User talk:Trijnstel

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to my user talk page.

I will respond on this page to everything left here unless stated otherwise.

If I leave a message on your talk page, I will look there for a response.

Busy desk.svg This user is currently busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Contents

#wikimedia-privacy / #wikimedia-checkuser access request [edit]

Hi. I've been appointed to the enwiki Audit Subcommittee. I understand I'm supposed to request access to the #wikimedia-privacy and #wikimedia-checkuser IRC channels, and that you're one of the people who can help me with this. Could you, please? Thanks. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 04:51, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

No need to worry about it — already taken care of, by DerHexer. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 05:44, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Richwales. Sorry, was extremely busy yesterday. I fixed one tiny mistake, so you should now have access to both channels indeed. Good luck! Trijnsteltalk 09:55, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Re: your revert [edit]

I've started a discussion on Template talk:SWMT-Members#Rights. I don't see why you care whether or not my global groups are listed there. PiRSquared17 (talk) 22:55, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, but I prefer to be complete: either mention the global rights of *everyone* or don't mention those rights (or that specific person) at all. Trijnsteltalk 18:54, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Removal [edit]

Please! delete the redirect to rename the Hacienda name Article [1] and [2]. Thank you! -- Дагиров Умар (talk) 22:41, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

I guess it's already Yes check.svg Done today by ce:User:Дагиров Умар (yourself?, ah, you're an admin again, nvm). Trijnsteltalk 21:56, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

? [edit]

Hi Trijnstel. Should we use Steward request page as discussion page? There is already request for comment here ,therefore i moved comments there and it was an internal issue. We discussed, but Mirzali and Takabeg didnt really disscussed there. They just use political words to change the topic.--Gomada (talk) 09:50, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

(after ec) Maybe, but you requested the removal of the rights of Mirzali, thus it's not up to you to remove his (and someone else's) comment on SRP. Trijnsteltalk 09:57, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
i understand, but there was such a conflict before. Therefore, i thought it will not be good to start disscuss there. But as you want.--Gomada (talk) 10:11, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Block of 79.141.161.13 [edit]

It wasn't warned... PiRSquared17 (talk) 00:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

He sure was. You said yourself on his user talk page: "It's OK to discuss the issue on cawiki, open an RfC, etc., just don't vandalize." And I repeatedly reverted his edits, with an explanation! Besides, it's only a 1-day block. He's still able to edit his user talk page and I never heard a thing of him. With regards, Trijnsteltalk 08:43, 22 May 2013 (UTC)