Steward requests/Permissions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Requests and proposals Steward requests (Permissions) latest archive
This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia wikis which do not have a local permissions procedure. Please check the sidebar to the right to see whether your request belongs better elsewhere. Specifically, bot requests, requests for CheckUser information and global rights requests belong on their respective pages.

If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).

Interface translations are done at translatewiki. Please do not request administrator access for that purpose; your request will be declined.

For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel (web client). In emergencies only, type !steward in the channel to inform stewards that you need help. Otherwise, you can use @steward to gain attention if the channel is quiet.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions | Unexpired temporary access

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Using this page[edit]

  1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below:
    ==== User name@xxproject ====
    {{sr-request
     |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
     |domain    =
     |user name =
     |discussion= 
    }}
    (your remarks) ~~~~
    
  2. Fill in the values:
    • 'domain': the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
    • 'user name': the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case you're requesting access for multiple bots, leave this field blank and give a list of these bots in your remarks
    • 'discussion': a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]").
  3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of identity[edit]

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to confirm their identity. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also submit the relevant identification to the Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the office.

Requests[edit]

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below:

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access[edit]

See administrator for information about the position. Requests for removal of access belong in another section. Admins doing cross-wiki work may wish to see IRC/wikimedia-admin for information about joining #wikimedia-admin.

If you are requesting administrator status to translate the wiki interface, this should be done at the translatewiki.net instead (see mw:localisation). You can ask questions in the IRC channel or on the mailing list.

If you are requesting adminship to handle one-time vandalism incidents or clearing a deletion backlog, please see Vandalism reports and Steward requests/Miscellaneous.

Stewards
Currently-active temporary permissions are listed at /Approved temporary; please use {{Systmp}} for temporary permission. Please invite new sysops to the admin IRC channel.
Archiving
Requests only need remain listed below for a few days, and may afterward be removed as long as they have been copied to the subpage. Users who archive requests on that page, please check if the request was correctly added to the temporary subpage before removing it from this page.

For permanent sysopship please provide a link to the local community approval. For temporary sysopship please state for how long and for which tasks you need it, and link to a local announcement.

محمد مجیب@sdwikipedia[edit]

(I want to be admin to delete empty articles and improve the Sindhi wikipedia for always.) محمد مجیب (talk) 2:50, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Requests should be posted for at least one week. On hold at least until Dec 21. --M/ (talk) 10:45, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Divineale@elwikiquote[edit]

I proposed user Divineale (she accepted my proposal) for sysop in el.wikiquote. It seems she is the only remaining registered user contributing there. Besides that the main reason for the proposal is that she is a very expirienced user, having done a ton of work in el.wikipedia, checking/finding and removing copyvio's from articles, and it's this domain that I believe she will make a good use of the tools since she has declared interest to put some order in this wiki that's almost without an active community for some time. The only admin there is inactive for allmost 2 years Ah3kal (talk) 12:21, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

On hold until 19 December (1 week minimum for discussion). --MF-W 16:32, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

فلورانس@fawikt[edit]

Thanks, Florence (talk) 00:30, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

I can only give you a temporal access for 3 months. Ruslik (talk) 20:01, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
hi @Ruslik0:, for why 3 months?. and after 3 months??? --Florence (talk) 22:13, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
After 3 months you may ask for an extension. Ruslik (talk) 19:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
ok, np and thanks --Florence (talk) 05:04, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Mjbmr@fawikinews[edit]

Temp access for three months, thank you.  Mjbmr (discussioncontribs) 07:58, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access[edit]

See bureaucrat for information about the position. In principle, requests for temporary bureaucrat access are not granted.
General note
There is an ongoing discussion regarding the minimum number of votes and overall participation to promote users to bureaucrat at Talk:Bureaucrat/2010-02#Minimum number of votes (see also this RFC). Users are encouraged to assist in the development of a policy that allows stewards to not decide on whether a promotion is valid or not. Thank you.

CheckUser access[edit]

To request CheckUser information, see Steward requests/Checkuser. This is the place to request CheckUser access. Note that temporary CheckUser access is not permitted and the temporary status is only used by Stewards.

Stewards
When someone asks for CheckUser status, please check the current policy before giving the status. There is an email template to request identification from the new CU. Do not grant CU access unless the user is identified to the Foundation. Breaching these rules may be cause for removing your steward access. When you give someone CheckUser, please list them on CheckUser, ask them to subscribe to checkuser-l, email checkuser-l-owner-at-lists.wikimedia.org so the listadmins know the person is allowed on the mailing list, and make sure they contact an op for access to #wikimedia-privacy and #wikimedia-checkuser.

Oversight access[edit]

To request to have content oversighted, ask in #wikimedia-stewards, or, for requests regarding English Wikipedia email oversight-en-wp-at-wikipedia.org. This is the place to request Oversight access. Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and the temporary status is only used by Stewards.

Stewards
Do not grant Oversight access unless the user is identified to the foundation, which will be announced on the Identification noticeboard. When you give someone oversight access, list them on Oversight.

Removal of access[edit]

If you're requesting the removal of your own status, make sure you're logged in to a global account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see previous discussion on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.

To request the removal of another user's status, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. All discussion must take place on your local wiki. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, a trusted person from that wiki should provide a link here to the discussion, a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion.

In either case, copy and paste the following text into the correct section (see instructions above). Please post requests at the bottom of the section.

However, as the bureaucrats of a few wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a separate list of these specific wikis.

==== username@domain ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = 
 |user name = 
 |discussion= <!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
}}
Your remarks, etc. --~~~~

Beachcomber@nl.Wikibooks[edit]

Please remove my administrator rights at Nl Wikibooks. I'm still an active contributor, and want to concentrate on writing when I find the time, Beachcomber (talk) 17:30, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Time2wait.svg On hold for 24 hours per standard operating procedure for a self-request. -- Avi (talk) 19:32, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
    Yes check.svg uitgevoerd, rechten weggehaald. Dank voor uw bijdrage als moderator. Mvg, Savhñ 01:23, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Scrutineers to enWP elections[edit]

Status:    Done

Removed the checkuser rights for Barras, Trijnstel, and Matanya at English Wikipedia following their temporary assignation to undertake scrutineer duties there. (Email request to stewards).  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:55, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Aren't you a local sysop on enwiki? --MF-W 23:35, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
IMO, it falls into an exception for being a non-controversial removal, as described in our policy. Though not self-requested, it is clear that it should be done the way it was after the scrutineers' participation was ended, thus there was no decision taken by Billinghurst. It would have been better though, if this request had been started by a commissioner/coordinator.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 00:55, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
For transparency, I was the one who sent the email to the list; in the past the scrutineers have removed the rights themselves following the elections. I know some people have viewed CU/OS granted by ArbCom to be okay for homewiki actions, but as we recently had a case where enwiki ArbCom didn't follow their own procedures recently regarding CU/OS granting, I'm not so sure that this is a good practice for stewards from an ArbCom homewiki to be granting permissions on that wiki moving forward, as it could be controversial. --Rschen7754 05:20, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests[edit]

Requests that don't fit in other sections belong here. Import rights can be granted on most wikis by stewards only, not bureaucrats, so the automatic list of local bureaucrats is irrelevant for this. Please gather community consensus before placing a link to the discussion here.

Note that the following types of requests belong on separate pages:

See also[edit]