User talk:WizardOfOz/Archive 2

Think I´m back again.

Forgot to sign in :) apologies 81.96.200.255 17:44, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatroll[edit]

Hi. I'm almost sure that the autopatroller flag already comes with the sysop flag and is redundant to have them both. That's how it works on other wikis and perhaps it is the same here. Maybe you want to find a more secure answer from other users. Regards.” T_eleS (T _{PT @ C G}) 23:57, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You can see rights assigned to different user groups at Special:ListGroupRights. The autopatrol right is indeed included in the sysop rights. Jafeluv 00:21, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I didn´t saw Done in the box, so i tought it is not included. --WizardOfOz ^talk 05:29, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Ильнар Шайдуллов 09:08, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

&[edit]

Hello Amir,
I think User:Altsupr and user:ALTshift45 are same users. Best, —CnkALTDS 19:51, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they are, thats why i have block him, and for the text :) --WizardOfOz ^talk 19:53, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And, what do you think about contents of (1) and (2)? I have warned the user about excessive unrelated content, but still no reply.—CnkALTDS 20:11, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn´t delete it, ´couse the same information can be found on other pages about her. If there is no responce in few days, you can tag it with delete and someone will take care. --WizardOfOz ^talk 20:14, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bosnian localization[edit]

Thanks for notifying me about the translation!

We're continuing to test banners every Thursday on English language projects until we launch on November 7. What we're looking for, from the Bosnian community, is a local wiki discussion and talk on meta about the possibilities of finding unique slogans for banners that will be specific for Bosnians. If the English banners translate appropriately, we'll be running those with those of the community. We want you to be a part of this, and as you are an active Bosnian Wikimedian I look forward to working with you to keep the lights on. Keegan 05:38, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will try to contact others and to see who is interested. For my self, i will try to translate some messages as i have done last year. --WizardOfOz ^talk 14:49, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vapmachado[edit]

The above listed user has requested clarification as to which statements of his cause offense and why. If you have the time to address his concerns, it might be helpful for his future productivity and beneficial for his state of mind during his current inability to edit.

I'm curious to learn that he doesn't find any of his recent actions to be disruptive to the community or abusive of its individual members, but I imagine that not everyone bears the same social empathy, and such deviations from the norm should be patiently dealt with.

Please have yourself an entirely awe-inspiring day and pleasant slumber later. ;)

ttfn. Kylu 02:01, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Softredirects deletions[edit]

Hi, I've restored some soft redirects you deleted in batch because they were not orphaned nor broken; some of the have a very interesting edit history (no WM:CSD#M2, nor WM:CSD#A1 because they weren't transwikied). I suppose you wanted to orphan Template:soft redirect, which has a strange behaviour, and its category; I think it's easier to replace it with {{interwiki redirect}} when possible. --Nemo 20:24, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zakgreant[edit]

I agree. ;-) --Nemo 17:15, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia CAT/de[edit]

Gerade sehe ich alle die Fehler die du korrigiert hast. Vielen dank, wirklich! Deutsch ist nicht meine Muttersprache und dazu machte ich die Übersetzung ziemlich schnell -zu schnell!- und das Resultät hast du schon gesehen: wirklich zu viele Fehler. Na ja, wie gesagt vielen dank für deine Hilfe!!! --f3RaN 17:47, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion tags[edit]

Hi Wizard, I usually do a leave an apt description in the edit summary but you are absolutely right I will leave a reason with the SD tag itself according the WM:CSD. Thanks for pointing it out. Theo10011 18:07, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RfA[edit]

Hi WizardofOz, thanks for your comment and support. I am terribly sorry if you got the impression that I lost my cool or got aggressive with my comment. I want to assure you that I have been involved in much heated discussions as an admin and a user, and I haven't let them get to me personally. The thing is, I was considering withdrawing my RfA last week because I agreed with the criticism, I chose to stay on after cbrown suggested I wait, I want to build a favorable impression before I go through with the RfA since I agree that most of the community here doesn't know me. In hindsight, I am not sure if I should have mentioned the user categories, and I agree that was not assuming good faith, I hope to live up to your and others expectations in future. I am sorry for that comment, Thanks for the support. Regards. Theo10011 17:45, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for all the support and guidance. I really appreciate it.Theo10011 17:52, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

haha I think Dfreg already did it. Theo10011 17:59, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

:)[edit]

