User talk:Ruslik0

Welcome to Meta!

أهلا Ruslik0، ومرحبا بك في ويكيميديا ميتا ويكي! يعمل هذا الموقع على تنسيق ومناقشة كل مشاريع ويكيميديا. ربما سيكون مفيدا لك مطالعة صفحة السياسات هنا. إذا كنت مهتما بأمور الترجمة، راجع ميتا:بابلون. يمكنك أيضا ترك ملاحظة في ميتا:بابل (من فضلك راجع أولا التعليمات هناك قبل ترك الملاحظة). إذا أردت الاستفسار عن شئ ، لا تتردد في سؤالي في صفحة نقاشي. تمتع بالتحرير هنا!

Hola Ruslik0! Benvingut a la Meta-Wiki de la Fundació Wikimedia! Aquest lloc està fet per a coordinar i discutir tots els projectes de la Fundació Wikimedia. Potser us serà útil llegir la nostra pàgina de polítiques (en anglès). Si us interessen les traduccions, visiteu Meta:Babylon. També podeu deixar un missatge a Meta:Babel o al Meta:Metapub (però abans de fer-ho, llegiu les instruccions situades al principi de la pàgina). No dubteu en preguntar si teniu qualsevol dubte. Si cal ho podeu fer en la meva pàgina de discussió. Bona sort!

Vítejte, uživateli Ruslik0, a vítejte na Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Tento server je určen pro spolupráci a diskusím ke všem projektům nadace Wikimedia. Možná si budete chtít přečíst naše pravidla. Pokud chcete spolupracovat na překladech, navštivte Meta:Babylon. Také můžete přidat příspěvek na Meta:Babel či Meta:Metapub (nejdříve si přečtěte pokyny na začátku těchto stránek). V případě potřeby se neváhejte zeptat se na mé diskusní stránce. Hodně štěstí!

Hallo Ruslik0, und Willkommen bei Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Diese Webseite dient der Koordination und Diskussion aller Wikimedia-Projekte. Vielleicht findest Du es nützlich, unsere Regelseite zu lesen. Sofern Du daran interessiert bist etwas zu übersetzen, besuche Meta:Babylon. Du kannst auch eine Notiz auf Meta:Babel oder Meta:Metapub hinterlassen (bitte lies die Anleitung am Anfang der Seiten, bevor Du etwas schreibst). Wenn Du möchtest, kannst Du mir auch auf meiner Diskussionseite Fragen stellen. Fröhliches Bearbeiten wünscht

ވިކިމީޑިޔާގެ މީޓާ-ވިކީ އަށް މަރުހަބާ! މިވެބްސައިޓަކީ ވިކިމީޑިޔާގެ ހުރިހާ މަޝްރޫޢުތަކާއި ބެހޭގޮތުން ވާހަކަތައް ދެކެވި އެ މަޝްރޫޢެއް ހިންގައި ހަދާ ވެބް ސައިޓެވެ. އަޅުގަނޑުމެންގެ ޤަވާއިދުތައް ފުރަތަމަ ވިދާޅުވުމަކީ މުހިންމު ކަމެއް ކަމުގައި ދެކެމެވެ. ތަރުޖަމާކުރާ ހިތްޕުޅުވެވަޑައިގަންނަވާ ނަމަ މީޓާ:ބެބިލޯން އަށް ވަޑައިގަންނަވާށެވެ. އަދި ހަމަ އެހެންމެ މިކަމާއި ބެހޭ ލިޔުމެއް މީޓާ:ބޭބެލް ގައި ލިޔުއްވަވާށެވެ. (އެހެންނަމަވެސް އެޞަފްޙާގައި އެއްވެސް އެއްޗެއް އިތުރު ކުރެއްވުމުގެ ކުރިން އެ ޞަފްހާގެ މަތީގައިވާ ޢިބާރާތް ވިދާޅުވެލައްވާށެވެ.) މިއާއި މުދު ހިތްހަމަޖެހިވަޑައިގަންނަވާ ނަމަ އިތުރު އެހީ އަށް އެދުމަށް މި ޞަފްހާ ގައި އެދުމަށް ފަސްޖެހި ވަޑައި ނުގަންނަވާށެވެ. އުނިއިތުރު ގެނައުމުގައި އުފާވެރި ވަގުތުކޮޅެއް ހޭދަ ކޮށްލައްވާށެވެ!!

Hello Ruslik0, and welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Meta:Metapub (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). If you would like, feel free to ask me questions on my talk page. Happy editing!

¡Hola Ruslik0! ¡Bienvenido a la Meta-Wiki de la Fundación Wikimedia! Este sitio es para coordinar y discutir todos los proyectos de la Fundación Wikimedia. Tal vez le sea útil leer nuestra página de políticas (en inglés). Si le interesan las traducciones, visite Meta:Babylon. También puede dejar un mensaje en Meta:Babel o Meta:Metapub (pero antes de hacerlo, por favor lea las instrucciones situadas en lo alto de la página). No dude en preguntar si tiene cualquiera duda, o pregunte en mi página de discusión. ¡Buena suerte!

سلام Ruslik0، به ويكی مديا متاويكیخوش آمدید! این وبگاه برای بحث و هماهنگ کردن ويكي مديا است. برای شما مفید است که اول صفحه سیاست های اینجا را بخوانید. اگر شما علاقمند به ترجمه هستید به صفحه متا:بابیلون سر بزنید. همچنین اگر یادداشتی داشتید می توانیید در متا:بابل یادداشت خود را بگذارید (قبل از نوشتن یادداشت به توضیحات موجود در صفحه توجه کنید.). اگر سوالی داشتید می توانید در صفحه بحث. سوال خود را بپرسید و کمک بخواهید!

Hei Ruslik0, ja tervetuloa Wikimedian Meta-Wikiin! Tämä nettisivusto on kaikkien Wikimedia-säätiön projektien koordinointia ja keskustelua varten. Saattaa olla hyödyllistä lukea käytäntömme. Jos olet kiinnostunut käännöksistä, käy Meta:Babylon-sivulla. Voit myöskin jättää huomautuksen Meta:Babel, Meta:Metapub -sivulle (ole hyvä ja lue ohjeet sivun yläosassa ennenkuin kirjoitat sinne). Jos haluat, saat vapaasti kysyä minulta kysymyksiä keskustelusivullani. Iloisia muokkaushetkiä!

Bonjour Ruslik0, et bienvenue sur le Meta-Wiki de Wikimédia ! Ce site a pour but de coordonner et discuter de l’ensemble des projets Wikimédia. Il vous sera utile de consulter notre page sur les règles de Wikimédia. Si vous êtes intéressé par des projets de traduction, visitez Meta:Babylon. Vous pouvez aussi laisser un message sur Meta:Babel ou Meta:Metapub (mais veuillez d’abord lire les instructions en haut de cette page avant d’y poster votre message). Si vous le voulez, vous pouvez me poser vos questions sur ma page de discussion. À bientôt !

Ola Ruslik0! Benvido a Meta-Wiki, da Fundación Wikimedia! Este sitio é para coordinar e discutir sobre calquera dos proxectos da Fundación Wikimedia. Tavez lle sexa útil ler a nosa páxina de políticas (en inglés). Se lle interesan as traducións, visite Meta:Babylon. Tamén pode deixar unha mensaxe en Meta:Babel ou en Meta:Metapub (pero antes de facelo, por favor lea as instrucións situadas no alto da páxina). Non dubide en preguntar se ten calquera dúbida, ou pregunte na miña páxina de conversa. Boa sorte!

