Requests for new languages/Wikinews Kurdish
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
[edit] Kurdish Wikinews
| ←main page | Requests for new languages (Wikinews Kurdish) |
|
Contents |
| Proposal summary |
|---|
| Language details:
Kurdish (ku / كوردي, ISO 639-2)
|
| Users interested in forming an editing community: Add N beside users that are native speakers, and P beside the original proposers' names. |
| Relevant pages: |
| External links: |
| Please read Meta:Language proposal policy for help using this template correctly. |
- Number of speakers: 26.000.000 million of people
- Location spoken: Iran, Iraq, Syria, Turkey, Armenia, Lebanon.
[edit] Arguments in favour
- Support There do already exist Kurdish WikiMedia-Projects, e.g. the kurdish Wikipedia with now nearly 10.000 articles and a wiktionary with nearly 35.000 articles. So there will be a future for this new Kurdish Project. --Bangin 17:34, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Support It is necessary for every language to live in all aspects of Wikimedia. --Zandweb 02:41, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Support. --Kaaveh Ahangar 22:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support there are 20 - 25 million people speaks this language. Wikinews is necessary for millions of Kurds. --Maviulke12 05:02, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support - I support it! --Mirzali 22:29, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support - I support it to, we need that! Kurdodino 13:15, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support Kurdish Wiktionary is a particularly successful project and I am confident that the Wikinews would be as well. Bogorm 17:06, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Support Euskaldun 15:46, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support
[edit] Arguments against
- Comment Out of the 10,000 articles practically almost all are stubs created in a bot like manner. There are serious problems on KU wiki on a variety of problems ranging from neutrality to copyright violations. KU.wiki doesn't have much of a matured community. Very few active editors. I feel it is far too early for this. It should be experimented on the incubator either way. -- Cat chi? 17:41, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I thing this project won't be good. --Absar 10:41, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- This wasn't an argument against, it was just an opinion without any comment. --Bangin 14:03, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose No activity. --OosWesThoesBes 06:57, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Not enough support (Red4tribe 17:06, 23 April 2008 (UTC))
- Oppose Please focus first on Wikipedia, before starting spin-offs. --Jeroen 02:19, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Per OosWesThoesBes and Red4tribe. Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 09:20, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose As Jeroen said, the Wikipedia is too underdeveloped Rbritt518 06:22, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Oppose--Aycan 11:52, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose As Jeroen and Rbritt518 said,they should improve their wikipedia first,to start Wikinews.--Rockermert hsm 17:35, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- Nope, Wikinewses need to be fast and I see hardly any activity to justify the creation of this Wikinews. Pmlineditor Talk 16:57, 16 September 2009 (UTC)