Ma, nema na čemu. Nisam znao da si blokiran :) Eh, svakavih likova ima. micki t 18:21, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hvala na "statusu" :) U zadnje vreme mi više odgovara da se bavim tzv. tehničkim aspektima rada wikija (patroliranje, vraćanje vandalizama, rad sa slikama), nego da pišem članke. U principu nemam ništa protiv da se prijavim u SWMT, iako ne mogu da obećam da li ću i koliko biti aktivan. Ne znam da li se očekuje od članova da budu aktivni u određenoj meri? Ako se očekuje samo da se patroliraju izmene na malim wikijima u slobodno vreme (čitaj: kad nemaš ništa pametnije da radiš), onda OK. Verovatno mogu da pomognem :) micki t 16:47, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To je onda u redu. Prijaviću se večeras. Hvala i pozdrav! micki t 16:52, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Hi, I'm not Check user, I'm a Admin. --Tia Solzago 21:44, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my mistake. --Tia Solzago 21:44, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Meta:Requests_for_deletion#Help:Category_redirect[edit]

Makes sense. I didn't do myself because having contributed to the page I have a mild COI. :-) --Nemo 20:15, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bad joke[edit]

May I know what kind of things you call « exessive vandalism » ? Is it prohibited to talk on talk pages ? If you want real vandalism, may you will have to protect many pages.

I invite you to stop that bad joke and let user: serein read what i wrote.

Wikinews[edit]

Aloha! Vidim da se na ovoj stranici već nekoliko dana nalaze dva članka sa sr wikinews. Ne znam ko je to označio za brisanje, ali mislim da je greška jer postoji dozvola od Bete za kopiranje njihovih vesti na wikinews, što uglavnom i radi Milošev bot. Pretpostavljam da i ostali ne znaju šta da rade, dok ih niko nije obrisao već tri dana :) Šta se radi u ovim situacijama: ručno se uklone članci sa te stranice ili je potrebno nešto drugo? Pozdrav! micki t 22:00, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ih, ko će njega nahvatati :) Nema veze, videću sa nekim. micki t 22:09, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

E baš sam krenuo to da uradim :) micki t 22:11, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My edit[edit]

Hi. Why did you revert my edit? I just asked why they demote themselves from something they battled to obtain (or not?) to see what they would say. Have I breaked a rule by doing that? Ajedor 21:53, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flag[edit]

Ok, NP!--Nick1915 -^{all you want} 12:03, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ja sam zapravo mislio da uradim i jedno i drugo za svaku sliku: i da označim da nema licencu i da pošiljaocu pošaljem poruku o tome. Upravo smišljam neku univerzalnu poruku. micki t 21:52, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nešto poput ovog. micki t 21:53, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nije to tako veliki posao kao što se čini. Ja povremeno radim sa slikama. Jedini problem je što ovde nema gotovih šablona, jer bi u suprotnom sve bilo gotovo za 20 minuta. Ajd smisliću neko rešenje, ali mislim da je najefikasnije da se stavi oznaka i na sliku i da se pošalje obaveštenje - tako nema greške. micki t 21:58, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

U tom slučaju moram prvo da dopunim šablon {{no license}}. Ti gledaj pa ispravi ako pogrešim. OK? micki t 22:01, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dobro, hoćeš večeras da to sredimo ili sutra? micki t 22:04, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Može, i meni to odgovara. Ja ću pripremiti šablone pa ćemo to očas srediti. Pozzz micki t 22:07, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ja gledam "Only Fools and Horses" :))) micki t 22:11, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Slike[edit]

Uradio sam one šablone, ali reko' bolje da još neko pogleda. U principu, stavi se na sliku {{no license}} i na tom šablonu se automatski kreira poruka koju treba staviti na stranicu za razgovor korisnika. Ovo je poruka koju on dobije (naravno umesto onoga [[:{{{1}}}]] piše naziv konkretne slike). Da li je sadržaj poruke OK? Mislim da nije problem da se označe sve slike koje nemaju licencu i obaveste pošiljaoci, a kod samog brisanja treba voditi računa o tome šta je za brzo brisanje, a na šta treba obratiti malo veću pažnju. Eto... micki t 21:42, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I ja sam umoran da bih odradio sve, ali ću sutra to završiti. Hoćeš li mi dati bot flag ili može i ovako? micki t 21:48, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pa stavi mi onda taj status da ne zatrpam SI, a ja ću kada završim zatražiti od prvog birokrate da me vrati u pređašnje stanje :) Ako ti ne budeš u blizini. micki t 21:52, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Završio sam za večeras. Skini mi status. Prošao sam kroz poslednjih 100, a ostalo ćemo kasnije. Pozzz micki t 23:31, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He he, telepatija? micki t 23:31, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

== Rename=%253D

Thanks a lot, Wizard! :) --Larry Yuma 23:51, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OSM.js[edit]

Pleasse take a look http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki_talk:OSM.js and I hope you can make an update. --Kolossos 21:34, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

EC[edit]

Znaš da sam ja Bosanac :) Šta ti znači to "EC"? micki t 12:19, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

