Stewards/Elections 2013/Votes/QuiteUnusual

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

QuiteUnusual (Neil)[edit]

ContentsYes • No • Neutral

QuiteUnusual talk • contribs • SULutil (accounts) / stalktoy • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: en-n, fr-2, es-1, de-1
  • Personal info: I am QuiteUnusual (or Neil).

    I first registered on the English Wikipedia on 5 October 2006 where I am still active. I am a Bureaucrat, Administrator and CheckUser on the English Wikibooks as well as an OTRS Agent. Having these roles on a small Wiki (there are only nine Administrators, three Bureaucrats and three CheckUsers) means I have been involved in the full range of activities (Mediawiki edits, renames, blocks, protections, history merges, deletions, rights changes, Abusefilter, CheckUser, judging when to grant admin rights, etc.) that a Steward would need to understand and apply correctly on a Wiki. I am an active participant in crosswiki efforts to reduce spam and vandalism as part of the CheckUser community. I monitor a number of IRC channels including #wikimedia-stewardsconnect and am available most days.

    I think I have the right technical knowledge, aptitude and attitude to support the Wikimedia projects as a Steward. I would focus on areas where the Global Sysops can't help out, such as CheckUser work on small Wikis, rights changes and renames on projects without Bureaucrats rather than Small Wiki Monitoring Team anti-vandalism work, although obviously I would help there as required.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: en-n, fr-2, es-1, de-1
  • Informationen zur Person: Ich bin QuiteUnusual (oder Neil).

    Ich habe mich zuerst am 5. Oktober 2006 in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia registriert, wo ich immer noch aktiv bin. Ich bin Bürokrat, Administrator und CheckUser-Berechtigter im englischsprachigen Wikibooks sowie OTRS-Bearbeiter. Da ich diese Funktionen in einem kleinen Wiki innehabe (es gibt dort nur neun Administratoren, drei Bürokraten und drei CheckUser) bin ich von dort bereits mit dem gesamten Bereich der Tätigkeiten (Mediawiki-Edits, Umbenennungen, Sperren, Seitenschutz, Versionsgeschichten zusammenführen, Löschungen, Rechte-Änderungen, Missbrauchsfilter, CheckUser, bewerten, wann Admin-Rechte zu vergeben sind, usw.) vertraut, die ein Steward verstehen und korrekt in einem Wiki anwenden müsste. Ich bin als CheckUser aktiv an wiki-übergreifenden Bemühungen zur Reduzierung von Spam und Vandalismus beteiligt. Ich beobachte eine Reihe von IRC-Kanälen, darunter #wikimedia-stewardsconnect, und bin an den meisten Tagen verfügbar.

    Ich glaube, dass ich das richtige technische Wissen, Eignung und Verhalten habe, um die Wikimedia-Projekte als Steward zu unterstützen. Ich würde mich eher auf Bereiche konzentrieren, in denen Globale Administratoren nicht helfen können, wie CheckUser-Abfragen auf kleinen Wikis, Rechteänderungen und Benutzerumbennungen auf Projekten ohne Bürokraten, als auf Vandalismusbekämpfung im SWMT, auch wenn ich dort natürlich auch helfen würde, wenn nötig.
suomi:
  • Kielet: en-n, fr-2, es-1, de-1
  • Henkilökohtaiset tiedot: Olen QuiteUnusual (tai Neil).

