User talk:Polimerek
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Spróbujmy moze wypracować jedną wersję - zobacz Talk:Zasady postępowania w wypadku trollingu
- Ja się przy tym układzie "art. X pkt. Y" nie upieram. Zastosowałem go ze względu na łatwiejsze poruszanie sie po takim tekscie. IMHO łŁatwiej znaleźć "art. X pkt. Y" niż "7 zdanie od końce w rodzdziale: XXXXXX". Można jednak zmienić Artykuły na rozdziały - tytuły już są. A listę numerowaną na nienumerowaną. Preeambuła powstałaby z rozbudowania Art. 1
- Co do "sztabu kryzysowego" - w początkowej fazie konfliktu, gdy jeszcze możłiwa jest mediacja, to dobry pomysł, ale w ostatecznosci o uznaniu kogoś za trola IMHO powienien uznawać ogół, a nie "grupa" po konsultacji, to może niektórym zalatywać TWA w negatywnym rozwinięciu.
- Gdyby zastosować w całosci twoją propozycję z "sztabem kryzysowym" dochodzimy do pewnego paradkosu: Ta sama grupa zgłasza "podejrzanego" (zatem pewnie popadła z nim w owe konflikty), usiłuje z nim dyskutować (tu dochodzi zapewne do eskalacji istniejacych konfliktów) i wreszczie decyduje o tym, czy "podejrzany" jest trollem. (Nemo iudex idoneus in re sua ;P)
- Art. 4 pkt. 3 - to ostateczność, gdy łagodne metody zawiodą. Trzeba wziąć pod uwagę, że niektórzy są niereformowalni
- Art. 4 pkt. 4 - ma zapobiec otoczce i walkom wokół "zjawisk" typu Xcor/Darzbór i Ergonom/Kwiecień. Dwa przypadki to już prawie reguła.
- Art. 4 pkt. 5 - to dla "miłosiernych"
Contents |
[edit] Art 13 and the rest
I don't want you to get in trouble for the things we say. Is there any way we can talk with those people who don't agree and explain our concerns? Maybe we need to do a little "explanation" here, and just say that we're not against everyting, but that some things make little sense, or cannot go according to the Wikimedia Foundation. Maybe we should talk to those people directly, either on the wiki or on irc if it's at all possible. Do not hesitate to ask me if you think it is a good idea. We have nothing against the Polish you know ;-). you should have seen the debate while we were doing the French bylaws ;-). Best. notafish }<';> 22:55, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
- Oh, and I was just kidding about "the Foundation does not want that", I don't think the board will say anything against it. This only hurts Wikimedia Polska, not the Foundation. The real question that they have to ask themselves is..how are they going to make sure that someone is a contributor? As soon as they have answered with an answer that makes sense, then I'll be fine with the article. This said, I don't really mind. I just think it is an impossible article to keep up :-). notafish }<';>
- Ok, I answered Julo on the talk page of the English version. Again, do not hesitate to make clear that if this article stays, I won't scream against the bylaws :-). As I said, I just think it is making life difficult for Wikimedia Polska ;-). Thanks for your patience :) notafish }<';> 00:22, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Fund drive
The start of the fund drive has been delayed for at least a few days. The reason is to give us more time to prepare more translations, a press release, donor feedback mechanisms (such as automatically listing new PayPal donations), and work on next quarter’s budget. Sorry for the late notice on this. I will update the translation coordination page with the finalized start and end dates after the board decides that on their Friday 9 December meeting. --Daniel Mayer 21:34, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Scholarship application!
Thanks for the translation polimerek :-) Warning : we are updating the form a little to make it more clear and less, well, boring. (Update available in 30 min or so.) And we are asking people to fill out the application form in English even though the form itself is being translated (we won't have many translators at the conference, so some basic English proficiency will be useful). Please take a look at the new updated form (of course anyone who sends in the older form will be treated just the same; we just want to make it less of a chore to fill out). Sj 23:06, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Updated. Cheers, Sj
[edit] OT
Well... That's a wonderful baby. Compliments, M/ 22:52, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks!
Polimerek, thanks much for your creation of Polish Wikipedia. Very interesting stuff, much of which I never knew. -- fuzheado 15:40, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] BG WP
Hello. I am a sysop on BG WP and I am from Sofia. I saw your (a bit random :-) ) requests to members of our wikipedian community. How can I help you? Btw I saw another colleague who contacted you but I wouldn't advise you to engage with her in case you want to have your work done. :-D --Spiritia 00:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Polimerek/OTRS
Shouldn't this be on the OTRS wiki instead? Cbrown1023 talk 20:45, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Poke. :-) Cbrown1023 talk 21:35, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Your edits to the Q&As...
... are greatly appreciated. I am currently proofreading your translation—I really value some of your excellent ideas. Thanks a lot for your help! Tomasz W. Kozłowski 07:52, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- There we are. I hope you agree to this changes. If not, be bold :-) Tomasz W. Kozłowski 08:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- I have just marked this as published. If you want to proofread the text, please do so—I will, again, appreciate your contributions. (Uff, we've managed to finish it even before February 5th! Yay!) Best, Tomasz W. Kozłowski 15:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
