Talk:Steward requests/Checkuser

This page is for discussions related to the Steward requests/Checkuser page.   Please remember to: Sign posts using the four tildes (~~~~) Remain civil and polite during discussions. Place new text under old text (start a new post)

CU template category

For reference: Category:Checkuser_templates Kylu 01:58, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

"Requests by IPs will not be processed"

Interesting. Show me the related policy, please...--Müdigkeit 20:00, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Too many unneeded CUs taking place

In my opinion as a steward and a checkuser I think there are far too many invalid checkuser requests being made. I've seen stewards perform useless requests. These include doing requests when the right thing to do is to just block a user anyway, CU or not. This case doesn't need a CU.  It looks like a duck to me cases are another example; Troller 123, and Trollr 123 made within a few minutes of each other and doing the same things, just need a block, not CUs. My basic point is to use the minimum action needed to halt the behavior. Additionally, too many CU requests are being used as battle elements in personal grudges. If this continue to happen, people will find themselves prohibited from requesting CUs. Repeated invalid requests will see negative action against the requester. Whether or not other stewards do likewise, I for one will be handling invalid CU requests with strong action! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fr33kman (talk • contribs) 19:24, 25 September 2011 (UTC).

I agree with Fr33kman, and would also like to point out that by blocking both Troller 123 and Trollr 123, the autoblock will catch any additional accounts, so a checkuser isn't needed at this point. When a checkuser would be needed is if another account, Troller 321 was made a minute after the other two blocks, because then it is obvious that the account is using either a range or a proxy. Just my 2c Ajraddatz (Talk) 19:26, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Is it allowed in Wikipedia?

To keep in the pages of wiki Administrator's personnel thesis? at http://sd.wikipedia.org ? Other problem is We call Computer as same in English, but admin forcibly used his word Ganpukar of Computer. I have proof that thousands of published books called it Computer not Ganpukar. If some one oppose him he started abusive language. That is the reason sd.wikipedia.org never got attraction to Sindhi community. Plz check record there. Other things are he locked CSS due to that on the same site there are lot of font styles appeared there. He is not able to set commonCSS or Monocss. We are in trouble to work in our local Sindhi language. I don't know where to say for this problem. Record history says all the situation there. I appeal plz warn him to follow en.wikipedia.org rules, other wise he will continue use his personnel details and personnel promoted articles there. Dear I am sorry If u r not right person to say all about this, Plz suggest me where I can raise this issue. My sd.wikipedia.org ID is same. His thesis is not a violetion? http://sd.wikipedia.org/wiki/ماحولياتي_انتظام_ڪاڻ_اُپُگِرَهِي_عَڪس_ضماءُ_۽_درجه_بنديءَ_جي_طريقن_جو_اَڀياس Alixafar 00:00, 21 November 2011 (UTC)