Steward requests/Checkuser: Difference between revisions
Quentinv57 (talk | contribs) →Spambot @ zh.wikipedia: results |
+evidences and answers. |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
=== Lacerda Bhahia@pt.wikipedia === |
=== Lacerda Bhahia@pt.wikipedia === |
||
{{CU request |
{{CU request |
||
|status = |
|status = <!--don't change this line--> |
||
|language code = pt |
|language code = pt |
||
|project shortcut= w |
|project shortcut= w |
||
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
:Eu acho uma total falta de irresponsabilidade simplesmente listar os suspeitos por cidade. Há quase 2 milhões de pessoas vivendo em Curitiba e refinar a lista de suspeitos por uma categoria criada por uma userbox é um total erro. Acham mesmo que um fantoche poderia cair no erro de indicar a localização de sua cidade por userbox? Raríssimos socks que eu vi usaram do recursos de userboxes. Não sei se posso ser suspeito, já que o meu IP é um número totalmente diferente do mencionado (201.89.79.126). Edito aqui regularmente há 3 anos e nunca fiquei sob este tipo de suspeita. Conheço o trabalho de alguns dos usuários mencionados como o Deyvid Setti e posso afirmar que ele faz contribuições responsáveis para o projeto. Esse tipo de seleção de suspeitos é muito superficial, me desculpem. ('''English''':I think a total lack of irresponsibility simply list the suspects by city. Nearly 2 million people living in Curitiba actually and refine the list of suspects by a category created by a Userbox is a total mistake. Do you really think a sock puppet might fall into the error of indicating the location of your city using a Userbox? Socks that I saw very few used the resources of userboxes. I do not know if I can be suspicious, since my IP is a totally different number mentioned (201.89.79.126). I edict here regularly for 3 years and never been under such suspicion. I know the work of some of the users mentioned as Deyvid Setti and I can say that he is responsible contributions for the project. This type of selection of suspects is very superficial. Sorry.) [[User:Wallinson|Wallinson]] 00:35, 14 February 2012 (UTC) |
:Eu acho uma total falta de irresponsabilidade simplesmente listar os suspeitos por cidade. Há quase 2 milhões de pessoas vivendo em Curitiba e refinar a lista de suspeitos por uma categoria criada por uma userbox é um total erro. Acham mesmo que um fantoche poderia cair no erro de indicar a localização de sua cidade por userbox? Raríssimos socks que eu vi usaram do recursos de userboxes. Não sei se posso ser suspeito, já que o meu IP é um número totalmente diferente do mencionado (201.89.79.126). Edito aqui regularmente há 3 anos e nunca fiquei sob este tipo de suspeita. Conheço o trabalho de alguns dos usuários mencionados como o Deyvid Setti e posso afirmar que ele faz contribuições responsáveis para o projeto. Esse tipo de seleção de suspeitos é muito superficial, me desculpem. ('''English''':I think a total lack of irresponsibility simply list the suspects by city. Nearly 2 million people living in Curitiba actually and refine the list of suspects by a category created by a Userbox is a total mistake. Do you really think a sock puppet might fall into the error of indicating the location of your city using a Userbox? Socks that I saw very few used the resources of userboxes. I do not know if I can be suspicious, since my IP is a totally different number mentioned (201.89.79.126). I edict here regularly for 3 years and never been under such suspicion. I know the work of some of the users mentioned as Deyvid Setti and I can say that he is responsible contributions for the project. This type of selection of suspects is very superficial. Sorry.) [[User:Wallinson|Wallinson]] 00:35, 14 February 2012 (UTC) |
||
'''Translate to Portuguese''': ''Eu sinto obrigado a informar [a] todos os stewards aqui que o Usuário:Bruno Leonard é completamente inconfiável, como mostram por freqüentes bloqueios na PT-WP. Sua alegação é preposterosa, há mais de um milhão de usuários na PT-WP e ele está tentando provar uma coneção aleatória só porque esses usuários são de Curitiba, que é a 8ª maior cidade no Brasil e por isso tem uma quantidade significativa dos usuários em PT-WP. Isto parece que o Usuário:Bruno Leonard é um paranóico conspirador, mas eu vou deixar você tirar [sic] suas próprias conclusões. (...) Então, deparei com isso e decidi postar os links aqui, neste absurdo pedido. Eu espero que mostre como este Usuário:Bruno Leonard não é confiável, [é] paranóico conspirador.''