Talk:Amical Wikimedia/Bylaws

Re-reading this. Do we really need the statement about which Wikipedia was the first? I don't think so ;-) notafish }<';> 12:44, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The same can be said about the entire preamble. It is not regulating the association. It only explains the situation. Preamble could be eliminated. It has not legal value. It only has moral value to encourage readers to engage the project.[1]--Gomà 12:06, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And of course can be eliminated. --Gomà 12:08, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I like a little context, I think it's good. But yes, we should be careful what kind of context is given. notafish }<';> 21:14, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to propose an alternative wording. Andorran association is not registered yet.--Gomà 13:20, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]