|Wikipedia has more about this subject:
please note 
Thanks for experimenting with the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki. Your test worked, and has now been reverted or removed. Please use Meta:Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles will be reverted quickly. Please see the introduction page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our project and also read about Meta's Inclusion policy on what is and isn't allowed on Meta-Wiki. Thanks.
Stop these page moves, thanks.
- Don't worry, I know what I'm doing. But thanks for the welcome. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:03, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
User:Philosopher in zh wikipedia has been renamed and you may usurp the name.--Ffaarr 13:52, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks --Philosopher Let us reason together. 23:38, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
My photograph 
It was my ID card, and it has been edited by Capmo. I hope it won't be deleted.
Thanks for the information.
08:28, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, I'll let it there. Sorry, my English is Indonesian English. 11:50, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
th wiki usurp 
Request is done. Happy editing. --Lerdsuwa 13:44, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! --Philosopher Let us reason together. 23:52, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Talkback - Wikimania 2013 
- Thanks! --Philosopher Let us reason together. 02:25, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- Cool! 谢谢 --Philosopher Let us reason together. 20:56, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Global bans policy discussion 
At Requests for comment/Global bans, where you have commented in support of Option 2, a third option has recently been implemented. The first two options did not prove a way for respondents to indicate that they oppose global bans entirely, i.e., that it is not possible to write a meaningful global bans policy that would attract their support. Option 3 is intended to provide that opportunity, and to aid in distinguishing between people who oppose the proposed policy because it requires improvements and those who oppose the proposed policy because no policy permitting global bans should be adopted.
Because the third section was added late by a respondent, it is possible that some people who responded early in the RFC have commented at option 2, but would really prefer to support option 3, or support both. If so, you may voluntarily choose to move your original comment or to or strikethrough your original comment and add new comments. This is a courtesy notice of the change, and there is no requirement that you take any action. WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:41, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- I am perfectly fine with my comment being left where it is - I haven't yet decided whether a global ban is a good idea in itself, and don't think that that question needs to be answered in the current RfC at any rate. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 18:31, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- Glad you like my name, thanks! --Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:49, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Wikimedia Travel Guide: Naming poll open 
You are receiving this message because you voiced your opinion at the Request for Comment on the Wikimedia Travel Guide.
The proposed naming poll opened a few days ago and you can vote for as many of the proposed names as you wish, if you are eligible. Please see Travel Guide/Naming Process for full details on voting eligibility and how the final name will be selected. Voting will last for 14 days, and will terminate on 16 October at 06:59:59 UTC.
In passing 
- That must be a new change? When I joined OTRS not that long ago, the page was filled with endorsements. With regards to 99of9, in particular, I'd hope that a comment from an en.wiki admin would be useful since he has no "advanced permissions" on en.wiki - if only to show that he is familiar with how things work there. But then I've often wondered by additions to OTRS aren't done by the admins or 'crats on the local projects themselves (who would be familiar with the standards of the projects), so ... – Philosopher Let us reason together. 15:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Meh - I completely agree with you however my equally supportive comment was removed. How the hell you can provide "diffs" for good behaviour I have no idea. I think people forget that some people have worked together for years not days. --Herby talk thyme 15:52, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Time passes and nothing happens... It seems as though the OTRS admins have decided to "circle the wagons" and pretend that the Indians do not exist. I really do find it very worrying that part of the organisation dedicated to ensuring good communication happens has decided not to communicate with the community over issues that concern us. I have no idea what to do next - thoughts welcome. Regards --Herby talk thyme 17:27, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
- I do have a few thoughts, but I'm going to sit on them for a week or so until they've developed. I have a potential change that I might start sending out feelers on, but before I do that, I need to give it some thought. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:46, 16 January 2013 (UTC)