Talk:User groups
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Contents |
Hierarchy [edit]
clearly there is a natural hierarchy. can people re-sort this list so i can figure out where i can fit in?
Page title [edit]
Any objections to moving this page to User groups? Referring to these groupings as classes seems a bit out of sync with our principles and has strange connotations. Thoughts? --MZMcBride 06:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- I'd support that, especially considering as it is labeled as "user groups" in the relevant special: page. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:44, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- "User groups" is more technically correct, so
Done — Mike.lifeguard | talk 12:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- "User groups" is more technically correct, so
Autoreviewer [edit]
What about autoreviewers? Kayau 10:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Staff expanded text & expanded chart [edit]
Staff expanded text & expanded chart should be extracted into separate page named Staff users, as example. Please make this before starting translations. --Kaganer (talk) 07:13, 1 May 2013 (UTC)