<br>Quer dizer que a minha alegação posta pedido de verificação, ao tentar ''"provar uma coneção aleatória só porque esses usuários são de Curitiba (...)"'' é ''"absurda"''? Como é que eu tenho provas irrefutáveis da maior suspeita que você é o mesmo que se disfarça em diversos IPs, hã? Como soube dessa verificação, pois nem [http://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usu%C3%A1rio_Discuss%C3%A3o:31Julho1985&action=history sequer foi avisado em IPs ou usuários registrados] (veja o histórico). Aliás, depois que postei essa verificação, você [[:pt:w:Tropa de Elite|pediu pra sair]] [http://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikip%C3%A9dia%3APedidos_a_administradores%2FPedidos_de_bloqueio&action=historysubmit&diff=28855374&oldid=28854460 da wikipédia] e ainda vamdaliza [http://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usu%C3%A1rio_Discuss%C3%A3o:Bruno_Leonard&diff=prev&oldid=28883371 minha discussão da WP-PT] e depois no meta por duas vezes [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABruno_Leonard&action=historysubmit&diff=2260325&oldid=2257081 aqui] (IP {{srcu|187.59.64.61}}) e [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bruno_Leonard&diff=prev&oldid=3434535 aqui] (IP {{srcu|189.34.91.21}}), chamando de ''"(...) CHEFE DESTA GANGUE (...). UM BANDIDO (...)."''. Depois |
|||
dessas edições, gerou dúvida: Por que esse usuário (31Julho1985) resolveu ser inativo, se o mesmo diz que não ter ligação e ainda depois das minhas denúncias? Esse usuário não é confiável e ainda descobri mais IPs em janeiro ({{srcu|189.123.241.108}} e {{srcu|189.123.242.154}}) e ainda tem usuários já estão desconfiando de você numa votação [[:w:pt:Wikipédia:Páginas para eliminar/Filipe de Fiúza|Wikipédia:Páginas para eliminar/Filipe de Fiúza]] e o pior, ao invés de se defender, me calunia ao chamar de ''"conspirador paranóico"''. Pode ter certeza que vai ter troco e não tenho medo das suas ameaças. Posso ter problemas por conta de diversos bloqueios, mas não sou igual a esse vândalo caluniador.<br>Sobre reclamação do usuário acima (Wallinson), não estou acusando todos os usuários de Curitiba só por que é 8ª maior cidade do Brasil e que a WP-PT tem 1 milhão de usuários (na verdade tem quase 1 milhão), mas apenas reafirmar que há um usuário que se disfarça de IPs e usuários registrados. O mais curioso é que quando posto esta verificação é bem lenta, mas comparar com outros casos, é rapidamente feita em poucos dias. E aí, algum checkuser não vai verificar as contas suspeitas ou querem que eu apresente "mais provas"?<br>('''Translate to English''': ''You mean put my claim check request, trying to "prove a random connection just because these users are in Curitiba (...)" is "preposterous"? How do I evidences irrefutables of greater suspicion that you are the same as disguises himself in various IPs, eh? How did this check, it was not even warned in IPs and registered users (see history). In fact, after I posted this check, you ask to quit wikipedia and still vandalizing my discussion of the WP-PT and then the goal here twice (IP 187.59.64.61) and here (IP 189.34.91.21), calling "(...) THIS GANG BOSS (...). A BANDIT (...).". After these issues, generated questions: Why this user (31Julho1985) decided to be inactive, if it says it does not have a connection and even after my complaints? This user is not trusted IPs and also found out in January (189.123.241.108 and 189.123.242.154) and still have users are already suspicious of you vote in Wikipédia:Páginas para eliminar/Filipe de Fiúza and worse, instead of defending himself, slander to call me "paranoid conspirator". You can be sure it will have change and not afraid of their threats. I have problems on behalf of several blocks, but I'm not like this thug slanderer.<br>On complaint of the above user (Wallinson), I'm not accusing all users of Curitiba just because it is the 8th largest city in Brazil and the WP-EN has 1 million users (in fact has almost 1 million), but only to reaffirm that there is a user who disguises herself as IPs and registered users. The funniest thing is that when you put this check is very slow, but compared with other cases, it is quickly done in a few days. And then, some checkuser will not check the suspicious accounts or want me to present "additional evidence"?''). [[User:Bruno Leonard|Bruno Leonard]] 00:22, 16 February 2012 (UTC) |
|||
=== Turereporter@zh.wikipedia === |
=== Turereporter@zh.wikipedia === |
Revision as of 00:22, 16 February 2012
Checkuser icons | |
---|---|
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments. | |
{{Confirmed}}: Confirmed | {{MoreInfo}}: Additional information needed |
{{Likely}}: Likely | {{Deferred}}: Deferred to |
{{Possible}}: Possible | {{Completed}}: Completed |
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely | {{TakeNote}}: Note: |
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated | {{Doing}}: Doing... |
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive | {{StaleIP}}: Stale |
{{Declined}}: Declined | {{Fishing}}: CheckUser is not for fishing |
{{Pixiedust}}: CheckUser is not magic pixie dust | {{8ball}}: The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says |
{{Duck}}: It looks like a duck to me | {{Crystalball}}: CheckUser is not a crystal ball |
<translate> This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also [[<tvar name="SRP">Steward requests/Permissions</tvar>|requesting checkuser access]]). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.</translate>
<translate> Before making a request:</translate>
- <translate> Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.</translate>