    Rekisteröidyin englanninkieliseen Wikipediaan 5. lokakuuta 2006 ja olen yhä aktiivinen siellä. Olen Byrokraatti, Ylläpitäjä ja Osoitepaljastaja englanninkielisessä Wikikirjastossa sekä OTRS-vapaaehtoinen. Näissä rooleissa toimiminen pienessä wikissä (meillä on ainoastaan yhdeksän Ylläpitäjää, kolme Byrokraattia ja kolme Osoitepaljastajaa) tarkoittaa, että osallistun koko siihen tehtävien kirjoon (järjestelmäviestien muokkaus, käyttäjänimen vaihdot, estot, suojaukset, sivuhistorian korjaukset, poistot, käyttäjäoikeuksien vaihdot, väärinkäyttösuodattimen käyttö, osoitepaljastukset, harkinta siitä milloin myöntää ylläpito-oikeudet jne.), jotka Ylivalvojan tarvitsee ymmärtää ja pystyä toteuttamaan Wikissä. Osallistun aktiivisesti wikienvälisiin spammin- ja vandalisminvastaisiin toimiin Osoitepaljastajayhteisön osana. Valvon useita IRC-kanavia, mukaan lukien #wikimedia-stewardsconnect, ja olen useimpina päivinä tavoitettavissa.

    Uskon, että minulla on oikea tekninen tietämys, taidot ja asenne tukeakseni Wikimedian projekteja Ylivalvojana. Keskittyisin aihealueisiin, joissa Globaalit Ylläpitäjät eivät voi auttaa – kuten Osoitepaljastajan työhön pienissä Wikeissä ja oikeuksien myöntämiseen ja käyttäjänimen vaihtoihin byrokraatittomissa projekteissa – Pienten wikien valvontaryhmän vandalismintorjuntatyön sijaan, vaikka tietenkin voisin tarvittaessa auttaa myös siinä.
עברית:
  • שפות: en-n, fr-2, es-1, de-1
  • מידע אישי: דיבור כאן
Bahasa Indonesia:
  • Bahasa yang dikuasai: en-n, fr-2, es-1, de-1
  • Informasi pribadi: tuliskan pernyataan Anda di sini
日本語:
  • 言語: en-n, fr-2, es-1, de-1
  • 候補者の情報: 所信はこちら
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: en-n, fr-2, es-1, de-1
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Ik ben QuiteUnusual (of Neil).

    Ik meldde me eerst op 5 oktober 2006 aan op de Engelstalige Wikipedia, waar ik nog steeds actief ben. Ik ben een bureaucraat, moderator en checkuser op de Engelstalige Wikibooks en ik ben ook een OTRS'er. Doordat ik deze rollen vervul op een kleine wiki (er zijn maar negen moderators, drie bureaucraten en drie checkusers) heb ik me beziggehouden met alle activiteiten (bewerkingen in de MediaWiki-naamruimte, accounthernoemingen, blokkades, beveiligingen, samenvoegingen van bewerkingsgeschiedenissen, verwijderingen, aanpassingen van gebruikersrechten, misbruikfilter, checkuser, besluiten wanneer moderatorrechten worden toegekend, etc.) die een steward zou moeten begrijpen en op de juiste wijze zou moeten toepassen op een wiki. Als onderdeel van de checkusergroep neem ik actief deel aan het cross-wiki werk om spam en vandalisme terug te dringen. Ik ben aanwezig in een aantal IRC-kanalen, waaronder #wikimedia-stewardsconnect, en ik ben meestal beschikbaar.

    Ik denk dat ik de juiste technische kennis, bekwaamheid en toewijding heb om de Wikimedia-projecten te ondersteunen als steward. Ik zou me meer richten op de zaken waarbij de global sysops niet kunnen helpen, zoals checkuserwerk op kleine wiki's, aanpassingen van gebruikersrechten en accounthernoemingen op projecten zonder bureaucraten, dan op de vandalismebestrijding door het Small Wiki Monitoring Team, hoewel ik indien nodig natuurlijk ook daarbij zou helpen.

Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2013/Questions#QuiteUnusual


Yes[edit]

  1. Iste Praetor (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2013 •  Why not? Iste (D) 00:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Quentinv57 (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2013 •  I’ve seen you doing a great job as a checkuser on Wikibooks. This has given you not only the experience you'll need with private data, but also shown that you were able to coordinate with the other projects. It’s true that you didn’t worked much around the small wikis and that you are sysop only on one project, but stewards are not forced to work in every areas and can have some preferences. That’s why I think that you will be an asset to the steward team. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 00:13, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Igna (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2013 •  Ignacio (talk) 00:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2013 •  Érico Wouters msg 00:59, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Lord Roem (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Lord Roem (talk) 03:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  πr2 (t • c) 03:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Juliancolton (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  –Juliancolton | Talk 03:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  --cyrfaw (talk) 03:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
       GeoJoe1000 (Not eligible, checked by Bennylin) •  GeoJoe1000 (talk) 03:47, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Techman224 (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  I see that you recognize that you can only use your steward rights on the English Wikipedia for emergencies. Techman224Talk 03:57, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Morning Sunshine (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Trongphu (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Trongphu (talk) 05:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Hazard-SJ (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •   Hazard-SJ  ✈  05:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13. White Master King (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  White Master (es) 06:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2013 •  Shanmugamp7 (talk) 07:13, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Reade (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Reade (talk) 09:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2013 •  Legoktm (talk) 09:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Philippe (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  --Philippe (talk) 10:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Micki (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  micki 10:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 10:46, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Sahirshah (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Sahirshah (talk) 10:48, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Torreslfchero (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Torreslfchero (talk) 10:51, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Lukas²³ (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  why not? Lukas²³ (talk) 11:31, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Frigotoni (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Trustworthy, will do a good job! Frigotoni ...i'm here; 13:01, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Vacation9 (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Vacation9 (talk) 13:05, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Luckas Blade (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  --Luckas msg 13:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  OK ►Safir yüzüklü Ceklimesaj 14:05, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Barras (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  I think he will do a good job with the mop. Barras talk 14:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Deb (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 • . Deb (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Ansumang (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  seems quite usual ;) -- ɑηsuмaη ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 15:56, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  30. MJ94 (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  MJ94 (talk) 17:57, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Wildcursive (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Wildcursive (talk) 18:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Bruno Russell (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Seen some great work Bruno Russell (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Jbribeiro1 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  José Luiz talk 20:52, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Bk1 168 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Bk1 168 (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Ebe123 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 21:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Is an experienced checkuser on enwikibooks with whom I worked very pleasantly, so happy to support. Trijnsteltalk 21:59, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Nickispeaki (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Nickispeaki (talk) 22:49, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Bua333 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Bua333 (talk) 23:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Theopolisme (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Theopolisme talk! 23:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  40. David Ludwig (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  David Ludwig (talk) 01:27, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Hurricanefan24 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  Hurricanefan24 (talk) 01:45, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  Why not? (thanks to Fastily for it quote). Wagino 20100516 (talk) 02:22, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Hoo man (Eligible, checked by Érico Júnior Wouters)2013 •  Hoo man (talk) 03:13, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Cncplayer (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  Cncplayer (talk) 04:06, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  45. TBloemink (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  — TBloemink talk 09:44, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Wiki13 talk 10:09, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Smile4ever (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  Smile4ever (talk) 16:01, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  48. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  NaBUru38 (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Alifazal (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  Alifazal (talk) 17:18, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Armbrust (talk) 17:44, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  51. MisterGugaruz (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  MisterGugaruz (talk) 18:29, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:41, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Aced (Eligible, checked by Legoktm)2013 •  Aced (talk) 19:47, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Heubergen (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  Heubergen (talk) 22:39, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Ralgis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  — mantis [religiosa] — 01:52, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Ansei (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  balanced judgment Ansei (talk) 01:59, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  57. TParis (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  TParis (talk) 04:38, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Taketa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  From his contributions he seems trustworthy and capable. Taketa (talk) 10:06, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Mabdul (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  mabdul 12:04, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Millosh (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  We need experienced bureaucrats. Millosh (talk) 13:39, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Addshore (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2013 •  ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 14:25, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2013 •  Shizhao (talk) 14:36, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Vale93b (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2013 •  Vale93b (talk) 14:48, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Oddbodz (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  Oddbodz (talk) 15:15, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Krenair (Eligible, checked by Legoktm)2013 •  Krenair (talk • contribs) 20:01, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  66. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  İncelemeelemani (talk) 03:45, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Sj (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  A history of good work. –SJ talk  05:25, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  FASTILY (TALK) 07:42, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
