Steward requests/Global: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 100: Line 100:
}}
}}
:: Also, this is related to [[#Mr. man|the discussion above]], Mr. man is the hijacker who used the account as a sockpuppet.[[User:Andrei Stroe|Andrei Stroe]] 10:36, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
:: Also, this is related to [[#Mr. man|the discussion above]], Mr. man is the hijacker who used the account as a sockpuppet.[[User:Andrei Stroe|Andrei Stroe]] 10:36, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
:::We would need Mike to confirm but this account is already locked, by Mike Lifeguard, I believe per CU evidence that it was Mr.Man when we were investigating his other account. '''<font color="#999" face="Tahoma">[[User:Jamesofur|<font color="#008">James</font>]]'' ([[User talk:Jamesofur|<font color="#000">T</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Jamesofur|<font color="#000">C</font>]])</font>''''' 10:40, 1 February 2010 (UTC)


== Requests for global IP block exemption ==
== Requests for global IP block exemption ==

Revision as of 10:40, 1 February 2010

Shortcut:
SRG
This page hosts requests for membership in an existing global group and for requesting Global (un)blocks, locks and hidings. Proposals for new groups should be made on Meta:Babel.

To make a request, read the relevant policy (global rollback, global bot, global blocking) and make a request below. Explain why membership is needed for that group, and detail prior experience or qualifications and for requesting a global block, please indicate why a global block is necessary and for how long.

Any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion, though only stewards may use {{yes}} or {{no}} templates.

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests


Requests for global (un)block

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Please also review Global blocking. Only IP adresses can be globally blocked at this moment. Please see #Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding if your request involves an account.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You know the IP address(es) you wish to have globally blocked or unblocked.
  2. For blocks, the global blocking criteria are met.
  3. For unblocks, your request addresses the original reason for blocking the IP, if any.
When requesting that your IP be unblocked, note that stewards need to know your IP address to even consider a request.
To find your IP, please visit http://www.whatismyip.com/
You are not required to disclose your IP in public - you may make requests privately to any steward on IRC or by email.

Historic continuing falsification by two accounts and a static home-IPaddie

and by cu on nl-wiki confirmed sockpuppet

and added the static home-ip addie:

Belong to a dutch youngster that perpetuates in a very dangerous kind of vandalism, namely presenting real looking but often wrong information on historic articles on nl-wiki en-wiki de-wiki pl-wiki it-wiki fr-wiki, no-wiki and sv-wiki. It is gross scale falsification of data, adding real looking but wrong "facts"

nonsense for the most part removed and each time placed back by him - glatisant and mvdleeuw went to wiki-fr to remove it

Thank you - this is the worst kind of vandalism there is and efforts to deal with it on nl-wiki only lead to blocks getting longer and longer (currently six months), blocking of the sockpuppet but he simply when blocked continues with IP-addie and accounts on other wiki-versions. Kind regards, MoiraMoira 12:34, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Both accounts are globally locked, IP globally blocked. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:37, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. man

Hello! Please, i request unblock for global block of Mr. man. I promise that in future I will become quiet and I will not do that. I wish Mr. unlock global account man. Thank you.--79.118.29.196 12:29, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why should we believe what you say? You continued socking even after being blocked in the Romanian wikis. Pmlineditor ∞ 12:31, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Do not lie sir. I swear this time. I was wrong and I admit fault. Vărog if you sir, unlock me. Thank you beautiful.--79.118.29.196 12:35, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maye we can give him a chance, the last one. I have seen doing good job at Romanian Wikinews in the last week. I don't know. --Romihaitza 12:39, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please... I speake the sysop job. Thank you. --79.118.29.196 12:41, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't he have a last chance already?  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 15:44, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, he did? I was only told that he was blocked now and what for. I didn't know that he was granted a last chance. -Romihaitza 15:49, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
He did have a lot of chances at the Romanian Wikipedia and continued doing the wrong job. I am having daily discussions with him via IM and I do not notice any improvement of his thinking. Of course, despite: “I swear that I quench”.
Personally, I support young contributors, but I also oppose the ones who do not show good faith. Minisarm 17:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Now, I strongly oppose. User:Sirty is a clone of User:Mr. man and User:Ervin C. -- he told me this evening (via IM) he translated Stewards/elections 2010/Guidelines/ro and I was very surprised about that. He lied once again and he does not deserve any tolerance. Minisarm 18:02, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please kinly! No block me! Please! Thank you! --—Sirtytalk 18:20, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if your request doesn't include the necessary information.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting that a global account be (un)locked, please be sure that:

  1. You have evidence of cross-wiki disruption from the account(s).
  2. You can show that it is not feasible to use local-only blocks or other measures like page protection to combat the disruption.
  3. You have considered making the request in [irc:irc.freenode.net/wikimedia-stewards IRC], especially for account names which will be hidden, or for urgent requests.
To make a request for an account to be locked or unlocked
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why the account(s) should be locked/unlocked.
=== Global lock/unlock for [[user:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{Global request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |user name1= Example
 |user name2= Foo
 |user name3= Bar
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion= [[Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
}}
Status:    In progress
  • Redfox (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • CA • ST • lwcheckuser)
  • Discussion: This account has been hijacked. At ro.wikipedia, this user's unified account's password has been made public and the password was changed by someone else (4 Jan 2010). The account was blocked indefinitely at ro.wp, and the user agreed to use another account. However, the former account has been used later (9 Jan 2010) as a sockpuppet(as shown by checkuser) in order to obtain adminship at ro.wikiquote, and possibly for distructive edits at other wikis. Most of the evidence is in Romanian, approximate translations are:
    • [1] "I found Redfox' access requisites: Username:Redfox Passowrd:digital-tower" - these credentials are not valid anymore, as they have been changed; message repeatedly written on the ro.wikipedia Village Pump, 4 Jan 2010.
    • [2] "We only wanted to scare redfox, today he came to work, looked at access logs and exposed us. (...) We never thought anyone would change his password. (...)"; message left on my talk page, 5 Jan 2010 - irrelevant parts are left out, they refer to the personal quarrel of the account's owner and those who exposed his credentials, I can translate that, too, if requested. Andrei Stroe 14:29, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could Redfox (I mean the right one with his new account) confirm this request please? --თოგო (D) 14:20, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the second of two edits made by the global account post-block (a quick 'hello!' on meta). A comment from redfox would help resolve this. Sj+ help translate 00:29, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I asked him via e-mail for a confirmation.Andrei Stroe 10:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also, this is related to the discussion above, Mr. man is the hijacker who used the account as a sockpuppet.Andrei Stroe 10:36, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
We would need Mike to confirm but this account is already locked, by Mike Lifeguard, I believe per CU evidence that it was Mr.Man when we were investigating his other account. James (T C) 10:40, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for global IP block exemption

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review Global IP block exemption
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting global IP block exemption, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To request global IP block exemption
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why you need the access and why you're suitable. If needed, link to relevant discussions.
=== Global IP block exempt for [[user:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = 
 |discussion=
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a short period of consideration (typically 5 days). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

None currently

Requests for global rollback permissions

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review Global rollback
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable.
===Global rollback for [[user:Foo|Foo]]===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = Username
}}

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a short period of consideration (typically 5 days). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

Global rollback for Jyothis

Status:    In progress

I work in swmt and in fighting vandalism and I am a regular in #cvn-sw. I am an admin in ml wikipedia, wikisource and BC in wikibooks. Thanks!--Jyothis 14:29, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DerHexer, some of the edits (like page tags) may have already been deleted. Here are some that I could find - here, here, here. --Jyothis 23:21, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Global&oldid=1837456"