- <translate> Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using [[<tvar name="diff">mw:Special:MyLanguage/Help:Diff</tvar>|diff links]] or other evidence.</translate>
- <translate> Make sure there are no local checkusers.</translate>
- <translate> Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:</translate>
<translate> How to make a request</translate>
|
---|
<translate> How to make a request:</translate>
|
Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Requests
Rightpeople@zh.wikipedia
- List of users
- Rightpeople (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- 正義者 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Goodeditor (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Wukiwriter (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Correctnews (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Mytvcom (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- It's Likely Goodeditor, Wukiwriter, Correctnews and Mytvcom are the same. Bettytseone is a Confirmed sock of Goodeditor.
- More accounts who are Likely related: Boscobody, Specialgood, Sueling, Citywalking, Balleho and Turereporter. (Please check their edits.)
- Rightpeople is technically Unrelated and 正義者 is Stale.
- Kind regards, Trijnstel 18:32, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Many thanks!--Gakmo 00:39, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Donkey06@pt.wikipedia
- List of users
- Donkey06 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Ogacihc (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Kroywenn (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Selegna (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Esramm (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- CU log
- Discussion: w:pt:Anexo:Lista de países e territórios por área. See also w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Donkey06/Archive.
- Donkey06 is Stale, but Confirmed for Ogacihc = Selegna = Gabriel Rosetti. As for Kroywenn and Esramm, they seem Unrelated. --FiliP ██ 10:17, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Lacerda Bhahia@pt.wikipedia
- List of users
- Chucknurres (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- 31Julho1985 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- CAPGIGANTE (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- WikiLord (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Pepita Negra (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Joaquim C. Sousa (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Al Lemos (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Caroline Rossini (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): No ano passado fiz denúncia e que confirmou o maior escândalo de sock puppets da WP-PT de todos os tempos aqui. Porém, nos últimos seis meses, ele voltou (Lacerda Bhahia) com diversos IPs e contas, que verificados pelo Utrace, todos eles são de Curitiba, Estado do Paraná, sul do Brasil, apenas editar bairros de Curitiba e pedir bloqueios aos usuários desafetos. Abaixo os IPs de Curitiba (English: Last year I made the complaint and confirmed that the biggest scandal of sock puppets of EN-WP of all time here. But in the last six months, he returned (Lacerda Bhahia) with different IPs and accounts, which verified by Utrace, they are all in Curitiba, Parana State, southern Brazil, Curitiba neighborhoods just edit and ask users to block rivals. Below the IPs of Curitiba):
- 187.37.246.249 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- 189.123.242.230 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- 177.16.133.36 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- 187.37.106.118 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- 200.189.119.250 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- 189.123.242.230 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- 201.24.29.84 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser) (provável / probable)
- 177.16.133.36 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser) (provável / probable)
Nota: todos os IPs são iniciais 187, 188 e 189, o que demonstra que usuário utiliza é IP sock puppet (usa diversos IPs para enganar outros usuários e sabe bem das políticas). Há também IPs iniciais 200 e 201, dos Estados (São Paulo e Rio de Janeiro, entre outros) aproveitam pra fazerem o mesmo, o que leva as suspeitas de combinação. Abaixo as listas deles, retirados do Wikipédia:Pedidos a administradores/Pedidos de bloqueio/Arquivo (English: Note: All initial IPs are 187, 188 and 189, which shows that user is using IP sock puppet (use different IPs to deceive others and is well aware of the policies). There is also initial IP 200 and 201, the states (São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, among others) use to do the same, which leads to suspicions of match. Below lists them:): 2010/05, 2010/06, 2010/07, 2010/08, 2010/09, 2010/10, 2010/11, 2010/12, 2011/01, 2011/02, 2011/03, 2011/04, 2011/05, 2011/06, 2011/07, 2011/08, 2011/09, 2011/10, 2011/11, 2011/12 e 2012/01.