E baš ti hvala na ovom prosvetljenju :) Još neko mi je pre mesec dana napisao nešto slično, ali mi je bilo u tom trenutku mrsko da pitam šta znači. Pozzzz micki t 12:24, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prevođenje[edit]

Nema problema ako nije baš puno i dugo:) Što još? --Flopy 18:03, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tada vjerojatno više neću imati volje:D --Flopy 18:08, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nađoh još jednu i prevedoh;) --Flopy 18:18, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stewards elections[edit]

Vidim da su pripreme u toku ;) micki t 17:27, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ja koristim ovaj dodatak za Microsoft Office Word. Radi i na novom Officu. Inače, postoje i neke online varijante. Ova je prva na koju naletih, ali ih ima dosta. micki t 17:37, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pa dobro, i ja sam iskoristio neke tvoje prevode :) micki t 20:41, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I ti si tu. Gledao sam pre par trenutaka i nije te bilo :) Podneo sam zahtev za GR, pa ako ti nije problem pogledaj i slobodno ispravi tekst jer meni sr-->en nije jača strana. Fala :) micki t 20:19, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Skont'o sam. Brži si od mene. micki t 20:22, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

Hi - as blocking admin could you take a look at this. I realise that this is not the easiest of users to deal with but I think there is an argument for unblocking here. If they were to be unblocked I would personally suggests that it was accompanied by a final warning as I would imagine any future block might be indef given the overall situation. Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HTML2wiki[edit]

Pogledaj da li ovo služi ičemu, pa obriši ako je nepotrebno. micki t 07:59, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ja sam ranoranilac, uglavnom :) micki t 08:06, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User name change[edit]

Hello, if you don't mind, can I have my user name changed from "User:Snake311" to "User:a7x"? —§ stay (sic)! 07:04, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Btw, good luck on your stewardship election. Best wishes, —§ stay (sic)! 18:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SERB1914[edit]

Glasacu za tebe ako mi skines blok sa wikipedia na bosanskom jeziku,jer ipak sam shvatio greske :) --Serb1914 18:13, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok,da li ces me sblokirati na wikipediji? --Serb1914 20:57, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Guidelines[edit]

Hello WizardOfOz!
Last time I checked the Anweisungen für den Wähler they contained [under the header Wähler; second point (button)] the following words: und umgekehrt (in German). The 'same' exists in the English version of the Guidelines, but not in Uputstva which you translated on 16 January 2011, at 11:32:16 (CET). The translation in Bosnian language contains the following words (in Bosnian): ili obrnuto. That translation is not correct. I haven't corrected it myself because, obviously, I am not as proficient as the native speakers of the Bosnian language. Thanks for the help. Thank you. -- Bugoslav 01:10, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Procitaj jos jednom. --WizardOfOz ^talk 15:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moja greska u pravu si. --WizardOfOz ^talk 19:11, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

english at mlwiki[edit]

Press Control-M to switch languages in mlwiki. Good try though. :) --Jyothis 21:34, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I tought it´s just about the letters :D --WizardOfOz ^talk 05:04, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

lol No. it is a complex language on its own and yes, people do understand if you type english in malayalam. However, since we have much more letters than en, it is not that straight forward. --Jyothis 03:47, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DEagleBot in bs.wp[edit]

Please unblock my IP and DEagleBot in bs.wp to create bot request --Dark Eagle 10:07, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

but I'm still bocked by IP: 78.154.134.133 --Dark Eagle 10:15, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How all is ok. Thanks) --Dark Eagle 10:25, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In re Meta:Requests for adminship/Fr33kman[edit]

Specifically diff:

The whole point of WM:MSR was to allow stewards to use their global admin rights on Meta so they wouldn't need to seek local adminship/bureaucratship to do routine tasks on Meta. The request to avoid possibly controversial tasks at WM:MSR#Administrative actions on Meta was more to keep stewards who may not be familiar with the "politics" of Meta out of hot water.

Strictly speaking, if a non-admin steward decides to perform a possibly controversial action here and claim discretionary ability due to WM:MSR, we're not going to argue their right to attempt to do it, just possibly the outcome. :)

If you have any questions on the policy, I do like to think I'm familiar with that particular one. Kylu 17:49, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to see any steward which is inactive on meta :D. About policy: if we say they are sysops/crats on meta, i can´t see any reason not to grant them those rights with election. If we are honest, the most work for a sysop here is reverting of vandalism, deletions and removing of spam. And I´m sure that all stews know enough about that. There is only one little problem called m:RfC. If a stew shouldn´t decide (as i can see this is removed in the policy), we would have a COI in such cases, because as a admin on meta you should act sometimes if discussion overheat. The most RfC are closed without conclusions. I think that there should be also a policy about RfC (who can close them, who can make a conclusion, and is this conclusion binding for a RfC) and about a role of stews in it. I´m just tired to look at trusted and good standing users which are stews running trough a RfA. I´m ready to grant sysop to all stews without discussion (or perhaps something like RfB on meta, where two or three sysops/crats just need to endorse), but crat only for those who need it. --WizardOfOz ^talk 18:11, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly what MSR was designed to address: They already have the ability to do the things, this was just giving them the permission to do it without running for local admin/bureaucrat. If they want to do things that might be controversial, though, it would be better to run first that way they have community consensus to make those hard decisions. I guess I'm not explaining myself well, I'm sorry. Kylu 00:53, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Admin[edit]

