Wikijunior/Logo/Proposal/A

From Meta

[edit] Current discussion

1. I think this is the best choice for the Wikijunior logo. However neither one was in SVG format. I've taken A turned it into an SVG image and changed the colors to give C. The color scheme of A and B are similar to the color scheme used by Wikimedia, so they may not be acceptable to the Wikimedia Foundation. --darklama 00:00, 23 April 2008 (UTC) updated: --darklama 19:26, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
2. I like this one. It stood out to someone passing by and seems to have some consistency with the WikiMedia logo. -- Jtneill - Talk 14:18, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
3. Yes I like this one, the A variant best. The colour schemes on the other two seem to confuse my eyes a bit, make it harder to grasp the shapes immediately. --Mcld 17:00, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
4. This design is my favorite out of all the Wikijunior logo candidates. My favorite color scheme is the first one, I think it fits the best with the other Wikimedia logos. Wesley Gray 20:04, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
5. I like A for first choice and C for second choice. We need uniformity for all projects. miranda 16:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
6. A is my favorite too. --Xaura 16:54, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
7. This logo uses the major portion of Wikimedia logo (two slices creating stylized W & M letters, also a circle above it, although bigger) which is definitely not good idea. (Actually my first thought when I saw this logo was "Wikimedias of the world, unite!" ;-)) Also versions A and B could be attacked as not "politically correct" since they show pretty much only Caucasian types.
   — Danny B. 01:24, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
8. A is the best one of all the proposals. It also gives the sence of "WikiJunior is a project of Wikimedia" to basic internet readers, just as "Maxis is an Electronic Arts brand". I quite agree that some people could also think of the logo as racist. I propose that we change the heads to a dark colour, the other one is brown, while the other is something light. -- Felipe Aira 09:15, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Previous discussion

1. This logo, kind of like the Wikiversity one, has slightly ambiguous depth. Obviously the middle "child" is in front, but they're all flat, and it should be on a different plane since it's closer, since we assume they're all the same size. Also, the sharp shape caused by the middle figure superimposed on the other two (in "B," the left hemisphere of the blue, right of red) is a little unpleasant. ALTON .ıl 07:38, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
2. I'd be fine with keeping this as the logo. What are the objections to this? – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 00:49, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
3. Keep this logo. It is already perfect. Londenp 11:59, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
4. Why two blue people in A, racial undertone here perhaps? I think they should all be colored differently like in B. colours in B better for heads and bodies. Take B picture and A font for best combination or maybe B is just all round better. SunCreator 14:56, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
5. Too christmasy, no.--Afa86 17:33, 19 April 2008 (UTC)