Steward requests/Checkuser

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
←Requests and proposals Steward requests (Checkuser) latest archive→
Shortcut:
SRCU
Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
Confirmed Confirmed MoreInfo Additional information needed
Likely Likely Deferred Deferred to
Possible Possible Completed Completed
Unlikely Unlikely Note Note:
Unrelated Unrelated Doing Doing...
Inconclusive Inconclusive Stale Stale
Declined Declined Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing
Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
Duck It looks like a duck to me Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball

This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also requesting checkuser access). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.

Before making a request:

  1. Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.
  2. Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using diff links or other evidence.
  3. Make sure there are no local checkusers or policies.
  4. Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:


How to make a request 

How to make a request:

  • Place your request at the bottom of the section, using the template below (see also {{srcu}} help). 
    === Username@xx.project ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = 
 |project shortcut= 
 |user name1      = 
 |user name2      = 
 |user name3      = 
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = [[Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
 |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
}}

    For example:

    === Example@en.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = en
 |project shortcut= w
 |user name1      = Example
 |user name2      = Foo
 |user name3      = Bar
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = [[:w:en:Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
 |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
}}
  • Specify the wiki(s) you want to perform the check on.
Crosswiki requests
MetaWiki requests

Contents

[edit] Requests

[edit] Rightpeople@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of Users
Rightpeople (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
正義者 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Goodeditor (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Wukiwriter (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Correctnews (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Mytvcom (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
  • Reason(s): To prevent further edit disputes and restore normal editing. The users concerned participated in edit disputes concerning TV articles, such as [1] and [2]. Puppets may be created to evade three-revert rule (WP:3RR). -- Gakmo 03:49, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
It's Likely Likely Goodeditor, Wukiwriter, Correctnews and Mytvcom are the same. Bettytseone is a Confirmed Confirmed sock of Goodeditor.
More accounts who are Likely Likely related: Boscobody, Specialgood, Sueling, Citywalking, Balleho and Turereporter. (Please check their edits.)
Rightpeople is technically Unrelated Unrelated and 正義者 is Stale Stale.
Kind regards, Trijnstel 18:32, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Many thanks!--Gakmo 00:39, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Donkey06@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of Users
Donkey06 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Ogacihc (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Kroywenn (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Selegna (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Esramm (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
  • Reason(s): Systematic vandalism, abusive use of sock puppets to change data of this article. Francisco 23:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Donkey06 is Stale Stale, but Confirmed Confirmed for Ogacihc = Selegna = Gabriel Rosetti. As for Kroywenn and Esramm, they seem Unrelated Unrelated. --FiliP ██ 10:17, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Lacerda Bhahia@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of Users
Chucknurres (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
31Julho1985 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
CAPGIGANTE (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
WikiLord (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Pepita Negra (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Joaquim C. Sousa (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Al Lemos (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Caroline Rossini (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
  • Reason(s): No ano passado fiz denúncia e que confirmou o maior escândalo de sock puppets da WP-PT de todos os tempos aqui. Porém, nos últimos seis meses, ele voltou (Lacerda Bhahia) com diversos IPs e contas, que verificados pelo Utrace, todos eles são de Curitiba, Estado do Paraná, sul do Brasil, apenas editar bairros de Curitiba e pedir bloqueios aos usuários desafetos. Abaixo os IPs de Curitiba (English: Last year I made the complaint and confirmed that the biggest scandal of sock puppets of EN-WP of all time here. But in the last six months, he returned (Lacerda Bhahia) with different IPs and accounts, which verified by Utrace, they are all in Curitiba, Parana State, southern Brazil, Curitiba neighborhoods just edit and ask users to block rivals. Below the IPs of Curitiba):
  1. 187.37.246.249 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
  2. 189.123.242.230 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
  3. 177.16.133.36 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
  4. 187.37.106.118 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
  5. 200.189.119.250 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
  6. 189.123.242.230 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
  7. 201.24.29.84 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser) (provável / probable)
  8. 177.16.133.36 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser) (provável / probable)

