Meta talk:Administrators/Removal/April 2010

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Have the proposed administrotors been informed to sign up here if they like to keep their rights? Barras talk 17:01, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

I will inform them now if no one beats me to it. Ottava Rima (talk) 17:04, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
A bureaucrat needs to re-review the list before informing anybody. — Dferg (talk) 17:05, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
This does not seem to be checked well enough yet, I just checked EdBever, and he definitely has more than 10 edits of the spam blacklist. Finn Rindahl 18:23, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Indeed, the checking wasn't very studious. It's listed below that I made four "actions requiring admin privelege [sic]" (thats the wording from the policy), but I can see at least six for me - remember, people, edits to protected pages (eg. M:ID) and also using rollback count as "actions requiring admin privelege [sic]". Obviously this didn't remove me from the needing-to-sign category, but it may have for other people. Daniel (talk) 18:26, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Here's list of all admins:

  • .snoopy.: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • A. B.: has done more than 10 edits last 6 months, however I found only 2 admin actions during that time span. Qualifies for proposed removal.
  • Abigor: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Adambro: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Alexanderps: more than 10 edits. More than required 10 log actions, however, only 8 admin-related log actions since October 1, 2009. Qualifies for proposed removal.
  • Alison: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Andre Engels: more than 10 edits; no actions, requiring admin privileges. Qualifies or proposed removal.
  • A. B.: has done more than 10 edits last 6 months, however I found only 2 admin actions during that time span. Qualifies for proposed removal.
  • Angela: more than 10 edits; no actions, requiring admin privileges. Qualifies or proposed removal.
  • Anthere: more than 10 edits; 1 action, requiring admin privileges. Qualifies or proposed removal.
  • Avraham: promoted March 16, 2010. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Az1568: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Barras: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Bastique: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Bdamokos: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Beetstra: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Cbrown1023: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Church of emacs: promoted March 10, 2010. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Daniel: more than 10 edits; 4 action, requiring admin privileges. Qualifies or proposed removal.
  • Danny B.: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • DerHexer: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Dferg: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Drini: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Dschwen: has permanent restricted adminship. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • dungodung: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Bdamokos: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • EVula: does not qualify for automatic removal, already confirmed adminship.
  • EdBever: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Effeietsanders: more than 10 edits. More than required 10 log actions, however, no admin-related log actions since October 1, 2009. Qualifies for proposed removal.
  • Eloquence: more than 10 edits. More than required 10 log actions, however, only 3 admin-related log actions since October 1, 2009. Qualifies for proposed removal.
  • Erwin: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Finnrind: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Frank Schulenburg: Wikimedia Foundation staff. I'll consult someone about him.
  • GerardM: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Guillom: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Innv: promoted January 30, 2010. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • J.delanoy: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Jamesofur: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Jon Harald Søby: has done more than 10 edits last 6 months, however I found only 3 admin actions during that time span. Qualifies for proposed removal.
  • Juliancolton: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Jusjih: has done more than 10 edits last 6 months, however I found less than 10 admin actions during that time span. Qualifies for proposed removal.
  • Kylu: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Lar: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Lustiger seth: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • M7: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • MBisanz: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • MZMcBride: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Mardetanha: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Mentifisto: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Mike.lifeguard: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Millosh: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Mxn: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Nick1915: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Notafish: has done more than 10 edits last 6 months, however I found less than 10 admin actions during that time span. Qualifies for proposed removal.
  • Oscar: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Pathoschild: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Patrick: already confirmed adminship.
  • Pharos: already confirmed adminship.
  • Philippe: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Rdsmith4: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Sean Whitton: already confirmed adminship.
  • Shanel: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Shizhao: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Sj: already confirmed adminship.
  • Tfinc: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Thogo: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Tiptoety: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Walter: has done more than 10 edits last 6 months, however I found less than 10 admin actions during that time span. Qualifies for proposed removal.
  • Werdna: has done more than 10 edits last 6 months, however I found less than 10 admin actions during that time span. Qualifies for proposed removal.
  • WizardOfOz: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.
  • Wutsje: more than 10 edits and 10 admin actions last month. Does not qualify for any form of removal.

Bolded ones qualify for proposed desysop. vvvt 20:40, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Don't you love people with such respect for the community. --Herby talk thyme 11:47, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Frank Schulenburg was elected and uses seperate account for Foundation purposes, therefore he is eligible for reconfirmation. vvvt 18:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Herby, I don't believe that there is a legitimate "meta community". Meta is a wiki kept around to dump stuff that doesn't belong elsewhere. It's helpful for me to have administrator access here for use on occasion, and I don't view performing regular maintenance on this wiki as a rational prerequisite for keeping it. It seems akin to asking all English Wikipedia administrators to have at least ten administrator actions in the Template namespace in order to maintain their administrator access for that namespace. I am active in the WIkimedia movement, and that should be enough. Werdna 14:04, 11 April 2010 (UTC)


Moved from the main page. vvvt 18:08, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Did you read these usernames before you put them up for de-adminship? Werdna 10:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

About 10 times or more. vvvt 18:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)