נכתב בלשון זכר למען הנוחות
היי Ruslik0, וברוך בואך ל- ויקימדיה מטא-ויקי! אתר זה נועד בכדי לתאם פעולות ולדון בפרויקטים של וויקימדיה. יש להניח שדפי המדיניות שלנו יהיו שימושיים עבורך. אם הנך מעוניין לבצע עבודות תרגום, בקר ב-Meta:Babylon. תוכל גם להשאיר הערה ב-Meta:Babel, Meta:Metapub, (אנא קרא את ההוראות בראש הדף לפני כתיבה שם). אם תרצה, הרגש חופשי לרשום לי שאלות בדף השיחה שלי. עריכה נעימה!

Pozdrav Ruslik0, i dobro došli na na Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Ova stranica služi za koordinaciju i raspravljanje oko Wikimedijinih projekata. Vjerojatno će Vam biti korisno pročitati naše stranice vezane za politiku rada. Ako ste zainteresirani za prevođenje, posjetite Meta:Babylon. Možete također ostaviti poruku na stranicama Meta:Babel, Meta:Metapub (molimo pročitajte upute na vrhu te stranice prije nego što pošaljete tamo svoj komentar). Ako imate neko pitanje, možete ga postaviti na mojoj stranici za razgovor. Sretno uređivanje!

Helló Ruslik0, és üdv a Wikimedia Meta-Wikijén! Ez a weboldal az összes Wikimedia projektet érintő ügyek megtárgyalására és koordinálására szolgál. Hasznosnak találhatod elolvasni az irányelveinket (angolul). Ha szeretnél fordításokat végezni, látogasd meg a Meta:Babylon-t, vagy a Meta:Babel, Meta:Metapub, oldalon hagyhatsz üzenetet (mielőtt ide írsz kérlek olvasd el a lap tetején található utasításokat). Ha szeretnél, nyugodtan kérdezz tőlem a vitalapomon. Jó szerkesztést és tartalmas szórakozást! Jó szerkesztést és tartalmas szórakozást!

Halló Ruslik0, vertu velkomin(n) á Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Þessi síða er til að ræða saman um öll Wikimedia-verkefni og samhæfa þau. Kannski finnst þér gagnlegt að lesa stefnusíðuna. Hafir þú áhuga á þýðingum er Meta:Babylon rétti staðurinn. Þú mátt skrifast á við okkur í Meta:Babel eða Meta:Metapub (vinsamlegast lestu notkunarreglurnar áður en þú breytir síðunni). Hikaðu ekki við að hafa samband við mig á spjallsíðu minni ef þú hefur einhverjar spurningar. Gangi þér vel!

Halo Ruslik0, dan selamat datang di Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Situs web ini berperan sebagai tempat koordinasi dan diskusi mengenai seluruh proyek-proyek Wikimedia. Mungkin akan bermanfaat bagi Anda untuk membaca halaman kebijakan kami. Jika Anda tertarik untuk melakukan penerjemahan, kunjungi Meta:Babylon. Anda juga dapat meninggalkan pesan di Meta:Babel atau Meta:Metapub (bacalah petunjuk di bagian atas halaman tersebut sebelum meninggalkan pesan di sana). Jika perlu, Anda dapat bertanya kepada saya di halaman pembicaraan (talk page) saya. Selamat menyunting!

Ciao Ruslik0! Benvenuto sulla Meta-Wiki della Wikimedia Foundation! Questo sito serve a coordinare e discutere di tutti i progetti della Wikimedia Foundation. Potrebbe esserti utile leggere le nostre policy (in inglese). Se sei interessato a fare traduzioni, visita Meta:Babylon. Puoi anche lasciare un messaggio su Meta:Babel o Meta:Metapub (ma per favore, leggi le istruzioni che si trovano all'inizio della pagina prima di scrivere). Se vuoi, puoi lasciarmi un messagio nella mia pagina di discussione. Buona fortuna!

Ruslik0さん、ウィキメディア メタ・ウィキへようこそ！このサイトは、ウィキメディアのプロジェクト間の調整や話し合いを目的としています。もしよろしければ、基本方針とガイドラインのページを是非ご一読ください。もし翻訳に興味をお持ちなら、Meta:Babylon をご覧ください。Meta:Babel, Metapub にメッセージを投稿していただくことも可能です（投稿前にページ上部の説明をお読みください）。お困りの際は、ご遠慮なく私の会話ページに質問をお寄せください。楽しくやっていきましょう。どうぞよろしくお願いします。

Ruslik0님, 위키미디어 메타 위키에 회원가입하신 것을 환영합니다! 이 사이트는 모든 위키미디어 프로젝트들 간의 상호조정과 토론을 위한 공간입니다. 우리의 정책을 보면, 도움이 되실 겁니다. 만약 번역에 관심이 있으시다면, 바빌론을 방문해 보세요. 또한 바벨, 메타퍼브를 사용하실 수도 있습니다. (사용하시기 전에 각 문서의 사용설명을 먼저 읽어주세요). 만약 궁금한 것이 있으시면, 부담없이 저의 토론 문서에 질문을 올려주세요. 즐거운 편집이 되시길 바랍니다!

Hai Ruslik0, dan selamat datang ke Meta-Wiki Wikimedia! Laman web ini adalah untuk mengkoordinasikan dan membincangkan segala Projek Wikimedia. Anda boleh mendapat banyak faedah dengan membaca laman polisi kami. Jika anda berminat menterjemah, silalah lawati Meta:Babylon. Anda juga boleh meninggalkan pesanan di Meta:Babel atau Meta:Metapub (sila baca panduan di atas laman yang berkenaan sebelum meninggalkan pesanan). Jika perlu, tanyalah soalan di laman perbualan saya. Selamat menyunting!

Hallo Ruslik0, en welkom op de Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Deze website is voor het coördineren en bespreken van alle Wikimedia-projecten. Waarschijnlijk vind je het handig om onze beleidpagina te lezen. Als je geïnteresseerd bent in het vertalen van teksten, ga da naar Meta:Babylon. Je kunt ook een bericht achterlaten op Meta:Babel of Meta:Metapub (lees wel de instructies aan het begin van de pagina voordat je een bericht achterlaat). Als je nog vragen hebt stel ze me dan op mijn overlegpagina. Veel plezier met bewerken!

Hei Ruslik0, og velkommen til Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Denne siden er til for å diskutere og samordne alle Wikimediaprosjektene. Vil du vite mer om siden, kan vår policy-side komme til nytte. Er du interessert i å hjelpe til med oversettelser, besøk Meta:Babylon. Du kan også legge igjen en beskjed på Meta:Babel, Meta:Metapub (vær vennlig og les instruksjonene øverst på siden før du skriver noe der). Hvis du vil, er du velkommen til å stille spørsmål på min diskusjonsside. God redigering!

Cześć Ruslik0 i witaj w projekcie Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Ta strona została stworzona do koordynacji i dyskusji nad wszystkimi projektami Fundacji Wikimedia. Proszę Cię o przeczytanie naszych zasad. Jeżeli chcesz się zając tłumaczeniem stron, odwiedź Meta:Babylon. Możesz również zostawić notkę na stronie Meta:Babel, Meta:Metapub, (proszę jednak, abyś najpierw przeczytał instrukcje na górze tej strony). Jeżeli będziesz potrzebował pomocy zostaw komentarz na mojej stronie dyskusji. Miłego edytowania!

Olá Ruslik0! Seja bem-vindo ao Meta! Este site/sítio é dedicado à discussão e à coordenação de todos os demais projetos da Fundação Wikimedia. Talvez lhe seja útil ler a página contendo a nossa política (em inglês) antes de começar a editar. Se tiver dúvidas, sinta-se à vontade para me fazer perguntas em minha página de discussão, ou deixe uma mensagem para toda a comunidade na Babel, Meta:Metapub, a versão do Meta da Esplanada. Boa sorte!