Nota: todos os IPs são iniciais 187, 188 e 189, o que demonstra que usuário utiliza é IP sock puppet (usa diversos IPs para enganar outros usuários e sabe bem das políticas). Há também IPs iniciais 200 e 201, dos Estados (São Paulo e Rio de Janeiro, entre outros) aproveitam pra fazerem o mesmo, o que leva as suspeitas de combinação. Abaixo as listas deles, retirados do Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Pedidos de bloqueio/Arquivo (English: Note: All initial IPs are 187, 188 and 189, which shows that user is using IP sock puppet (use different IPs to deceive others and is well aware of the policies). There is also initial IP 200 and 201, the states (São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, among others) use to do the same, which leads to suspicions of match. Below lists them:): 2010/05, 2010/06, 2010/07, 2010/08, 2010/09, 2010/10, 2010/11, 2010/12, 2011/01, 2011/02, 2011/03, 2011/04, 2011/05, 2011/06, 2011/07, 2011/08, 2011/09, 2011/10, 2011/11, 2011/12 e 2012/01.

Lista de todos os usuários suspeitos (English: List all users suspected): Wikipedistas em Curitiba.

As provas ou suspeitas colhidas podem indicar que a Wikipédia pode ter sido manipuladas por muito tempo e só eu percebi (English: The collected evidence or suspicion may indicate that Wikipedia may have been manipulated for a long time and I only realized). Bruno Leonard 05:15, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Como aconteceu vandalismo recente com ofensas, [3] e [4], inclua esse IP e usuários na verificação, baseado nas suspeitas aqui. (English: As happened with recent vandalism offenses, [...], include the IP and users in verification, based on suspicions here.):

Bruno Leonard 02:36, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

I feel obliged to inform all stewards in here that User:Bruno Leonard is completely unreliable, as show by his frequents blocks on PT-WP. His claim is preposterous, there's over a million users on PT-WP and he's trying to prove a random connection just because these users are in Curitiba, which is the 8th largest city in Brazil and so it has a significant amount of users on PT-WP. It seems to me that User:Bruno Leonard is a paranoid conspirator, but I'll let you reach your own conclusions.--31Julho1985 03:49, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
So I came upon this and I decided to post the links here, in this absurd request. I hope this shows how User:Bruno Leonard in an unreliable, paranoid conspirator.

