User talk:M7

User language
it-N Questo utente può contribuire con un livello madrelingua in italiano. en-3 This user has advanced knowledge of English. es-2 Este usuario tiene un conocimiento intermedio del español. fr-2 Cet utilisateur dispose d’un niveau intermédiaire de connaissance en français. de-1 Dieser Benutzer beherrscht Deutsch auf grundlegendem Niveau. pt-1 Este utilizador pode contribuir com um nível básico de português.
Users by language

To contact me...

please use my talk page. You can write me in any of the languages mentioned in my Babel templates. Usually I'll answer in Italian only if you write in Italian, otherwise I'll use English. Sorry, but my knowledge of other languages is too limited to permit anything more than reading. --M/

Hello, may I know why you have my orders gelöcht

Archives

• #1 up to April 30, 2007
• #2 up to January 30, 2009

Confirmation edit

This was edited by M7it, my non-SUL user name on ja.wiki. --M/ 21:04, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Turzh@ukwiki

Did you have concerns about that request?  — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 18:05, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I don't read Ukranian either, however Google translate provided a good translation, which seems clear enough to me. However, I'll defer to you.  — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 21:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

thanks

:-) J.delanoy^gabs_adds 20:12, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Richiesta

Ciao M/, puoi togliermi il flag di admin? Da ormai troppo tempo non ho più il tempo e le forze per svolgere quel ruolo di servizio. Ti ringrazio in anticipo! --AmonSûl 14:58, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

CheckUser

Hi M7! Please have a look at https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/private/checkuser-l/2009-July/007120.html . Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC) P. S.: To your question: Global blocks does not effect meta: so that the IP can request an unblock here (or trolls furthermore as these IPs just did).

Richiesta di "delete" di pagina utente

Ciao, avrei bisogno per favore di una mano per eliminare la mia pagina utente in (quella gabbia di matti della) wikipedia lombarda. E' la prima volta che faccio un account (di solito edito anonimamente) e posso assicurarti che sarà l'ultima. Ho voluto dare una mano a un amico (user:Belinzona) a caricare alcune pagine, poi volevo andarmene (ma mi era stato raccomandato di non fare edit anonimi). Ho testimoniato quanto è successo qui su meta, alla mia pagina utente (user:Swiss51). Ho riportato in una sottopagina user:Swiss51/lmo la cronologia della mia pagina utente e di discussione in lmo. Dapprima avevo inserito degli avvisi che l'account aveva finito di operare ma loro hanno fatto dei rollback. L'ultimo dei miei contributi è un template "delete" su entrambe le pagine, ma non vogliono apparentemente saperne. Peraltro ho subito ogni genere di trolling e attacchi, e non ho avuto neanche un benvenuto. Insomma, vorrei cancellare la mia pagina utente per favore. Molte grazie per l'aiuto. Buona notte, --Swiss51 22:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Deletionist

Ciao M7, a tag has been placed on Talk:Deletionist requesting this talk page to be speedy deleted from meta. Given that you started that page; perhaps you want to keep this little discussion for historical interest?. Saludos, — df|  16:11, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

User:Dominic

When you completed this request, did you also take his administrator status by accident? Nathan ^T 23:48, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Revert on Vote page

You are very correct! I had been checking some things on my phone while I was away from my computer and must have accidently pressed the rollback button, It has happened 2-3 times in the past but I always caught it right away. I have reverted my edit so that the vote remains and again thank you for pointing it out. James (T|C) 21:28, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

chiarimento

Leggi user talk:Vituzzu#chiarimento, poichè anche tu m'insulti bloccando miei IP. Hai capito che Luigi28/Presbite e BarbaNane non sono mie utenze, dunque, anzichè accanirti contro le mie vere utenze, perchè non chiedi tali sblocchi agli amministratori di en.wiki?--Ducatista 15:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Gente come te che si vanta di creare ad arte voci POV (evadendo blocchi e bandi) non è - evidentemente - compatibile con il progetto. --M/ 15:22, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

ricordo bene di averti insultato nella tua personale posta telematica quindi sai il mio indirizzo telematico nonchè i miei veri nome e cognome ma tu dopo un'iniziale cordialità ti sei ostinato contro di me e continui a insultarmi! Considera che:

• io collaboro al progetto da prima di te e in più sezioni linguistiche di quanto faccia tu
• mai mi son vantato di alcunchè
• solitamente non rispondo agli insulti ma tu, Vituzzu e Montesacro avete superato un certo limite quindi ho semplicemente reagito in passato nonchè recentemente
• gente come me ha molta pazienza ma quando la perde può ricambiare gl'insulti ricevuti con i dovuti interessi
• non sto qui per litigare ma neanche per fare amicizie
• son rispettoso di tutti ma reagisco se provocato offensivamente
• tu non sei in grado di giudicare le mie voci
• non hai titolo per stabilire che non sono compatibile con il progetto--Ducatista 16:09, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

La tua capacità di reagire, di offendere, di fare propaganda, di evadere i blocchi è ben nota a molti, anche su altre Wiki. E, mi spiace, ma le tue ultime affermazioni sono inesatte - fino a che la comunità di Wiki e di meta.wiki lo riterranno opportuno - ho titolo (insieme ad altri, ci mancherebbe) per amministrare alcuni progetti, quindi anche per stabilire l'incompatibilità di un editor con il progetto, decidendo le varie azioni necessarie a tutela. --M/ 16:20, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

• certo sei amministratore in due sezioni linguistiche ma non puoi bloccare il collegamento di un giapponese che vuol collaborare al progetto dalla biblioteca nazionale di Bari
• se certi insulti stavano nella sezione portoghese, è logico bloccare solo in tale sezione
• hai ragione: molti fanno propaganda ma tra questi non mi trovi!
• inserire le biografie dei campioni di -pallone col bracciale- con la mia utenza Pantaleone non è propaganda!--Ducatista 16:41, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

No, certo. Infatti si tratta di abuso di utenze multiple ed evasione di blocco. Ed ecco che scatta un nuovo blocco e l'ennesima querelle con qualche amministratore. Cambiare gioco no? --M/ 16:44, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

difatti cambio sempre gli articoli così non mi potete individuare: ma non fate meglio a reintegrarmi poichè mai ho vandalizzato un articolo? Voi dovreste cambiare gioco: se vi chiedo di lasciarmi sviluppare la parte sportiva soltanto, potreste accettare?--Ducatista 17:05, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Le mie immagini

Ciao M7, ti pubblico sto link per fartelo ricordare: http://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussioni_utente:MM/archivio_30&diff=prev&oldid=25478569

Allora, tu mi bloccasti perché manifestai in maniera impropria la volontà che le mie immagini fossero rimosse da wikipedia. Ieri guardando i log delle mie modifiche, mi sono accorto che a molti mesi di distanza questo non è accaduto, anzi l'utente che si firma Blackcat (Sergio D’Afflitto, La Spezia, 20 settembre 1965) le ha spostate su commons senza la mia autorizzazione. Questa non è una minaccia, sto solo ribadendo la mia volontà a uno stewart e amministratore di Wikipedia affinché la cosa sia fatta al più presto. --Grifter72 20:52, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Quale parte di "irrevocabile" non ti è chiara?

--M/ 20:54, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Cosa intendi per irrevocabile?

La licenza con cui hai rilasciato le immagini è irrevocabile. --M/ 21:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Non so di cosa stai parlando.--Grifter72 21:03, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Allora è meglio che ti informi prima di scrivere. --M/ 21:05, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Questo significa che non intendi rimuoverle?--Grifter72 21:07, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Io non ho nessuna autorità per rimuoverle. Le immagini rilasciate con licenza GFDL non possono essere rimosse a capriccio, inoltre chiunque può, rispettando i termini della licenza che tu stesso hai apposto, caricarle ovunque. --M/ 21:09, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Aggiungo che le immagini precedentemente rilasciate in GFDL sono state migrate ad una doppia licenza Creative Commons + GFDL. --M/ 21:12, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Ok, grazie. Non interpretarla come minaccia. Io comunque ho fatto la mia richiesta direttamente a te. Tu mi hai detto che non si può. Buona serata. --Grifter72 21:17, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Okay. Io leggo quello che c'è scritto qui, confronto con quello che hai fatto su it.wiki e agisco di conseguenza. E' questo che cerchi da me? --M/ 21:18, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Block of Grifter72