Lista de todos os usuários suspeitos (English: List all users suspected): Wikipedistas em Curitiba.
As provas ou suspeitas colhidas podem indicar que a Wikipédia pode ter sido manipuladas por muito tempo e só eu percebi (English: The collected evidence or suspicion may indicate that Wikipedia may have been manipulated for a long time and I only realized). Bruno Leonard 05:15, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Como aconteceu vandalismo recente com ofensas, [3] e [4], inclua esse IP e usuários na verificação, baseado nas suspeitas aqui. (English: As happened with recent vandalism offenses, [...], include the IP and users in verification, based on suspicions here.):
- 189.34.91.65 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Jonathan Baltazar (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Jolielegal (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Deyvid Setti (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Bruno Leonard 02:36, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- I feel obliged to inform all stewards in here that User:Bruno Leonard is completely unreliable, as show by his frequents blocks on PT-WP. His claim is preposterous, there's over a million users on PT-WP and he's trying to prove a random connection just because these users are in Curitiba, which is the 8th largest city in Brazil and so it has a significant amount of users on PT-WP. It seems to me that User:Bruno Leonard is a paranoid conspirator, but I'll let you reach your own conclusions.--31Julho1985 03:49, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- So I came upon this and I decided to post the links here, in this absurd request. I hope this shows how User:Bruno Leonard in an unreliable, paranoid conspirator.
Links: [[1]] [[2]] [[3]] --31Julho1985 04:01, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Not done Seems like CheckUser is not for fishing applies fr33kman 05:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Eu acho uma total falta de irresponsabilidade simplesmente listar os suspeitos por cidade. Há quase 2 milhões de pessoas vivendo em Curitiba e refinar a lista de suspeitos por uma categoria criada por uma userbox é um total erro. Acham mesmo que um fantoche poderia cair no erro de indicar a localização de sua cidade por userbox? Raríssimos socks que eu vi usaram do recursos de userboxes. Não sei se posso ser suspeito, já que o meu IP é um número totalmente diferente do mencionado (201.89.79.126). Edito aqui regularmente há 3 anos e nunca fiquei sob este tipo de suspeita. Conheço o trabalho de alguns dos usuários mencionados como o Deyvid Setti e posso afirmar que ele faz contribuições responsáveis para o projeto. Esse tipo de seleção de suspeitos é muito superficial, me desculpem. (English:I think a total lack of irresponsibility simply list the suspects by city. Nearly 2 million people living in Curitiba actually and refine the list of suspects by a category created by a Userbox is a total mistake. Do you really think a sock puppet might fall into the error of indicating the location of your city using a Userbox? Socks that I saw very few used the resources of userboxes. I do not know if I can be suspicious, since my IP is a totally different number mentioned (201.89.79.126). I edict here regularly for 3 years and never been under such suspicion. I know the work of some of the users mentioned as Deyvid Setti and I can say that he is responsible contributions for the project. This type of selection of suspects is very superficial. Sorry.) Wallinson 00:35, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Translate to Portuguese: Eu sinto obrigado a informar [a] todos os stewards aqui que o Usuário:Bruno Leonard é completamente inconfiável, como mostram por freqüentes bloqueios na PT-WP. Sua alegação é preposterosa, há mais de um milhão de usuários na PT-WP e ele está tentando provar uma coneção aleatória só porque esses usuários são de Curitiba, que é a 8ª maior cidade no Brasil e por isso tem uma quantidade significativa dos usuários em PT-WP. Isto parece que o Usuário:Bruno Leonard é um paranóico conspirador, mas eu vou deixar você tirar [sic] suas próprias conclusões. (...) Então, deparei com isso e decidi postar os links aqui, neste absurdo pedido. Eu espero que mostre como este Usuário:Bruno Leonard não é confiável, [é] paranóico conspirador.