Links: [[1]] [[2]] [[3]] --31Julho1985 04:01, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Not done Not done Seems like Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing applies fr33kman 05:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Eu acho uma total falta de irresponsabilidade simplesmente listar os suspeitos por cidade. Há quase 2 milhões de pessoas vivendo em Curitiba e refinar a lista de suspeitos por uma categoria criada por uma userbox é um total erro. Acham mesmo que um fantoche poderia cair no erro de indicar a localização de sua cidade por userbox? Raríssimos socks que eu vi usaram do recursos de userboxes. Não sei se posso ser suspeito, já que o meu IP é um número totalmente diferente do mencionado (201.89.79.126). Edito aqui regularmente há 3 anos e nunca fiquei sob este tipo de suspeita. Conheço o trabalho de alguns dos usuários mencionados como o Deyvid Setti e posso afirmar que ele faz contribuições responsáveis para o projeto. Esse tipo de seleção de suspeitos é muito superficial, me desculpem. (English:I think a total lack of irresponsibility simply list the suspects by city. Nearly 2 million people living in Curitiba actually and refine the list of suspects by a category created by a Userbox is a total mistake. Do you really think a sock puppet might fall into the error of indicating the location of your city using a Userbox? Socks that I saw very few used the resources of userboxes. I do not know if I can be suspicious, since my IP is a totally different number mentioned (201.89.79.126). I edict here regularly for 3 years and never been under such suspicion. I know the work of some of the users mentioned as Deyvid Setti and I can say that he is responsible contributions for the project. This type of selection of suspects is very superficial. Sorry.) Wallinson 00:35, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Turereporter@zh.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of Users
Turereporter (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Citywalking (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Tonesmaybe (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Moneyocean (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Aboutvital (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Heardused (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Thatturn771 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Passbybye (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Rightpeople (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Confirmed Confirmed that:
  • Tonesmaybe = Guideheads = Thatturn771 = Referspoke = Touchtouch666 = Moneyocean = Realblues = Aboutvital = Cloudraise = Haveseems = Heardused = Localbrief = Halfgoalsff = Tendssuch = Linesopendrr = Cleardance = Stepshaltdfgr = Handsblindships = Dataopenttr = Civilpaper = Beingsixty66 = Sleeppanic = Civiltypes = Axispenny = Madeblind = Whendropsada = Poemsnewly = Closebirds11111 = Bloodyears = Loopbrown = Aboutsteps55 = Rancheach333 = Totalahead = Hfduhfisudhis = Goalsclub = Comesroadhruhgr = Ideasroads = Spanblood = Wavesaway = Panelbased
  • Turereporter = Citywalking = Bettytseone, but likely Unrelated Unrelated to others
  • Passbybye = Passbyby, but likely Unrelated Unrelated to others
However, Rightpeople seems completely unrelated. As you can see, there is a clear sockfarm there, with somewhat usernames mostly having some kind of pattern. --FiliP ██ 10:46, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Comment Comment See also this request above with some of these sockpuppets. Trijnstel 11:27, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. And, as an admin on zhwp asks (wp:AIV), could you please check whether those 40 users listed above are puppets of KellyMok (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser • CentralAuth • AllContribs) or not? --Naiveandsilly 17:07, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
After a review of PeterSymonds we both agree it's Likely Likely the above sockpuppets are related to KellyMok. Trijnstel 19:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Oh, it may be a sockpuppets of Kellymok's puppet... Here comes the final 外劇迷 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser • CentralAuth • AllContribs). Sorry for any trouble made. Vandalism is rediculously complex on those articles of TVB dramas. --Naiveandsilly 16:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
That account doesn't exist. Are you sure you mentioned the correct username? Trijnstel 17:13, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
The account is 外剧迷 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser • CentralAuth • AllContribs)--Shizhao 01:54, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] LeoINTDP@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Done
List of Users
LeoINTDP (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Jesús Dátolo 23 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
  • Reason(s): The two users are violating a policy (en:WP:NPOV) at the article Alexandre Pato. View: [10] and [11]. PcTalk 21:59, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Is there a reason to believe that they are violating the policy on multiple accounts? Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing, and just because two editors share an opinion does not mean that they are the same editor. If you can show evidence why they may be the same editor, great. Otherwise, local dispute resolution and/or protective measures seem more appropriate. Have I missed something? -- Avi 00:47, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Yes, there is good reason to suspect. Previously, LeoINTDP violated BLP in pt:Jesús Dátolo (view), the same name as possible sockpuppet. As shown previously, LeoINTDP had conflicts on page pt:Alexandre Pato. Please see the links and accept this request. I can answer any question you, but it will be a very bad English. Sorry for bad English. PcTalk 01:00, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Inconclusive Inconclusive Outside that their ISPs both are in the same geopolitical entity, I don't see an obvious connection. If another steward wants to review, that would be fine. -- Avi 01:42, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Braz Leme@pt.wikipedia

Status:    Not done
List of Users
Braz Leme (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Paulista Separatista (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
Russoww (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)
  • Reason(s): Users have the same interest in the subject, and use the same reference (a blog) to force your point of view. Halleltalk 04:33, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
The links you gave us do not provide any reason to check those users. pt:User:Paulista Separatista only edited the talk page, both others just have one or two edits on the page itself ... So no problem yet. a×pdeHello! 10:08, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] See also


Requests for: permissions (global) — bot status — CheckUser information (local) — deletion (speedy deletions: local | multilingual) — translation — logos — URL blacklisting — username changes (local) — SUL problem solving — new languages — adminship on Meta — comments — interwiki map — an account on WMF wiki — help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat


Retrieved from "http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Checkuser&oldid=3437401"
Personal tools
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Beyond the Web
Print/export
Toolbox