Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
Mjbmr (talk | contribs)
Line 63: Line 63:
==== User Sujay25@bn.wiktionary ====
==== User Sujay25@bn.wiktionary ====
{{sr-request
{{sr-request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|status = done<!--don't change this line-->
|domain = bn.wiktionary
|domain = bn.wiktionary
|user name = Sujay25
|user name = Sujay25
Line 69: Line 69:
}}
}}
The reason why I would like to have Adminship in Bengali Wiktionary is because this project is less popular and I think it is for absence of an active admin in here. Priority wise there are lot of works needed to be done like templates and gadgets. Most of them are not working properly. Structure of the Articles are also very much in random order. As I am an active editor in bn.wiktionary for last 3 years I have tried to encourage other editors from our community to edit here but they always complain it is very cumbersome to edit in here. [[User:Sujay25|Sujay25]] ([[User talk:Sujay25|talk]]) 20:34, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
The reason why I would like to have Adminship in Bengali Wiktionary is because this project is less popular and I think it is for absence of an active admin in here. Priority wise there are lot of works needed to be done like templates and gadgets. Most of them are not working properly. Structure of the Articles are also very much in random order. As I am an active editor in bn.wiktionary for last 3 years I have tried to encourage other editors from our community to edit here but they always complain it is very cumbersome to edit in here. [[User:Sujay25|Sujay25]] ([[User talk:Sujay25|talk]]) 20:34, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
:{{TempSysop|4|2015|06|07||}} --<small>[[User:MF-Warburg|MF-W]]</small> 00:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC)


==== Mjbmr@fawikivoyage ====
==== Mjbmr@fawikivoyage ====

Revision as of 00:51, 7 February 2015

Shortcut:
SRP

This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure.

Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.

  • Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
  • If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
  • For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type !steward in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type @steward for non-urgent help.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below:

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case you're requesting access for multiple bots, leave this field blank and give a list of these bots in your remarks
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

Requests

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below:

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

Steward requests/Permissions/Sysop-header

User Juster@ty.wp

Please create a local request. --MF-W 18:55, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I really like to create a local request, but there's no to much audience on this wiki, so they advised me to ask here --Juster (talk) 21:48, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That already seems like a request. Please link to it. --MF-W 23:43, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Here's the link [[1]]
 On hold until 8 Feb noting that this is a follow-on request from a short previous stint.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:40, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bokareis@gotwiki

Hello there. The reason why I would like to do an admin request is because I have studied several Gothic grammar books and due to the number of mistakes in the Wikipedia interface of the Gothic language I decided at a certain point to simply stop contributing, instead, I would like to an admin request now to clean up the mess, one of the reasons is that I have enough time to do this. The main page for example contains several sentences which are incorrect and misspelled words. If I get adminship (or a temporary one), it's possible for me to remove all mistakes which I spot and apply the correct grammar to them. Another thing which I would like to change are the language proficiency texts for Gothic (got-1, got-2 etc.), they contain sentences like: This person speaks Middle Gothic. I would rather like to change that to "Gothic at an average level", but with correct vocabulary, as this sentence reads like there exists some kind of Middle Gothic. I also need to change some of the system messages which currently aren't good, and the things from translatewiki don't get exported to got.wikipedia.org anymore too. I know that users at Wikipedias in ancient languages usually don't have the knowledge to contribute, but I also think that possible contributors are scared away by the grammar mistakes from users at the Gothic wikipedia which have good motivation and positive intentions, but which create texts which aren't of good quality. I also would like to change the current transliteration system. The current one requires users to copy-paste a javascript at each page, I 'm sure that I and the other users can find a better way to do it like an automatic javascript at every page. Bokareis (talk) 23:26, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

UsmanKhan@ur.wiktionary

Currently, There is no administrator on Urdu Wiktionary (See list) , An administrator is important for such an important educational project, I request to grant me Administrator as well as Bureaucrat rights to help in the improvement and development of Urdu Wiktionary project.--عثمان خان شاہ (talk) 20:44, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Admins are appointed by a consensus of the community so you will need to make your request there, and after a week stewards will evaluate it. Please link to any such discussion in the template field above. I do not think that stewards will be appointing crats to the wiki, there is no evident requirement.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:53, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
the page is linked.--عثمان خان شاہ (talk) 17:37, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User Sujay25@bn.wiktionary

The reason why I would like to have Adminship in Bengali Wiktionary is because this project is less popular and I think it is for absence of an active admin in here. Priority wise there are lot of works needed to be done like templates and gadgets. Most of them are not working properly. Structure of the Articles are also very much in random order. As I am an active editor in bn.wiktionary for last 3 years I have tried to encourage other editors from our community to edit here but they always complain it is very cumbersome to edit in here. Sujay25 (talk) 20:34, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Granted for 4 months to expire on 2015-06-07. --MF-W 00:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mjbmr@fawikivoyage

Sysop. Mjbmr (discussioncontribs) 22:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

Steward requests/Permissions/Crat-header

CheckUser access

Steward requests/Permissions/CU-header

Akeron@FRproject

The French Arbcom has appointed Akeron as a CU. For the French Arbcom, Laszlo french (talk) 14:53, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold pending identification. Trijnsteltalk 21:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lechatjaune@pt.wikipedia

Lechatjaune was elected for a one-year term as checkuser (44/1/0). As former member of Arbitration Committee, he is already been identified. Thanks in advance. Érico Wouters (msg) 19:14, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Trijnsteltalk 20:15, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wpedzich@plwiki

Per linked local policy, due to the result of RfCU (97% votes in favour), I hereby request granting Wpedzich Check User privileges at plwiki. Wpedzich has already identified himself to WMF. Einsbor (talk) 21:56, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Trijnsteltalk 22:00, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oversight access

Steward requests/Permissions/OS-header


Removal of access

<translate>

  • If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see [[<tvar name="self-discussion">Talk:Steward_requests/Permissions/2011#Self_requests</tvar>|previous discussion]] on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, provide a link to the discussion, with a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a [[<tvar name="crat-rem">Bureaucrat#Removing_access</tvar>|separate list of these specific wikis]].
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions for inactivity, link to your local inactivity policy. If your site does not have inactivity policy, the global policy [[<tvar name="aar">Admin activity review</tvar>|Admin activity review]] applies.
  • See the [[<tvar name="usage">#Using this page</tvar>|instructions above]] for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.</translate>

InvisibleSun@en.wikiquote

Removal of sysop and Bureaucrat flags after community discussion. Discussion time limit has elapsed. Results were eight (8) for removal (of both admin and bureaucrat flags) and three (3) for keep. Community agreed that this was simply due to inactivity and would be considered "without prejudice". Thank you, ---- Cirt (talk) 00:57, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:23, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This is now moot because the discussion has been re-closed but, for future reference, policy at en.wikiquote is that only local Bureaucrats should close a vote of confidence and bring the request here. ~ Ningauble (talk) 21:59, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous requests

Steward requests/Permissions/Misc-header


See also

Steward requests/Permissions/Footer