Talk:Spam blacklist

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
Requests and proposals Spam blacklist Archives (current)→
Shortcut:
WM:SPAM
WM:SBL
The associated page is used by the MediaWiki Spam Blacklist extension, and lists strings of text that may not be used in URLs in any page in Wikimedia Foundation projects (as well as many external wikis). Any meta administrator can edit the spam blacklist. There is also a more aggressive way to block spamming through direct use of $wgSpamRegex. Only system administrators can make changes to $wgSpamRegex, and its use is to be avoided whenever possible. For more information on what the spam blacklist is for, and the processes used here, please see Spam blacklist/About.
Proposed additions
Please provide evidence of spamming on several wikis. Spam that only affects a single project should go to that project's local blacklist. Exceptions include malicious domains and URL redirector/shortener services. Please follow this format. Please check back after submitting your report, there could be questions regarding your request.
Proposed removals
Please check our list of requests which repeatedly get declined. Typically, we do not remove domains from the spam blacklist in response to site-owners' requests. Instead, we de-blacklist sites when trusted, high-volume editors request the use of blacklisted links because of their value in support of our projects. Please consider whether requesting whitelisting on a specific wiki for a specific use is more appropriate - that is very often the case.

Please sign your posts with ~~~~ after your comment. This leaves a signature and timestamp so conversations are easier to follow.

Completed requests are marked as {{added}}/{{removed}} or {{declined}}, and are generally archived (search) quickly. Additions and removals are logged.

Other discussion
Troubleshooting and problems - If there is an error in the blacklist (i.e. a regex error) which is causing problems, please raise the issue here.
Discussion - Meta-discussion concerning the operation of the blacklist and related pages, and communication among the spam blacklist team.
#wikimedia-external-links - Real-time IRC chat for co-ordination of activities related to maintenance of the blacklist.
Projects

Information

Tools

Requests

snippet for logging
{{sbl-log|1548504#{{subst:anchorencode:SectionNameHere}}}}

Contents

[edit] Proposed additions

This section is for proposing that a website be blacklisted; add new entries at the bottom of the section, using the basic URL so that there is no link (example.com, not http://www.example.com). Provide links demonstrating widespread spamming by multiple users on multiple wikis. Completed requests will be marked as {{added}} or {{declined}} and archived.

[edit] chinesemusic.net



Already  Added but not logged:

\bchinesemusic\.net\b

 — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 00:51, 21 June 2009 (UTC)


Spam filter is in error, please restore
Discussion on 新笛
Dear Mike.lifeguard
Wiki is in error. The inventor of 新笛 was 丁西林(1893—1974), not Zhang. see References 参考文献 Lee Yuan-Yuan and Shen, Sinyan. :Chinese Musical Instruments (Chinese Music Monograph Series). 1999. Chinese Music Society of North America Press. ISBN 1-880464039 :Shen, Sinyan. Chinese Music in the 20th Century (Chinese Music Monograph Series). 2001. Chinese Music Society of North America :Press. ISBN 1-880464047
Thanks!
OK, but that doesn't necessitate plastering this domain all over. I'll let a third party review this.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 03:17, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] clipmarks.com



This site just adds a frame around any user-submitted content, creating an arbitrary URL in the process (e.g., similar to an URL redirector, but with spam). Any site found here can be linked directly instead. Gavia immer 02:09, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

 Added - please note there are links to be cleaned up (on several wikis).  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:38, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] pbguide.com











Spammed on, but not limited to:

The site is a link directory, it has no encyclopedic content. - Simeon 23:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

 Added  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 15:39, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] reverent.org





Spammed on: ca, da, de, el, en, et, fr, hr, hu, id, is, ja, jv, li, lt, nl, pt, ro, ru, sl, sv, tr, zh

 Added -- Wutsje 00:48, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] lurl.me

URL shortener.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 03:55, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

 Added  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 15:25, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] li2.me





URL shortener. 66.57.5.28 14:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Also lynk2.me.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 15:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 Added  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 15:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] ly2.us and related

















URL shorteners. All associated with the li2.me/lynk2.me site reported immediately above. 66.57.1.249 14:57, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

