User talk:Manuelt15

Welcome to Meta![edit]

Hello Manuelt15!, and Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing! -- Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 07:43, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re:AstaBOTh15@euwiki[edit]

Hola Màñüé£†¹5, como los cambios del bot no solamente son interwikis sino también añadir plantillas recomiendo preguntar la comunidad local por su opinión en eu:Wikipedia:Bot-ak/Baimenak#AstaBOTh15, claro, puedes seguir, pero para el flag necesitan 'votar' algunos usuarios en eu:Wikipedia:Bot-ak/Baimenak#AstaBOTh15. Saludos, --birdy geimfyglið _(:> )=| 18:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

messages[edit]

You have new messages

Hello, Manuelt15. You have new messages at Abigor's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Huib talk^Abigor 11:15, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello :)[edit]

Hello Manuelt15, yo voy a votar a favor de ti en las elecciones a steward, por que eres un usuario fundamental y neutral en la Wikipedia en español. Saludos cordialmente Globalphilosophy 18:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias por el apoyo ;) -- Màñüé£†¹5 ^talk 20:32, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should edit your user page to show you are now a steward.[edit]

I reversed your close of the Moulton discussion at Steward requests because I looked at your user page and saw no indication you were a steward. So I reversed it. Sorry.

Your close was not correct, but that's another matter. Moulton was not whitelisted. Rather, the account was delinked by renaming. Further, stewards may act at local wikis when it has become apparent that local administration, even though it theoretically exists, is absent or otherwise unable to handle a situation. That administration could then, if it wishes, reverse the action. However, now, with your close, it will be necessary to go through local process again, and, from history, this will be a bloody mess. The amount of discussion this particular user has created is enormous, and he is blatantly demanding that he be blocked, and he will do whatever it takes, as long as he can maintain any shred of appearance that it was "abuse."

Good luck as a steward, but your first action for me to notice doesn't give me a lot of hope. --Abd 16:24, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Abd is mistaken. My account was both detached from SUL and whitelisted, to defeat Jimbo's corrupt action to lock it at the express request of FeloniousMonk (before ArbCom sanctioned him for a long history of such corrupt practices). —Moulton 16:35, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If SBJ whitelisted, he did not reveal it, and he would not have used the rename trick. There is another whitelist, a username whitelist, that was used previously. There was no defiance of Jimbo in the action, it was simply considered reasonable to give Moulton a chance. I'll check. That edit above is, of course, Moulton socking, as he will indeed do. --Abd 16:42, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The correct place to search for user permissions is this, but you're right, I forgot to point that out in my userpage.

That's why I said "whitelist" with "", is a way to call it: a local bureaucrat intentionally lifted locally the application of a global lock.

I'm sorry, but maybe you misunderstood the role of a Steward, in such communities we are limited to enforce consensus, we can't block by our own unless is an emergency, and in this case is not. -- Màñüé£†¹5 ^talk _es 16:53, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikiversity custodians broke both the SUL lock and the Titleblacklist on pages in my userspace. They had to break both so that anyone could post to my talk page. —Moulton 18:50, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify the history, and place it in context: The original edit to the Wikiversity Titlewhitelist was by a probationary custodian who was doing it as a wildcard action without seeking consensus (and he wrote: to counter-attack meta's blacklist). That was quickly reversed by another custodian. When Ottava unblocked Caprice, Moulton's non-SUL account, as one of his last -- and not discussed -- actions as a custodian before being desysopped, he also restored the Titlewhitelist for Moulton, but I'm not sure I understand the action of that edit, since he made it display as Caprice. Moulton was still globally locked.
Caprice was then able to edit, from the unblock. Adambro promptly blocked, but I objected to involvement (though really to the action being taken without request for review, it would have been superior, probably, to leave Caprice blocked at that time until standing issues had been resolved. Adambro, however, unblocked and resigned as a custodian. That left Caprice free to edit.
When Moulton, as Caprice, had edited for some time, without serious disruption, 'crat SBJ opened a discussion proposing to delink the Moulton account from the SUL lock. There was plenty of precedent for this, and it was a workaround that had been invented to handle the lack of a global lock whitelist. There was no objection to the 'crat action this time, probably because Moulton had been editing as Caprice, and it was considered more straightforward for him to be able to edit as Moulton, and, as Caprice, he hadn't been disruptive.
I may have become confused on this, by recent comments from Melos who, as a steward, had referred to a "global block" and then local whitelisting for Wikiversity, but, in fact, now that I check, had globally locked. It may still be true that there is no local whitelist for global locks, and that "global blocks" only apply to IP. There is precedent as well, however, for a steward going around to local communities to block, as an implementation of a "global ban," precisely to allow simple local administrative action to undo it, and this was done in the case of the global lock of User:Thekohser; the lock was simultaneously lifted. However, Mike.lifeguard, in an action that was apparently not discussed on-wiki, replaced the global lock, later, thus defeating specific local unblocks where the account was still SUL-linked. So local 'crats began using the renaming trick, which delinks, and this was done on a number of wikis without problem. --Abd 20:23, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The local lock was lifted with consensus, but in such a way that the action could not be reversed.

