User talk:MaxSem

From Meta

Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to my talk page! Please submit all requests for permissions here and bug reports to Bugzilla. If you need to contact me privately, use email. However, I may answer on your talk page if your mail contain no confidential information.

Please sign your posts with ~~~~. Archive

Contents

[edit] Feature request for Special:Uncategorizedpages

Привет. В украинской википедии я разгребаю некатегоризованные страницы (Uncategorizedpages), и мне кажется, что на этой странице была бы полезна информация о том, кто создал такую страницу. Когда видишь что группу страниц создал определенный юзер, то легче определить кому написать замечание, а так ходишь по каждой странице, смотришь хистори... Не подскажешь, куда бы мне написать об этом feature request/enhancement ? --Movses

bugzilla. MaxSem 12:46, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reg: Malayalam Wiki: Removing beaurocrat status

MaxSem,

Observed that you've revoked manjith's wikipedia beaurocrat status. It was a bit hasty, as we dont have any other (active) beaurocrats, and is creating a situation where we have to run to meta wiki to have new sysops elected etc. You should have waited till a new beaurocrat is selected. Is there a way to undo your actions? :-)

Simynazareth 18:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC)simynazareth

We have no reason to decline voluntary resignations, but such actions can be easily undone if the user requests to be resysopped and the local community does not mind (i.e. resignation wasn't caused by ongoing controversy). I suggest you to ask Manjith to be a bureaucrat until his replacement is elected. MaxSem 18:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks MaxSem, I am asking him the same. If he wishes to stay on till a replacement is in place, would we (the local community) have to nominate him to be a bureaucrat? or a simple 'undo' possible? :-) Simynazareth 18:38, 15 May 2007 (UTC)simynazareth
No, renomination is not required. MaxSem 18:50, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Опять спам

Массово ставятся ссылки на cinematheque.ru с тИЦ в 40 пунктов. Задолбался откатывать спамеров: w:ru:Служебная:Contributions/Сергей_Ру, w:ru:Служебная:Contributions/89.17.34.82. Может уже пора в спам-фильтр? --the wrong man 08:42, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Спам продолжается: w:ru:Служебная:Contributions/СИНЕМАТЕКА. --the wrong man 11:46, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Занёс вчера, но забыл отписаться. MaxSem 08:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Request

Greetings MaxSem!

Can you kindly grant me temporary sysop priviledges on Myanmar Wikipedia because I wish to translate the interface into Burmese. Just 72 hours would be enough. please.

Also, I would like to apologize for my conduct on Ug.wiki. Please forgive me.

--Jose77 05:25, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Advice of mine is that kind of thing has to be asked on the proper request page, and nowhere else.
DarkoNeko 22:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:MaxSem/Sandbox2

Hi. You have a broken redirect there. I don't want to just delete it without asking, maybe you still need it... The talk page there redirects to an existing talk page but which has no page connected to it. :o) (Sorry for bothering.) --Thogo (talk) 14:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

I deleted it. MaxSem 20:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] К сведению: Translation_teams/ru

К сведению: Translation_teams/ru. Присоединяйся. --Kaganer 19:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Я хочу подать иск в АК викепедии на русском языке

Но не могу, страница исков заблокирована,

[1]

Я просил снять блокировку

[2]

Но получил отказ.

У меня имеются подозрения что АК викепедии на русском языке нарушает цели проекта.

В последнее время участились блокировки участников в нарушение правил в том числе кандидатов на идущих сейчас выборах в АК

В нарушениях правил замечены не только Администраторы но и бюрократ и Арбитр викепедии на русском языке можите ознакомиться с не рассмотренными АК исками [3]

Я как фанат викепедии на русском языке расстоен таким положение вещей.

Заблокированный соепаппет[4]. No comments. MaxSem 20:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Request for Bureaucrat Status in Malayalam Wikipedia

Dear MaxSem,

We've had an internal voting in malayalam wikipedia, and voted ml:User:vssun as the new bureaucrat. The details of voting are put in http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_permissions#Bureaucrat%20access . Could you please grant bureaucrat status to vssun. Thanks.

