User talk:OhanaUnited

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

[edit] Wikimania 2009 Bid

Could you state your area of interest for the actual conference here? Cbrown1023 talk 18:48, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] o rly?

Could you please explain your comment at Meta:Requests for adminship/Giggy? giggy (:O) 01:12, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WM Can meeting

Well, we just talked about the next meeting, and how a few of us couldn't get Teamspeak to work.

No one had a handle on the outstanding tasks, so I'm going to try and figure out what is up.

I don't remember, are you in Toronto? Thanks Historybuff 00:45, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

(hoping that you watchlisted my talk page) Yes, I live in Toronto (Richmond Hill to be exact) OhanaUnitedTalk page 01:49, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Current staff

Can you finish the updates of the Current staff translations into zh-(hans|hant)? We still need the following strings translated: "San Francisco, CA", "Organization chart", and "See also". Thanks. Cbrown1023 talk 22:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Can you make sure that Current staff (zh-hans|zh-hant) is updated with these changes (and maybe others, but I don't think so)? Cbrown1023 talk 16:16, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
See my reply. Cbrown1023 talk 23:28, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
and another reply. Cbrown1023 talk 01:05, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: FiriBot

My bot works on interwiki at wikipedias. I don't know if a pywiki bot can run on two different families. If you know that it's possible, please tell me, and I'll be happy to help Wikispecies. Firilăcroco discuție / talk 08:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: most visited wikipedias

Just to be clear, an anonymous user was putting words in my mouth. What you replied to isn't what I wrote. Sorry for the confusion. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 02:45, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Wikispecies on WMHK site

problem fixed, thx for your reminder -- ※   JéRRy   ┼   雨雨   ※  19:35, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] File:WMF licensing update vote ballots.JPG

Hi, where did you get the stats for this graph from? Thanks. :) — neuro(talk) 10:13, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Do you still have the inputs? Thanks, — neuro(talk) 20:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Would it be possible to have a copy? Thanks. — neuro(talk) 22:57, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Date # of votes
2009/04/12 0
2009/04/13 2500
2009/04/14 6400
2009/04/15 8200
2009/04/16 9200
2009/04/17 10000
2009/04/18 10800
2009/04/19 11500
2009/04/20 12200
2009/04/21 13100
2009/04/22 13700
2009/04/23 14400
2009/04/24 14900
2009/04/25 15300
2009/04/26 15900
2009/04/27 16300
2009/04/28 16700
2009/04/29 17200
2009/04/30 17500
2009/05/01 18100
2009/05/02 18600
2009/05/03 18707

OhanaUnitedTalk page 06:23, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for posting them. -- Jokes Free4Me 17:24, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Project Transitions status for vi.wiki

Hello Ohana United. Actually, in vi.wiki, we have never used GFDL-1.2 license tags as a choosable license when uploading (see the first revision of MediaWiki:Licenses). The existing tags are used when users copy a GFDL 1.2 image from other Wikimedia wikis to vi.wiki or they edited or translated some details in the image and released them under the same original licenses (you can check here). Can you suggest what should we do make vi.wiki ready for the image license transitions? I guess I would cross GFDL 1.2 out of official list of license tags for vi.wiki and make a discussion about GFDL-1.2 images at first? Vinhtantran 04:49, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

This is, in fact, a GFDL-1.2-only license tag. Vinhtantran 06:53, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Anyway, the most-used GFDL license tag in vi.wiki is vi:Tiêu bản:GFDL, which states GFDL and later, no disclaimer. vi:Tiêu_bản:GFDL-1.2 has minimum usage and no longer use for newer image since 2005. Vinhtantran 06:59, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
24 images. Tân (talk) 17:52, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
After a quick cleanup, this is a summary:
  1. 6 images are specified sources in Commons or English Wikipedia, they are all use the different license tags from original. I fixed or deleted them (if it has one in Commons).
  2. 3 images claimed that the uploaders are the authors, I have asked them to change their licenses to broader GFDL and also notify them about about license updating and that their images could be deleted if the vi.wiki community agreed.
  3. 15 images which weren't specified source has been tagged with no source or copyright infringement, the uploaders also have been asked to change the license in case they are the original authors. As in vi.wiki copyright policy, no source images will be deleted after 7 days.
I'm planning to open a community discussion about item 2 issue. Tân (talk) 08:15, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Global sysops

I'm not sure if you noticed, but if you didn't, Tiptoety responded to your comment there. Would you care to take a look at it? NW (Talk) 19:11, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:OhanaUnited"