Steward requests/Checkuser

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
←Requests and proposals Steward requests (Checkuser) latest archive→
Shortcut:
SRCU
This page allows you to request CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers. Please place your request at the bottom and be sure to specify the wiki on which you want the check to be performed using the format

===username@wiki===
*{{srcu|User name|language code|project shortcut}}
(please see usage first!). To request checkuser access, see Steward requests/Permissions.

Please do not ask us to run checks without good reason:

These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards, to allow easier at-a-glance reading of their notes, actions and comments.
Artículo bueno.svg Confirmed Symbol question.svg Additional information needed
Symbol support vote.svg Likely Symbol deferred.svg Deferred to
Symbol possible vote.svg Possible Symbol redirect vote.svg Completed
Symbol unlikely.svg Unlikely Symbol note.svg Note:
Symbol unrelated.svg Unrelated Symbol wait.svg Doing...
Symbol unsupport vote.svg Inconclusive Time2wait.svg Stale
Symbol declined.svg Declined Crystal 128 nofishing.png CheckUser is not for fishing
Pixie dust.png CheckUser is not magic pixie dust 8 ball icon.svg The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
Cyberduck icon.png It looks like a duck to me Crystalball.jpg CheckUser is not a crystal ball
  1. Running a check will only be done to combat disruption on one or more Wikimedia wikis.
    • Valid reasons for running a check include vandalism where a block of the underlying IP or IP range is needed, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption to one of more Wikimedia wikis.
  2. Requests to run a check with ambiguous reasoning will result in delays - please provide a rationale at the time you make the request
    • Show what the disruption to the project is, and why you believe the accounts are related.
  3. Requests to run a check on yourself will be declined
  4. Note that many projects have local CheckUser procedures, and requests for information on these wikis should be requested locally:
Crosswiki requests
MetaWiki requests

Contents

[edit] Requests

[edit] Sdee@zh.wikipedia

I suspect those two accounts are the same person because:

  1. w:zh:user:Akimotokenta made grammar mistakes to the article w:zh:何思謙(see [1]). I reverted that but later w:zh:user:Sdee brought back the grammar-mistake version and wrote the summary as "user:Akimotokenta 編輯合理，無需回退。" (Translation: "user:Akimotokenta's version is reasonable, so no need to revert.")(see [2]). Next I reverted that again.
  2. Akimotokenta added speedy deletion template to the article w:zh:吳國昌(see [3]), but it is clear that the article does not match zh.wikipedia's Criteria For Speedy Deletion, so w:zh:user:An Macanese reverted that. However, Sdee later added back the speedy deletion template and wrote the summary as "該用戶提出不嘗不是道理..."(Translation: "That user(Akimotokenta)'s request is not unreasonable...")(see [4]). Finally I reverted that again.
  3. In "Did you know?" nomination of zh.wikipedia, Akimotokenta voted a "support" to Sdee's nomination. (see [5], Akimotokenta voted {{支持}}(which means "support") to the nomination "澳門歷史城區哪座建築物曾是明朝時宣讀政府命令的場所？（擴建條目；澳門政權移交10週年系列條目）—TINHO 2009年11月7日 (六) 09:37 (UTC) ", in which "TINHO" is the signature of Sdee here)

For the above reasons, I suspect that user:Sdee, by utilizing user:Akimotokenta, made vandals to the articles and is supporting himself in his nomination. Please check ASAP as the nomination will end tomorrow, thanks very much. --CDIP No.150 repair meter 09:05, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

  • Artículo bueno.svg Confirmed Sdee == Akimotokenta  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 17:38, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Re-opened pending another steward double-checking my results.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 14:58, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
I double-checked, and I also come to the same result of Artículo bueno.svg Confirmed. --თოგო (D) 17:14, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Totally disagree with the judgement with the reason that this is toally unfair and unreasonable. (Please see apendenix 1 and apendenix 2 in the user talk pages as my reasons for objection and refer to the declearation letter by user:akimotokenta.) --AG0ST1NH0 18:50, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Checking user Uusijani

Could anybody check the user Uusijani? Seems that this is a vandalist who creates empty user pages in many Wikipedias and the only contents of those user pages is a long list of interwikis. See e.g. Upper Sorbian Wikipedia and Lower Sorbian Wikipedia. Thanks in advance. --Michawiki 23:01, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Er, just because they create their own userpage with interwikis doesn't mean they're vandalizing, many users do that (I just randomly encountered this, don't usually follow this page). -- Mentifisto 09:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure I see the rationale either. Are there actual problematic edits? Is there another user or users that is/are suspected of being a disruptive sock? ++Lar: t/c 00:58, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Agreed with above. Symbol declined.svg Declined --FiliP ██ 21:57, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] MS Wiki

The following user have previously vandal under different user log/IP.

What are the suspected users/IPs ? ++Lar: t/c 01:00, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
See latest archive. ...Aurora... 06:12, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Dealing@ko.wikipedia

Several users have continuously damaged Pokemon-related articles. First vandal was on September 9th, 2009, and vandal is still in progress.

ko.wikipedians want to know who he/she is and from where he/she's doing the disturbance. If you can understand Korean, see this ko.wikipeia sockpuppet investigation page.

Suspected sockpuppets are those:

Administrators have blocked them, but then, new id appears and continues the vandalism on articles.

If you can, please let me know which ip(or ip range) they are sharing. Then our administrators can block it.

We got a clue ip which is 119.70.40.101 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · VVV's · Luxo's · checkuser).

I think that you can start from here. adidas 15:19, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Fast checking please. --Kys951 15:21, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] See also


Requests for: permissions (global) — bot status — CheckUser information (local) — deletion (speedy deletions: local | multilingual) — translation — logos — URL blacklisting — username changes (local) — SUL problem solving — new languages — adminship on Meta — comments — interwiki map — an account on WMF wiki — help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat


Retrieved from "http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Checkuser"