Ciao Ruslik0, şi bine aţi venit la Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Acest website este pentru coordonarea şi discuţiile tuturor proiectelor Wikimedia. Este folositor să citiţi pagina despre politica noastră.. Dacă sunteţi interesaţi de traducere, vizita-ţi Meta:Babylon. De asemenea puteţi lasa o notă pe Meta:Babel, Meta:Metapub, (vă rugăm citiţi instrucţiunile de la începutul paginii înainte de a posta acolo). Dacă ai întrebări, nu ezita să mă întrebi pe pagina mea de discuţii talk page. Editare cu succes!

Здравствуйте, Ruslik0, и добро пожаловать на Мета-вики фонда Викимедиа! Этот сайт предназначен для координации и обсуждения вопросов, связанных со всеми проектами фонда. Для начала предлагаю ознакомиться с правилами этого проекта. Если Вы заинтересованы в работе над переводами страниц Мета-вики и других материалов, посетите Meta:Babylon. Вы также можете обсудить различные вопросы на странице Meta:Babel или Meta:Metapub (пожалуйста, ознакомьтесь с инструкцией сверху, прежде чем писать). Если возникнут вопросы, не бойтесь задавать их мне на моей странице обсуждения. Удачи!

Tjeta Ruslik0, dhe mirësevin në Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Ky vënd i rrjetës është për të koordinuar dhe diskutuar çdo projekt të Wikimediës. Mund ta gjësh të dobishme faqet e politikës sonë. Në qoftë se je duke interesuar në përkthime, vizitò Meta:Babylon. Mund të lësh një shënim në Meta:Babel ose Meta:Metapub (të lutem të lexosh përdorimet në fillim të fletës para se të postosh atje). Në qoftë se do, ndihu i/e lirë të më bsh pyetje në faqen time të diskutimit. Të auguroj një redaktim të këndshëm!

Здраво Ruslik0, и добро дошли на Викимедијин мета-вики! Овај сајт служи за координацију и дискусију око Викимедијиних пројеката. Вероватно ће Вам бити корисно да прочитате наше странице везане за политику рада. Ако сте заинтересовани за превођење, посетите Meta:Babylon. Можете такође и оставити поруку на страници Meta:Babel, Meta:Metapub (молимо погледајте упутства на врху те странице пре него што пошаљете свој коментар тамо). Ако имате неко питање, можете да ми поставите на мојој страници за разговор. Срећно уређивање!

Hej Ruslik0, och välkommen till Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Meta är till för att diskutera och samordna alla Wikimedias projekt. Vill du veta mer om webbplatsen, kan vår policy-sida komma väl till pass. Är du intresserad av att hjälpa till med översättningar, besök Meta:Babylon. Du kan skriva diskussionsinlägg på Meta:Babel eller Meta:Metapub (läs instruktionerna överst på sidan innan du skriver något där). Om du vill, är du välkommen att ställa frågor på min diskussionssida. Lycka till med redigerandet!

வணக்கம் Ruslik0, விக்கிமீடியா மேல்விக்கி! இற்கு நல்வரவு. இவ்விணையத்தளமானது கூட்டாகச் சேர்ந்து விடயங்களை விவாதிப்பதற்கென உருவாக்கப் பட்டது. விக்கித்திட்டங்கள். நீங்கள் எங்களின் பாலிசிகளையும் பாலிசி பக்கம் படித்தறியலாம். நீங்கள் மொழிபெயர்பில் ஆர்வமுடையவராகின், Meta:Babylon ஐப் பார்வையிடவும். நீங்கள் Meta:Babel, Meta:Metapub இல் குறிப்பொன்றையும் விட்டுச் செல்லலாம். (பக்கத்தின் மேலேயிருக்கும் அறிவுறுத்தல்களை வாசித்தபின்னரே அங்கே செய்திகளை இடவும்). நீங்கள் விரும்பினால் எனது பக்கத்தில் செய்தியொன்றை விடவும் talk page. உங்கள் ஆக்கங்களை வரவேற்கின்றோம்!

สวัสดีครับคุณ Ruslik0 ยินดีต้อนรับเข้าสู่ วิกิมีเดีย เมต้าวิกิ หรือในอีกชื่อหนึ่งว่า "แม่วิกิ" ! เว็บไซต์แห่งนี้เป็นเว็บสำหรับการบริหารและอภิปรายเกี่ยวกับเรื่องโครงการต่าง ๆ ของมูลนิธิวิกิมีเดีย ก่อนอื่น เราขอแนะนำให้คุณอ่าน นโยบายของเราก่อน ซึ่งมันอาจจะมีประโยชน์ในภายหลัง ถ้าคุณสนใจเกี่ยวกับเรื่องการแปลข้อความต่าง ๆ เป็นภาษาไทย คุณสามารถไปที่ หน้าบาบิลอน ได้ คุณยังสามารถทิ้งข้อความไว้ที่ หน้าบาเบล หรือ หน้าเมต้าผับ (กรุณาอ่านกระบวนการทิ้งข้อความที่อยู่ข้างบนสุดของหน้าก่อนทิ้งข้อความ) ถ้าคุณมีคำถาม สงสัย หรือต้องการคำปรึกษา คุณสามารถถามคำถามต่าง ๆ ได้ที่ หน้าพูดคุย ซึ่งวิธีการถามคำถามในหน้าพูดคุยได้ถูกเขียนไว้ที่นี่แล้ว ท้ายสุด มีความสุขกับการแก้ไขนะครับ !

Merhaba Ruslik0, ve Wikimedia Meta-Wikiye hoş geldin! Bu site bütün Wikimedia projeleri arasında koordinasyon sağlamak ve ilgili konuları tartışmak içindir. Eğer çeviriyle ilgileniyorsanız Meta:Babylon sayfasını ziyaret edebilirsiniz. Ayrıca Meta:Babel ve Meta:Metapub sayfalarına da mesaj bırakabilirsiniz (lütfen mesaj bırakmadan önce sayfanın en üstündeki yönergeleri okuyunuz). Sorularınız için kullanıcı mesaj sayfama mesaj bırakmaktan çekinmeyiniz. İyi değişiklikler.

Вітаємо Ruslik0, ласкаво просимо до Wikimedia Meta-Wiki!
Цей вебсайт призначено для координації та обговорення всіх Вікімедіа (Wikimedia) проектів. Для Вашої зручності пропонуємо переглянути сторінку політик. Якщо Ви зацікавлені у здійсненні перекладів, відвідайте «Вавілон», також можете залишити запис у Meta:Babel або Meta:Metapub (будь ласка прочитайте інструкції нагорі тих сторінок, перш ніж там писати). За Вашого бажання можете задавати мені запитання на моїй сторінці обговорення. Хай щастить у редагуваннях!

Xin chào Ruslik0, và hoan nghênh bạn đến với Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! Trang web này dành cho việc phối hợp và thảo luận về tất cả các dự án Wikimedia. Có thể sẽ hữu ích nếu bạn xem qua trang quy định của chúng tôi. Nếu bạn cảm thấy thích việc dịch thuật, xin hãy ghé thăm Meta:Babylon. Bạn cũng có thể để lại một lời nhắn tại Meta:Babel hoặc Meta:Metapub (xin hãy đọc hướng dẫn ở đầu trang trước khi viết tại đó). Nếu thích, mời bạn thoải mái đặt câu hỏi tại trang thảo luận của tôi. Chúc bạn có giờ phút hoạt động vui vẻ!

