Meta:Requests for adminship/Hillgentleman

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Hillgentleman[edit]

I would like to be a sysop because I know Chinese and I can help out. I contributed since last year on Meta in the translation department and in general discussions. I am an operator on Wikiversity beta and on Wikipedia in Cantonese. Hillgentleman 15:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support Already a great asset of meta. An additional mop might be beneficial to the community. --Aphaia 15:32, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --birdy geimfyglið _(:> )=| 15:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support (what took you so long:)) I've watched this user's work here for some time now. Helpful, sense of humour, hard working and throw in some useful languages, great (& Spacebirdy is waay too quick - edit conflit!) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support(English)A good, rational wikipedian.(Literary Chinese)為人言理，可堪大任。--Itsmine 15:37, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - A very hard working metapedian. I'd ask though to please make more use of the preview button. Majorly (talk) 15:56, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I agree with Majorly on the last bit :P.. Good editor and <cliché>I thought he already was an admin</cliché>...--Comet styles 16:09, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Eh sì :) --M/ 16:22, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Edmund the King of the Woods! 16:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support! Korg 16:50, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why not? --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:54, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
ovvio :-) --.snoopy. AKA dario vet · (talk) 17:56, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A. B. ^(talk) 20:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adambro 21:43, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Support - I really, genuinely thought he must have been one the first time I met him, and I was frankly surprised when I realised he wasn't. --Anonymous Dissident^Talk 22:28, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh gosh yes Support... I guess this means I don't get to promote him when he sails through. ++Lar: t/c 00:24, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support 当然. Joe 04:20, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support wholeheartedly. Thunderhead 04:27, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support oscar 10:27, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nick1915 -^{all you want} 13:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support active user on meta, will make use of them. Cbrown1023 talk 14:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jusjih 19:57, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Concordo Slade ♠ 21:11, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very helpful user, and adminship is No Big Deal anyway ;) Good luck. PatríciaR 21:35, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
support --Thogo (talk) 17:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with Cbrown1023. Acalamari 18:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Marbot 19:50, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ayup, very trusted user. No qualms about him having the sysop bit here. EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:02, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alex Pereira ^falaê 21:09, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support — :-) --Agüeybaná 00:32, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olando 13:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kronin▄¦▀ 16:05, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Active user, and trustworthy. FloNight 01:38, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support and my standard phrase: Weren't you an admin already? --OosWesThoesBes 17:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support drini ^[es:]_[commons:] 21:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The community approves this request and with many

Supports and no

Opposes I am pleased to say Hillgentleman now has sysop rights --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:31, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]