That's a judgment call, you know. It is not a question of "unable." There was a showing of emergency, and you judged, more accurately, that this was not an emergency. Did you investigate adequately for that, to make that judgment?

What I've responded to is the claim of incapacity, that on the face of this, you could not act because, you believe, there are local custodians who can act. I understand the principle. I'm not appealing at meta, this was an effort to avoid further local disruption, but the argument that a steward could not act is, from precedent, clearly false. There were plenty of prior cases where stewards did act, and no showing that the steward was reprimanded or other sign, outwardly, that this was improper. (In fact, it's been done when it was improper, but that's another story.) I'll note that from the original report, the steward PeterSymonds did, in fact, act, doing what could have been done by any local custodian, revision deletion. The argument could be similar, though there was stronger reason, privacy policy. The re-opening wasn't based on privacy policy, per se, but on clear and blatant harassment.

As to the steward permission, yeah, I often forget the specific pagename to use, but stewards generally do note it. No problem, Manuel, it just would have saved me that revert. No harm done, I assume, since nobody blocked me for revert warring with a steward! (I wouldn't have reverted again, anyway, even if you hadn't been a steward!) Again, welcome to the steward community, where, I'm sure, You Can't Please Everyone! Good luck. --Abd 17:56, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-wiki abuse??[edit]

Hi you blocked my unregistered adress for "Cross-wiki abuse". Kindly tell me why at my registered account at http://sw.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majadiliano_ya_mtumiaji:Kipala Rgds sw:user:kipala 65.49.14.58 17:32, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, are you using a proxy from US? [1] this address was used to vandalize cross-wiki. -- Màñüé£†¹5 ^talk _es 17:40, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Ripchip Bot[edit]

No problem, Manuelt15, the bot is already unblocked. And it was blocked for working without flag and with no request for that. Please note that its request was made just after it was blocked. The bot policy allows automatic approval, and the request is ok, now. But as we use FlaggedRevs, I ask you to not allow much more edits than the necessary the request, because we have to review each edit made until its flag is granted. If we don't do that, all edits made by other editors in the same articles will be pending. Thanks in advance, CasteloBranco^msg 20:28, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~[edit]

Hola Manuelt15, debes recordar mi "caso", soy el usuario Carrousel, Seguí tu consejo, pero de ver solución hasta ahora nada, finalmente me han bloqueado en wikipedia, y eso sin aún responderme siquiera mi solicitud de "segunda opinión", Le hable a un steward y me respondió algunas posibilidades sobre el asunto del ip que te había comentado, pero ningún administrador en wikiversidad se ha tomado la consideración de decirme algo. Quien me bloqueó, me sugirió usar la plantilla desbloquear, La cual tengo puesta con la explicación de todo mi "caso", con toda la información que al menos yo, puedo entregar, y quisiera saber si es que tú, no se si personalmente, pero al menos podrías hacer algo para que mi bloqueo sea estudiado por algún administrador, porque ahora si que no puedo hacer nada más, si lees mi pagina de usuario verás todo lo que pasó, y de verdad espero que ojalá puedas ayudarme. Saludos. Carrousel 03:16, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ahora mismo no podre resolver este asunto, en cuanto pueda contacto a algun admin de es.wv. -- Màñüé£†¹5 ^{talk [es]} 15:16, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

bueno, muchas gracias. Carrousel 10:46, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Latgalian BP[edit]