‪中文(简体)‬: Ruslik0，你好！欢迎光临维基媒体元维基！这个网站是为协调和讨论所有维基媒体项目而设。我们的政策页可能对您有用。如果您有兴趣协助翻译工作，请参观Meta:Babylon。你可在Meta:Babel、Meta:Metapub留下口讯（张贴之前请先读该页上指示）。若有问题，请在我的讨论页问我 。祝
编安！

‪中文(繁體)‬: Ruslik0，你好！歡迎光臨維基媒體元維基！這個網站是為協調和討論所有維基媒體項目而設。我們的政策頁可能對您有用。如果您有興趣協助翻譯工作，請參觀Meta:Babylon。你可在Meta:Babel、Meta:Metapub留下口訊（張貼之前請先讀該頁上指示）。若有問題，請在我的討論頁問我 。祝
編安！

-- Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 05:32, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Спасибо за вычитку

Я так и знал, что там не всё правильно. Спасибо. --Kaganer 17:17, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

tk.wiktionary closure

Hello, Ruslik0! Will you please consider this issue. Many things have changed since it was proposed to close Turkmen wiktionary. Since then we have been keeping a notice on closure at the main page. Now it is really annoying to bear such a burden. Personnally I ask you to help to finalize the proposal. Best regards! --Hanberke 05:40, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Why are you asking me? I am not a steward or even an administrator on meta. Ruslik 07:32, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Small and large wikis

I have seen that you have updated the list several times. Could you explain me why are some wikis listed at "# 2.3 Doesn't have CUs and doesn't have more than 50,000 articles or more than 10 admins" at not at "small wiki"?

Because they either have less than 50000 articles or less than 10 admins. Small wikis have less than 50000 articles and less than 10 admins. Ruslik 19:12, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

But then what about the lists 4.1 and 4.2? AND ist only at list 4.3. Merlissimo 23:41, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

I really do not know. I did not create this list. Ruslik 11:06, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

• 2 Large wikis
  • 2.1 Have CheckUsers

    -> is_meta = false && checkusercount > 0

  • 2.2 Have more than 50,000 articles and more than 10 admins but no CheckUser

    -> is_meta = false && checkusercount = 0 && acticlecount > 50000 && admincount > 10

  • 2.3 Doesn't have CUs and doesn't have more than 50,000 articles or more than 10 admins

    -> is_meta = false && checkusercount = 0 && ??????????????????????

• 3 Meta and programming projects

  • -> is_meta = true

  • 4 Small wikis
  • 4.1 More than 50,000 articles, but with 10 or less admins

    -> is_meta = false && checkusercount = 0 && acticlecount > 50000 && admincount <= 10

  • 4.2 More than 10 admins, but with less than 50,000 articles

    -> is_meta = false && checkusercount = 0 && acticlecount <= 50000 && admincount > 10

  • 4.3 Less than 50,000 articles and with 10 or less admins

    -> is_meta = false && checkusercount = 0 && acticlecount <= 50000 && admincount <= 10

All other conditions (except 2.3) joined would create a full list. Merlissimo 16:33, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Stewardship

Congratulations! You may connect to the chat for Ruwiki admins. Обывало 05:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. May be in future. Ruslik 08:34, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Поздравляю!

Поздравляю с избранием стюардом!--Anatoliy (talk) 16:57, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Спасибо. Ruslik 19:01, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

your account sk.source

Hi. You deleted today some pages on the sk.source which is OK. As somebody who follows the edits there I would like to ask you to create a simply text on your account, might be with a link to here. It can be strange for other user not to know what happened. Thanks. -jkb- 18:30, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

User:vago

Hi, Ruslik0! I want to usurp the account user:vago Can you help me? Best regards, Vago-az 14:06, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

User:Matthew.Dimashki

Hi there, sorry to contact you here, but i was blocked from editing the global unblock page too!!, the exact message given to me is as follows:

You are currently unable to edit pages on Wikipedia.

You can still read pages, but cannot edit, change, or create them.

Editing from your IP address or IP address range has been disabled on all wikis by Shizhao (meta.wikimedia.org). The reason given was "Open proxy".

To request unblock, visit your talk page and add the text {{unblock|global block — REASON}}. Replace "REASON" with the reason for requesting unblock.

Additionally, you may appeal the global block at Steward requests/Global.

The block expires on 21 October 2011 at 09:13.

thank you for your assistance 86.96.228.87 09:30, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

86.96.228.85

Global unblock no block metawiki--Shizhao 11:45, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Your check-user determination

Reference your Your check-user determination as per my request to you. When I referred your determination to the local administrators, action had been taken on users found sock-puppets except the user si:user:පසිදු කාවින්ද. It is not clear why this user is spared. Please advice us on what course of action to be taken. ---- ශ්වෙත 14:21, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

I do not know why local administrators decided not to block this user. You'd better ask them, not me. Ruslik 18:22, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Extremely sorry for bothering you. Thanks. --- ශ්වෙත 14:49, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Request for adminship somali wiki

hello, can you please help me out to become admin on Somali wiki, we have not had an active administrator for several years, I am native somali speaker and I have been active for years. please respond. maax

Start a discussion on so:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship. If after a week there is no objections, place the request on Steward_requests/Permissions#Administrator_access. Ruslik 12:45, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Блокировка

Здраствуйте Ruslik. Я бессрочно блокирован в енвики админом Khoikhoi. Я считаю это грубым нарушением правил Википедии. Я ни разу не получиль предупреждения. Ни разу был блокирован. Я написаль Khoikhoi о моей разблокировке. Но он даже не ответиль мне. Поэтому я считаю что вопросом дольжень заниматься арбком. Пожалуйста подумайте о ситуации. И напишите про свои выводы. N KOzi^Talk 05:36, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Вы должны использовать en:template:unblock. Ruslik 06:23, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Спасибо. Воспользовался. И когда будеть ответ. --N KOzi^Talk 06:45, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Здраствуйте Руслик. Вы можете мне обьяснит, зачем мой запрос отклонили. Благодарю. --N KOzi^Talk 06:10, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Потому, что администратор решил, что если он разблокирует вас, то вы продолжите делать, то что привело вас к блокировке. Ruslik 06:43, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Пожалуйста вы можете сообщить админам блокируюших меня, что я им даю слово, что не буду ни разу нарушать правило енвики. Я там новичок. Даю слово что никогда не буду вандализировать. Как досадно, я глобалный участник и ни разу не что-то блокирован, даже не предупрежден. Пожалуйста, скажите им, чтобы мне отдали последний шанс. --N KOzi^Talk 06:46, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Блокировка была не за вандализм, а за нарушение en:Wikipedia:CANVASS. Ruslik 07:08, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Ладно, будь en:Wikipedia:CANVASS. А мне разьве нельзя дать шанс. --N KOzi^Talk 07:14, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Ваш ответ на вопрос звучал так: не читал (и не буду). Ruslik 08:51, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

У меня проблемы с английском. Я его не так понял. --N KOzi^Talk 09:03, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Personal attck on individual

With due respect I would like you to interfere the personal attack on me Subhashish Panigrahi. Two of the other Wikipedians of Odia Wikipedia, ସମ୍ବିଧାନ ମହାନ୍ତି and Jyoti Prasad Pattnaik are consistently opposing each of my contributions instead of taking part in any constructive contribution. As the Odia Wikipedia is in its infancy such individual attack and opposition is deeply regretted and hurts. Please consider this and take necessary action. ସୁଭ ପା (Subhashish Panigrahi) 09:11, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Can you provide some diffs. Ruslik 11:10, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Promote conflict

Sorry! :D Made it six months per the proposed guideline (although it's not policy or anything). Hope that's okay. Jafeluv 11:15, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

I changed to six months. Ruslik 12:40, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Olsi Hysa