You have blocked Grifter72 for "Intimidating behaviour/harassment: Trolling and legal threats, cp." My understanding of Italian is not the greatest, but I could not see the "trolling" or "legal threats". Could you please point out where these are? By the way, "legal threats" are a block that is removed once it is stated that there will be no legal matter as the block exists simply to keep Wikimedia from being used during ongoing legal trials/disputes. Ottava Rima (talk) 21:53, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Meta normally does not block an individual for blocks on other Wikis, nor do we block because we are to allow appeals here. I also do not see the level of harassment or threats that would warrant an indef on Italian Wiki, so I am bothered by your level of response here. It also seems that you have a conflict of interest in the blocking here in addition to your block at the Italian being inappropriate. Ottava Rima (talk) 22:28, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

This shows that you have a conflict in that you blocked a user then you blocked him on meta from having any ability to appeal when he was being very civil and polite. That is inappropriate behavior. I am asking you to undo your block now and follow protocol. He was not being abusing, harassing, and made it clear that he would not pursue any legal action. As such, both blocks have no basis as there is a blatant claim that there would be no legal action. Ottava Rima (talk) 22:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

"Reaffirming my will" to have the image deleted. Please do not take words out of context. His last statement was clearly stating he would not take legal action ("Non interpretarla come minaccia"). My Italian is strong enough to know that. Ottava Rima (talk) 22:40, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

"the user could easily write to OTRS queue (info-it(at).wikimedia.org) in case he/she intends to further explain his will" The user has made it clear that they don't understand what is going on. How are they supposed to know about writing to OTRS if you just block them like that? Show some latitude. If your images were suddenly moved and relicensed without anyone informing you first, you'd probably be upset too. The user was very polite above and I think it would be in the best interest of both meta and Italian if you unblock them and explain to them the proper ways they can handle the situation - i.e. contact OTRS, deal with them, etc. Just blocking someone, talk page and email, is not what normally happens on meta and I am just bothered by what appears to be over aggressiveness in response to a user with a legitimate concern. Ottava Rima (talk) 22:49, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

I cannot take your claims of private data being released seriously as 1. I do not see anything above or in the history and 2. there have been no oversighting. If there was such a breach as you claim you would have addressed that already. It is obvious that you will not retract the block so I will be posting later at Babel asking that the block is overturned and asking for an inquiry over at Italian Wiki of the matter. Ottava Rima (talk) 23:05, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

As a secondary note: the only info on others posted above is copied from this user profile statement. Making a claim that reproducing material that is blatantly posted on a user page about an individual as "posting private data", which has the connotation of being potentially oversightable material (i.e. outing), is not appropriate. I ask that you strike your accusations towards that effect. Ottava Rima (talk) 23:08, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

• Thank you very much. I will now try to post on his talk page informing him how to proceed. I will stress that making legal threats and the rest will not be accept and advise him on our best practices. Hopefully, everything can be resolved. Ottava Rima (talk) 23:18, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

151.49.0.0/18

Mi è stato segnalato che qualche bravo ragazzo ha qualche problemino a editare qui su meta a causa di questo. Che ne dici se lo riportassimo a solo anonimi, lasciando libera la creazione account? Il vandalo delle sandbox ha sempre agito da anonimo. Ciao --Melos 19:28, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting that vandal on my talk page. Much appreciated. Ciao! --dferg ^{☎ talk} 21:46, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

thanks

thankyou for tell about RFC--Betalph 17:29, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

SUL

ciao, se guardi la crono della mia pg discussione in ti.wiki vedrai che dr. claudio sta cercando di registrarsi a nome mio in altre wiki: a causa di ciò in chan mi hanno suggerito di fare questo. dal momento che esistono già altre utenze in altre wiki a nome mio (http://toolserver.org/~vvv/sulutil.php?rights=1&user=Gregorovius) ho visto che serve uno stewart per ovviare al problema. Potresti farci qualcosa ? buona giornata --Gregorovius 15:24, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Falso Tia

Non è che ci scappa un CU crosswiki visto che i candidati sono due e per entrambi bisogna avvertirne i genitori? --Vituzzu 21:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Sì sì lo so ma c'è questo che ora sta guardando Melo ;) --Vituzzu 22:19, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Visto, l'account lo ha già bloccato a livello globale. --M/ 22:22, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Re

Buon Natale anche a te! Ciao! :)--Nick1915 - ^{all you want} 17:43, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: Welcome templates, an honest mistake

Ok, thanks.

