Steward requests/Permissions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests(Redirected from RfP)
Jump to: navigation, search
Requests and proposals Steward requests (Permissions) latest archive
This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia wikis which do not have a local permissions procedure. Please check the sidebar to the right to see whether your request belongs better elsewhere. Specifically, bot requests, requests for CheckUser information and global rights requests belong on their respective pages.

If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).

Interface translations are done at translatewiki. Please do not request administrator access for that purpose; your request will be declined.

For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel (web client). In emergencies only, type !steward in the channel to inform stewards that you need help. Otherwise, you can use @steward to gain attention if the channel is quiet.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions | Unexpired temporary access
Crosswiki requests
MetaWiki requests

Using this page[edit]

  1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below:
    ==== User name@xxproject ====
    {{sr-request
     |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
     |domain    =
     |user name =
     |discussion= 
    }}
    (your remarks) ~~~~
    
  2. Fill in the values:
    • 'domain': the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
    • 'user name': the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case you're requesting access for multiple bots, leave this field blank and give a list of these bots in your remarks
    • 'discussion': a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]").
  3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of identity[edit]

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to confirm their identity. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also submit the relevant identification to the Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the office.

Requests[edit]

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below:

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access[edit]

See administrator for information about the position. Requests for removal of access belong in another section. Admins doing cross-wiki work may wish to see IRC/wikimedia-admin for information about joining #wikimedia-admin.

If you are requesting administrator status to translate the wiki interface, this should be done at the translatewiki.net instead (see mw:localisation). You can ask questions in the IRC channel or on the mailing list.

If you are requesting adminship to handle one-time vandalism incidents or clearing a deletion backlog, please see Vandalism reports and Steward requests/Miscellaneous.

Stewards
Currently-active temporary permissions are listed at /Approved temporary; please use {{Systmp}} for temporary permission. Please invite new sysops to the admin IRC channel.
Archiving
Requests only need remain listed below for a few days, and may afterward be removed as long as they have been copied to the subpage. Users who archive requests on that page, please check if the request was correctly added to the temporary subpage before removing it from this page.

For permanent sysopship please provide a link to the local community approval. For temporary sysopship please state for how long and for which tasks you need it, and link to a local announcement.

AmaryllisGardener@scowikipedia[edit]

I would like to extend my sysop rights for as long as possible. The discussion has been open for over three days. I use my sysop rights to perform all types of cleanup as I was the only active sysop. Thank you. --AmaryllisGardener talk 18:17, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

On hold til 10 Aug. Ajraddatz (talk) 19:07, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
I won't close this as I am going to express an opinion - I think AmaryllisGardener has a long enough track record that I'd support making this at least a year. With > 13,000 edits and a track record with sysop rights, it's only the small community size that means it can't be permanent (IMO) QuiteUnusual (talk) 16:33, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2015-08-10. Ajraddatz (talk) 04:56, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Thank you! --AmaryllisGardener talk 16:09, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

‎Dk1919 Franking@scwikipedia[edit]

I request temporary admin rights on sc.wikipedia for ‎Dk1919 Franking too.--L2212 (talk) 18:36, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

The request page seems to suggest that the request should last until 14 August? --MF-W 20:41, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Tecnically that's an election, but nobody is voting. I don't know if in that means 1 vote could be sufficient.--L2212 (talk) 11:29, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
The election closed.--L2212 (talk) 16:53, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2014-11-17. Please remember to translate the interface at translatewiki.net only and preferably upload images to Wikimedia Commons. To prolong your adminship, please come back a few days before the status expires or hold a local election if the community grows. Thanks. --MF-W 17:03, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Zhuyifei1999@zhwikivoyage[edit]

Zhuyifei1999 is a temporary admin on zh.voy (see here), after our local vote, can any Steward extended or give him a permanent sysop rights?--TianyinLee (talk) 04:43, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done permanent. Ruslik (talk) 15:31, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Geoleplubo@pcd.wikipedia[edit]

I had rights for adminship from 25 december 2012 (3 + 6 + 6 + 6 months) so I was Granted for 6 months to expire on 2014-10-03 ( see = https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Permissions/Approved_temporary#Geoleplubo.40pcdwiki ). Because of a mistake my administrator rights are closed now. it is wrongly mentioned as 4th August here ? Please can you put again my temporary adminship. At the same time I put a vote on pcd.wikipedia to request for a permanent adminship. Thanks, Geoleplubo (talk) 00:46, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