Simynazareth 19:10, 26 May 2007 (UTC)simynazareth

[edit] CheckUser guidelines on Hebrew Wiki

Dear MaxSem,

I am a sysop on Hebrew Wiki. I was the one who put forth our current guidelines for checkusers, which was accepted by the community. Out of the three CheckUsers initially appointed, two have effectively left several months ago. We then had a failed election, in which tactical voting ("I will fail your candidate if you don't support mine") kept us from appointing new CheckUsesrs. The remaining CheckUser is being elected as a beurocrate, so I put forth a "face lift" to the guidelines, which is now being voted upon in our Parliment.

In the proposed system, every check-user operation is required to be authorized (in advanced, or on-the-fly) by *all* appointed CheckUsers. This provides, to my opinion, far greater transparency, hence protecting all users of he-wiki from excessive use of the CheckUsers priviliges. Nevertheless, to avoid being left with no active CheckUser (we are under constant flood of vandals attacks), I am suggesting a voting system that will choose the most supported candidates, rather than having the community voting on each of the candidates separately.

In spite of all that, assuming the new guidelines will be approved, I am confident that our candidates will gain the support of the vast majority in the community. We are not going to ask for any appointment that contradicts the basic Meta policy on that matter. Uzi V. 20:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Uzi, unfortunately it is not up to me or other stewards. This is a foundation policy, and you should propose exemptions with the Board. Also, please note that all checkuser will have to provide WMF with their personal details and proofs that they are 18 or older. MaxSem 05:23, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: usurpation

Brilliant. Thanks! :) - Mark 04:27, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Remove CheckUser status

Обрати, пожалуйста, внимание на запрос: Requests_for_permissions#User:DaeX --ajvol 15:56, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Это должен сделать другой стюард. MaxSem 16:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Akan Wikibooks

Thanks for running the CheckUser on the vandalism. I had to change one of your blocks from indefinite, however, as according to en.wiki, the IP address was that of a public terminal. I've put them in the "sin bin" for a shorter duration, hopefully this may stop the vandalism from happening. Thanks for that! --WiganRunnerEu 20:31, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] What are the meta rules for usurpations?

I noticed the link for the Board things and I'd like to be able to participate using my name of en:User:N but I noticed the name is taken on meta and was used to create a throwaway account. Will I have to wait for the Unified Login? Nardman1 11:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

We don't have codified rules regarding that, but enwiki's rules are being used de-facto. Therefore, you cannot usurp this account because it has two edits. You may want to start a discussion on this matter on Meta:Babel though. MaxSem 12:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
I was able to contact the user on the czech Wiki and get permission. Thanks for your reply. -N 16:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] CheckUser policy

Greetings :) Isn't what you said when the policy was created? It has been edited since then. Himyeana 14:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Images

The images were modyfied by me (so something that is my own work), but forgot to put the source where they were from in the original format. It would have been wiser to cite the source (they are free images anyway) than remove them altogether. This however, you wouldn't have had in perview. But I don't see how you asumed that they are non-free either. Anyway, they will be sortted in an appropriate manner. Otherwise, thanks for the notification. --B. Jankuloski 12:59, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Arabic Wikipedia

  • Please remove my sysop status in the Arabic Wikipedia --Aram33 20:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please hear me out

I have somethink to say why do u block me from IRC?--יודל 20:17, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Because you behaved too bad an resorted to personal attacks on Effeietsanders. MaxSem 10:25, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Efeit has belittled me and has constantly berated me and i have in no way directly personally attacked him. but its gone i better forget from that experience. soryy.--יודל 11:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Moving

Oops, that's because of my moving into a different namespace. I'll create redirects. Thanks for spotting that! TheFearow 10:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I'm an admin!