Please see ltg:Vikipedeja:Dūmu meits#Bot policy, and say you final decision, thanks --Dark Eagle 18:35, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Usurpación[edit]

Hola, Manuel,

Podrías proceder con esta usurpación? Ya que el dueño de la cuenta nunca contestó el mensaje. Gracias. Gus

Gracias por la usurpación. Gus

De nada. -- Màñüé£†¹5 ^{talk [es]} 00:31, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Buenas noches, pedido.[edit]

Hola que tal buenas noches, queria saber si podrias hecharme una mano con un logotipo que me gustaria subir, y pues tengo un mail con permiso por parte de dicha empresa propietaria de ese logotipo, y tu tienes usuario en OTRS, queria saber si tu puedes ayudarme. El permiso solo lo otorgarán para el articulo de dicha empresa, el cual estoy narrando.

El logotipo es del sitio [www.quanam.com quanam.com]. Desde ya agradezco tu ayuda, Saludos! Maxpana3 03:56, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Estimado Steward[edit]

Hola Manuelt15, deseo mucho recuperar mi cuenta Globalphilosophy de la Wikipedia en español, ya que fui baneado para siempre, por favor ayudame! ya paso mas de un año de mi expulsion T_T quiero seguir editando en la enciclopedia mas importante de la historia. Saludos cordiales --Globalphilosophy (-̮̮̃•̃) (ღTalk♥) 02:50, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, honestamente no creo que eso sea posible, varios biblios están de acuerdo en que se mantenga el bloqueo por varias razones, empezando porque ultimamente antes del bloqueo solo te dedicabas a entregar premios a usuarios, y segundo que en este mensaje no reconoces que estuvo mal lo que hiciste, solo que "quieres editar la enciclopedia mas importante de la historia." Su ki deseas puedes aplear a otra persona o te puedo permitir hacer la solicitud formal en la wiki, como lo veas. -- Màñüé£†¹5 ^{talk [es]} 14:37, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deseo el perdon de los Bibliotecarios y de la comunidad en general, quiero redimirme ya que comprendo las acciones negativas que hice, ya no hare ediciones tontas (como dar premios, inflar ediciones con redirecciones y bienvenidas a usuarios innecesarias y ya no evadire un bloqueo) por favor compañeros despues de mas de un año de bloqueo, entendi mi castigo y ruego la salvacion de mi cuenta para mejorar, arreglar y contribuir la Wikipedia en español; ademas obedecere educadamente mas reglas que me impongan los bibliotecarios. --Globalphilosophy (-̮̮̃•̃) (ღTalk♥) 03:46, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Polish WIKIPEDIA no objektive[edit]

I rename "homosexual marriage", as "sexuality couple". And than one of the moderations (I don't known, maybe steward) deprived me possibility editing Wikipedia. I don't understand, why everything was fine until I edited moral terms. When I' wrote, that marriage isn't the same homosexual couple and family isn't homosexual parents with children.

I think, that polish version of Wikipedia it'n OBJECTIVE. Wizikj 23:31, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing admin rights of Санюн Вадик@mhr.wikipedia[edit]

My apologies for the rather long notice given here. It regards M7's removing the admin rights of user Санюн Вадик@mhr.wikipedia - I am sending the same notice I've sent him so that this matter can be resolved properly. Unfortunately, you were both intentionally given false information here by user ПешСай@mhr.wikipedia.

There is currently a vote happening at the Meadow Mari (mhr) Wikipedia to have the sysop - ПешСай@mhr.wikipedia - deprived of his position. He reported that sockpuppets were being used to vote against him:

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Checkuser

As far as I can tell, PeterSymonds compared the IP addresses, found a match, and nine users at the Meadow Mari Wikipedia were blocked, their votes presumably made invalid in the vote. As a further result, Санюн Вадик@mhr.wikipedia - the initiator of the vote to have ПешСай@mhr.wikipedia's sysop rights removed, lost his admin rights.