 Added & thanks.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:50, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] papagiovanni.com



The site was being mass spammed by an IP (now globally blocked), on several wikis. Please blacklist as spam. --Kanonkas 18:38, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

 Added per recent spamming and User:COIBot/XWiki/papagiovanni.comMardetanha talk 19:02, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
A link to this website is wanted at the Dutch Wikipedia. Therefore, I've requested the deletion of this one from the spam blacklist. (see below) - Lolsimon 19:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] besplatne-slike.net

Please add besplatne-slike.net, 98.131.185.24, 98.131.135.122.









A Serbian version of public-domain-image.com, added from IPs starting with 89.216. to articles like Free image resources (cont), en:Wikipedia:Public domain image resources (cont) ru:Википедия:Источники изображений (cont.) together with moving the old, not yet deleted, spam links to the top or putting more of them in.





--AVRS 16:02, 8 July 2009 (UTC); AVRS 16:25, 8 July 2009 (UTC), AVRS 20:56, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

I am removing all the links to them I see, except for one used as a source for a file. The Serbian language link has been added at lower positions of some of the pages later, e.g.: cont.

At User:COIBot/XWiki/public-domain-image.com it’s been suggested that appropriate links are not removed, but that made it possible to move the links to the top of the lists they were in.

--AVRS 21:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] japanhero.webs.com

This is the second time I've seen this link show up on the English Wikipedia, and I have a feeling it is being used elsewhere, but the website seems to change depending on what the subject of the article is. Here's ultraqjapanhero.webs.com being added by two accounts (most definitely the same individual) [1] [2] at en:Ultra Q and here's ultrasevenjapanhero.webs.com [3] [4] being added to en:Ultra Seven. And here's an instance of kamenriderjapanhero.webs.com being added [5]. I don't know if perhaps the entirety of webs.com should be blacklisted, but the "japanhero.webs.com" series should be blacklisted based on the spamming that has happened.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 21:24, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed additions (Bot reported)

This section is for domains which have been added to multiple wikis as observed by a bot.

These are automated reports, please check the records and the link thoroughly, it may report good links! For some more info, see Spam blacklist/Help#COIBot_reports. Reports will automatically be archived by the bot when they get stale (less than 5 links reported, which have not been edited in the last 7 days, and where the last editor is COIBot).

Sysops
  • If the report contains links to less than 5 wikis, then only add it when it is really spam
  • Otherwise just revert the link-additions, and close the report; closed reports will be reopened when spamming continues
  • To close a report, change the LinkStatus template to closed ({{LinkStatus|closed}})
  • Please place any notes in the discussion section below the HTML comment

[edit] COIBot

The LinkWatchers report domains meeting the following criteria:

  • When a user mainly adds this link, and the link has not been used too much, and this user adds the link to more than 2 wikis
  • When a user mainly adds links on one server, and links on the server have not been used too much, and this user adds the links to more than 2 wikis
  • If ALL links are added by IPs, and the link is added to more than 1 wiki
  • If a small range of IPs have a preference for this link (but it may also have been added by other users), and the link is added to more than 1 wiki.



[edit] Proposed removals

This section is for proposing that a website be unlisted; please add new entries at the bottom of the section.

Remember to provide the specific domain blacklisted, links to the articles they are used in or useful to, and arguments in favour of unlisting. Completed requests will be marked as {{removed}} or {{declined}} and archived.

See also /recurring requests for repeatedly proposed (and refused) removals.

The addition or removal of a domain from the blacklist is not a vote; please do not bold the first words in statements.