Quer dizer que a minha alegação posta pedido de verificação, ao tentar "provar uma coneção aleatória só porque esses usuários são de Curitiba (...)" é "absurda"? Como é que eu tenho provas irrefutáveis da maior suspeita que você é o mesmo que se disfarça em diversos IPs, hã? Como soube dessa verificação, pois nem sequer foi avisado em IPs ou usuários registrados (veja o histórico). Aliás, depois que postei essa verificação, você pediu pra sair da wikipédia e ainda vamdaliza minha discussão da WP-PT e depois no meta por duas vezes aqui (IP 187.59.64.61 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)) e aqui (IP 189.34.91.21 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)), chamando de "(...) CHEFE DESTA GANGUE (...). UM BANDIDO (...).". Depois
dessas edições, gerou dúvida: Por que esse usuário (31Julho1985) resolveu ser inativo, se o mesmo diz que não ter ligação e ainda depois das minhas denúncias? Esse usuário não é confiável e ainda descobri mais IPs em janeiro (189.123.241.108 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser) e 189.123.242.154 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)) e ainda tem usuários já estão desconfiando de você numa votação Wikipédia:Páginas para eliminar/Filipe de Fiúza e o pior, ao invés de se defender, me calunia ao chamar de "conspirador paranóico". Pode ter certeza que vai ter troco e não tenho medo das suas ameaças. Posso ter problemas por conta de diversos bloqueios, mas não sou igual a esse vândalo caluniador.
Sobre reclamação do usuário acima (Wallinson), não estou acusando todos os usuários de Curitiba só por que é 8ª maior cidade do Brasil e que a WP-PT tem 1 milhão de usuários (na verdade tem quase 1 milhão), mas apenas reafirmar que há um usuário que se disfarça de IPs e usuários registrados. O mais curioso é que quando posto esta verificação é bem lenta, mas comparar com outros casos, é rapidamente feita em poucos dias. E aí, algum checkuser não vai verificar as contas suspeitas ou querem que eu apresente "mais provas"?
(Translate to English: You mean put my claim check request, trying to "prove a random connection just because these users are in Curitiba (...)" is "preposterous"? How do I evidences irrefutables of greater suspicion that you are the same as disguises himself in various IPs, eh? How did this check, it was not even warned in IPs and registered users (see history). In fact, after I posted this check, you ask to quit wikipedia and still vandalizing my discussion of the WP-PT and then the goal here twice (IP 187.59.64.61) and here (IP 189.34.91.21), calling "(...) THIS GANG BOSS (...). A BANDIT (...).". After these issues, generated questions: Why this user (31Julho1985) decided to be inactive, if it says it does not have a connection and even after my complaints? This user is not trusted IPs and also found out in January (189.123.241.108 and 189.123.242.154) and still have users are already suspicious of you vote in Wikipédia:Páginas para eliminar/Filipe de Fiúza and worse, instead of defending himself, slander to call me "paranoid conspirator". You can be sure it will have change and not afraid of their threats. I have problems on behalf of several blocks, but I'm not like this thug slanderer.