Hi Ruslik, could you take a look at my comments in Olsi Hysa's rename request? Unless you have objections, I think it could be marked as done and archived. Jafeluv 20:24, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Marked as done. Ruslik 07:48, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Access of user rights

Hello Ruslik0. The temporary access you requested on this wiki has expired (see archived request). Thanks. Jusjih 00:19, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

I did not request any access on that wiki. Ruslik 07:03, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Jusjih probably meant to post that at Hydriz's page. Jafeluv 07:10, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Yes. This should indeed go to Hydriz's page, but I did not remain logged in on Greek Wikinews, so I had to manually log in to avoid showing my IP. Sorry for a bug misleading to your talk page. By the way, thanks for responding to the end of bureaucrat flags on Chinese Wikisource. The only other bureaucrat became inactive. Once removed, being the only bureaucrat would be redundant, so I also announced the resignation. Please help start a vote about Requests for comment/Minimum voting requirements#Bureaucrat. I hope that my resignation as the first and last Chinese Wikisource bureaucrat will show a model that small wikis deserve no bureaucrats.--Jusjih 16:13, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Singularity42 is biting me! Can you do something about it?

ghost 9630

Well Ruslik0, no idea how much time you spend on the Dutch language Wiki, but I am actually Dutch and contribute on the English and Dutch wikipedia (in English as Prudentia). The fact that you block me because i live in the United Arab Emirates seems rather harsh (putting it mildly) and your statement that this whole country is unproductive reeks of discrimination. Please clarify where I have recently been unproductive?195.229.242.59 the 7th June 2011

My comment was Hard blocking the whole country is not very productive - Hard blocking ... is not very productive. So, I did not blocked you. I only relaxed the block settings to allow registered users to edit. Ruslik 12:04, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

mhr.wiki: CU, desysop and RfC

Would you please have a look at this RfC? Thank you, M/ 17:04, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your work on mhr.wiki issue. I am going to post my opinion on the RfC page, also confirmed from your second Checkuser results. Please feel free to unblock old users when you are sure that they are regular contributors. --M/ 19:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Татарский Викиучебник

Добрый день. Не могли бы Вы нам помочь в одном случае? На данный момент у нашего проекта не имеется ни бюрократа, ни администратора. Из-за этого я хочу обратится к Вам за помощью. Проблема такова: Нам нужно чтобы страницы начинающиеся со слова Wikibooks: были автоматически ссылались на страницы с названием Викикитап: . Мы создали такие страницы, но все же они считаются как статьи и входят в статистику. Если вы можете чем нибудь помочь я буду очень благодарен. С наилучшими пожеланиями MalTsilna 12:12, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Проще всего создать алиас Викикитап для пространства Wikibooks. Для этого к 'wgNamespaceAliases' в файле InitialiseSettings.php нужно добавить следующее:

'ttwikibooks' => array(
        'Викикитап' => NS_PROJECT,
        'Викикитап бәхәсе' => NS_PROJECT_TALK,
    ),

В этом случае страницы Викикитап будут автоматически ссылаться на Wikibooks. Перед эти необходимо переименовать все страницы начинающие с Викикитап в начинающиеся с Wikibooks – иначе первые исчезнут.

Хотя, как я понимаю, вам нужно наоборот: чтобы Wikibooks автоматически ссылался на Викикитап? Ruslik 16:19, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Да, чтобы страницы с английским названием Wikibooks автоматически ссылался на кириллическое Викикитап, но если это возможно. --MalTsilna 09:16, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Тогда вам нужно на beta wiki перевести Wikibooks на Татарский. См. также Betawiki:Portal:Tt. Там лучше спросить у тех кто этим занимается. Я же с переводами служебных сообщений дела никогда не имел. Ruslik 18:47, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Большое спасибо, попробую спросить. --MalTsilna 04:35, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

User:Xumepa

Dear Ruslik0,

According to message that ПешСай left on my talk page, mhr:User:Xumepa is not a sock puppet, he is a real person, and he wishes to be unblocked. What do you think, is it possible? Thanks! Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 21:47, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Or, if it is more comfortable for you, you could hand over this issue to me - I will explore the situation and unblock the user if I find evidences that he would be legitimate user in the future. Thanks! Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 05:00, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

The user edited from an IP address, which was used in the past by ПешСай. This is highly suspicious. However you are an administrator now, so it is up to you to decide. Ruslik 06:58, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much, I will explore the details before taking any action. Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 20:47, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Temporaries

Hi! When you remove temporary permissions, please remember to move the request from SRAT to the latest archive as it says at the top of the page. That way the next permission to expire is kept at the top of the page, which makes it easier to keep track of what expires next. Cheers, Jafeluv 09:53, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Help!

Dear Ruslik0, Help me to open a page named Drishtantoism Drishtantoism

Administrator's Favourites

Hello Ruslik0 , Wikipedia Administrator 'Boing! said Zebedee' Seems to be favouring two editors 'Sitush' & 'MatthewVanitas' Regularly . If you have time to spare, I request you to look in to this matter. Thanks .

Please help me!

Please go to the hakka wikipedia, Addition 2 groups:Patrollers,Rollbackers,and They are awarded for Administrator.Thamks! —小躍 02:30, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Stewards can not create local user groups. You should request their creation on bugzilla:. Ruslik 06:50, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Checkuser results

Hello, I recently posted a request here to check User:Brox for having multiple accounts, one of your colleagues confirmed User:Brox's ties with three accounts, but even faced with these confirmations the user:Brox still doesnt admit using those confirmed accounts and maintains his innocence. Are those checkuser results credible enough? I mean what is the possibility that results may be wrong and the user really doesnt operate those confirmed accounts. Please, could you comment of that and recheck everything if possible, we really do not want and an innocent user and sysop be involved in these affairs. Tomreves 14:46, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

I've commented on User talk:Tomreves and in the checkuser report. I've explained to Tomreves what I suspect is correct, that the identification by geolocation could be very weak; depending on the location, there might be a million people with the same "geolocation." What was "confirmed" was the identification of the three other accounts with each other. The identity with Brox was called "likely," but absent better information than "geolocation," it might more aptly be called "possible," or even "unlikely," given that actual IP and user agent information were likely different. Given that Tomreves has been telling Brox that he's obviously lying, on lt.wikipedia, because of this checkuser result, someone should enlighten him about the uncertainties of checkuser. Thanks. --Abd 20:56, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Do not expect much from as I'm traveling and do not have regular access to internet. Ruslik 04:28, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

 Done Not proved. fr33kman 06:18, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

RFGR

I've noticed that you violated the standing rules when you granted global rollback to Addihockey10. GR debates usually last for a minimum of 5 days. You closed this in less then 3 days. I have received such a number of complaints that I felt I had to reopen the RFGR. I further think you should censured, it's not the first rash act I've seen from you. fr33kman 15:49, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

There were complaints in this specific instance, but generally I think this is an intrinsic problem as there are actually no explicit minimum requirements ("short period of consideration"), and as such I don't think anyone could really be at fault. -- Mentifisto 16:20, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Fr33kman, when you make such serious accusations, please, provide:

(i) a link to a policy or guideline (your "standing rules") that I supposedly violated;

(ii) diffs of my "rash acts".

Otherwise they are just a slander. Ruslik 19:50, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Firstly, slander is verbal, in print it is libel. Secondly, this is what I talking about. Sorry to those that are unable to see it. I was brand new as a steward at the time and so ran it past more senior stewards, who agreed it was in violation of the Privacy Policy; DerHexer oversighted it As for granting global rollback, it is common practice to allow about 5 days for comments. fr33kman 14:32, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Libel or slander? Does it really matter? What is important is that you without any evidence are accusing me of habitually committing "rash acts". What you have managed to cite so far is one example from 5 months ago, which was not actually a rash act as you should know. It was about different interpretations of the privacy policy. (And do not forget that on 1 March I was a brand new steward like you.)