[edit] caesarstone.com and caesarstoneus.com





In looking into why CaesarStone was blacklisted, I see that it is on a list of companies blacklisted because of their association with the SEO company Seology. I want to be sure that it is clear that CaesarStone was unaware of Seology's spamming activities and has terminated their association with Seology. In addition, they have requested that Seology remove all references to CaesarStone from their website.
I believe there is benefit to clear CaesarStone from the blacklist. CaesarStone was the world’s first company to use quartz as the main component in its manufactured surfaces. They revolutionized engineered stone technology with the use of quartz to create a new surfacing material.
Historically there is value to seeing how this industry started, and how engineered stone surfaces have increased in popularity since their start in 1987.
Additionally, it is interesting to learn that CaesarStone is located on kibbutz Sdot Yam just south of the Israeli town of Caesarea. It is the main industry of the kibbutz, which was founded in 1936.
I think this combination of a successful industry on a historical kibbutz is of value to Wiki readers. I hope you agree. --DeenieGuss 05:29, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

I have seen these archived discussions which show why CaesarStone was originally blacklisted, and I understand and accept the reasoning, although it is not clear to me why Seology's client was blacklisted for Seology's actions. CaesarStone only became aware of the blacklisting last month when I contacted them about it. Once I contacted CaesarStone and explained to them why they have been unable to contribute to Wikipedia, they terminated their assocation with Seology. They took the further step of requesting that Seology remove any link or reference from the Seology website to CaesarStone. Is it necessary to continue to blacklist CaesarStone for the mistake of hiring an SEO company who conducted a spamming campaign without their knowledge or consent? Is there anything CaesarStone can do to convince you that there is cause to remove them from the blacklist? Thank you for your help. --DeenieGuss 06:55, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Why would it possibly matter whether it's the domain owner who spams the domain or not? If it's spammed, it's spammed, and we are allowed to curb abuse of our wikis no matter who is doing it. To consider removing the domain from the blacklist, we'll want to know how it is useful for our projects.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:53, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] android-phones.ru



Hi, Why this domain was added to blacklist, I wonder? I only added useful links on some wiki pages topic related with android-phones.ru

Could you please remove it from this blacklist?

--0xDEFACE 11:16, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

The reason for the blacklisting can be found here.
The website seems to be a blog. Links to blogs are generally not wanted in many Wikipedias. What makes this website uesful to our wikis? --Jorunn 12:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for answer. Indeed, it's a blog based/structured resource which contains lots of information about Android-powered devices in russian: news, articles, reviews and so on... The matter is that there are less such resources in russian internet and that is why i think it may be sometimes helpful additional on some wiki pages. For example, russian page http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android contains no any links on russian recources. Content of android-phones.ru (btw this site was first or second resource about Android topic in russian internet) is carefully updated on regular basis, so i think it may be called as "Android in Russia" or in different way. I admit that i added this link on some wiki pages one by one in order until it was blocked just because of I did not know why it was hidden after each publication, approximately on the next day but now i know why :) Anyway, i would like to sort out that issue.--0xDEFACE 14:43, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

You should suggest including the link on the article's talk page in ruwiki. If they want to add it, they can whitelist it.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 23:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] 66163.com



66163.com is a Chinese portal website, and I don't know why it's in the spam blacklist.--Dingar 01:26, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

66163.com isn't blacklisted.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:28, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

I undo this, and it tell me http://www.66163.com is in blacklist.--Dingar 01:53, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

zhwiki has used the regex \d{5,}\.c(n|om) with the comment "六合彩spam". Deferred to w:zh:MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:55, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Great! Thank you!--Dingar 02:04, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] channeldb2.com



I would like to get channeldb2.com unblocked. This is community site for IBM DB2 database users. Over 1700 members, about 300 videos, most of them educational.

88.102.83.205 22:45, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

The site claims to be a social networking site, which we don't need to link to, and it was spammed (not a lot, but it was being pushed). Can you explain how that'd be a useful link for our projects to use?  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 03:20, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] papagiovanni.com



At the Dutch Wikipedia, we had a link to this site, but this was deleted by user Mardetanha (because of this latest action; see this link for the deletion at nl.wikip). I got a complain today from one of our users, but I'm only sysop at the Dutch Wikipedia, so I cannot delete it from this blacklist. The link to this website is wanted (site with much information about this subject) at the Dutch Wikipedia so it should not be at this spam blacklist. - Lolsimon 19:49, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

