Abstract Wikipedia/Wikifunctions logo concept/Proposal 10

The idea was to have the logo representing a function, with the red central circle being the "code".
The blue parenthesis brings a dynamic visual for the concept.
Colors, design proportions and the visual language are meant to be in line with the family of project logos.

Voting[edit]

Voting has closed.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Support Mahir256 (talk) 00:12, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Ddxfx 01:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bodhisattwa (talk) 02:54, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jeeputer (talk) 03:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good use of d:Q87528921, brings to mind clockwork Arlo Barnes (talk) 04:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gopico (talk) 07:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like the symethry and "F" in the logo. Emptywords (talk) 07:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support GeMet (talk) 07:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Vojtasafr (talk) 08:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Teseo (talk) 08:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ויקי4800 (talk) 10:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sgd. —Hasley 14:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ain92 (talk) 18:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pennenetui3000 (talk) 20:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alvaro Vidal-Abarca (talk) 20:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Xavi Dengra (MESSAGES) 23:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SD hehua (talk) 05:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hasmetlihasmet (talk) 16:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ZioNicco (talk) 13:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Aca (talk) 16:27, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Qh13 (talk) 17:31, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Artrixs (talk) 11:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Farzinovski (talk) 13:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rita2008 (talk) 17:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Epìdosis 19:16, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Daniel Mietchen (talk) 03:22, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 06:18, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yacine Boussoufa (Talk!) 06:55, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Guettarda (talk) 00:40, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is mystical, its integrative, it is even a bit musical. Nice one. TiagoLubiana (talk) 01:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Xiplus (talk) 08:41, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support BLWikimedian (talk) 09:40, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 13:18, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nhakama (talk) 21:07, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adamant.pwn (talk) 01:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Higa4 (talk) 05:01, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support 99of9 (talk) 06:33, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Liked the use of the letter f - it will make this logo clear Ldorfman (talk) 23:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hsarrazin (talk) 18:31, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Harald Krichel (talk) 19:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mastrocom (talk) 20:02, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Aleks Andre (talk) 04:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ата ^(talk) 06:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Photonoxx (talk) 07:18, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support The shape makes me think of mathematical notation and the layout and weight seem a good match to other Wikimedia logos. MartinPoulter (talk) 09:18, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thiemo Kreuz (WMDE) (talk) 16:37, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quiddity (talk) 17:43, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support WFC-11-12-55 (talk) 19:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.