You have still failed to provide any link to a policy that I supposedly violated as "common practice" does not equal "standing rules". Moreover I doubt that it had even been a common practice—many GR requests had been closed in less than 5 days by different stewards.

Let's now discuss your reopening and reclosing that GR request. I noticed that you have voted "yes" in it and I have always thought that users who are involved into a discussion may not close (or reopen) it. In fact what you have done is one the worst cases of an administrator (or steward) acting while involved which I have seen. If this had happened in Enwiki the closure would have been reverted quite quickly. Should this be done here as well? I find it funny that you accusing me (an uninvolved steward) of closing the discussion slightly too early while not paying attention to the fact that you himself violated a much more important principle. The result was predictable—a discussion about granting GR rights turned (thanks to your efforts) into a circus.

So, may I request that you to strike what you wrote in your first comment in this thread (with due apology to me)? It is of course up to you to decide to do or not to do this, but I am not going to leave this libel (let's use your terminology) without consequences. Ruslik 16:02, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes, we were both new stewards, but I knew it was a violation, why didn't you? I apologize for using "standing rules". To me, that doesn't have to mean written; the UK constitution is largely unwritten but it's still law. I don't believe that reversing an early closure even though I voted is a problem; just because a conflict of interest can occur does not mean that it will. The closure was far too early and I had several people complain to me. Reopening could have also lead to his not getting the flag; more people might have opposed, or the candidate might have done something that brings his judgement into question. As for rash acts, the PP issue and way too early closure of the RFCU seem rash; it's just an opinion of you that I've developed. I'm sure many people have developed opinions on me. No personal offense is meant here, but I think you are taking it that way. fr33kman 17:00, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

PS: Nothing is libel if it is true and you did violate the privacy policy, it is true you closed the RFGR early; my opinion of you being rash is not actionable as it is an opinion, not a statement of fact. Please don't wikilawyer me "...I am not going to leave this libel (let's use your terminology) without consequences." fr33kman 17:37, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Violation? Which one? You should know that the privacy policy does not prohibit checkusers from linking accounts to IPs in some circumstances. It is only a tradition among checkusers not to do this. So, there was no violation, but I have still decided to voluntary abide by this tradition.

You have also ignored majority of what I said above. There had been no an "unwritten rule" as well. And the problem is not so much in you reopening but in you closing of the discussion, as you were clearly involved. This created an appearance of inappropriateness. So, may I simply reopen that GR request again, because it was closed by an involved steward? I will not do this, of course, because it will be too much for poor Addihockey10.

Because you refused to do what I asked you to do above, we will continue this discussion in another place. Please, do not post any more comments here, because I will remove them. Ruslik 17:48, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

I am willing to having the voting open for longer if people think that's what should be done. It's not too much ;). Addihockey10 05:57, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

High expectations for Steward behavior

Ruslik0, your discussion with Fr33kman above seems to show an unwillingness to consider criticism and an impulse to take it personally, which I'd think inappropriate for any administrator, but especially a steward. Will you please reflect on this? Thanks. --Abd 18:17, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

I have not noticed any criticism, only libel. Ruslik 07:17, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

This is a criticism, Ruslik. It's easy to "notice" criticism as libel. It's more useful to consider it. --Abd 14:26, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Can point me to exact words that were critical as opposed to libelous? I do not see any. Ruslik 15:01, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

That's much better. All "libel" may be interpreted as criticism. Let's look first at my comment here. Do you see it as critical or libelous? (It could be both, of course.) --Abd 15:38, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Your comment is just your opinion, not a statement of a fact. As such it can not be libelous, only wrong. Ruslik 15:59, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Opinions are neither true nor false. But we can move on, you are correct, it's an opinion. I don't have time to do the review right now, but for the moment, "criticism" is always opinion, not fact. (Stating facts is not criticism, though sometimes people take factual statements that way.) So dismissing criticism as "opinion" is not the same as listening to it. --Abd 16:32, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

What Fr33kman said above was a statement of facts. Ruslik 16:59, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Great. I'll go through his comments and extract and distinguish between fact and opinion, for your review. However, Ruslik, "criticism" is, as I said, always opinion. It depends on judgments of what's right and what is wrong, usually in some moral or normative sense. You corrected an obscure spelling error in the section header. My opinion is that you should have left it, because you broke links from page history, and the intended meaning was clear. "Should have" is a normative opinion, not a fact. That the error existed, and that you corrected it to the intended word, are facts. That links were broken is also a fact. Now, the only thing really of interest here, in this tiny incident, is the opinion! And there is no right or wrong about that. It's just an opinion. You may agree or not agree, but if you say, "that's only your opinion," you'd be "dismissive." Is that a fact or just my opinion? Maybe it's good to be dismissive. What do you think? --Abd 17:24, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

What you are saying is getting too complicated. I would prefer something simpler. Ruslik 18:39, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Just a note on Popo

As I explained to Fr33kman last night, the account had an SUL but the wikiversity was not part of that SUL (until, what it seems, today, when he made the one edit). You can see how the SUL was built, with many of the items being password linked at the time because of age. This isn't so much a problem for new accounts but was a problem with older accounts that had to relink the names. The major problem in my view is that you didn't mention the French account, nor have we been provided evidence that a global lock was necessary. If it was an impersonation, Abd's local block was enough. [1] only edited one Wiki after all. It would be helpful if someone asked about the impersonation unless it is a clear vandalism impersonator (i.e. User:UserAIsMean or such thing). Does that make sense? Ottava Rima (talk) 14:17, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

I mentioned the French account in my original request for lock,[2] it appears that Ottava did not notice it. Without knowledge of that account (as a 'crat on fr.wiki) my global lock request would have made no sense, and, in fact, neither would my block on WV, it would have been premature. As to CU on the "Le" account, Ottava is correct, below, as to a possibility, but it would be fishing. CUs may choose to do that, but I'll entirely leave the judgment to CUs whether or not to do the check, as well as to take and/or report it and/or take action. --Abd 19:28, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes, Popo le Chien has not had an account on enwikiversity until today, when he made his first edit. This fact allowed an impersonator to create Popo Le Chien account thus avoiding anti-spoof protection. As this action was done in bad faith, the account needed to be locked to prevent impersonation on other projects including frwiki. Ruslik 16:33, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

As a followup - was a CU ever done on the account? Normally, impersonators are long standing trouble makers. Ottava Rima (talk) 17:33, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

I have not done any checks. Ruslik 18:32, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

You have wiki-mail!