U zadnje vreme imam sve manje vremena za wiki, pa ne znam koliko bih mogao realno da doprinesem kao admin. Znam da neki gledaju na te stvari kao na nekakav status ili prestiž, ali je meni to samo još jedno sredstvo pomoću kojeg mogu da lakše obavim neke stvari i pomognem u funkcionisanju konkretnog projekta. Zato i ne volim da tražim ovlašćenja koja možda neću previše koristiti. Osim toga, ovo je projekat koji ima zavidan broj aktivnih admina. Možda se kandidujem u nekom narednom periodu. Hvala ti ipak na ponudi, koju veoma cenim :) micki t 09:48, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neka ovaj predlog bude, ako se slažeš, na standby-u :) micki t 10:10, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inače, i tebe manje viđam u skorašnjim izmenama. Ili se mimoiđemo :) Mada, otkada je završen izbor novih i potvrđivanje starih stjuarda, stvari su se ovde inače malo usporile. Nema tako puno izmena za pregledanje. Ajd da ti više ne dosađujem :) Pozdrav! micki t 10:30, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletions[edit]

Hi! Consider using the flood flag istead of a temporary bot flag. That's what it's for :) Regards, Jafeluv 21:22, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are just few and than its done. But yes will use it next time. :D --WizardOfOz ^talk 21:23, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Na šta konkretno misliš? micki t 11:21, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pa, koristi se termin "društveni mediji" ili "društvene mreže". E sad, jedino je stavljeno "Internet" umesto "onlajn". Ali to i nije tako sporno. Kako bi ti to preveo? :) micki t 11:28, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Čekaj, misliš zbog velikog "I" u reči "Internet"? Ako je zbog toga, prema Pravopisu koji je izašao krajem prošle godine u srpskom se Internet piše velikim slovom. Ali mi "internetske" zvuči malo neobično. Možda da stavimo onlajn, kad je tako već i u originalu? micki t 11:36, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ispravio

Zaista zvuči bolje. Slobodno prijavi ili sam ispravi ako naiđeš na neke greške. micki t 11:43, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ccccc. E, ne damo

Inače, Nikola, Mihajlo i drugi su više na tome radili. Ja sam pravio manje izmene, da se ne lažemo :) micki t 11:48, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dobro, onda. Ti predloži, a ja ću gledati da takođe napišem nešto kada prihvatim kandidaturu. micki t 17:13, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Prihvatio sam. Nadam se da nisam nešto pogrešio jer mi engleski još uvek nije baš dobar, iako se polako popravlja. micki t 17:39, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hvala na nominaciji. Ostalo će odlučiti zajednica, kako si već rekao. Za mene administriranje nije novina, a opet ta prava mi nisu neophodna u tolikoj meri da bez njih ne bih mogao ili ne bih želeo doprinositi na način kako sam to radio do sada. Jedino bi mi prava olakšala obavljanje nekih stvari. Tako da ako se završi pozitivno - jedna obaveza više :) Ako i ne prođem na glasanju, nastavljam kao i do sada :) Baj d vej, idem uskoro malo do Bosne. Nisam bio odavno. micki t 17:48, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ne verujem da ću ići tamo ovaj put. U Sarajevo sigurno, a možda malo i drugih mesta - malo poslovno, malo iz zadovoljstva. Jedino ne mogu da ostanem predugo zbog ispita. micki t 17:52, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Range Blocks[edit]

It won't work. You'll have to permanently block some 300,000 IPs in four states, including almost all of Eastern Massachusetts (where there are more institutions of higher learning than any other place on the planet), plus the entire IPv6 network, worldwide. It would be wiser to abide by the WMF Whistleblower Policy, correct the errors by the erratic admins, custodians, and stewards, and forgo the cover-up of the cover-up. Cascading cover-ups didn't work for Nixon and it won't work here. —Caprice 18:23, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But it will be easier if you could stop your behavior or not? You can also contact the foundation for your issue or not? This could be game without end between us and honestly it brings nothing. --WizardOfOz ^talk 18:27, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My behavior is to demand reasonably ethical management of a high-profile 501(c)(3) tax-exempt non-profit enterprise that represents itself (to the IRS and to the donors) as as an educational project with a published Charter, Mission, and over-arching Policies. Ethical Management is a learned behavior, and one that may include some graduate level work in Philosophy. Before I escalate, to WMF or to any other party with a story of corruption, cover-up, and lame-brained, bone-headed errors (like a squadron of zany Keystone Cops oversighting a silly parody written by a college professor who is a Bureaucrat on an educational wiki), I need to take a measurement of just how pervasive is this Comedy of Terrors. Education is indeed a game without end. But at least let it be a game with some detectable progress, eh? —Caprice 18:44, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But even if we start with this never ending story, it will change nothing untill you go there where your issues come from and to those you thing that they are responsible. Me nor enyone you are trying to contact here can help or do something to change it. But if you think that this is the way you can be heard, we can continue with this silly game. --WizardOfOz ^talk 18:58, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Block of Capsot[edit]