       Springyboy (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  Seems like a great person to do the job Springyboy (talk) 09:38, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Geohem (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  Geohem (talk) 09:44, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Greenbreen (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2013 •  Greenbreen (talk) 10:06, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  71. EKMK (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  EKMK (talk) 12:17, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Laaknor (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2013 •  Laaknor (talk) 13:34, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Gálaniitoluodda (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  Hmm... "Yes" vs. "No". YES Gálaniitoluodda (talk) 14:37, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Mike Peel (Eligible, checked by Alan.lorenzo)2013 •  Mike Peel (talk) 21:06, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)2013 •  Harlock81 (talk) 00:31, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Hrishikesh.kb (Eligible, checked by Mr.Ajedrez)2013 •  Hrishikesh.kb (talk) 06:33, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Cangadoba (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Cangadoba (talk) 06:40, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Taweetham (Eligible, checked by Mr.Ajedrez)2013 •  Taweethaも (talk) 08:08, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Kiltpin (Eligible, checked by Makecat)2013 •  Kiltpin (talk) 11:59, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Irvin calicut (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Irvin calicut (talk) 13:28, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Thompson.matthew (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  Thompson.matthew (talk) 16:12, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:22, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Wangxuan8331800 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Wangxuan8331800 (talk) 17:46, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Egeymi (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Egeymi (talk) 18:14, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Makecat)2013 •  Zeljko (talk) 09:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Zivax (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2013 •  --Zivax (talk) 11:13, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  87. EternamenteAprendiz (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Keep up the good work! :) EternamenteAprendiz (talk) 16:30, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Waldir (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2013 •  Waldir (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
       Tazerdadog (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  Tazerdadog (talk) 22:30, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2013 •  Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:31, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  90. King of Hearts (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:50, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
       Rmb009 (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  Rmb009 (talk) 07:55, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Vyom25 (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Vyom25 (talk) 12:32, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Orgio89 (Eligible, checked by Makecat)2013 •  Orgio89 (talk) 13:03, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  93. billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  technically sound in CU, some more xwiki would have made it easy — billinghurst sDrewth 15:29, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Jan eissfeldt (Eligible, checked by Mr.Ajedrez)2013 •  jo Jan eissfeldt (talk) 18:41, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  95. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  — X-Javier ✉ [m'écrire] 18:56, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Bencmq (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  lacks xwiki experience a bit, but very satisfying answers compensates that Bencmq (talk) 05:11, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Savh (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Savhñ 07:25, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Mátyás (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Mátyás (talk) 14:00, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Quintucket (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  QU is an active and dedicated admin (and bureaucrat, I believe) on wikibooks, where he's always been quick to address administrative tasks, and respond to questions and concerns. Quintucket (talk) 16:26, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
       SpecialAdviser (Not eligible, checked by Mh7kJ) •  SpecialAdviser (talk) 10:59, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  100. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2013 •  The Banner (talk) 12:18, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Generally folk from wikibooks turn out ok...;) Herby talk thyme 17:30, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  102. John F. Lewis (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Per Quentinv57. John F. Lewis (talk) 17:57, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2013 •  Experience on multiple wikis across language barriers is highly desirable in stewards, as a sizable chunk of our job involves just that, but I don't see why this user would do a bad job if elected. Experience as a checkuser is quite valuable and experience on projects that aren't wikipedia is very valuable and rather rare, so I think the user will most likely be okey. Snowolf How can I help? 18:36, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  104. RajeshPandey (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  RajeshPandey (talk) 18:38, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Dougsim (Eligible, checked by Makecat)2013 •  <Dougsim (talk) 07:40, 17 February 2013 (UTC)>.[reply]
  106. Filelakeshoe (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2013 •  Filelakeshoe (talk) 18:13, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Axpde)2013 •  Jusjih (talk) 13:00, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Sargoth (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2013 •  <optional comments>. Sargoth (talk) 15:37, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  109. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  B20180 (talk) 17:11, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Dungodung (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  FiliP ██ 20:14, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Philosopher (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2013 •  – Philosopher Let us reason together. 02:58, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Ruslik0 (Eligible, checked by Makecat)2013 •  Ruslik (talk) 11:53, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Pelz (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  Pelz (talk) 19:37, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Beeblebrox (Eligible, checked by Mr.Ajedrez)2013 •  Beeblebrox (talk) 17:29, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Avocato (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2013 •  Avocato (talk) 19:29, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Edouard-rainaut (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2013 •  Edouard-rainaut (talk) 19:36, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Σ (Eligible, checked by Alan.lorenzo)2013 •  Σ (talk) 21:33, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Franz53sda (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  Experienced, thrustworthy Franz53sda (talk) 00:39, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Sachinvenga (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  . Shlok talk . 13:51, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Sokac121 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Sokac121 (talk) 12:14, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Albertus Aditya (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2013 •  Albertus Aditya (talk) 12:43, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2013 •  Wpollard (talk) 15:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Maximilian Schönherr (Eligible, checked by PiRSquared17)2013 •  Maximilian Schönherr (talk) 17:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Grondin (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •   Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 17:31, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  125. O. Morand (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  For me he completely meets the criteria. O. Morand (talk) 17:53, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Beeswaxcandle (Eligible, checked by Alan.lorenzo)2013 •  Beeswaxcandle (talk) 02:15, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Kyah117 (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2013 •  Kyah117 (talk) 10:32, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Daniel749 (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2013 •  Daniel749 talk 14:54, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  Rzuwig► 18:12, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Elfix (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  Elfix 19:28, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Shaun9876 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  §haun 9∞76 ༆ 01:46, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Webclient101 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  Webclient101 (talk) 05:20, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Didieram (Eligible, checked by Mr.Ajedrez)2013 •  Didieram (talk) 20:06, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Mogador (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  Mogador (talk) 03:27, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Jorgecarleitao (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  Jorgecarleitao (talk) 11:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Danrok (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Danrok (talk) 21:54, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  137. MarcoAurelio (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 23:57, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No[edit]

