Meta:Requests for adminship/AmiDaniel

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

AmiDaniel[edit]

At least 100 valid contributions on another Wikimedia project: About 15,000 on enwiki, 600 on enwikiversity, few thousand scattered elsewhere.
100 valid contributions on the Meta-Wiki: Yes
Administrator of another project: w:User:AmiDaniel, mw:User:AmiDaniel
Meta userpage: User:AmiDaniel
Valid contact address: Special:Emailuser/AmiDaniel
Have read (and understand) Meta admin policy: Yes

I'm requesting adminship on meta to assist with fixing problems and responding to requests concerning (among others) the Spam blacklist, the Interwiki map, and globally-used templates. For the last few months, I've simply been nagging User:Eagle 101 whenever I need something done, but I believe it would certainly be more effective (and less likely to cause him annoyance :D) if I could handle these things myself. Thank you for your consideration. AmiDaniel 04:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support Fine admin on en.wp, I have no concerns about your adminship here. EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Anonymous Dissident^Talk 06:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --.anaconda 10:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Nick1915 -^{all you want} 11:35, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - He is a fine wikipedia admin and fixing problems is what he does best ..--Comet styles 11:42, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ma'a --Alnokta 12:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jusjih 16:03, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Marbot 17:19, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pro. --Thogo (talk) 18:30, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
+ ¿Por qué no? Cbrown1023 talk 00:19, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adambro 22:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aphaia 23:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Completely trusted user as far as I am concerned. However I am going Neutral here. I see no recent work on en wp blacklist nor on the blacklist talk page here and I would have thought that was a prerequisite for wanting more rights related to that? --Herby ^{talk thyme} 07:48, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi Herby, indeed I haven't done any work on the local blacklist/whitelist on enwiki, and indeed "work" is likely the wrong word for what I would be doing with the spam blacklist here. In the last few months I've fielded many, many complaints about malfunctions with the blacklist (most wind up on IRC in the #wikimedia-tech channel), many resulting from broken regex's that blacklist too many (or in some cases, all) external links, and have had to hunt down meta admins to help to resolve these problems. I presume that, with sysop rights here, I would continue this trend of fielding complaints, but would fix them here rather than trying to hunt down someone else who can. For some reason, I tend to be far less a contributor than a problem fixer (of my edits on Wikipedia, very, very few have anything to do with writing encyclopedia articles), and I would likely continue this role on meta. Indeed you are correct that it is a bit presumptuous and ill-advised to decide to mess with the meta blacklist -- the blacklist shared by all wikimedia wikis -- before even working with one on a local project; however, I would note that I have considerable knowledge in working with the SpamBlacklist extension, having assisted many users of both Wikimedia and non-Wikimedia wikis to configure it and use it appropriately. Anyway, thank you for comment, and I will certainly consider working on enwiki's blacklist before touching the one on meta. AmiDaniel 08:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - I sincerely appreciate the thoughtful response. I'll go think too, my vote may well be reviewed! --Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yep - quality answer to a less than quality quality question, I can live with that Support --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:48, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Support based on your exchange with Herby. How soon can you start?!! --A. B. ^(talk) 14:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - clearly qualified, should do a good job. WjBscribe 17:35, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely will make a good admin. Captain panda 23:46, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support The right man for the right job :) ~ Riana ⁂ 02:40, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trustworthy, appropriate decorum, wikiwise...got the Right Stuff for the meta admin team. FloNight 21:44, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support ElinorD 19:30, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vote closed, AmiDaniel promoted to sysop. MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 06:58, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you all very much for your support! It means a lot to me, and I'll try not to let you down. AmiDaniel 21:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]