Hello WizardOfOz, I can't see what exactly Capsot posted that led to the oversighting of his work and his block, but could you point me to a discussion of it? –SJ · talk | translate 08:35, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure Wizard will answer in due time, but Capsot left message to all the members of the movement roles working group. The content of the post contained private and potentially libelous information. That was the reason, the edits was oversighted. Wizard can elaborate on this of course. Theo10011 08:48, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you for the update. I no longer have os on this wiki but I get the picture. I restored his ghost's comments on my talk page, however, since they seemed reasonable. –SJ · talk 09:07, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I'll add it to his talk page for the record. es:Magister Mathematicae 17:12, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That comment states the lock rather than explaining it. We don't usually use locks to resolve social disputes or sockpuppetry among established users - unless this was meant to set a precedent. Was there a discussion about it here on Meta? –SJ talk 01:17, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If the content of an email can be considered potentially libelous, the responsability lies on the writer of the email, not on the the reproducer (like Julian Assange).
A disclaimer in an email has no legal effect, being it unilateral and written at the end of the mail, after the main text.--193.145.56.241 18:04, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but per Austrian law, where I´m located, there is a law which prohibits providing of correspondence without permission of both sides (and disclaimer clearly confirms that there is no permission). I´m not a OS here on meta, so I just provided the information to meta OS who decided to oversight. Feel free to contact him. --WizardOfOz ^talk 18:13, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

;)[edit]

Fala ;) micki t 19:27, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He he, znači bio sam dosadan? Hvala i tebi na kandidaturi. micki t 19:29, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RFC re. Bojan admin abuse[edit]

I'll write in English so everyone can follow.

Vote on sr wiki decided whether he will remain admin. However, there is still an issue of abuse of his admin rights, which sr wiki is unable to solve by itself (for example 3 blocked users didn't vote). Furthermore, he closes the discussion about his abuses (and no neutral party even commented the story) etc, etc. Today, he calls me a liar and no one intervenes?

It is my hope that independent review of the whole case will be held, here and now. If nobody cares, wikipedia will lose more good contributors. Apparently, only admin rights are respected. --Мирослав Ћика 19:49, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK if this is your POV i´m not someone who judge. But as i explained, it is solved locally. For other things you can make a new request but the first one is closed. THX --WizardOfOz ^talk 19:53, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ja sam zavrsio već, ali oni ne daju. Imali su mesec dana svu pažnju, nisu uspeli u svojoj nameri, a maske su pale. Obrisao sam ono što sam u besu napisao. -- Bojan Talk 19:52, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citaj odgovor iznad vrijedi i za tebe. --WizardOfOz ^talk 19:53, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flood flag[edit]

Aloha! Ovih dana, kada uhvatim vremena, sređujem Meta/Commons duplikate. Neke slike se ne koriste uopšte na Meti, pa tu nema puno posla. Međutim, dešava se da se neke slike koriste i na preko 20 stranica na Meti, pa je potrebno zameniti naziv slike na tim stranicama pre brisanja duplikata. Gledam sad kako da ne zatrpavam skorašnje izmene kada radim tako nešto i setih se da sam pre nekoliko dana video na tvojoj stranici za razgovor da je neko spomenuo Flood flag. Mogu sam sebi da dodelim tu zastavicu, ali me zanima da li je potrebno prethodno negde najaviti tako nešto ili je dovoljno u sažetku navesti zbog čega to radim. Ne znam kada ću to ponovo raditi, ali me zanima kako funkcioniše. Dobro, u objašnjenju piše: it must be remembered the administrators are already trusted with the ability to delete pages, block users, view deleted material, place protections on pages, etc. In the end, this added functionality should not require more trust than that sysops are already given. ali je opet bolje pitati :) Ti imaš ovde više iskustva od mene. micki t 20:07, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dođe mu isto :) micki t 21:40, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Znam, šalim se :) Što bi rekao Đole Balašević: „Ma princip je isti, sve su ostalo nijanse...” micki t 16:15, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Đe s' ba?[edit]