-- Lavallen 17:15, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Бюрократ

Здраствуйте Ruslik0. У нас бюрократ удаляеть статьи и страницы голосования без обсуждение. Что делать? --N KOzi^Talk 04:32, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Эти статьи были созданы ботом и содержали только один шаблон. Я не знаю какие правила существуют Азербаджанской Википедии, но в Английской Википедии, например, они были ли бы быстро удалены. Ruslik 07:39, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Ок. Спасибо за информацию. --N KOzi^Talk 09:08, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Снова здраствуйте Ruslik0. У нас уже что то похожее на сумащедший дом. Бюрократ лишаеть статуса всех активных ботов. Я ничего не понимаю. Пожалуйста помогите. --N KOzi^Talk 05:21, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Ну вам нужно спросить об этом бюрократа. Все эти боты стали ботами сосвсем недавно. Ruslik 07:10, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Снова здраствуйте Ruslik. У меня один вопрось. Мы писали это для себя или или какь. --N KOzi^Talk 06:47, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Что писал? Ruslik 13:11, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Requests for comment/User:Sortilegus@az.wikipedia Вот этого кажеться для комментов, но этих комментов там немного. Как в этом случае поступить чтобы было правильно. --N KOzi^Talk 13:26, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

usurp request

Hi dear Ruslik. Please check My request again. My user is active to 298 wikis [3] to now. Thanks.--Mehdi^Talk 16:47, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

User:Nature Protector/Отзывы

Здраствуйте Ruslik0. Один из бессрочно заблокированных участников русской Википедии создал страницe обсуждения своей будущей заявки на разблокировку. На этой странице появилось несколько участников-новичков знакомых с реалиями ВП (Special:Contributions/Norah Jones Special:Contributions/Рефуга из Суевнмаэка Special:Contributions/Suspected Taxi Special:Contributions/Je ne regrette rien). Как мне кажется, все эти учетные записи принадлежат одному и тому же человеку. Раз так, то на лицо использование виртуалов с целью поддержки своего мнения. Прощу Вас проверить эти учетки на предмет вирта. Понимаю, что этот запрос больше относится к чекъюзерам меты, но увы, я не нашел чекъюзеров знающий русский, а по-английски понимаю плохо, собственно поэтому и обращаюсь к Вам. --Sergey Semenov^talk 15:06, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Если участник любит разговаривать сам с собой на странице в своём собственном пространстве, то это никаких правил не нарушает. Я пока не вижу оснований для проверки. Ruslik 18:20, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Действительно, это ж не голосование на выборах админов/бюрократов/стюардов/ещё кого-нибудь, просто страница. От того, что кто-то создаёт видимость поддержки через виртуалов, мете плохо не станет. 85.141.93.111 19:11, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Leynavan

Hello Ruslik. I don't understand why this account cannot be locked. I checked every of his contributions, and it is cross-wiki spamming. Even if old, this account just aims/aimed to spam projects. I don't see any policy saying that an account should be blocked on at least one project to be globally locked. Every previous similar situations have resulted by a global block / global lock, and want to understand why this cannot apply here. Thanks for clarifying. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 09:23, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

I prefer not to lock accounts without recent edits. It is also possible that the owner of the account simply misunderstood the purpose of Wikimedia Projects. Ruslik 10:28, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. But blocking this account won't be a mistake either ? (personally I would have blocked it). If it was yesterday (and not two/three months after), you will have blocked the account ? Sorry for disturbing, I just try to understand what's wrong :) -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 12:24, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Global lock is a very blunt instrument. It should be reserved for the worst cases. Ruslik 15:49, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

See Global lock. A local block can be and may be discussed, and usually the user is given the right to appeal, on their Talk page. A global lock is invisible locally, the user just vanishes and seems to be nonresponsive, because they cannot respond. They can email, generally, but users don't necessarily know that. Global locks thus bypass local process; there should be some sign that widespread local disruption is actually being created, and blocks show that, and especially normal blocks that leave talk page access open. Thanks, Ruslik0, for confirming my impression about global locks, which are sometimes abused.

My conclusion from investigation: user may have conflict of interest, but some links may have been legitimate. Many did stand for more than a month until removed as a consequence or as part of the blacklisting. User did not ignore warnings to stop, stopped completely, July 27. Additional users are sporadic, and may have simply found the link with Google to add to articles of interest to them. --Abd 18:09, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

GedawyBot

Hi sir, I found your name in recent changes page; So, I need you to see this application please. Sorry for any nuisance.--Mohamed ElGedawy ^Talk 17:49, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

Your comment was insightful. (on the optional question) I have always wondered why no one else think about blocking the user first. Turn out I forgot about the ability to unblock self as long as he still have the sysop flag. Had I remember about that, my answer would be different. (on the second part of your comment) Isn't that should be somewhere in Stewards policy? And isn't there an exception to use sysop tools (i.e. block) in large projects for global abuses? Bennylin 13:37, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

---

Hi sir, I made an application here. Sorry for any nuisance. Regards.--Mohamed ElGedawy ^Talk 23:30, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Username change request

Hello Ruslik. I wonder why this request is kept opened. Stewards can't rename elsewhere, so it could be closed at done, no ? Thanks -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 14:33, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

I think it can be closed. Ruslik 19:29, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I will close. It's better if "In progress" requests are really the ones that left. Thanks ! -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 19:47, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Steward_requests/Bot_status#HiW-Bot.40euwiki

Hello Ruslik. I think you're wrong there : even if a local 'crat is active, the bot flag should be granted by stewards (automatic approval). -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 11:15, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Automatic approval was not requested. Ruslik 12:41, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

They should say it's based on automatic approval everytime they request it ? -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 14:39, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Yes. They also said nothing about the function of the bot. Ruslik 15:01, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

I just asked him to complete his request. Thanks for the help and have a nice weeek-end. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 15:16, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Dzongkha Wikipedia

Could you handle this? I'm not overly sure what is wanted. Thanks! fr33kman 15:12, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

I increased the font size. Ruslik 16:02, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Спасибо. (Наконец-то я нашёл того, кто поможет.) Сейчас ситуация такая: увеличился шрифт, написанный кириллицей или латиницей. А шрифт на дзонг-кэ остался неизмЕнным. Можно это исправить? (Можно попробовать подсмотреть в тибетской википедии, как они увеличили шрифт - эти языки и шрифты похожи. Только в тибетской википедии почему-то не увеличен шрифт левого и верхнего меню - это тоже хотелось бы сделать в википедии на дзонг-кэ.) Цель - сделать википедию на языке дзонг-кэ читабельной для носителей этого языка. Будет здОрово, если нам удасться это сделать - это даст новый толчок развитию этого языкового раздела. --Impro 18:30, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

На сколько я вижу, шрифт на дзонг-кэ тоже увеличился – он сейчас такого же размера как латинский или кирилический. Размеры шрифта в заголовках вкладок и в навигационном меню тоже вполне нормальные. Ruslik 06:07, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Да, вижу. Видимо у меня из-за компа вчера такая проблема была. Сегодня на другом компе - всё хорошо, всё большое. Ещё раз - спасибо. --Impro 07:36, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Нужно очистить кэш браузера. Ruslik 10:11, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Спасибо. --Impro 10:33, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Um

[4] You can't just do that. This is really, really bad. The only way to create new user groups is to have a policy and there is a procedure for that. Stewards are not allowed to make such changes on their own. There wasn't even anything close to consensus to even implement it, let alone any policy allowing for you to do this. Ottava Rima (talk) 14:47, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

This is just a way to make the existing practice more predictable. Ruslik 18:33, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Still not allowed. There has to be consensus and a public declaration before you can run any tests. Ottava Rima (talk) 19:05, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Stewards action on enwiki

Hi, you stated yourself on your userpage on enwiki that you would refrain from taking any steward actions there as it is your homewiki. You seem to have forgotten that with 3 actions on enwiki in the past hour. While they may be relatively uncontroversial, you were pretty clear in saying you would not taking any actions. Given it's hardly an emergency, I fail to see why it could not have been left for another user. Regards, Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 19:33, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Stewards policy allows me to perform such actions in "clearcut cases" like this one. As to my user page, I actually looked at it so long ago that I forgot what I wrote on it. In fact this was the first case when I did any action on enwiki. Ruslik 19:48, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Indeed, steward policy has a clearcut exception, while your statement didn't. Seems to me that it should still be left to somebody else to carry out such operations, especially in this circumstances. Regards, Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 19:55, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

