Abstract Wikipedia/Wikifunctions logo concept/Proposal 9

It should be fairly obvious that the design is based on a fusion of two letters "W" (for wiki) and "λ" (for functions).
The logo is also a carefully organized composition of four triangular arrows. Arrow is used in the design as the building block because it is commonly used to represent functions under various circumstances, such as arrow notation for mathematical functions, and arrow functions in different programming languages.
Because of its simplicity, it works well at different sizes and can be easily adapted for different applications (the "powered by" button is an example application).
Shapes in the logo are based on the design grid to create geometric harmony.

Voting[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Voting has closed.

Support Mahir256 (talk) 00:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thadguidry (talk) 00:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shizhao (talk) 01:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support By far the most pleasing one to look at. In contrast to a lot of others, it works great in small sizes and low resolutions, because it is not too detailed. Yet it perfectly conveys what Wikifunctions will be about using common symbols. Would still look great in black and white. Bonus: the W looks a bit like horns symbolising the potential of the project. CamelCaseNick (talk) 02:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Original. Love it. — 🍕 Yivan000 ^view_talk 03:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support —〚 Arronwan 〛 03:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Strong support to this one! Jeeputer (talk) 03:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Labdajiwa (talk) 04:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love it. Legoktm (talk) 04:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - My favorite in visual effect and in spirit. Recognizable and memorable on its own, not just as a subset of characters one could type on a keyboard. –SJ talk 05:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amadalvarez (talk) 06:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Babu (talk) 06:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mysterymanblue (talk) 07:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Elegant, evocative, clear, and nice to look at Julio974fr (talk) 07:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support GeographieMan (talk) 07:31, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support J'aime cette présentation. I like the design. Huguespotter (talk) 07:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Markus Krötzsch (talk) 08:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Just because of lambda reference Papuass (talk) 08:31, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ornek11222^talk 08:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support TFerenczy (talk) 09:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sintakso (talk) 09:46, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support GPSLeo (talk) 11:33, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lepticed7 (talk) 11:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kpjas (talk) 11:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tulp8 (talk) 12:03, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Root992 (talk) 13:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --★ Ano op✉ 13:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tgr (talk) 13:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mcoffsky (talk) 13:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sgd. —Hasley 14:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pinky sl (talk) 14:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Imetsia (talk) 17:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support this one just stood out to me. ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Carlsrator (talk) 18:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support even if you don't see the lambda, it is visually appealing. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ponor (talk) 19:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Achird (talk) 19:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pennenetui3000 (talk) 20:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support clean, distinguished Bertux (talk) 23:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support The most modern looking Sabas88 (talk) 07:49, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gopico (talk) 09:21, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nafiul adeeb (talk) 09:30, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sultan Edijingo (talk) 19:25, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Martinvl (talk) 20:51, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support This logo is phenomenally dynamic. It is highly stylized, but includes a distinct "W" shape, and a less-distinct lambda (less-than-obvious/hidden elements in logos are sometimes really cool. Think the arrow in the FedEx logo, or the hidden "H" in the Hartford Whalers logo). This would make a rather iconic logo for the project if selected. SecretName101 (talk) 19:28, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting idea, good use of Wikimedia colors, visually distinct shapes; I have a bit difficult with the "pointiness" of the shapes. Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 20:09, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dr Bowser (talk) 21:54, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Monirec (talk) 08:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bencemac (talk) 08:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Onionbar (talk) 13:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support SVcode (talk) 20:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Grüße vom Sänger ♫^(Reden) Hold the election 20:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simply gorgeous! Love at first sight grows deeper as we dance. GrounderUK (talk) 22:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ɱ 20:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support ‐‐DutchTina (talk) 20:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 22:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnom (talk) 00:13, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Johannnes89 (talk) 01:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Snaevar (talk) 21:22, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Artrixs (talk) 11:15, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Golmore (talk) 11:55, 8 March 2021 (UTC)�[reply]
Support WikiLuke (talk) 12:32, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support LydiaPintscher (talk) 17:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lokal_Profil (talk) 22:57, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 06:16, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ebe123 (Communication | Activity report) 06:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thomas Kinz (talk) 08:28, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Vincent Simar (talk) 21:12, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Smihael (talk) 21:29, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love this one! Position one for me! Thuvack (talk) 05:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support JakobVoss (talk) 09:09, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lyokoï (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like that it is light and aspirational. I could see both the W and the lambda without reading the explanation. Elitre (talk) 11:44, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nintendofan885 (talk) 12:04, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lionel Allorge (talk) 13:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Olaf (talk) 14:29, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 19:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would also support this in a different color scheme. harej (talk) 20:12, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support VisbyStar (talk) 20:25, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lindsaykwardell (talk) 22:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Iniquity (talk) 23:25, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adamant.pwn (talk) 01:11, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support うらにわ (talk) 01:27, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support The concept behind the the logo is very interesting. From afar this one has stood out amongst the many other logos here due to its unique shape and well-blended-in meaning that can be visually seen without needing it to seem forced into the logo. EmpAhmadK (talk) 01:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Satdeep Gill (talk) 07:25, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like a bird and I like the free-form of it. Jane023 (talk) 08:17, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support DSwissK | 💬 10:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nikki (talk) 17:51, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Behnam (talk) 18:04, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Olea (talk) 08:49, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Olea (talk) 08:49, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:19, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Camelia (talk) 20:08, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Farzinovski (talk) 22:50, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shani Evenstein. 10:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support User:Ivan_bea 18:15, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support the wub "?!" 18:21, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support as proposer Stevenliuyi (talk) 19:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like Wiki Grawiton (talk) 22:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support TomT0m (talk) 10:52, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support stwalkerster (talk) 16:38, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mastrocom (talk) 19:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GrandBout (talk) 20:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Katwambu (talk) 17:41, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quiddity (talk) 17:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ashekeelahi (talk) 21:04, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support KuboF Hromoslav (talk) 23:48, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Abstract Wikipedia/Wikifunctions logo concept/Proposal 9

Voting[edit]

Navigation menu

Search