User talk:SkyBon

Welcome to Meta![edit]

Hello SkyBon!, and welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 01:26, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please[edit]

Could you please tone down the rhetoric here? It wont help the situation by making such statements. Ottava Rima 19:49, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's not a rhetoric, it is an adequate response when someone accuses someone of something without any proof. SkyBon^{Talk\Contributions} 19:54, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an admission by User:SA ru that he was banned from the ru.wikipedia. This is a list of edits by User:SA ru, which does not have any edit to ru.wikipedia. This implies that the banning happened on another name. Having two names, with one blocked, is the definition of a sock puppet. Having a new name in which there is a disconnection between the clearly marked block log would also be a legitimate reason for SA ru to be characterized in the manner fitting. The first link posts to your talk page on Wikipedia, which suggests that you would know all of this already. Therefore, I will ask you again to please tone down your rhetoric. The use by Cary Bass cannot be interpreted as an "attack" or "insulting", merely a characterization of the account for the benefit of others who may not realize the missing context (i.e. that this user was banned on ru.wikipedia and was using an account not connected to their previous edits). Ottava Rima 20:01, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The user has no other accounts blocked on English Wikipedia so he is not a sock puppet. SkyBon^{Talk\Contributions} 20:12, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Russian wikipedia. He even admits on your en.wiki talk page that he is still editing ru.wikipedia yet there is nothing in his contribs to suggest that. Therefore, they must be happening on yet -another- account. So, we have the one he suggests was indeffed, the SA ru account, and a mysterious third account that is still active over there. That is strong evidence that the user operates sock puppets. Now, can we end this matter? Ottava Rima 20:15, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblock[edit]

Unblock request declined

This blocked user has had their unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request.
Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request reason: No violations of policies comitted. The block was made behind everybody's backs. See http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Requests_for_help_from_a_sysop_or_bureaucrat#Meatpuppetry.2Fvotestacking_on_Steward_requests.2FGlobal_permissions.23Global_sysop_for_putnik SkyBon^{Talk\Contributions} 14:00, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason: No you where only here to act as a trol Huib talk 17:12, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

block log
gblock log
blocklist
stalktoy
guc
unblock
gunblock
contribs: +/-

Troll? Hm, interesting. Why troll? Any explanation? SkyBon^{Talk\Contributions} 18:21, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another request for unblock[edit]

Unblock request declined

This blocked user has had their unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request.
Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request reason: I still insist on my innocence. Also I can't accept trolling accusations without any proof. SkyBon^{Talk\Contributions} 19:09, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason: No need for an unblock here. Block seems to be fine. Barras ^talk 21:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

block log
gblock log
blocklist
stalktoy
guc
unblock
gunblock
contribs: +/-

Third request for unblock[edit]

Unblock request declined

This blocked user has had their unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request.
Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request reason: Long time has passed and the block on Meta does not let me contribute to Wikimedia projects fully. SkyBon

Decline reason: I can´t see any benefits in granting this request for a meatpuppeter. So declined. WizardOfOz ^talk 06:04, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

block log
gblock log
blocklist
stalktoy
guc
unblock
gunblock
contribs: +/-