User:Jamesofur

The removal of tools from Jamesofur actually surprises me. I agree, James should have responded earlier. However: we remove tools to secure the wiki, and to prevent damage to the wiki. The inactivity guidelines are clearly written to avoid having tools resting with dormant accounts, thus making the tools subject to compromise. Is there any danger that James is actually dormant? I don't think anyone can seriously argue that. Precedent set in other groups (not specifically global sysops) is that the tools remain in the hands of staff who wish to keep them and don't misuse them. This is precedent so as to not discourage talented content contributors from taking Foundation jobs. While I obviously wouldn't attempt to impose my will on the global sysop team, I think this action need re-thinking. Philippe (WMF) 01:48, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

What's the context here? Is there a discussion regarding this somewhere else? Kaldari 09:57, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

User_talk:Jamesofur. Ruslik 13:39, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Non-steward edits from a steward account during a period where the encyclopaedia is unavailable for normal editing

Would you like to explain how this diff from en. represents Steward work while the encyclopaedia is uneditable due to community consensus. It looks like normal content or gnoming work; not stewardship. Fifelfoo 13:08, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry, I did not realize at that moment that I was able to edit only because I am a steward. I did not actually follow all discussions about SOPA. Ruslik 13:44, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

No worries! These things happen. Happy editing when the encyclopaedia is live again! Fifelfoo 22:09, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Чеченская Википедия

Здравствуйте. Прощу присвоить мне временный флаг администратора в чеченской википедии для удаление масового вандализма обрашаюсь к вам потому что на чеч вики нет ни одного активного администратора. -- Дагиров Умар 21:23, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Прошу вас снять временный флажок админа с участника Дагиров Умар.

Причина: 1) Не знание чеченского языка, правописание и грамматика (ноль) ниже первого класса. 2) Удаляет страницы обсуждения и тд. Спасибо за внимание. Sasan700 13:42, 5 February 2012 (UTC) Он начал удалять обсуждения после того как я написал ему вот это: 1) Умар., то, что ты перевел якобы на чеченский язык про Юрт-Аух никто не сможет прочесть на чеченском, прошу вас, не публиковать в че-вики статьи на русском языке и не переводить их. Умар ты вообще не знаешь чеченский язык! Может быть ты умеешь говорить на чеченском языке, знаю как аккинцы говорят на чеченском..., тем более у тебя нет никакой грамматики правописания чеченского языка, слова не различаются, люди читать не смогут! Понимаешь? Такое первоклассники не напишут! Оставь статью, я его сейчас переведу, с других вики языков на чеченский. 2) Не удаляй Дийцаре:Юрт-Аух обсуждения! Зачем удаляешь? Ссылка здес Sasan700 13:53, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

В первом случае это его собственная страница обсуждения, а во втором на момент удаления он был единственным автором. Поэтому я не вижу злоупотреблений правами администратора. Ruslik 14:42, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Вашу реакцию возьмут на заметку. Спасибо Sasan700 14:55, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Omission

Hi Ruslik0, I'm not sure but I think that a "be" has been omitted from the sentence "I have tried to useful to the Wikimedia Community" in the English version of your confirmation. Regards from Iran AMERICOPHILE 19:55, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Ruslik 06:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikimania

Hi Ruslik,

I see that you have been working on a Wikimania bid, but have not moved it to the "official" section of the page Wikimania 2013 bids. Do you plan to move forward with this bid? If so, please simply move it to the appropriate section; the deadline is today. -Pete F 01:07, 29 January 2012 (UTC) (member of the Wikimania 2013 jury)

I am not working on any bids. Ruslik 06:48, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Re:

Yep, I saw it some days ago, it's just a liar troll :D the "we are 50 users" part is almost the funniest. --Vituzzu 14:37, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

in korean wikinews

Hi, you just deleted the page n:ko:mediawiki:Sitenotice with the messeage 'outdated message', but it is not outdated. Because n:ko:위키뉴스:관리자 선거/Idh0854(RFA) is progressing currently, please restore the page. Thanks. --SEVEREN 07:51, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Done, but that discussion began in august. Ruslik 09:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, however, cuz' it isn't active well, we have to notice it.. --SEVEREN 04:37, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Protocol relative urls

You said: "Thank you for updating Wiktionary/Table, but could you in the future use mw:MediaWiki 1.18#Protocol-relative_URLs?" — You're going to have to talk to the maintainer of the Wiki Stats scripts at s23.org (here at Meta and/or over there), since that's the source of the wikitext that people are pasting into that page (and all the many similar stats pages). As long as the s23.org scripts are not changed, you'll be fighting an uphill battle just asking individual users to do it (I don't update those pages often enough for your current request to have much of an effect). - dcljr 10:19, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Maniawiki

I no longer have permissions to update those site notices, as they have been partly or wholly locked; I left a message on the stewards noticeboard. –SJ talk   08:10, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Done. –SJ talk   10:59, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Issues about re-directs in Sinhala Wikipedia

We have an issue about re-directs in Sinhala Wikipedia. We had a discussion at Village Pump without conclusive agreements on the issue.
The problem in summary is as follows. A user had created articles [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], and [10]. The article names were section names of already existing article. The user had copied the content of corresponding sections and pasted them to these "new" articles. Noticing this I proposed that those articles should be deleted under A10 of criteria for speedy deletion. Another user who is also an administrator had redirected two of these articles to the corresponding section of the main article. I protested as the criterion for speedy deletion is met. However, the administrator/user argues that the newly created article names are valid and hence should be re-directed and not deleted. If this is allowed, will it create a precedence and be followed by all users in all wikipedia & will we have junk and useless article names and re-directs unnecessarily. We eagerly await your opinion on this matter please. --- ශ්වෙත (talk) 05:03, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

This practice is actually followed in the English Wikipedia - newly created articles that largely duplicate existing articles are frequently redirected (instead of deletion) to an existing article or its section (of course, if the title is not complete nonsense). Do not worry about creating too many redirects because they are cheap. Ruslik (talk) 06:50, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks...

for the copyedits on global bans. Much appreciated! Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 17:33, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Email

Please read the email I sent you. Also, keep the contents private. ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 18:38, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

I have answered your e-mail. Ruslik (talk) 19:31, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Not currently recieved. :/ ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 20:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

I sent it to the correct address. Please, check your spam folder. Ruslik (talk) 07:52, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Checked, nothing. Suppose without giving out the information, you could put it here, on my quite private sub-talk-page. User talk:Tomtomn00/H. ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 08:33, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

I said that in the broad range that you indicated only several IP-addesses are globally blocked. So, it seems unlikely that those blocks can have any influence on you. Ruslik (talk) 09:08, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
It seems as my IP has just settled. However, a check says it is 86.109.212.101 who is globally blocked. ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 08:56, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

This IP is an open proxy from Russia. Ruslik (talk) 11:36, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Russia you say, remember what I said about, the address changes. I can currently post this here, however, sometimes I can't. ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 20:11, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

If you can not post here, it is not due to global blocks—they do not apply to the meta. Ruslik (talk) 15:43, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

As 'post here', I mean throught all wikimedia projects. ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 18:10, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

If you want IP block exampt right, please, apply at SRGP. Ruslik (talk) 08:18, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Anonymous?

What does "Changed to anonymous only. Ruslik 19:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC)" mean on https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Global&oldid=3247004  ? On trying to edit (except here) I see also that "The block expires on 26 May 2012 at 18:48." Thanks in advance for clarification, 72.37.171.100 21:05, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

It means that if you register an account you will be able to edit from this IP address. Ruslik (talk) 03:31, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Limburgish Wikibooks

Please restore this page. It should be moved to another place, not deleted. Please inform semi-active users next time before deleting pages :) --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 15:34, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Do you really want this? The only content was "#REDIRECT [[Talk:Veurblaad]]". Ruslik (talk) 19:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

In that case you can leave it. Your edit summary was not very clear, so my guess was that there was still some discussion contents left. --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 09:11, 16 May 2012 (UTC)