On complaint of the above user (Wallinson), I'm not accusing all users of Curitiba just because it is the 8th largest city in Brazil and the WP-EN has 1 million users (in fact has almost 1 million), but only to reaffirm that there is a user who disguises herself as IPs and registered users. The funniest thing is that when you put this check is very slow, but compared with other cases, it is quickly done in a few days. And then, some checkuser will not check the suspicious accounts or want me to present "additional evidence"?). Bruno Leonard 00:22, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Turereporter@zh.wikipedia
- List of users
- Turereporter (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Citywalking (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Tonesmaybe (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Moneyocean (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Aboutvital (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Heardused (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Thatturn771 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Passbybye (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Rightpeople (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- CU log
- Discussion: zh:wp:RFCU, zh:wp:AIV, zh:talk:名媛望族, zh:talk:缺宅男女
- Confirmed that:
- Tonesmaybe = Guideheads = Thatturn771 = Referspoke = Touchtouch666 = Moneyocean = Realblues = Aboutvital = Cloudraise = Haveseems = Heardused = Localbrief = Halfgoalsff = Tendssuch = Linesopendrr = Cleardance = Stepshaltdfgr = Handsblindships = Dataopenttr = Civilpaper = Beingsixty66 = Sleeppanic = Civiltypes = Axispenny = Madeblind = Whendropsada = Poemsnewly = Closebirds11111 = Bloodyears = Loopbrown = Aboutsteps55 = Rancheach333 = Totalahead = Hfduhfisudhis = Goalsclub = Comesroadhruhgr = Ideasroads = Spanblood = Wavesaway = Panelbased
- Turereporter = Citywalking = Bettytseone, but likely Unrelated to others
- Passbybye = Passbyby, but likely Unrelated to others
- However, Rightpeople seems completely unrelated. As you can see, there is a clear sockfarm there, with somewhat usernames mostly having some kind of pattern. --FiliP ██ 10:46, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Comment See also this request above with some of these sockpuppets. Trijnstel 11:27, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. And, as an admin on zhwp asks (wp:AIV), could you please check whether those 40 users listed above are puppets of KellyMok (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate) or not? --Naiveandsilly 17:07, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- After a review of PeterSymonds we both agree it's Likely the above sockpuppets are related to KellyMok. Trijnstel 19:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, it may be a sockpuppets of Kellymok's puppet... Here comes the final 外劇迷 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate). Sorry for any trouble made. Vandalism is rediculously complex on those articles of TVB dramas. --Naiveandsilly 16:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- That account doesn't exist. Are you sure you mentioned the correct username? Trijnstel 17:13, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, it may be a sockpuppets of Kellymok's puppet... Here comes the final 外劇迷 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate). Sorry for any trouble made. Vandalism is rediculously complex on those articles of TVB dramas. --Naiveandsilly 16:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- After a review of PeterSymonds we both agree it's Likely the above sockpuppets are related to KellyMok. Trijnstel 19:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. And, as an admin on zhwp asks (wp:AIV), could you please check whether those 40 users listed above are puppets of KellyMok (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate) or not? --Naiveandsilly 17:07, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Comment See also this request above with some of these sockpuppets. Trijnstel 11:27, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- The account is 外剧迷 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate)--Shizhao 01:54, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
LeoINTDP@pt.wikipedia
- List of users
- LeoINTDP (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Jesús Dátolo 23 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- CU log
- Discussion: w:pt:Alexandre Pato
- Is there a reason to believe that they are violating the policy on multiple accounts? CheckUser is not for fishing, and just because two editors share an opinion does not mean that they are the same editor. If you can show evidence why they may be the same editor, great. Otherwise, local dispute resolution and/or protective measures seem more appropriate. Have I missed something? -- Avi 00:47, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, there is good reason to suspect. Previously, LeoINTDP violated BLP in pt:Jesús Dátolo (view), the same name as possible sockpuppet. As shown previously, LeoINTDP had conflicts on page pt:Alexandre Pato. Please see the links and accept this request. I can answer any question you, but it will be a very bad English. Sorry for bad English. PcTalk 01:00, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Inconclusive Outside that their ISPs both are in the same geopolitical entity, I don't see an obvious connection. If another steward wants to review, that would be fine. -- Avi 01:42, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Braz Leme@pt.wikipedia
- List of users
- Braz Leme (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Paulista Separatista (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Russoww (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- The links you gave us do not provide any reason to check those users. pt:User:Paulista Separatista only edited the talk page, both others just have one or two edits on the page itself ... So no problem yet. a×pdeHello! 10:08, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Spambot @ zh.wikipedia
- List of users
- CU log
- Discussion: w:zh:Special:log/block/Bencmq
- Doing.... True that it would be better if you had the right to do it yourself. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 16:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- Inconclusive I checked almost ten of these spammers, but there's unfortunately nothing to be done. All the ones I checked come from different IP ranges, some even come from different countries. I guess it would be better to improve the spam detection methods. I can help you if you want, just pick me out some of those spambot edits that have not been matched by the AbuseFilter and I will try to help you. Kind regards, -- Quentinv57 (talk) 16:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
See also
- Archives:
- CheckUser policy.
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation