User talk:Lupo

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

quiero saber como hago para hacer que mi wiki aparezca con las pestañitas adicionales de la parte de abajo: Como en este diseño ¿ como le hago? informame a boga@nuestracanoa.info

help with problem[edit]

hello I have a problem with another user, constantly harassing me, can you advise me as to what to do?Alphagirl20 00:21, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your additional questions at User talk:Anthere[edit]

Thank you for your answer. I known the wikilivres: project, that question is more related to some thinkings that I've made in the last months than this specific copyright issue per se :).

My query related to the URAA is because the situation on copyrights for Brazil and Portugal (the countries that pt.wikisource is predominantly accessed) on 1996 is very friendly to keep the most majority of works on that project (Brazil: on 1996, 5988/73. currently: 9610/98; Portugal: on 1996, 63/85 + changes until 114/91. currently: 63/85 + changes until 50/2004), making me less sad when deleting the copyrighted-at-USA ones. 555 15:10, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for pointing to me that stuff. Now I need to research for copyright status regarding every and all works by w:Fernando Pessoa (thanks to god I've a book with detailed informations regarding the publication of each poem; I hope to end it still this year ). *sigh* going to delete ~40% of works by Fernando Pessoa (a very popular writer) and unable to do scan fests with works from w:Noel Rosa (as composer) and w:Alberto de Oliveira..... gah, it may cause problems with n00bs, but if the best choice is to move to wikilivres and delete... *sigh* Thanks again. 555 17:06, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edits on User talk:Anthere. I've read I truly think the WMF should clarify these points in a resolution on hosting as Anthere's opinion (!) /me going to fix the issue on pt.ws and pt.wp 555 23:50, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, she did agree with that[1]. More serious was the confusion at the Commons[2] I hope I stopped that one cold.[3] Lupo 09:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
gosh. well, I'm going to add my two cents on your most recent message to Anthere about this issue.
Regarding the commons:Template:PD-URAA thanks for sharing this link with me (I'm too busy on pt.ws issues to follow the discussion about it at Commons). Currently I'm drafting a new set of templates that I think to be more user-friendly, based on the Gutenberg Rules layout at s:pt:Ajuda:Domínio público#Em_dom.C3.ADnio_p.C3.BAblico [4]. For example, PD-1996 has split on DP2, DP3 and DP4. 555 13:19, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CU request[edit]

I reverted your request. That's not a CU request, take it up with the project admins. Not the stewards. Mww113 13:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. There are no project admins. The two that exist are inactive. Lupo 13:33, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, then if I were you I would request temp. adminship on m:SR/P Mww113 13:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Superprotect status[edit]

Dear Lupo, since you are an administrator on a wiki from which no user participated in this discussion, I'd like to make sure you are aware of some recent events which may alter what the Wikimedia Foundation lets you do on your wiki: Superprotect.

Peteforsyth 09:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]