Steward requests/Miscellaneous

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Requests and proposals Steward requests (Miscellaneous) latest archive
This page is for requesting that a specific administrative action (such as page deletion) be performed by a steward or global sysop on a Wikimedia wiki having no active administrators. (If the wiki does have active administrators, file the request with one of them.) If the wiki has an active editor community, any potentially controversial action (deletion of actual content, edit to a protected page, renaming of a protected page, etc.) should receive consensus from the wiki community before being requested here, and a link should be provided to that consensus in the request.

To add a new request, create a new section header at the bottom of the page (just above the categories) of the form:

=== Very brief description of request here ===

Then describe your request more fully below that. It is helpful if you can provide a link to the wiki (or the specific page on the wiki) in question, either in the header or in the body of your request.

To report vandalism issues, please use Vandalism reports instead.
Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Bot-reported speedy deletion requests[edit]

This section is for reports filed via Kimberley-nia Bot on the SWMT's IRC channel #cvn-sw (bot's irc nick is Dellieplagiat). They are submitted on this subpage. Please watch this page separately if you are a steward, a global sysop, or a local administrator.

It is possible to manually edit this list if you follow the bot's formatting. If you feel a request is inappropriate, please remove the lines containing that request entirely. (Leaving comments, modifying the header line, and striking out reports will confuse the bot.)

Example for the correct formatting:

* {{msd-link|ie.wikipedia|Talk:Europa}}
*: spam - IRC user DerHexer ~~~~~

Properly-filed requests that point to pages that have already been deleted or do not exist will be automatically removed by the bot. Note: It is unnecessary to remove requests for wikis where local admins "can handle it by themselves". If that is really so, the pages will surely be deleted within a small period of time and then be automatically removed from the list by the bot.

Manual requests[edit]

Please see this tool for a list of pages tagged with {{Delete}} and/or the local equivalent.

Disable abuse filter[edit]

Please delete/disable on of these; they do the same thing. Special:Abusefilter/100 Special:Abusefilter/99. --Glaisher (talk) 10:15, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Keep 99, get rid of 100 if you have to. PiRSquared17 (talk) 14:04, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Updated 99 in line with the help about article_articleid, and disabled 100 a few hours ago. Watching the stream of abuse for hours, and even resorted to turning block on, though would like to be able to do that globally, but won't/can't. Fairly large number of hacked PCs out there being zombified for this abuse. :-/  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:09, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
I don't like the idea of IPs getting indef-blocked. Also iirc, there was some discussion on not enabling block option on global filters. --Glaisher (talk) 08:18, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
It is my plan to convert them in a day or so to something like a month or two, the are hijacked computers. :-/ Yep it is a bit of a shame that the system gblocks indefinite, and it is something that we should get amended with a bugzilla for IP addresses, maybe something like a week. Re not using, sure, it was an emergency measure, and not used lightly.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:28, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Oh, I see that Tegel has one made changes to block lengths at one wiki, I am treading through others.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:32, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Media wiki[edit]

Can a global sysop block globaly this ip : he delete translation Manual:Installation guide/id and vandalism them diff. Regards --Grind24 (talk) 10:27, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Only 3 edits globally (luxo:, all in mediawikiwiki (1 valid edition and 2 not valid). I see no reason to block globally or locally. Currently exists more than 20 active local admins, if he continuous request there a local block.
Note: The GS we can't globally block, is a capacity of stewards. Cheers, Alan (talk) 11:59, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks you Alan . Regards --Grind24 (talk) 12:16, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Global protect[edit]

Do you stewards have tool for proect page globally, or is it even possible? I was asking article Professor_Layton_vs._Phoenix_Wright:_Ace_Attorney to be protected globally because an IPv6 user (every time with different IPv6 address) inserts fake information into the article. 16:06, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

No, there is no global protection tool currently. --Glaisher (talk) 07:57, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Ok, no more then. 14:12, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Copy a page from frwiki to mediawikiwiki[edit]

Status:    Done

Could you please copy w:fr:Aide:Pywikipedia/ and its history to mw:Manual:Pywikibot/ I tried to ask on mw:Project:Requests#Import w:fr:Aide:Pywikipedia/, but nobody answered in two weeks. Orlodrim (talk) 18:18, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

I pinged the local Importers there. --Glaisher (talk) 07:57, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, this is now done. Orlodrim (talk) 00:04, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Spam target b:cy:Arbennig:RecentChanges[edit]

To note that cyWB is being hit as a spam target, and has no active administrators. So eyes there would be useful. I have given it a clean today, and I may get back there to run some CU tests to see if we can stop the spambot creations.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:25, 19 November 2014 (UTC)


@Billinghurst: Looks like this one is prone to FPs (like people trying to create articles in user space). [1] [2] [3] [4] I don't think disallow should be enabled at its current state. Some possible modifications: not match if <ref> {{templates}} are in wikitext. --Glaisher (talk) 06:51, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

I am not sure that any of those user page edits are primary material. We could look to utilise email_confirm which would have let one of the four through, we could also look to change the displayed rejection message rather than the default, so the edits being disallowed could be more helpfully supported. We could look to exclude subpages. Any person who has edited even remotely per a guideline will not be caught by that filter.
There is a whole load of blocked spambots in the abuse log, and its false positive rate had been very low for meta and small wikis. Let us find some worthy content that is caught, and we look ensure that is not caught by the log filters.  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:19, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Global filters are supposed to be completely uncontroversial and I see some hits which may be considered as valid edits at some wikis and we meta users shouldn't be disallowing such edits unless it's blatant spam. This is not blatant spam, afaict. --Glaisher (talk) 14:58, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Made two changes though we now have On average, its run time is 3.37 ms, and it consumes 208 conditions of the condition limit. which is mounting up. If someone can see improvements, please suggest them.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:18, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Hmm, it must be a calculation concerning the average, the condition count is now right down, so that is okay.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:57, 24 November 2014 (UTC)


I really need this to be deleted. It has been sitting out for a while. Eurodyne (talk) 19:27, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

I don't see it as an emergency and the local admin was active today, so bring it up locally. -- Tegel (Talk) 19:33, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

See also[edit]