What ПешСай@mhr.wikipedia is perfectly aware of is that all nine accounts belong to individual physical persons (he would be, as these nine include some of the most active editors at the Meadow Mari Wikipedia) that do indeed occasionally share IP addresses as they all work in the same building - the House of the Press in Yoshkar-Ola, Republic of Mari El, Russian Federation. A vast chunk of Mari-language publications - in print, radio, television - are housed in this one building, making the external IP-address of this building one that would be shared by a huge chunk of the Mari journalists and authors.

ПешСай@mhr.wikipedia - who is also acquainted with the individuals in question in real life - can be seen addressing the individuals in question personally in the discussion in question. http://mhr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%B9:%D0%A2%D3%B1%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B0#.D0.9E.D0.B1_.D1.83.D1.87.D0.B0.D1.81.D1.82.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.BA.D0.B5_.D0.9F.D0.B5.D1.88.D0.A1.D0.B0.D0.B9. Unfortunately, this conversation is mostly in Russian, but he does in one sentence confirm this in English as well:

"Lifeway, I know you in real life, you couldn't talk English at all. Who is writing such texts for you?--ПешСай 14:16, 6 Пеледыш 2011 (UTC)"

I would offer you translations of Russian quotations in which he addresses other users as well - making it clear that he not only knows that they are separate individuals, but that they are separate individuals he is acquainted with personally - but as a supporter of the vote to have him deprived of his rights, I would of course not be a neutral source. I can offer to highlight quotes in question, though, for you to have them translated from Russian into English by a third party. And I can offer you personal contacts to the blocked individuals that would confirm that they are indeed separate physical individuals.

The vote in question is being extremely difficult due to activities of this sort, and mediation "from above" would be desperately needed. I have already requested this from PeterSymonds, along with my request to undo his decision to block these nine accounts, but I honestly don't know who the right person to address here is. I know that decisions regarding the deprivation of admin rights have to be made within communities before the stewards get involved, but this kind of stuff is making it extremely difficult to carry out any kind of fair vote.

As one of the first editors at the Mari Wikipedia during the Incubator stage (that was driven away by ПешСай@mhr.wikipedia's conduct as an administrator, but my account information will confirm this - User:JBradley), I can offer to send a steward that might review the situation an overview of this sad tale from its inception till today. I'm hoping to find time to write it up this account in the evening. The "other side" would of course have the same right.

Cheers, Jeremy Bradley, University of Vienna, Marivienna 16:25, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Translator, We need you![edit]

Dear Manuelt15,

You have helped us in previous years with translations and for that we are most grateful. Now we turn towards the 2011/12 fundraiser. It may seem forever away, but work has already begun getting everything ready to go. This year we want to have landing pages covering as many countries in as many languages as possible.

Right now, we want to figure out who is interested in translating for the fundraiser. This year we're hoping to have more of a solidified "core" group of translators that we can count on to have work done by a few key dates, but we'd also welcome help from people who are willing to just help out when they can.

If you would be interested please take a look at this little sign-up survey and fill it out http://survey.wikimedia.org/index.php?sid=13638&newtest=Y&lang=en. With that we can start building a list of people and filling any gaps in the languages we serve.

Many Thanks

Joseph Seddon (User:Jseddon (WMF))

Production Coordinator
Wikimedia Foundation
Jseddon (WMF) 00:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Languages[edit]

Can you please tell us which languages you speak? As steward it is pretty important to know that.--Sanandros (talk) 22:56, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Global CSS/JS migration[edit]

Hello Manuelt15. You have global scripts in User:Manuelt15/global.js, which you import using your local JS pages. Since August 2014, your global.js and global.css pages are loaded automatically on all wikis. Since you already import them yourself, you may experience script errors or tools being added twice. Do you want me to remove the global imports from your local pages using Synchbot (without changing any other content)? —Pathoschild 19:07, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi again! I haven't heard back from you, so I'll assume you don't want to do this. Feel free to leave me a message or add a Synchbot request if you change your mind. :) —Pathoschild 17:19, 09 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]