I've replied to the concerns at my talk page on the English Wikipedia. See here. --Kanonkas 20:16, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
I think the discussion can better be here. The website is wanted at the Dutch Wikipedia, so should not be at the blacklist (the website is maybe not official, but has much information). It's a shame there is spammed with this website, but there are also many spams with google.com... As it is a usefull website, it should be removed from the blacklist. The spamming can stop by blocks or local blacklists, not via this blacklist I think. - Lolsimon 20:34, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
If you believe it's useful for the Dutch wiki, you can use the local spam whitelist (MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist) on nl.wiki. When you've whitelisted the link, you can use the external link again on nl.wiki. --Kanonkas 20:50, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Indeed. Fighting cross wiki link spam (which this clearly was) by blocks or local blacklists is highly impractical and would make monitoring hundreds of small wikis almost impossible as far as link spam is concerned. If the link is wanted on nl:wiki only, it should be whitelisted there. Wutsje 20:56, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
On it.wiki I rollbacked a broad spam into many articles, including deep linking. --M/ 20:59, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
I saw it was spammed many times in many wiki's, so it is added to the blacklist very rightly. As we want one link at the subject article, I'll place it on the local whitelist. Thanks for your responses, Lolsimon 22:53, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] tinypic.com



What the hell? Why is tinypic.com on the blacklist? It is not a URL redirector as was falsely claimed, it is more like a pastebin, but for uploading images (or like a traditional image hosting site such as flickr or photobucket but not requiring a log-in). It does not do any redirecting. I routinely use it to quickly upload screenshots and such to explain visual display problems more effectively than I could with words. — CharlotteWebb 14:36, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

I also came here wondering that. The addition request just say URL redirector. Thus it seems reasonable to remove it. Moving section to removals Platonides 23:14, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, I should have noted that it's not in fact a URL redirector. It is however widely abused, which is the actual reason it's been added. That the comment was wrong is actually not a good reason to remove it; how does it help the projects? To be fair, most abuse is vandalism, and gets quickly reverted.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:59, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
How has it more abusable than any other image storage site? The random file-name is irrelevant as file-names are not a reliable predictor of image content in the first place (surely you realize this already, being an admin on commons?). — CharlotteWebb 09:20, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
It's not more abusable than other such sites. It's more abused than other such sites. Of course how they name files is irrelevant - did anyone suggest otherwise? To proceed with this in some sensible manner, could you please let us know how links to this domain helps our projects?  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 11:25, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

I use it to upload WP screen-shots and such (to link to them in a discussion and say "this is how it looks on my screen", etc.) which are unsuitable for commons, having no long-term encyclopedic use. I particularly like this site as I have no password to remember or forget. Sure I could use a different site for this purpose, but then so could anyone else for any other purpose. — CharlotteWebb 01:08, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Amazon



I just tried to link to a book review on Amazon and couldn't save because it's on the spamlist. Could someone remove it, please? It's very useful to be able to link to the reviews they publish—the professional ones, not the readers' comments. SlimVirgin (talk) 19:26, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi SlimVirgin. Can you please give us a link to the site? Thank you, --Kanonkas 23:47, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Well, that's a little more difficult to do when it's blacklisted. CharlotteWebb 00:29, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Not the full URL. An example would be: test123.com --Kanonkas 00:42, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm guessing they mean amazon.com, but that's not blacklisted.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:03, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Troubleshooting and problems

This section is for comments related to problems with the blacklist (such as incorrect syntax or entries not being blocked), or problems saving a page because of a blacklisted link. This is not the section to request that an entry be unlisted (see Proposed removals above).

None currently

[edit] Discussion

[edit] New COIBot functionality

Our IRC spam fighters are aware that the linkwatchers also try to detect local questionable link-additions (the local variety of the cross-wiki reports in User:COIBot/XWiki. I have now extended the functionality to local reports, which are categorised in Category:COIBot Local Reports. They have their own LinkStatus template, {{LinkStatusLocal|wiki|status}} (wiki is the full wikidomain, status is the same as the normal status). In the end there will be a full tree of categories of localised reports, for some examples:

Have phun! --Dirk Beetstra T C (en: U, T) 20:09, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Personal tools
Create a book