score 1=weakest 5=strongest |
Potential for impact | |
(A) The project fits with the Wikimedia movement's strategic priorities | 3 |
(B) The project has the potential to lead to significant online impact. | 3 |
(C) The impact of the project can be sustained after the grant ends. | 3 |
(D) The project has potential to be scaled or adapted for other languages or projects. | 4 |
Ability to execute | |
(E) The project has demonstrated interest from a community it aims to serve. | 2 |
(F) The project can be completed as scoped within 6 months with the requested funds. | 4 |
(G) The budget is reasonable and an efficient use of funds. | 3 |
(H) The individual(s) proposing the project have the required skills and experience needed to complete it. | 3 |
Fostering innovation and learning | |
(I) The project has innovative potential to add new strategies and knowledge for solving important issues in the movement. | 2 |
(J) The risk involved in the project's size and approach is appropriately balanced with its potential gain in terms of impact. | 3 |
(K) The proposed measures of success are useful for evaluating whether or not the project was successful. | 3 |
(L) The project supports or grows the diversity of the Wikimedia movement. | 3 |
Comments from the committee:
|