要約ウィキペディア/要約ウィキペディア命名コンテスト/名称

第二回目の投票は'2025年11月19日に開始され、12月1日に終了します。

このプロジェクトの概要をお読みいただき、抽象ウィキペディアについて理解し、投票資格の詳細をご確認ください。 ウィキメディア財団の法務部門および広報部門から提供された注意事項が、各選択肢の横にある表に示されています。

#	名前	例	Round 1 votes and discussions	コミュニティからのメモ	ウィキメディア財団からのメモ
1	Abstract Wikipedia		リンク	abstracting from concrete languages established name for the project contains "Wikipedia", but it is not only for Wikipedia contains "Wikipedia" people know, but is not like the Wikipedia people know "abstract" is ambiguous, and can refer to research paper summaries, art, mathematical abstraction, etc. 完全な議論を参照	Legal: Using an established trademark such as Wikipedia as part of the name gives us a lot of legal certainty. Branding: OK branding — Existing name. It implies modification of the existing Wikipedia platform but deviates from the movement naming practice of using a Wiki prefix which creates a disconnect.
2	Multilingual Wikipedia		リンク	intended to be multilingual, ie. usable by people with different mother tongues straightforward, simple, clear, and plain contains "Wikipedia", but it is not only for Wikipedia contains "Wikipedia" people know, but is not like the Wikipedia people know Wikipedia is already multlingual 完全な議論を参照	Legal: Using an established trademark such as Wikipedia as part of the name gives us a lot of legal certainty. Branding: Difficult branding — Deviates from movement naming practices and could be misread as a description of Wikipedia instead of a project itself. It is also confusing and misleading as Wikipedia is already multilingual.
3	Wikiabstracts		リンク	generating data-based short texts similar to academic abstracts conveys what it is about seems confusing, and plays with a "misconception" about the project aim "abstract" is ambiguous, and can refer to research paper summaries, art, mathematical abstraction, etc. 完全な議論を参照	Legal: More in-depth legal review would be needed if this option wins, to determine if we could adequately protect it as a trademark. Branding: Good branding — Makes clear use of movement naming practices (Wiki prefix) but uses a common word (abstracts) usually used to describe summaries which could be misleading.
4	Wikigenerator		リンク	a project that generates text for Wikipedia clear, immediately understandable, creative will be confused with generative AI sounds like a project to generate wikis (like Incubator), not just text for some wikis 完全な議論を参照	Legal: More in-depth legal review would be needed if this option wins, to determine if we could adequately protect it as a trademark. Branding: Great branding — Makes clear use of movement naming practices (Wiki prefix) and uses a common term (generator) to clearly communicate the project’s functionality.
5	Proto-Wiki		リンク	"proto" meaning "before" or "original", as in "proto language" following the pattern of Meta-Wiki; rolls off the tongue unusual pattern with the hyphen and capitalization this project is not a predecessor to a "real" wiki, which the name suggests 完全な議論を参照	Legal: More in-depth legal review would be needed if this option wins, to determine if we could adequately protect it as a trademark. Branding: Difficult branding — Somewhat follows movement naming practices by using Wiki as a suffix but uses an uncommon word (Proto) that could lead to misinterpretation and lack of clarity on what the project is about.