With the size of the community, I would doubt that we would grant permanent adminship, though would see that we would extend the period of the granting of the right.  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:43, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
According to the last renewal, the temporary adminship should have lasted until 3 October. I reinstated admin rights. --MF-W 17:06, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

MZaplotnik, Xyxyx & Hladnikm@slwikiversity[edit]

I request for the prolongation of admin rights (after first and second approval). After one week of discussion being open no user has responded. There has been more than one year now with no admin in slovene wikiversity although the need to have them exists. --Janezdrilc (talk) 12:55, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Comment Comment MZaplotnik and Xyxyx have been inactive on slwikiversity for quite some time (since 2012 / early 2013 -- though both seem active on slwiki)... only Hladnikm is currently active. Just a note... Personally I'm not fond of promoting rather inactive users to admins. Trijnsteltalk 22:05, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

As I am informed there was some lack of inactivity on Wikiversity due to the loss of adminship - the zeal for cooperation in some way went down with posting new requests (they were initiators of the project). If I may suggest I would try once more for all of them to get them back to Wikiversity and help the community. I think that in case of temporary rights it's better to try then not to try. --Janezdrilc (talk) 22:59, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Comment CommentThe whole conversation at slWV is a construction. The dates on the requests are 2012, and the page has been built in 2014. I do not think that we have evidence of people requesting rights, and a community having a reasonable chance for conversation. If rights are required, we need a proper conversation where someone nominates themself, or agrees to being nominated, and the community having the chance for comment. The purpose of rights is to allow active people to fulfil a role.  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:24, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

I understand. I have created the page for admin requests (link above) in 2014 for the reason of standardization of request pages across all sl: wikis. It also contains archive of 2012 requests (from the old page). The v:sl: community is very small so the actual voting can't be carried out - this is the situation of all sl: wikis except Wikipedia. There is no other way to become admin (again) than this way. They are highly trusted users and all of them are admins at least on one project. --Janezdrilc (talk) 11:31, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

I sent them a notice to confirm their agreement on promotion. --Janezdrilc (talk) 12:15, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

They all confirmed. I'am sorry for procedure inconviniences. --Janezdrilc (talk) 17:25, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

You are missing my point. This is not a suitable process. If they wish to be admins, there is a process to be followed, and they should follow it. I do not see that it is proper for these users to be nominated by proxy, and not confirm their nominations on a page. If they canot do that, they are not worth having as administrators. So unless they are going to be active as administrators, it is better that they do not have the rights. They are real, not party decorations.  — billinghurst sDrewth 19:58, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

In slovene community the selfnomination is understood as kind of "less hygienic" (of course, such cases are completely acceptable). So it is common in our praxis that someone - if possible - nominate you and manage then the further process for you. I was nominated for admin on q:sl: by User:Dbc334, I agreed and got promoted. No problem with that. I am an admin for 7 years on w:sl: and 6 years on s:sl: and I think I know the whole slovene community quite well. What can I say more. --Janezdrilc (talk) 20:53, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

You are still missing my point. I covered both scenarios in my previous reply. And your niceness in process or not, stewards require this certainty of activity to comply with our due diligence, and our duty of care.  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:13, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Hm, I don't know if I still follow you... they confirmed the nomination but didn't request for themselves here neither on v:sl:, am I right? (Is there any page in Meta where I can read about the whole procedure and conditions about adminship?) --Janezdrilc (talk) 21:42, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

There is some admin work to be done at SL WV and noone can't do it because of the lack of sysops at the project. I understand my almost 2 year inactivity at SL WV might be a problem. Give admin status at least to Hladnikm but please consider he almost never used admin tools while Xyxyx and me did use them. @Billinghurst, previous requests for adminships are not a construct, they can be seen here, Janezdrilc simply moved them to more appropriate page title (RfA) and made a local announcement there so other members of local community can express their opinions. And yes, self promotion is not an ususal practice in Slovene wiki community. MZaplotnik (contribs) 10:41, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
On a construct there is no evidence that the candidates are requesting the rights, so please get them to confirm their candidature on the page linked, as I have asked above. It is that simple.  — billinghurst sDrewth 15:08, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

All three of us confirmed the request for adminship here and there hasn't been no objections from other members of WV commnutiny for almost two weeks.. See top of the linked page, here's my brief translation:

Wikiverza:Prošnje za administratorstvo = Wikiversity:Requests for adminship.
Trenutne prošnje = Open requests
Če se strinjate, bom na Meti obnovil administratorstvo uporabnikom Xyxyx, Mzaplotnik in Hladnikm. Wikiverza je namreče že več kot eno leto brez administratorja. --Janezdrilc (pogovor) 15:13, 6. avgust 2014 (CEST) = If you all agree, I'm going to renew the adminship for Xyxyx, Mzaplotnik & Hladnikm at Meta /Wikimedia/. /Slovene/ Wikiversity has been without sysop for more than one year.
Se strinjam. --Hladnikm (pogovor) 14:24, 14. avgust 2014 (CEST) = Agreed.
Tudi jaz. --M¦Zaplotnik (prispevki) 14:51, 14. avgust 2014 (CEST) = Me too.
Se strinjam -- Xyxyx (pogovor) 19:07, 14. avgust 2014 (CEST) = Agreed.
Hope that helps. Regards, MZaplotnik (contribs) 17:07, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
That's great, thanks. One of us will get to it when one of us has the time.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:36, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Openbk@plwikinews[edit]

Our bureaucrat is inactive. Openbk (talk) 19:59, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold until 20 August we will give the 'crat a week to respond to your ping. And I will do a little digging around to look at the activity to see if we need to ping.  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:27, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
@Rschen7754: mid Sep will be 2 years inactive.  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:39, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
AAR was already done for this wiki, so AAR would not be a factor here. Of course, local discussions to remove should be respected as appropriate. --Rschen7754 02:18, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
@Openbk: which means that AAR in normal process won't revisit this wiki in a while. If your community has concerns about your missing bureaucrat, and its effects, that you should escalate that matter within plWN.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:22, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
We believe that the current AAR rules are good and we don't want to change anything. Openbk (talk) 13:04, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Nicolas Eynaud@ocwikipedia[edit]

Our bureaucrat does not respond. --Jfblanc (talk) 18:33, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

He even voted... have you tried to contact him on his talk page? I don't see it at the moment. --MF-W 23:03, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Yes I did, even through email, before posting here. Regards. --Jfblanc (talk) 06:32, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold until 27 August I have pinged the 'crat on their local wiki user talk page. Putting request on hold and allowing local 'crat to act.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:42, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access[edit]

See bureaucrat for information about the position. In principle, requests for temporary bureaucrat access are not granted.
General note
There is an ongoing discussion regarding the minimum number of votes and overall participation to promote users to bureaucrat at Talk:Bureaucrat/2010-02#Minimum number of votes (see also this RFC). Users are encouraged to assist in the development of a policy that allows stewards to not decide on whether a promotion is valid or not. Thank you.

CheckUser access[edit]

To request CheckUser information, see Steward requests/Checkuser. This is the place to request CheckUser access. Note that temporary CheckUser access is not permitted and the temporary status is only used by Stewards.

Stewards
When someone asks for CheckUser status, please check the current policy before giving the status. There is an email template to request identification from the new CU. Do not grant CU access unless the user is identified to the Foundation. Breaching these rules may be cause for removing your steward access. When you give someone CheckUser, please list them on CheckUser, ask them to subscribe to checkuser-l, email checkuser-l-owner-at-lists.wikimedia.org so the listadmins know the person is allowed on the mailing list, and make sure they contact an op for access to #wikimedia-privacy and #wikimedia-checkuser.

Oversight access[edit]

To request to have content oversighted, ask in #wikimedia-stewards, or, for requests regarding English Wikipedia email oversight-en-wp-at-wikipedia.org. This is the place to request Oversight access. Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and the temporary status is only used by Stewards.

Stewards
Do not grant Oversight access unless the user is identified to the foundation, which will be announced on the Identification noticeboard. When you give someone oversight access, list them on Oversight.

Removal of access[edit]

If you're requesting the removal of your own status, make sure you're logged in to a global account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see previous discussion on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.

To request the removal of another user's status, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. All discussion must take place on your local wiki. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, a trusted person from that wiki should provide a link here to the discussion, a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion.

In either case, copy and paste the following text into the correct section (see instructions above). Please post requests at the bottom of the section.

However, as the bureaucrats of a few wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a separate list of these specific wikis.

