User talk:Marcok

Please post on my main talk page: it:Discussioni utente:Marcok.

Superprotect letter update[edit]

Hi Marcok,

Along with more hundreds of others, you recently signed Letter to Wikimedia Foundation: Superprotect and Media Viewer, which I wrote.

Today, we have 562 signatures here on Meta, and another 61 on change.org, for a total of 623 signatures. Volunteers have fully translated it into 16 languages, and begun other translations. This far exceeds my most optimistic hopes about how many might sign the letter -- I would have been pleased to gain 200 siguatures -- but new signatures continue to come.

I believe this is a significant moment for Wikimedia and Wikipedia. Very rarely have I seen large numbers of people from multiple language and project communities speak with a unified voice. As I understand it, we are unified in a desire for the Wikimedia Foundation to respect -- in actions, in addition to words -- the will of the community who has built the Wikimedia projects for the benefit of all humanity. I strongly believe it is possible to innovate and improve our software tools, together with the Wikimedia Foundation. But substantial changes are necessary in order for us to work together smoothly and productively. I believe this letter identifies important actions that will strongly support those changes.

Have you been discussing these issues in your local community? If so, I think we would all appreciate an update (on the letter's talk page) about how those discussions have gone, and what people are saying. If not, please be bold and start a discussoin on your Village Pump, or in any other venue your project uses -- and then leave a summary of what kind of response you get on the letter's talk page.

Finally, what do you think is the right time, and the right way, to deliver this letter? We could set a date, or establish a threshold of signatures. I have some ideas, but am open to suggestions.

Thank you for your engagement on this issue, and please stay in touch. -Pete F (talk) 18:38, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Architetti per FOP[edit]

Secondo te quali potrebbero essere alcuni organi o enti o associazioni di architetti che potrebbero risponderci o comunque essere interesati a dire qualosa sulla libertà di panorama? Intanto potremmo mettere qualche collegamento a liste di contatti alla pagina EU_policy/Engage/Authors, io ho già esaurito le mie idee. :( Forse funziona meglio se scrivi tu firmandoti come architetto, per le italiane? --Nemo 07:48, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocco #429991[edit]

Ciao, ho fatto login per sbaglio dall'IP polimi e quindi ora l'ufficio è bloccato per 24 ore, riesci ad annullare l'autoblocco #429991 in it.wiki per evitare che dia fastidio a qualcuno? --Federico Leva (BEIC) (talk) 11:15, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Research:Freedom of panorama survey among architects of Italy[edit]

Ciao, sto lavorando a questa cosuccia e mi servirebbe il tuo aiuto per assicurarmi che abbia senso per un architetto. Poi ti rispondo sull'articolo. --Nemo 12:10, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposte e richieste per la ItWikiCon 2020[edit]

Ciao :-) come forse avrai saputo, l'edizione 2020 della ItWikiCon si farà online. È aperto lo spazio per proporre i propri interventi. Dato che avevi richiesto uno o più argomenti per l'edizione del 2019, che non si è potuta svolgere, mi chiedevo se fossi interessato a richiederli per quella del 2020 (o anche altri, ovviamente). Se è qualcosa di cui vorrai parlare o che vorrai fare tu, segui ItWikiCon/2020/Proposte#Submit_a_Proposal, mentre se è qualcosa a cui saresti interessato e che vorresti che qualcuno facesse scrivi in ItWikiCon/2020/Proposte#Requests. Ciao e grazie ;-) --Superchilum^{(talk to me!)} 09:08, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Menù del giorno[edit]

Ciao :-) forse ItWikiCon/2020/Proposte/Il menù del giorno è un po' criptico (per quanto immagino sia voluto, il lasciare un po' di suspense ;-) per aumentare l'hype). Qualche indicazione in più forse potrebbe essere utile? --Superchilum^{(talk to me!)} 21:02, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Superchilum: In effetti. Per il momento ho solo lanciato l'idea, metteremo a punto i dettagli con calma con lo staff di BEIC. --Marcok (talk) 21:06, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Almeno definire cosa intendete per "risorse digitali"? ;-) --Superchilum^{(talk to me!)} 21:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Superchilum: Ho integrato scrivendo "risorse digitali libere (soprattutto artistiche, bibliotecarie e archivistiche)", intendendo risorse provenienti da istituzioni culturali. --Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk) 13:55, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vikidia[edit]

Ciao, sei tu?--158.255.215.51 14:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Si. --Marcok (talk) 15:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On Italian FOP[edit]

Hello Marco Chemello. I just remembered the discussion at c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/08#Question on the so-called de facto Italian FOP, after I read again Research:Freedom of panorama survey among architects of Italy.

Are there any renewed attempts to introduce freedom of panorama in your country? I am aware that the pandemic situation there is not so good (but ours seems much worse), so I don't expect a freedom of panorama introduction attempt at anytime soon. If there is, hope the survey that your chapter made serves as a guide for that.

In my opinion, attribution is not an issue since c:COM:FOP China and c:COM:FOP Portugal both require attribution of the author for every use of images of copyrighted public artistic works. I may have suggestion, that future Italian FOP will require mandatory attribution for architecture (and if possible, sculptural works) if the authors are known, and that attribution is not necessary if the authors are unknown.

Anyway, hope for the best and that FOP be introduced in your country during my lifetime :-) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @JWilz12345:, thank you for your message. We have no news as Parliament works, however we as Wikimedia Italia are changing our approach to Wiki Loves Moments for this new year edition, to force the recognition of an "implicit" panorama freedom (the concept we already discussed together). We are providing a strong legal backup for this. So I think from about June we'll have interesting news. ;) --Marcok (talk) 09:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]