||This language has been verified as eligible.
The language is eligible for a project, which means that the subdomain can be created once there is an active community and a localized interface, as described in the language proposal policy. You can discuss the creation of this language project on this page. (See an unofficial analysis of this request.)
Replace this line with your opening argument in favour of the new project.
Arguments in favour
Support Support Pontevedra78 23:05, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I think that a new project must be discussed between potential user or people interested, but actually nobody has shown his interest in this project and is possible that it can not be maintained. Sorry for my english, i know that is bad. Regards. --Albert galiza 17:16, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Oppose At present, the project cannot be viable. A user who has not showed his ability on the other projects of wikimedia (wikipedias and others) in galician, portuguese or spanish yet, would not know how to be enough to introduce a project. Sorry of not not me exprimmer correctly in English .Elvire 18:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Oppose Yo no speak english. Lo siento --184.108.40.206 12:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose. Galician is not yet ready for a Wikiversity. This situation can be compared to Limburgish. Limburgish is also a minority language that is not yet ready for a Wikiversity. Currently there is only one page and one interested and inactive user. --OosWesThoesBes 12:32, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Oppose I think that the other projects in Galician language must be larger before open new projects. Nowadays, we have Galician Wikibooks and Wikiquote with very few activity, and Galician Wiktionary must be improved. --Norrin strange 09:30, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Albert galiza and Elvire. I don't think that Galician is ready for Wikiversity and of course, a request for open a project must be iniciated by interested and responsible users. ATM, if the project would have been opened, I supose it will be dead and unmantained. —Dferg (talk) 10:08, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Btw, I'd like to know what is the rationale of the proposal as I don't see anyone. —Dferg (talk) 10:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Galego is a potencial language. --Pontevedra78 12:41, 25 February 2009 (UTC)