Talk:No open proxies
- Please add new topics to the bottom of this page
Contents |
"nobody care" [edit]
I don't understand the reversion with the edit of summary of "nobody care". So I have restored it pending a discussion here. NonvocalScream 16:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- enwiki's policy is irrelevant here & all wikis have access to the user group, making it a pointless inclusion. I've again removed this reference. — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 16:47, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- Per the thread above, it is correct that some projects assume this to be a global policy, that is the way it is. It helps to link to an example policy that a project has set for exceptions, for guidance. I'll edit that into the page here, with more clarity. Hopefully this is a good compromise. If it does not sit well, revert me, and we can discuss it more. Best, NonvocalScream 17:11, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
"Why" [edit]
Maybe you have your idea,however,do you know one word called"Great FireWall"?Please,it's not esay to go to the websites like wiki which tell the truth.Without open proxies,searching wiki is very dangerous is China(even you can't access it)!Please,is this the only way?--Etrebil 12:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
List of proxy [edit]
Sorry to bother but someone can check this list? Some IP in this list still vandalism in global projects wikipedia.Tnt1984 15:40, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Simply test using open proxies [edit]
You can find proxies at http://proxy.org/ and get an open proxy like http://www.1proxy.de/. By the way please block the proxy. --217.79.179.55 22:57, 17 May 2012 (UTC) Another proxy is https://zacebook.com/ . 37.220.1.234 23:00, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Instructions on appeals and translations [edit]
- This page should use the Translate extension, it's quite an important one. Volunteers?
- As I said in the context of legitimate Tor edits, I think this should contain some generic instructions valid for all projects on how to request appeals (unblocks, especially for broad IP ranges) or exceptions (IP exempt status). Most stewards link NOP in their block reasons, and it gets about 2000 visits per month (3000 in total).[1] [2] The best way is probably the stewards' OTRS queue, unless this proves to bring too much traffic/work for them; depending on the nature of the block and on the project of interest (and its policies), stewards could then act on the request or forward it to the appropriate queue/mailing list/on-wiki request page/agent/whatever.
--Nemo 12:28, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Support Yes to translate extension and to handle block appeals via OTRS (provides better privacy for users; which are not forced to publicy disclose the IP they're editting from in order find the blocked IP/Range). I don't expect we'll be that flooded but given that all stewards are now entitled at least to have access to the stewards queue, we potentially have more helping hands. In order to set this page for translation I'd like to improve it a bit first though. Best regards. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:29, 18 February 2013 (UTC)- Support--210.72.12.105 15:14, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- Support Per MarcoAurelio. Trijnsteltalk 22:55, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- Support Both suggestions seem reasonable. πr2 (t • c) 23:02, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