Hi MaxSem, thank you very much! :-) I'll go update the List now. Cheers, Tangotango 07:08, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please block vandal who exposes privacy on yi.wiki

[5]. joel.m h=was found in checkuser to own this name which exposes my private identety [6] he was allready blocked but unblocked this night again please do your job and breblock him [7]--זלמן לייב 11:01, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Please send all such requests to Meta. MaxSem 11:02, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
It is there already[8] on the irc steward channel nobody wants to act--יודל 11:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Spam site for black list

Please add to black list domain moigorod.ru add all its subdomains - for example bir.moigorod.ru, irk.moigorod.ru, etc. They definetely tried to increase popularity of these sites using Wikipedia even in irrelevant articles, like ru:Scooter, ru:Слова-паразиты, etc. MaxiMaxiMax 05:39, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Spam on ru

Hi Max - just found a great new tool for cross wiki contribs. It shows a spammer on ru.wikipedia among a number of other places. I've indef blocked where I can (& if you want the ip it's in the CU log with my name!) and deleted. This is the link you need - cheers --Herby talk thyme 08:15, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Wow, thanks Herby, that's a wonderful tool! MaxSem 09:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Great for vandals and spambots too - glad to help - cheers --Herby talk thyme 09:46, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Scots Gaelic Wiktionary

Hi Max,

Thanks for the temporary twiddled bit over on gd.wikt - I was kinda only expecting a week, but three months will work :) Given that, rather than just clean up and stabilise the wiki, I'll try petitioning some Scots Gaelic editors I know with a view to getting them involved and maybe regenerating the wiki. Thanks again - Ali-oops 22:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Spam removal query

Hi Max - I appear to have become active on the spam blacklist (!!) and a removal request has turned up with your name mentioned. Could you take a look if you get a minute and express an opinion? Thanks --Herby talk thyme 09:52, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Done. MaxSem 10:00, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Max - I'll watch it and respond now. The subject I'm familiar with, that particular one I was not. Cheers --Herby talk thyme 10:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Checkuser verification

Dear Sir

A group of users (friends) of Portuguese Wikipédia bring more illiberal policies regarding an non free wikipédia without a preoccupation with a environmental and social education.

This group of users (always the same) and some administrators propose and vote systematically to erase some pages with a total absence of knowledge about the subject, some of the articles with a high importance to the community. They have a chain of contacts to promote their vote and their contacts (friends) vote without common sense, reasoning, good judgment, brains or sagacity; They vote against the person and not against the article.

Less obvious for know, but perhaps as consequential over the long term, is a less participation of some users who TRY CONTRIBUTE to this projects with articles.

Because of this behavior from this group, I decide do not agree with their conduct and I write my point of view in there discussion pages (with total education) I have been blocked for suspicion of being a sock puppet after a checkuser. I know I am not a sockpuppet, so is impossible the checkuser be positive.

A several of times I and other users asked for a checkuser to my account, always reject for the “group of users”. But know, the “group of users” decide make the “checkuser”, it is strange and uncommon. Principally after reject my checkuser proposal to a ckecuser, They the ask a “checkuser” (2 days after) - strange? They admit in their discussion pages, they make a checkuser and the checkuser was negative… Know the new check user is positive. Is impossible. I know that.

All I ask to wikimédia foundation is that an administrator check the merits of the block. Please, verify the checkuser. Send me the results by email, because is impossible this result.

I think these groups (with administrators) are trying making a fraud to eliminate my participation. Put yourself in my shoes and imagine the frustration.

– The other user

– Me

[http://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:CheckUser/Pedidos_de_verifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o&oldid=7251137 – The checkuser rejected by “the group of users”]

– The same checkuser approved by “the group of users”

Sincerely,

Rui Resende

Portugal

P.S. The checkuser was made by a proponent's friend, after a stranger message ask him to see the email and after they reject the same checkuser request two days ago. Very strange.

P.P.S. Did I ever been Check'edUser? How many times? When? Who made the checkuser? Conclusions for the checkusers?

MY EMAIL: ratresende@gmail.com

[edit] Query

Hi Max, query for you here. [9] Many thanks, SlimVirgin (talk) 00:38, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Hope others gave satistiable answers to your concers while I was away? MaxSem 10:17, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Википедия

Упс, а чего ты в Википедии не правишь с 17 сентября?--Medved' 12:22, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Работа. MaxSem 10:17, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Roberta F.