Nisam te video u skorašnjim izmenama sto godina :) micki t 19:09, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nemam toliko vremena zadnjih par dana, al tu sam :D Sta ima kod tebe? --WizardOfOz ^talk 19:12, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nič posebno. I ja sam bio zauzet prethodnih 20-tak dana, ali opet sam tu. Ura :) micki t 19:16, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Onda udri Jovo na novo :D --WizardOfOz ^talk 19:18, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für Aufräumen ...[edit]

... der Überbleibsel von meiner SWMT-Säuberungsaktion. Ich wünschte, ich hätte das gleich selber mit machen können ... ;-) axp_de ^Hello! 23:12, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nichts zu danken. Bin mir sicher dass die Zeit bald kommen wird wenn du es selber machen kannst :D --WizardOfOz ^talk 23:22, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Schau'n mer mal, kommt Zeit kommt Rat ... ;-) axp_de ^Hello! 14:39, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Protection[edit]

Ha ha ha, nisam video da si ti zaštitio tekst minut pre mene, pa sam i ja to učinio. Never mind. micki t 21:18, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Odblokirao Capsota[edit]

Odblokirao sam ga pošto je kandidat za člana Borda. Ne ulazim u razloge za blokiranje i verujem ti, ali nije fer da bude blokiran tokom izbora. Tako, ako misliš da ga treba ponovo blokirati, molim te, blokiraj ga posle izbora, dakle, najranije 16. maja. --Millosh 17:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Htedoh reći, 16. juna :) --Millosh 18:05, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thanks for your message, I really appreciate it... Unfortunately in my opinion, it really comes way too late and it is greatly due to the current circumstances, that is it seems to respond more to pragmatism than to the wish to give me an opportunity... I am not making a decision yet but I have to tell you clearly that I asked for a fair judgment a long time ago and no one here seemed to pay attention to it, which in my opinion is a highly irregular procedure, an administrator even erased my message... Hadn't it been because of Samuel Klein's intervention I would still be banned from all the projects... I would prefer being judged by some kind of committee deeming what I have done is wrong or not, which are the charges against me with clear references and examples and then I would probably admit my guilts (if there is anything to admit). In my opinion the administrators should work as a community so I do not think it is fair to promise one thing or another to just one administrator, and if I was not wrong and have been blocked on uncorrect grounds why should I make such a promise which would decree I was responsible. I will let you know about my decision but well as soon as I will be less busy with the many things I have to do, but I must tell you that being deprived of Meta is not this bad, I don't really need it; on the contrary blocking me in all the projects really made me doubt seriously about the seriousness and democracy of it all; the projects matter, bureaucracy is not compulsory. On the other hand I should probably thank you, you all have made my determination stronger and then I probably would not have become a candidate without you, so I think that probably a lot of people will appreciate and thank the administrators actions from Meta in the long run. However I think you must be a nice person but you were probably urged to act this way by some other people from the higher spheres who will possibly never assume their responsibility if a real investigation needed to be done. I wish you all the best nonetheless. Have a nice week, Claudi Balaguer/Capsot 21:13, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I did not mean that the "pressure" happened now, I meant you might have blocked me after someone advised you to take care of me... On the other hand you seem to admit that I was not libelous (accusation that has lasted for two months) but you imply that my guilt is to have made a mail public, could you be more specific about the references allowing such a block then, aside from stating that it is forbidden in Austria (Wikipedia goes way beyond this country...). About the mail I am also sorry to tell you it was already made public in the Spanish Chapter list, I just copied here something everyone could consult there and tried to make it more public. I will find the link so you can see it by yourself in case you don't believe me. Good night! Capsot 21:41, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, this will be my last reply, because I don't have so much time to lose and it is way too obvious that you won't give me any sound reference about the law that I infringed in Meta (not in Austria... man I am so relieved you don't live in a country where they cut hands...) and well actually I could send all the letters I want with any statement at the end which has no real valid legal basis since no law is referred to; and since the letter was addressed to the President of a group, this person, if he is a real democrat, and Gomà is, (man, I am amazed to read your "Wikimedia is not a democracy", you should have told me/us before, I should probably make it a question for the candidates, "according to some administrators, Wikimedia is not a democracy, how can we change this?"; I sincerely hope it is not a banana republic, nor a monarchy (I am not fond of kings or queens), maybe it is a theocracy after all!) and he shows respect towards his members he has to tell them the reasons of such a change of policies, the letter was sent to (the head of) a group not really to an individual. Then do as you please, I have better things to do, but to make it clear simply state: "How you vile creature dare question my judgment, I do not abide by laws nor rules nor simple mortals like Jimmy Wales, for I am God, the maker of rules and you shall atone for your sins or be banned from heaven eternally". Bye now! Capsot 06:45, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