==== username@domain ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = 
 |user name = 
 |discussion= <!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
}}
Your remarks, etc. --~~~~

EvilFreD@nlwiki[edit]

I feel I can no longer discretefully perform tasks that are associated with administration in a community that propogates it's own interests above the privacy rights of individuals. Even though I respect anybody's opinion on that matter, I can not approve of this act of civil disobedience and therefor no longer wish to be associated to an organisation, in an administrative sense, that believes it's own values are more important than that of the individual. EvilFreD (talk) 19:18, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold for 24 hours as per standard practice. This request will be carried out tomorrow without any need for further communications, tho you are free to withdraw it at any time. Snowolf How can I help? 19:52, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Don't do this, EvilFreD.... Trijnsteltalk 20:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Done--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 06:14, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Rillke@commons.wikimedia[edit]

Please remove the sysop bit and assign all rights I had before becoming administrator. It puzzles out that Wikimedia Foundation has intentionally installed a super-mistrust-the-community protection level and I am no longer inclined to carry out administrative activities during my spare time, including maintenance and replacing deprecated functionality. Either the scripts will break over time or they are removed. In the past, the Wikimedia Foundation software department has imposed new edit restrictions on adminstrators, so that we are no longer able to edit all pages (glamwiki namespace), we are no longer able to script Special:Preferences (the security claim is invalid). And at this Wikimania, I experienced that WMF has turned into a commercial enterprise with employees without own opinion (there are exceptions and I am glad I met them) or motivation to seriously test the tools they advertise their own; some even have never contributed an edit to any Wikimedia project. This felt unnatural. -- I believe contributors should help interested parties getting started with new projects, teach them how to use Wikimedia Projects, and not paid professionals.

I came to Commons and became administrator because it gave me great freedom, trust and confidence. I now decide not to tolerate the drop in freedom, trust and confidence; doing the tedious work only and leaving all other decisions to paid WMF agents.

Finally I disagree with Foundation's criticism of the right to be forgotten. This position doesn't fit into my European Culture. Rillke (talk) 22:11, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I enjoyed getting the chance to meet you this past week and believe you should reconsider, or at least wait until this whole situation blows over. If it bugs you that much, just stop editing. Legoktm (talk) 22:28, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
PS, disabling scripting on Special:Preferences is a legit security claim since a user's email is displayed on the page, and was done back in 2007 (rev:22008) by a volunteer, nonetheless.
Hey Legoktm, Enjoyed meeting you as well and want to thank you for the globaluserjs/-css :)
  • Editing and coding: Of course I'll continue to, though I won't do the boring work at Commons as long as this issue is in place. And when the super-duper-protection is eventually removed, it's a good time for checking whether I still have the community's trust through an election, which is also a good place to get feedback. QA process.
  • Security: If one wants a user's e-mail address, one does:
    $.get( '/wiki/Special:Preferences' )
            .done( function( p ) {
                    console.log( $( p )
                            .find( '.mw-email-authenticated' )
                            .text() );
            } );
    or meta=userinfo&uiprop=email. And if e-mail is considered private, I don't know why MW went for Bugzilla in the first place. I was almost sure site script was disabled later (late 2011/2012) on special:preferences but not so sure about it. Commit messages in this time are too trashy to search them. -- Rillke (talk) 00:18, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold for at least 24 hours (per standard practice), possibly more (at the actioning steward's discretion). FYI, we cannot assign any rights on Commons (except CU/OS, but that's not the case here) - you will either need to ask an admin, or add the rights to yourself before the flag is removed. --Rschen7754 01:14, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
I can commit to making sure Rillke gets all the local permissions on Commons that he needs. odder (talk) 08:25, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
I'd say on hold until a statement by WMF on the current situation was published and we all had same time to think about it. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:15, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Meaning "old hold forever"? Vogone (talk) 10:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
No, a statement was announced for the next few days. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:40, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
The statement is there. Consequently, please proceed with the removal of the sysop bit in the planned schedule. -- Rillke (talk) 11:54, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
I have reassigned, and upgraded Rillke's Commons rights with my Commons admin hat. I feel that I should recuse from the stewardry component as it is one of my 'home' wikis.  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:34, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done - thanks for your appreciable efforts over the years. QuiteUnusual (talk) 13:33, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, all. -- Rillke (talk) 16:21, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Rillke@meta.wikimedia[edit]

Please remove the central notice access. I think I am not going to organize next year's Picture of the Year. And personally, banners are not a good UX, I think: Distraction from content and education and banner blindness are non-neglectable side effects. Rillke (talk) 22:11, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

I think that's a Meta crat responsibility, but I'll leave this open since there's enough Meta crats who come by. --Rschen7754 04:06, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done admin giveth, admin taketh away  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:36, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Á, JDavid, Magnus Manske, Moogsi, Zscout370 @ Commons[edit]