I have to say sorry for a long delay to say you thanks. Processing of my FILO stack from time to time fails ;) In general, it was more important to the Croatian community then to sh.wikt. It is good to know to see a prompt reaction from a stewad :) To be honest, I forgot for such steward behavior... In 2004 it was usual. --Millosh 16:29, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Requests for username changes

Не зная к кому обратиться, обращаюсь к тебе, как к наиболее знакомому лицу :) На странице Requests for username changes, я подал заявку (Александрит @ some wikiprojects of Found) на переименование в некоторых проектах. С 14 сентября ответа не получил... --Aleksandrit 20:13, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Loosing their adminship

Hello MaxSem.

We, the community of the Kurdish Wikipedia, have voted that (only at our Wikipedia) every admin, who hasn't contributed since six monthes and longer, shell loose his adminship.

So, please de-admin these two users:

Thank you.

Greetings, --Bangin 12:54, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Done, next time please post such requests to Requests for permissions, to ensure faster response. MaxSem 10:17, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Whitelisting on BG WP

Hello Max. May I ask you for whitelisting of one website on BG wiki. I dont know why did it gain notoriety but hosts one serious scientific-popular bulgarian journal "Kosmos", which needs to be cited as a source of information for one article, and maybe many more. If I got it right from the Spam blacklist it's the \bpass\.as\b that is blackslisted, but I am particularly concerned about http:// kosmos.pass.as/ . Can you help? Thanks in advance. --Spiritia 12:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello, ИнжИнера. No, I don't consider requests from socks. MaxSem 18:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Max! You just insulted me! :-) ИнжИнера's sockpuppet was Spiritius, mocking on my nickname. I am bg:User:Spiritia and an administrator of BG WP. Ready for negotiations? :-) --Spiritia 20:44, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
OMG, soooorry. I really should have investigated it further before posting such a reply. Anyway, the whitelist on bg wiki is located at bg:MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist and it's editable by any Bulgarian sysop. Once again, sorry. MaxSem 21:42, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
It's okay, really. Ain't it indicative that you remember the case, about half an year later?  :-) And thanks for the whitelisting instruction, I didn't know that we can do it locally, but I succeeded. Thanks again and all the best! --Spiritia 22:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 2007 Steward Confirmations

Hi. This is a semi automated notice so my apologies if it seems a bit impersonal. You're listed as holding the Steward permission. As you know, Stewards get reconfirmed yearly, and it's that time again... I noticed that you haven't yet filled out your statement at Stewards/confirm. If you'd like to learn what the community thinks, please visit the page and put in your statement. Volunteers have been busily translating statements already. It would be best to do this before November 26, as that is when the page is opened for public comment, to coincide with the elections of new stewards. If you would like to not be reconfirmed and have your name removed, you can remove your section, or ask a volunteer to do it for you. I hope this information helps. If you have any questions or comments, there is ongoing discussion at Talk:Stewards/elections_2007. Oh, one last thing, if you already knew about it and just hadn't gotten round to it, apologies for the reminder! :) ++Lar: t/c 04:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Interwiki map

Regarding: [10] Please consider bringing stuff, even obvious stuff, to the interwiki map talk page first. It sets a bad example for others when stuff is added without discussion. I apologise if it was discussed on Talk:interwiki map and I missed it... I actually would have opposed adding it as the wiki is not public and thus links are not useful to the general public. ++Lar: t/c 03:53, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

It was discussed on otrs-en-l, and we have other not-generally-useful prefixes, such as otrs:, svn: and rev:. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 18:16, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
But discussion on the otrs mailing list is not where discussion for interwiki links in general should happen, is it? We have a talk page for that. If it was discussed on the mailing list, perhaps the thing to do was to bring it to that talk page, say that there was a strong consensus already, developed on a private list, and did anyone have a problem with adding it, rather than adding it without any (non OTRS mailing list, that's a not very widely followed list) discussion. otrs:, svn: and rev: are all useful in that anyone can use them not just people logged in to the wiki. Let's take this to the talk page to discuss further? ++Lar: t/c 23:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Uploadtext

Could you please give the rationale of so radical change on MediaWiki:Uploadtext? It contradicted what I have understood and seem a bit too radical for me. --Aphaia 04:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

