Requests for new languages/Wikisource Georgian

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
main page Requests for new languages (Wikisource Georgian)
submitted verification final decision
Applications-system.svg This language has been verified as eligible.
The language is eligible for a project, which means that the subdomain can be created once there is an active community and a localized interface, as described in the language proposal policy. You can discuss the creation of this language project on this page. (See an unofficial analysis of this request.)

Contents

Proposal summary
Please read the handbook for requesters for help using this template correctly.

Arguments in favour [edit]

Georgian is the most pervasive of the South Caucasian languages, a family that also includes Svan and Megrelian and Laz . The Georgian alphabet is traditionally said to have been invented in the 5th century BC and reformed by King Parnavaz I of Iberia in 284 BC. Most modern scholarship puts its origin date at some time in the 5th century AD, when the earliest examples can be found. Generally speaking the most ancient Georgian written book is the Martyrdom of the Holy Queen Shushanik (also translated as The Passion of Saint Shushanik; Georgian: წამებაჲ წმიდისა შუშანიკისი დედოფლისაჲ, C’amebay C’midisa Shushanikisi Dedop’lisay) is the first extant piece of Georgian literature. Purported to have been written between 476 and 483, the earliest surviving manuscript dates from the 10th century. The author is Iakob Tsurtaveli (Jacob of Tsurtavi). --George Mel 14:27, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

P.S. see also Wikipedia - the article about Georgian literature --George Mel 14:30, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

  • 'Support'Support --Zangala 17:27, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Support--Jaba1977 17:36, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Support --Misho 05:55, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Support - The list of Georgian literary and other written works linked above, is not of course full. Georgia has one of the oldest and richest literature in the world. In favour I'll add, that putting full documents in a wikipedia articles became more frequent last time, like this one. That is the matter of demand for such project. Rastrelli F 07:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Support--მოცარტი 12:08, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Support - Island 12:52, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Support – --Lika2672 13:59, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Support – --| Narke 17:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Support--ლევანი 17:48, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Support--Tskiria 17:55, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Support ----თეკა 19:13, 9 June 2009 (UTC),
  • 'Support'Support--დათო_დათო 11:46, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Strong Support --თოგო (D) 09:39, 10 June 2009 (UTC) Georgian has a long tradition of literature and writing, so there is plenty of texts to digitalize.
  • 'Support'Strong Support --94.43.112.105 14:41, 10 June 2009 (UTC) I agree with Thogo.
  • 'Support'Support -- დათო
  • 'Support'Support -- Sandro 13:32 10 June 2009 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Support -- antonio Pergamena.png 17:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Support - Alsandro · T · w:ka: Th · T 17:43, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Strong Support -- ბესო 00:41, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Fully agree with Rastrelli F
  • 'Support'Support -- Lukakhim 13:16, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Strong Support --ჭანო17:43, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Support --Sandrosaxel 19:27, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Strong Support--Elo20 08:10, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Support -- As a very old language and with a written tradition dating back to the 5th century, Georgian has a very large collection of old texts and is thus a good candidate for its own Wikisource. Malafaya 13:10, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Support -- Undeniably relevant language/project, and from the activity on oldwikisource, there is a thriving community that will make the project a success. Hope the langcom acts swiftly on this one...― Teak 18:49, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Support It sounds fine to me. I will say it to LangCom. Evertype 14:06, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Support Sounds like a future great source of information. Too bad the localisation of MediaWiki (72%) and MediaWiki extensions used by Wikimedia (8%) is still pretty bad. How about a translation rally on translatewiki.net and you guys will be able to rock soon in your own Wikisource!? Siebrand 23:03, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm there already:) (With an old account)I've even stopped editing ka-wiki:)--George Mel 05:21, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Support--Andrijko Z. 16:26, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Support. Georgian language has a rich literature tradition, so Wikisource would have good perspectives. ОйЛ (OiL) 16:31, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Support--dixtosa 15:50, 2 march 2011 (UTC)
    More votes aren't needed here.
    It can be safely said at this stage that there's consensus that such project can be created. But for that to actually happen, the localization in translatewiki.net must be completed and there must be real activity in the current Test Wikisource project. --Amir E. Aharoni 09:42, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
  • 'Support'Support --Cekli829 09:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
  • SupportGiorgi13 (talk) 14:28, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Arguments against [edit]

Other discussion [edit]

  • How long is there left untill the project is created? --Gaeser 17:39, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
    • Currently 59.99% of messages of extensions used by Wikimedia projects are translated. Those messages should be fully translated before the project would be approved (as well as the first two groups which are currently 100% translated). More details at TranslateWiki. --Millosh 02:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Localization update [edit]

  • Currently 99.48% of MediaWiki messages and 88.07% of messages from the main extensions used by Wikimedia projects are translated. Those messages must be fully translated before the project would be approved. More details at TranslateWiki. --Amir E. Aharoni 23:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Translated--Andrijko Z. 12:20, 9 March 2011 (UTC)