Mailing list merge
|This page is kept for historical interest. Any policies mentioned may be obsolete. If you want to revive the topic, you can use the talk page or start a discussion on the community forum.|
note: Vote for this proposal was closed on March 25, and the mailinglist Intlwiki-l was formally closed. 
Both mailing lists serve as general discussion forums for the Wikipedia project. The intlwiki-l mailing list is, however, explicitly labeled as a list for the "non-English Wikipedias". This is discriminatory and ghettoizes these Wikipedias, in effect erecting a communication barrier between the members of the different projects (English and non-English).
An empirical look at the intlwiki-l and wikipedia-l archives supports that discussions are mostly about the same issues, with the addition of technical issues on the intlwiki-l mailing list.
For March 2004, on intlwiki-l:
- 4 technical threads regarding internationalization
- 4 bureaucrat/admin requests
- 1 media report
- 1 copyright thread (inter-project policy)
- 2 project announcements
- 4 Wikimedia project proposal threads
- 4 copyright threads (inter-project policy)
- 2 media reports
- 2 project announcements
- 2 threads pertaining to the English Wikipedia only
- 2 inter-project policy threads
- 1 bot thread (inter-project)
- 1 Wikimedia Foundation thread
- 1 bureaucrat request
- 1 bug report
- 1 feature proposal
Only about 3 or 4 of the MediaWiki developers are subscribed to intlwiki-l. Internationalization issues with the software should be discussed on the mailing list where developers are actually listening: wikitech-l. As for requests for adminship and bureaucrat status, these should be handled here on Meta, namely on Requests for permissions, so that there is a real consensus seeking process with open participation.
Merging the mailing lists will expose more people to international issues, reduce redundancy, reduce discrimination, and simplify project announcements.
Arguments against 
- This will expose people to issues from the English Wikipedia
- No, the policy is clear: Issues only relevant to the English Wikipedia are discussed on wikien-l. Enforcement of that policy will logically increase when more people are involved who are annoyed by its violation.
- People can discuss issues on intlwiki-l in their language
- This has always been allowed on wikipedia-l, too
- Some issues raised at Intlwiki-l are not interlingual or project-wide in nature. They are language-specific, and they need to raise the issue somewhere to get attention from others interested. Participants of Wikipedia-l and Wikitech-l might be more interested in project-wide issues, and not issues specific to minor language-wikipedias, nor basic questions from minor language-wikipedias.
- We can clarify that issues that need attention from outside their own language-wikipedias are welcome at Wikipedia-l and Wikitech-l.
Deadline: March 25, 20:00 UTC
Yes, the mailing lists should be merged:
- —Eloquence 19:55, 21 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Willy 20:18, 21 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Anthere 22:05, 21 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- The Anome 00:13, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- denny 03:26, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Timwi 04:38, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Ryo 08:57, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Looxix 11:55, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Kurt Jansson 19:06, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Andrew Levine 20:11, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Kpjas 21:21, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Erdal Ronahi 20:51, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Jeff8765 03:35, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- 220.127.116.11 01:34, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- BCorr|Брайен 21:38, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC)
No, the mailing lists should not be merged:
Other (please comment):
People can discuss issues on intlwiki-l in their language : This has always been allowed on wikipedia-l, too
- I have no memory of this being allowed. It would be good to publicly state it. Anthere
- Abstain: Spikey 22:07, 21 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- On grounds of ignorance. It does seem that any issues relevant across all non-English 'Pedians are relevant to Englash 'Pedians too. If individual wikis need individual lists, they should have them, like WikiEN-l.