Due to our inactivity policy (criterion #3), I hereby request the removal of administrator rights from the aforementioned users. They have all been listed in the previous inactivity run and failed to perform the required number of admin actions in the past six months (see exact statistics). Thank you! odder (talk) 19:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

All done. Please thank them for their service. — TBloemink talk 19:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
@TBloemink: Thank you! I have now contacted all those users and left them short notes, thanking for their service to the Commons community. odder (talk) 20:52, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Please remove administrator privileges from the account of Zscout370. In response to a de-adminship warning e-mail that I sent them after the start of the current Commons admin inactivity run, they asked that their adminship be revoked due to lack of time. Thank you! odder (talk) 06:59, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. -- Mentifisto 07:09, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

روزبه@fawiki[edit]

This user has been inactive for more 1 year and still has no edits for 1 month after reminding. Per our local policy the sysop and bureaucratic flags should be removed. Thank you.--Calak (talk) 09:15, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 07:57, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

GoEThe@ptwiki[edit]

Been inactive for some time now, haven't had time to edit let alone use the other tools. --GoEThe (talk) 13:17, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Forgot: Please remove bureaucrat flags. Don't mind if you remove other flags as well. --GoEThe (talk) 13:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Time2wait.svg On hold - on hold until 13:18, 15 August 2014 (normal practice). QuiteUnusual (talk) 13:31, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done. Removed bureaucrat flag on ptwiki. Thank you for your work. Savhñ 21:07, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Hym411 @ ko.wikinews[edit]

I decided to leave after reading this wikimedia-l thread. Please remove my admin status. Revicomplaint? 15:38, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold for 24 hours per standard practice. Snowolf How can I help? 16:04, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Withdrawn. Revicomplaint? 07:49, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Hym411 @ commons.wikimedia[edit]

Same as above. Revicomplaint? 15:38, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold for 24 hours per standard practice. Snowolf How can I help? 16:04, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Bye :( Jianhui67 talkcontribs 16:32, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Withdrawn. Revicomplaint? 07:49, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Hym411 @ wikidata[edit]

Same as above. Revicomplaint? 15:38, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold for 24 hours per standard practice. Snowolf How can I help? 16:05, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Withdrawn. Revicomplaint? 07:49, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Hym411 @ test.wikidata[edit]

Same as above. Revicomplaint? 15:38, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold for 24 hours per standard practice. Snowolf How can I help? 16:05, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Withdrawn. Revicomplaint? 07:49, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Pavlo Shevelo@uawikimedia[edit]

Please remove bureaucrat and sysop flags per Site administration policy. Pavlo Shevelo has voluntarily leaved the organisation, and thus is not an Audit Committee member anymore. Thanks — NickK (talk) 22:40, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done SPQRobin (talk) 22:49, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Misos@mkwikipedia[edit]

Please remove my sysop/bureaucrat privileges on all wiki projects that I have. I have been away from Wikipedia for too long, and other wikipedians have taken over. misos (talk) 07:38, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold for 1 day, standard for admin resignation  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:50, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Please note at Admin activity review/2013/Data when this (and all requests below from this user) are done. --Rschen7754 13:18, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done and Noted at AAR--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 16:51, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Misos@mkwikibooks[edit]

Same as above. 07:38, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold for 1 day, standard for admin resignation  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:50, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 16:51, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Misos@mkwiktionary[edit]

Same as above. misos (talk) 07:38, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold for 1 day, standard for admin resignation  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:50, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 16:51, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Drahreg01@dewikipedia[edit]

Please remove my sysop and checkuser flag on de:Wikipedia. Thank you. --Drahreg01 (talk) 13:13, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Time2wait.svg On hold for 1 day, standard for admin resignation  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:18, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
It is allready on hold for two days. See the linked discussion above. Thank you. --Drahreg01 (talk) 14:53, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Sure, I'll remove it back home (in about 3 hours) where I can update all relevant pages more easily. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 14:56, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done  — billinghurst sDrewth 15:06, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Twid@dawiki[edit]

This admin has not made any edits since 20th November 2013 and has got a notice about inactivity 7th July 2014, but has'nt made any edits since. Regards --Asger (talk) 09:59, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Done. —DerHexer (Talk) 10:04, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests[edit]

Requests that don't fit in other sections belong here. Import rights can be granted on most wikis by stewards only, not bureaucrats, so the automatic list of local bureaucrats is irrelevant for this. Please gather community consensus before placing a link to the discussion here.

Note that the following types of requests belong on separate pages:

See also[edit]