This one? What's wrong about it? MaxSem(Han shot first!) 11:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Input

Your input would be appreciated on closing this. Please see the talk page. Thanks, Majorly (talk) 00:28, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blacklist

Hi Max - thanks for adding the "tiny" clone yesterday. I've logged it now but maybe you could do so another time. I know it makes for more work but in a months time that will not be findable by anyone from the history (& 6 or 12 months will make it impossible). Cheers --Herby talk thyme 08:09, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

I always log what I did, bud didn't thought it's really needed for redirectors as it's self-explanatory. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 16:45, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Помогите подать заявку в мета вместе по восстановлению молдавского раздела.

Уважаемый администратор, обращаюсь к Вам с просьбой.

Нам совместными усилиями необходимо восстановить молдавский раздел Википедии, который заблокирован с 2006 года. Заблокирован он по политическим причинам - русофобски настроенные группы пытаются недопустить дальнейшего развития письменности молдавского на кириллице (официальной в республике Приднестровье) и вынудить всех пользоваться румынской латинизированной версией. Помогите пожалуйста, как разблокировать его содержимое для дальнейшего пользовательского редактирования. К кому обращаться? Очевидно, что раздел был заблокирован именно по политическим причинам якобы потому что молдавский это не язык, а диалект. Мы должны прекратить дискириминцию кириллического алфавита в Википедии. Почему татарский раздел существует на латинице а не на официальной кириллице и никто его не закрывает? Почему есть казалось бы лишние разделы на сибирском говоре (это ведь тоже не язык!!!!!!!!), сербскохорватском языке (при том что есть разделы на сербском и хорватском), простом английском (это же не отдельный язык!!!!) и на всех диалектах итальянского и немецкого и т.д.? Мне не важно принята ли в Молдове латиница или нет. В Приднестровье принята кириллица, ей же пользуются молдоване на Украине. Наша задача отражать реалии а не заниматься суждением что и как. Письменность на восточно романских языках зародилась и существовала 5 веков именно на кириллице!!!!!!!!!!!!! Низкий уровень активности в разделе объясняется в первую очередь низким уровнем интернетизации населения регион. Но ведь ситуация меняется. К тому же существование Приднестровья это уже факт на протяжении 17 лет, и никуда эта республика в ближайшем будущем не денется.


Спасибо за сотрудничество.Иван-чай 03:01, 8 мая 2008 (UTC)

Здравствуйте, Иван. Прежде всего стоит сказать, что правила касательно новых языков за последнее время стали гораздо жёстче — жестоко наколовшись с «сибирским языком», который потом пришлось целый год так сказать, закрывать обратно, гайки подкрутили очень серьёзно. При нынешнем положении вещей запросы на открытие проектов на упрощённом английском или фантазии сибирских сепаратистов отклонили бы без обсуждения, по формальному критерию — отсутствию признания языка филологами. Чётко требуется наличие у языка-кандидата своего кода в международном стандарте ISO 639. Так вот, сибирской говор уже закрыли, на упрощённый английский тоже регулярно баллон катят, но его сторонники пока отбиваются успешно (Language proposal policy не имеет обратного действия), насчёт татарского я честно говоря не в курсе, какая письменность там официальная, а какая нет — но в любом случае написание латиницей вместо кириллицы или наоборот не делает татарсий язык каким-нибудь другим, нетатарским.
Таким образом, хотя заявку на молдавский язык можно подать в любой момент, её сразу завернут. Для того, чтобы эта ситуация поменялась, надо предложить сообществу поменять правила. Это можно сделать на Metapub'е, рассылке foundation-l или обсудить необходимые действия с кем-нибудь из Langcom'а.
Теперь насчёт молдовского Викисловаря, против закрытия которого вы протестовали. Тут всё очень просто — даже вики на вполне удовлетворяющих критериям языках закрывают на ать-два, если они остаются пустыми. Поскольку на md.wiktionary.org было всего штуки три словарных статьи да несколько энциклопедических, утащенных из Википедии — его судьба была предрешена. Да и кому нужен пустой словарь? MaxSem(Han shot first!) 14:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] I read your message

I read your message at s:ko:User talk:WonRyong

Now, I am in IRC. -- WonRyong 02:41, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Задача для стюарда

ru:Википедия:Запросы к бюрократам#Оскорбительный ник. Сделаешь? --Obersachse 08:01, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Залочил и скрыл. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 07:13, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bot flag

can you give me bot flag for my training ? I want check my bot —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rusyasoft (talk • contribs) .

