Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Lao Wikipedia

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

The result of the following proposal for closing a WMF project is to KEEP the project. Please, do not modify this page.

The following discussion is closed: SNOW-close. Could just as well be called vandalism Seb az86556 20:02, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it.

I think Lao wikipedia (lo) have to deleted.

I see most of users are Thai, and if Lao users, they can speak Thai. Using Thai is good.

End Discussion: 31/12/2010--125.25.224.216 13:36, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Who agree

  1. Support - Laotians can speak Thai, and all users (except Tuinui and au8ust) are not from Laos.--125.27.48.143 15:58, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who disagree

  1. Oppose --Jo Shigeru 14:08, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose completely ridiculous request... Seb az86556 19:07, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose, this is not serious. Lao is a completely legitimate language. Recommend speedy close. Tempodivalse [talk] 22:10, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose Statements by 125.25.224.216 and 125.27.48.143 is inaccurate, baseless and ridiculous. Tuinui 04:35, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Oppose per above. Kansan 07:15, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose though we could close the english wikipedia. --OosWesThoesBes 11:15, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Oppose How could you think of that? Sorry if this is offense, but this the most silly idea I've heard in Wikipedia ever! Au8ust 15:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Oppose per above. PiRSquared17 16:31, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Oppose per above, and I support for speedy close. No legitimate support vote (only from one anon to date), poor rationale and piles of oppositions. It fails. --Aphaia 18:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who neutral

Comments[edit]

Suggest speedy close: No notification of local community, no reasonable rationale whatsoever (people in Laos are supposed to speak Thai? "Using Thai is good"? - or what's the anon trying to say?) Seb az86556 23:20, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.

Late comment[edit]

  1. Oppose per above. WhisperToMe 08:12, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]