--Haytham^Abulela 14:47, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Ombudsman commission rights

Hi. You forgot to change the global group membership for both old and new people, including my steward rights. ;) As for FloNight's oversight rights I informed Christine to fix the request. I guess they have to be removed too. --თოგო ^(D) 00:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Ottava block discussion suppressed

[1], I'm sure you saw. What Ottava did was to arrange what's going on to what is mostly likely to induce some admin to act without adequate review. He's only mentioned the block by WizardOfOz, and he removed the very relevant discussion leading up to his block and ensuing upon it. He's implying that this is only about WOO. He knows that he can get some sympathy on that basis. He removed with his "cleanup" my note about the RfC, which should definitely be reviewed by anyone considering unblock. (He previously removed my later note, I let it be.) He's hoping for a new or somewhat confused admin to happen upon his unblock template and not check things out. Not likely, perhaps, but also not impossible. Ottava is a master at framing evidence to make his fantasies appear real. Most people aren't fooled, but enough are that disruption expands.

The loose end is the RfC, it should be closed with a conclusion. As I noted in the later note, I asked for review at the admin request page. Meta is S L O W. It's okay, I suppose, but .... --Abd 19:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Ottava's cleanup action was based on my advice to keep it simple. There was no malintent, and you would do well not to assume bad faith behind every edit. Guido den Broeder 19:30, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

It's considered very bad form to remove discussion about an unblock when the unblock is still being requested. Some people have made some opposing claims to what he has said and have backed up their statements with proof. Him removing them is clearly an attempt to bias any decision making. -Djsasso 19:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

The page was turning into a mess, with some users importing all kinds of unrelated stuff into the discussion. You should have more confidence in your fellow administrators, surely they will always look at the page history before responding to the request. Guido den Broeder 20:00, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

• M7 responded to me on my user page, and I replied there. (permanent link) --Abd 20:13, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

[2]. Guido is asking a question which has the RfC as a thorough answer.... with comments from many respected users, etc. --Abd 20:56, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Abd, calling yourself a respected user is a bit odd, especially when you have recently been desysopped at en:Wikiversity for, among other things, your attacks on Ottava Rima. Guido den Broeder 22:30, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

• This is typical. Once one of these bulldogs is engaged, they don't let go. Instead of reading for agreement, every word is scoured for a way to "refute."

• I did not claim to be a "respected user." I was referring to many others commenting in the RfC.

• I could be awful, and that would be irrelevant. Guido has learned this from Ottava, though he was always tendentious: attack anyone who criticizes what you do, tossing up what dirt you can allege, if they go on the defensive, it makes you look good. --Abd 01:46, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Translator, We need you!

Dear M7,

You have helped us in previous years with translations and for that we are most grateful. Now we turn towards the 2011/12 fundraiser. It may seem forever away, but work has already begun getting everything ready to go. This year we want to have landing pages covering as many countries in as many languages as possible.

Right now, we want to figure out who is interested in translating for the fundraiser. This year we're hoping to have more of a solidified "core" group of translators that we can count on to have work done by a few key dates, but we'd also welcome help from people who are willing to just help out when they can.

If you would be interested please take a look at this little sign-up survey and fill it out http://survey.wikimedia.org/index.php?sid=13638&newtest=Y&lang=en. With that we can start building a list of people and filling any gaps in the languages we serve.

Many Thanks

Joseph Seddon (User:Jseddon (WMF))

Production Coordinator
Wikimedia Foundation
Jseddon (WMF) 00:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Is it allowed in Wikipedia?

To keep in the pages of wiki Administrator's personnel thesis? at http://sd.wikipedia.org ? Other problem is We call Computer as same in English, but admin forcibly used his word Ganpukar of Computer. I have proof that thousands of published books called it Computer not Ganpukar. If some one oppose him he started abusive language. That is the reason sd.wikipedia.org never got attraction to Sindhi community. Plz check record there. Other things are he locked CSS due to that on the same site there are lot of font styles appeared there. He is not able to set commonCSS or Monocss. We are in trouble to work in our local Sindhi language. I don't know where to say for this problem. Record history says all the situation there. I appeal plz warn him to follow en.wikipedia.org rules, other wise he will continue use his personnel details and personnel promoted articles there. Dear I am sorry If u r not right person to say all about this, Plz suggest me where I can raise this issue. My sd.wikipedia.org ID is same. His thesis is not a violetion? http://sd.wikipedia.org/wiki/ماحولياتي_انتظام_ڪاڻ_اُپُگِرَهِي_عَڪس_ضماءُ_۽_درجه_بنديءَ_جي_طريقن_جو_اَڀياس