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2013 •  Concerns on enwiki RFA give me pause to give a right that marks as autopatrolled globally (specifically relating to concerns regarding plagiarism and close paraphrasing); also could use a bit more crosswiki experience. Rschen7754 00:57, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  David1010 (talk) 10:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  Jobcolecting not really help us. Admin, Bureocrate, Checkuser in not only one project... - und now the Olymp as Stewart? Which person can do so much jobs? Marcus Cyron (talk) 01:51, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4. AGK (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  Per w:en:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/QuiteUnusual, which cannot be ignored when considering this candidacy. Sorry, QU. AGK [•] 02:22, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Ul1-82-2 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •  Ul1-82-2 (talk) 15:20, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  I've skimmed the en.wiki RfA and I've not understood why it should matter, perhaps someone could summarise it. Experience on sister projects is a good thing, but I seriously doubt that someone with more than 5 edits on 6 wikis only, and a not impressing activity on Meta, can be considered "cross-wiki enough" for a steward. I just don't know him enough to be able to overcome this doubt, but I may change my mind if I get more information in this election. (I'm also not very sure what he means with being "neutral arbiter of consensus" on wikis, but this is a small concern.) Nemo 18:46, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    I think the reference is to the copyright/paraphrasing issues, perhaps? Snowolf How can I help? 20:56, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Is this the only concern that can be found in that RfA? Does someone care to elaborate how this affects stewards duties? (I can imagine many answers, I'd like to know what are the relevant ones from those who care/know more.) --Nemo 21:07, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    If someone is struggling to follow to one of Wikipedia's most important policies, I don't want them to be having advanced permissions or the community respect that goes with having advanced permissions. Sven Manguard (talk) 23:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  I don't really care about the enwiki RfA, but the user has no experience outisde of a few English projects. Ajraddatz (Talk) 20:03, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2013 •  KTo288 (talk) 22:50, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Sven Manguard (Eligible, checked by Mr.Ajedrez)2013 •  Per en.Wikipedia RfA Sven Manguard (talk) 19:58, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2013 •  per Ajraddatz Vogone (talk) 13:29, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Thogo (Eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)2013 •  not enough experience outside English projects თოგო (D) 23:13, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Sumone10154 (Eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)2013 •  –sumone10154(talk) 00:21, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Daniel Mietchen (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Not enough cross-wiki experience. Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 01:49, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Steven Zhang (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Per concerns at enwiki RFA. Steven Zhang (talk) 13:14, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Tuvalkin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Not enough experience outside English projects. Tuvalkin (talk) 18:16, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2013 •  Per Nemo. --Brateevsky (talk) 16:24, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Intothatdarkness (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2013 •  Intothatdarkness (talk) 19:10, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Timotheus Canens (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  T. Canens@en.wp (talk) 23:21, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  MZaplotnik (contribs) 05:38, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Gryllida (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  I suspect that a bit more time with experience would help - wikipedia administrative positions are a good thing to become familiar with before becoming a steward. Gryllida 12:52, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Jmvgpartner (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2013 •  He lacks the necessary crosswiki experience.. Sorry Jmvgpartner (talk) 07:55, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Argos'Dad (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2013 •  Argos'Dad (talk) 03:09, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Reisio (Eligible, checked by White Master King)2013 •  Reisio (talk) 02:40, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  24. SpartacksCompatriot (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2013 •  SpartacksCompatriot (talk) 14:51, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Djsasso (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Djsasso (talk) 19:32, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  because of failed RfA on en. I want a non-controversial stewart, and this user does not have thorough community backing in the user's native language Wikipedia project. Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:06, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral[edit]