I've replied here: Template talk:Board elections 2011 infobox. Long story short-- voter guides are standard practice-- voters need to communicate with each other and pool their knowledge for the elections to work ideally. But don't worry, you can still stop my guide from overly influencing the election-- just make your own guide and make it more convincing than mine! Tell your friends to make their own guides. Tell everybody to make guides. That's what the election needs, not my opinion, but LOTS of well-reasoned opinions. --Alecmconroy 15:31, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I suport and thank the efforts of any editor to participate in the elections process. Just to provide another precedent of voter guides: User:Shalom Yechiel/2008 WMF Board elections.--Gomà 21:28, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Even if this is usual practice on enwiki, it´s still clear canvassing. My conclusion of candidates is almost the same like in the Alecmconroy´s guide, but i still think that this could lead some not informed users to vote per guide. Everyone should make his own conclusion and vote according to his conscience. --WizardOfOz ^talk 23:41, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IRC?[edit]

Heute nich' im IRC? axp_de ^Hello! 08:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Đes' ba? micki t 21:16, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Evo me. I ovdje i ondje :D --WizardOfOz ^talk 21:18, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well how do I appeal then[edit]

Can you give me an email address, which nobody has given yet, please so I can appeal without infringment or bullying. Mean it's not my fault if you lock it and there are no communication as to how to unlock it off wiki pages. Cheers. KnowIG

You´ve already misused mail adresses, so appeal it somwhere else. You are banned, and you should accept it. --WizardOfOz ^talk 21:00, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Er no I haven't. Are you going to give it to me or do I have to guess.

Yes you have. Or do you want to say you didn´t send mails to other sysops? --WizardOfOz ^talk 21:02, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well what is the email address then. I think that locking is stupid imo. As it leads you here if you don't need to be here to get it reversed. That's not been made clear and no instruction of how to reverse it has ever been given to me

Sidenote why should i accept anything when the're are worse users who do not communicate and are abusive hiding behind I like it argements????

So just FYI, if you are locked, thats because of vandalism and spam you´ve tried to add. Therefore, you have no longer access. As this is not a public project, but project owned by the Wikimedia foundation, where you are banned and there is nothing you can do against it. Just imagine if some visitor come to your home and try to spray some colour on your wall you don´t want. What will you do with him? --WizardOfOz ^talk 21:09, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But I didn't vandalise or spam, so the lock is unjust. Hence why I want to appeal it. Please as a formality don't talk down to me

I´m not talking down to you. I will contact the blocking sysop and discuss with him. But you need to wait and to look at this page sometimes. Ok? --WizardOfOz ^talk 21:14, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry I am watching your page. FYI I went after 2 people who I considered were bullying and then got frustrated and blanked something. I got blocked and then calmed down. So the need of locking imo was uneeded unjustified in away random as I as I said have not spammed or vandalised mulitple pages which is what locking would be needed for. Cheers. And IMO OTT

Sorry, but mails you´ve sended are more than offensive, and IMO EOD. Request is declined, and every next try of block evasion will lead to a block of your IP range and a information to your provider. Thanks --WizardOfOz ^talk 21:23, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

request not declined. Request is continuing thank you. Unlock and don't be so rude. You do as I say I do not deserved to be blocked. all I will say is i will be back you can't stop me, wiki is not elitest. It can't stop people so I suggest you unlock me. My behaviour was provoked, do you understand provoked hence not responsible. Goading from 2 users on my talk page and about me. Do you know what that means. So unlock me if you have any commonsense. And every reporting will lead to wikipedia being demolished. Secondly I was blocked for spamming and vandalism you changed the rules. You do not have the right to do that. So since you have changed them u unlock me as I have proved I was right and you were wrong. Do and do it now thank you

Today is just not your day. --WizardOfOz ^talk 21:30, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's it go hiding behind your blocks and locks when you know you are wrong. Carry on. Unlock me you have no justification to decline. i was locked for one thing your declining now for something else. Today's not your day as you will do what I say. You can't do what you just did. Unlock now

WizardOfOz cannot unlock you, only the stewards can. You can appeal by sending email to stewards-l@lists.wikimedia.org fr33kman 21:38, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sysop[edit]

Zašto si to učinio? Nije valjda zbog te priče o kategorijama? Takvih rasprava je bilo i biće na svim wikijima. U suštini, ovim je bswiki samo na gubitku :( micki t 16:29, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ako nesto mrzim, onda je nacionalizam i nase-vase. Kome treba nek neku uzima svoje. --WizardOfOz ^talk 16:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, neću da te ubeđujem i da ti dosađujem, ali još jednom izražavam žaljenje što je do toga došlo

Uglavnom, ima dovoljno posla i na drugim wikijima, pa ćeš ipak biti aktivan (nadam se). Pozdrav! micki t 20:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sigurno :D --WizardOfOz ^talk 20:58, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ime[edit]

Thnx :D Puno mi pomazes, a sto ovo nisi vise admin ? (Hattab 16:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Dakle?[edit]

Dakle, kao administrator, znate koja su pravila vikipedije povodom kategorijazije. Tri korisnika su se složila sa logičnim poboljšanjima, od toga je jedan administrator. Da čujem, šta sad, i šta dalje? --WhiteWriter 16:39, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

O bože. Sad sam tek video. Sve mi je jasno. --WhiteWriter 16:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Znaci moras pitati druge. --WizardOfOz ^talk 16:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sve mi je jasno... Ništa, i ja se povlačim odatle. Hvala ti svejedno na razumevanju, i izvini na svemu što sam ti, sasvim nenamerno prouzrokovao. --WhiteWriter 17:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nisi nista prouzrokovao, meni je svejedno sa koje strane dolazi nacionalizam, ne podnosim ga. --WizardOfOz ^talk 17:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ja ti garantujem da mi ni na kraj pameti nisu bile stvari koje su mi tako tužno i neprimereno pripisane. Editujem vikipedije od 2005. Nikada se neću vratiti tamo, osim za zamenu slika i sl. Korisniku CER-u treba pomoći da obavlja dužnosti administratora kako treba, jer trenutno ni blizu tako ne čini. Ovo je obrisano jedino i isključivo zato što je na ćirilici, jednim od zvaničnih pisama Bosne i Hercegovine. Verovatno će biti blokiran beskonačno posle ovog. I onda se postavi pitanje broj korisnika. Hvala za glas razuma, i izvini na deranžiranju, neću više, stvarno. Čedo preko Drine... Ta Drina nas i... :( Pozdrav, Oz. -WhiteWriter 17:33, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

poruka[edit]

Zdravo WizardofOz!Želio bih da ti predložim da uredim prije svega geografiju Goražda, jer sam uvido nedostatke koji su kardinalne greške. Nadam se da da cijenite mišljenja stručnjaka iz te oblasti...Imam dosta posdataka o Goraždu, počevši od geologije, geomorfologije, hidrografije, pedologije, urbane geografije, klimatologije itd..Samo trebam odobrenje da mogu vršiti izmjene.Duke of east 18:43, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ne znam zasto se obracate meni? I gdje mislite uredjivati clanak? Ako niste primjetili ovo je meta, sredisnji projekt za koordinaciju. Ako mislite uredjivati na bswiki, onda pitajte tamo jer ja vise nisam admin na bswiki. Inace uredjivati moze svako dok navodi provjerllive izvore, ovo je Wikipedija, slobodna enciklopedija. Poz --WizardOfOz ^talk 18:50, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some cookies for you![edit]

Hallo[edit]

Hallo WizardOfOz. Vielen Dank und ja; es war ein schüchterner Antrag :-) /me guesses some mistakes :s — you may proceed. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, -- Dferg ^{☎ talk} 18:48, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Translation[edit]

Hello. This is a message for all translators so sorry if it's already done. Thanks for your translation. Please note that this year's guidelines has changed, specifically this section that forbids all kind of comments in the voting page. Regards, -- Dferg 08:45, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bosanski prijevod filtra[edit]

Zdravo Wizarde, kako još uvijek ne postoji bosanski prijevod o filtru slika, možda je najbolje postaviti kombinaciju hrvatskog ili sh jezika. Ako si aktivan na bs wiki probaj nekoga zamoliti da dođe i prilagodi prijevod. Lijep podzrav --Anton 008 21:29, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WM:RFH[edit]

You're really too fast :D [1]. I'm happy to have a sysop colleague that works so hard. Thanks for your work, WizardOfOz ! -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 21:55, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Rollback[edit]

Hi Wizard. I wouldn't use rollback in that case, but you're correct. Thanks for the advice. Regards, Striker ^talk 18:12, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gde si, prijatelju?! Šta ima kod tebe? micki t 06:00, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gura se nekako. Bio sam nedavno u Bosni. Svratio sam na jedan dan i do Sarajeva. Sad spremam neke ispite i eto tako... Uobičajeno :) micki t 06:15, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Protection request[edit]

Would you please semiprotect my talk page again? Say, for 6 months? Thanks, NawlinWiki 13:55, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) NawlinWiki 16:17, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moje datoteke[edit]

Moje datoteke nisu bez izvora ,boje nisu pogrešne a i licence su uredu ,ali ne zanimame ako ne želiš moje datoteke na na bosanskoj wikipediji to je tvoja stvar.--Nanin7 15:46, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Grb sam stavio uz pomoć UploadWizard automatski je postavljena ta licenca .Naknadno sam promjenio licence File:Coat of Arms of Zepce.svg.--Nanin7 19:34, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]