User talk:Ceoil

Welcome to Meta![edit]

Hello Ceoil, and welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). If you would like, feel free to ask me questions on my talk page. Happy editing! Ottava Rima 00:49, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Usurp[edit]

I can post a usurp request for you on commons if you do not already have an account there to request under. Ottava Rima 01:05, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This would probably need to be done (but the meta request might suffice). Ottava Rima 01:07, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ottava, thanks, I have followed as best as I understand. I created the a/c on commons back in 06 or so, but never edited and forgot the password. I'm uploading a lot of images that would be better on commons than just on en, but so it goes. Thanks for the help. Ceoil 03:45, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a link to your proxy edit. That way, you wont have to reveal your IP posting yourself. I will keep an eye on it to see how it progresses. Ottava Rima 04:42, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trick, isn't it? Ceoil 11:18, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Try logging into Commons with your name and password now. :) Ottava Rima 17:58, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Email[edit]

I emailed you. You are being mislead regarding the Lucy poems. Not only does Bateson make it clear that there was no incest, but that Wordsworth kills off Lucy to make sure that there was no way to have any symbollic incestual relationship. I emailed you the excerpts. The sources 100% verify both the Lucy poems page and the early life page. Moorman, for example, is definitely not one of the people that believed there was any sexual relationship between the Wordsworths, especially not "erotic". The person is clearly not new and is most likely knows that their statements are wrong. Ottava Rima (talk) 00:50, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So it turns out that I was right and it was a sock. The user has already turned to two other socks to try and justify a lot of bad edits. be advised. Ottava Rima (talk) 16:21, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Poison Tree[edit]

[1] I did this for you and TK. Do what you want with it (credit if you can). Nothing big, but the Wikipedia page is absolute crap. Ottava Rima (talk) 03:46, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice. And well done. Chedzilla (talk) 15:55, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is odd how the "Blake project" isn't doing anything real. How disturbing. You could put that page through DYK if you want. It still needs a bit more work (like images from the plate and maybe some lines from the poem in addition to any other sources that could be found). Have fun - I have a lot more where that came from. Ottava Rima (talk) 01:53, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, Tulk was under another name - Charles Augustus Tulk. Apparently, Wikipedia hates redirects. :) Ottava Rima (talk) 02:24, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A ok! I'm reading through and looking at sources - will give a proper look in the morning. Ceoil (talk) 02:26, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ozymandias[edit]

[2] Small correction, - the publication should say publisehd 11 January and then Smith's was published in February. - Ottava Rima (talk) 19:01, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cough[edit]

Part One. :) - Ottava Rima (talk) 02:29, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

JSTOR account redistribution (The Wikipedia Library)[edit]

Hi - according to our records you received a free account for JSTOR through The Wikipedia Library. Because we’ve used up all of our allocated accounts, and it’s been some time since they were distributed, we want to redistribute any accounts that aren’t being used to users on our waitlist.

If you’re still using, or plan to use, your JSTOR access, no problem! Simply head over to the Library Card platform, log in, and request a renewal of your account. You should be able to do this from your user page, or the JSTOR signup page. If you can’t find the renewal button, or have any other issues or questions about this, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page. We’ll begin redistributing inactive accounts in September; if you request renewal after then we will only be able to reactivate your account if we have spots remaining. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]