Alixafar 01:06, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Still no response there

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Sindhi_Wikipedia,_a_house_of_problems

But still no one came to give suggestions Alixafar 19:42, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Richero cluster spam

Hi M7. Could you please give me some more information about the "Richero cluster spam"? Or point me to some sort of file? Thanks! Kind regards, Trijnstel_talk 17:54, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Closing a request

Ciao M7. I saw you on the recentchanges :-). The Meta:Requests for translation adminship/Simeondahl requires closure. As I've actually voted ("oppose") there it'd be innapropiate for me to close it and I wonder if you could close it, because it's more than a week old. Grazie mille. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 21:45, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: Translation

E 'stato un piacere, it's the least I could do for your help/assistance to me in the past year :) Ciao, -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 23:58, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

It's my pleasure. --Makecat 03:06, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Stewardship

An image that is partially in focus, but mostly out of focus in varying degrees.

Please notice that I asked three questions of each candidate at Stewards/Elections 2013/Questions

1. Do you look forward to being an active catalyst for consensus-building, especially in small wiki contexts?
2. Do you see your role as a passive bystander with a few tools?
3. Are you able to make balanced guesses about why, when and how "it is better not to reach than to go too far"?

As you know, you are identified as a steward at simple:Wikipedia:Administrators#List of Administrators. In this context, it is timely and meaningful to pose the same questions. --Ansei (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

These questions are forward looking and open-ended. Is it not appropriate and useful to ask such questions from time to time? Is it not reasonable to ask experienced stewards the same kinds of questions which are presented to steward candidates? --Ansei (talk) 23:50, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Questions are not a complaint. Your leap of logic not justified by the specific words of my diff. However, you may want to know that PeterSymonds drew a similar inference here. --Ansei (talk) 00:11, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Please consider what I have written here. --Ansei (talk) 06:36, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Bureaucrat discussion

Hello. A bureaucrat discussion has been opened to decide the outcome of this request for de-adminship. It is opened for more than three days now and it has only received one comment so far. If you could please pass by and leave your comments over there it would be really appreciated. Best regards.

— Delivered via Global message delivery on behalf of MarcoAurelio, 15:20, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Fundraising translation feedback

Hey M7, I have a bit of a request to ask from you. We pulled down our banners nearly a fortnight ago for what was a highly successful international fundraiser and brought the curtain down on last years fundraiser. This week however we will be changing payment processors and during the testing of the new system it would be useful to use the time productively on on testing banner text.

To help us out with this I wonder if you would be willing to help us improve our italian text using This Link

Simply follow the simple instructions on that page and if you have any questions feel free to contact me on my talk page.

We are going to run the test on tuesday so if you dont see this message till 24 hours after it was sent you can ignore me :) Many Thanks though.

Jseddon (WMF) (talk) 18:06, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Fundraising translation feedback

Hey M7, I have a bit of a request to ask from you. We pulled down our banners nearly a fortnight ago for what was a highly successful international fundraiser and brought the curtain down on last years fundraiser. This week however we will be changing payment processors and during the testing of the new system it would be useful to use the time productively on on testing banner text.

To help us out with this I wonder if you would be willing to help us improve our italian text using This Link

Simply follow the simple instructions on that page and if you have any questions feel free to contact me on my talk page.

We are going to run the test on tuesday so if you dont see this message till 24 hours after it was sent you can ignore me :) Many Thanks though.

Jseddon (WMF) (talk) 18:06, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Forced user renames coming soon for SUL

Hi, sorry for writing in English. I'm writing to ask you, as a bureaucrat of this wiki, to translate and review the notification that will be sent to all users, also on this wiki, who will be forced to change their user name on May 27 and will probably need your help with renames. You may also want to help with the pages m:Rename practices and m:Global rename policy. Thank you, Nemo 16:51, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Forced user renames coming soon for SUL

Hi, sorry for writing in English. I'm writing to ask you, as a bureaucrat of this wiki, to translate and review the notification that will be sent to all users, also on this wiki, who will be forced to change their user name on May 27 and will probably need your help with renames. You may also want to help with the pages m:Rename practices and m:Global rename policy. Thank you, Nemo 16:51, 3 May 2013 (UTC)