Which bot, what kind of training? What will be the purpose of this bot? Please note: Meta is not a test wiki. We actuallly have one, however I'm not sure if people are allowed to use it for bot testing. Please ask there. Anyway, the easiest way to test a bot is to install MediaWiki on your home PC. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 19:05, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Toolserveraccount

Hello MaxSem,
please send your real-name, your wikiname, your prefered login-name and the public part of your ssh-key to image:zedler-admins.png. We plan to create your account soon then. --DaB. 14:40, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Andreydog (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Я Andreydog (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log) являюсь «реинкарнацией» Andrey1008 (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log) ранее заблокированного участника (Правила блокировок 6.6.2.) в настоящий время меня снова обессрочили как кукловода с чем категорически я не согласен. Я внёс значительный вклад в развитие Википедии (Ташкентского метро) (Правила блокировок 6.6.2.) прошу снять с меня блокировку. Я само восстановился в целях восстановить ранее удаленные мои страницы. Я, полагаю, что решение о моем блокировании было необоснованным, имею право обратиться по этому поводу к любому администратору, который, убедившись в справедливости претензии, далее действует в соответствии с положениями Разделов 6.5 и 7 настоящих правил. (Правила блокировок 1.6.). «Усматриваю следующее нарушение: Использование участником других учётных записей с целью создания иллюзии поддержки собственного мнения (в том числе в голосованиях).» С данной цитатой я категорически не согласен. Да я всячески поддерживал участников. Эти участники так же, наверное, самовосстановились судя по тому что их имена одинаковые. Я считаю что Leonid-berkutov (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log) - Berkutov Leonid (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log) это одно лицо. После того как Леонид получил от Art-top разрешение Википедия:Правьте смело, то он и начал править. Да этот участник самовосстановился для того чтобы удалить шаблон Шаблон:Attribution-DmitriyPitirimov и изображения. Увидев это я естественно поддержал его. Irina-almaz (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log) добавила ироническую фразу. Alex Spade вообще не имеет право оскорблять участников ВП:НО, а затем еще и писать кляузы. Прошу меня разблокировать. --89.236.199.118 01:17, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Я, лично, так и не увидел ни единого доказательства того, что у вас есть разрешение авторов на использование этих материалов. Очень не советую регистрировать новые учётки для того, чтобы заявлять о своей невиновности - тем самым вы только усугубляете ситуацию. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 13:22, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Ну, все ясно и ты туда же. Andrey1008, Andreydog. --89.236.208.187 16:42, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use update

Hi, you may be interested in Meta:Babel#Basic_fair_use_on_Meta, and the now-updated Meta:Fair use. cheers --pfctdayelise 02:55, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Protection of Www.wikipedia.org template/temp

16 August 2008 MaxSem (Talk | contribs) protected "Www.wikipedia.org template/temp" ‎ (just in case [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed])

Just in case what? In case this is a wiki? It's a /temp page. The changes are moved manually to the live copy by admins (as I'm sure you're aware). If admins aren't using "Show changes", they shouldn't be admins. All due respect, I don't see any reason to have this page indefinitely semi-protected. --MZMcBride 17:12, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] a RFD @ fa.wikipedia

Hello MaxSem, Sorry in your report that is not true the 11 persons are the same user[[11]]. they used only the same coputer but Iranian which they don't want Afghan users in farsi wikipedia! thay close all account of them! If you want to know all the stories, please send me a mesage in my e-mail: mehdikhorasani@hohmail.com -- Mehdi Khorasani 15:48, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] About aa.wikt

Message for you --83.44.128.168 00:15, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MaxSem"
Personal tools