  1. Anubhab91 (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Anubhab91 (talk) 08:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Dimi z (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Like him, but can't tell for sure. Dimi z (talk) 10:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 15:58, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Makecat (Eligible, checked by Bennylin)2013 •  Not sure. Makecat 11:30, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Mirzoulug'bek (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Mirzoulug'bek (talk) 17:04, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Waka Waka (talk) 20:46, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Abutorsam007 (Eligible, checked by Igna)2013 •   Abu Torsam  15:56, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by Mr.Ajedrez)2013 •  CT Cooper · talk 20:12, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Murma174 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Murma174 (talk) 11:15, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Jafeluv (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  Trusted user and certainly does a lot of good work, but I would really like a bit more crosswiki experience. Jafeluv (talk) 12:56, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11. DonRumata (Eligible, checked by Makecat)2013 •  DonRumata (talk) 10:00, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2013 •  I dont't know what to think about you... Laurent Jerry (talk) 16:22, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Doctree (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  Doctree (talk) 05:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Hibiki-c (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2013 •  Hibiki-c (talk) 15:49, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15. ComQuat (Eligible, checked by Alan.lorenzo)2013 •  I'm not sure what to think of the candidate. ComQuat (talk) 00:25, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Ali1610 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  Ali1610 (talk) 21:03, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17. FalconL (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2013 •  I'm not entirely convinced... FalconL ?! 21:32, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Visnu92 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2013 •  Visnu92 (talk) 16:22, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Abaddon1337 (Eligible, checked by Alan.lorenzo)2013 •  Probably yes, but you need a little bit more xp. Abaddon1337 (talk) 18:43, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20. LPLT (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2013 •  LPLT (talk) 13:56, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Tarheel95 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2013 •  Tarheel95 (talk) 19:56, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Thine Antique Pen (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2013 •  Unsure. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 22:43, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2013/Votes/QuiteUnusual&oldid=24933278"