From Meta
[edit] Gilaki Wikibooks
| Discussion |
verification |
final decision |
 |
This language has been verified as eligible.
Although the language is eligible for a project, the community still needs to meet some requirements described in the language proposal policy. In the meantime, you can discuss the creation of this language project on this page. (See an unofficial analysis of this request.) |
|
| Proposal summary |
| Language details:
|
Users interested in forming an editing community:
Add N beside users that are native speakers, and P beside the original proposers' names.
|
| Relevant pages:
|
| External links:
|
| Please read Meta:Language proposal policy for help using this template correctly. |
[edit] Arguments in favour
- Strong support-- we whant to have Gilaki Wikibook.--AminSanaei 09:09, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
I Also support this action and that it is a need in gilaki society. 217.218.197.6 11:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Arguments against
- This is one out of 5 proposals for a Gilaki wiki. Though Limburgish has so many proposals too there's a difference. There's no activity and Gilaki does not seem to be ready get for a Wikibooks, a Wikinews, a Wikiquote, a Wiktionary nor a Wikiversity. Maybe this will change in the future but not now. If there's any activity shown, I'll become in favour of this request. --OosWesThoesBes 15:56, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] General discussion
Hoi, please check out the most used MediaWiki messages, they and all the other MediaWiki messages and the messages of the WMF extensions need to be localised. GerardM 12:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Localisation is still extremely poor: 3% of the most often used messages, 1% of all core messages translated. Siebrand 17:16, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Incubator
