Community Wishlist Survey 2017/Multimedia and Commons/Number of Pixels for images on Commons
Appearance
Number of Pixels for images on Commons
- Problem:
At Commons, when images are showed, there appears this message below the picture:
Original file (4,000 × 3,000 pixels, file size: 5.6 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg); ZoomViewer: flash/no flash
It would be very helpful, if it would show the Megapixels, in this case 4000 x 3000 = 12 Mpix.
- Who would benefit: All common users
- Proposed solution: Add Mpix to the image dimesions
- More comments:
- Phabricator tickets:
- Proposer: -donald- (talk) 13:54, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Translations: none yet
Discussion
[edit]Could we get some explanation as to how described situation may be a problem? (Is it lack of compatibility with camera marketing?..)--Reseletti (talk) 22:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Excellent proposal donald. I often have to whip out my desktop calculator to do this manually, so it would save me a lot of time. And such an easy solution to code. Reseletti, the FPC community has a 2 megapixel limit on its entries, and we often talk about images in terms of their pixel count there, and at the moment such a thing has to be worked out manually -- Thennicke (talk) 10:34, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
I see. So not everyone has that need and making the existing solution a little more accessible via a tickbox in the user preferences would be all we need, right?..--Reseletti (talk) 14:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Much easier to just have a number, 12.0 Mpx, next to the "4000 x 3000 pixels", on the file description page. To two decimal places, it's literally just a few characters, so there is no need for preferences to be involved here.
- Example: "5,419 × 3,048 pixels (16.52 Mpx), file size: 8.62 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg" -- Thennicke (talk) 02:32, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- I like the proposed format of Thennicke. Geraldshields11 (talk) 18:29, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- To add to this, it would be great to be able to search for images within a range of sizes by megapixel. We can already do that for file size, dimensions, and resolution, this would be one more unit of measurement. Edit: to be clear, I'd like to see this data exposed to the search engine as well as present on-screen. :) Ckoerner (talk) 22:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- I like the proposed format of Thennicke. Geraldshields11 (talk) 18:29, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Voting
[edit]- Support --Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk — mail) 08:27, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support -donald- (talk) 08:46, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support Dvorapa (talk) 10:33, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:17, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 18:41, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support Thomas Obermair 4 (talk) 23:03, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support If it doesn't take too much time to implement. Otherwise not a priority. Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:14, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support Shizhao (talk) 03:25, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support Donald Trung (Talk 🤳🏻) (My global lock 🔒) (My global unlock 🔓) 10:47, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support As Yann notes, there is a simple JS you can add but it would be great if the software just did this for everyone. -- Colin (talk) 16:08, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support El Grafo (talk) 10:27, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support I also like @Ckoerner's search improvement. M11rtinb (talk) 10:38, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support Lionel Allorge (talk) 13:09, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support Dromedar61 (talk) 21:31, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support Ckoerner (talk) 21:36, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support ~Cybularny Speak? 12:44, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support Waldir (talk) 10:56, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:48, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support Ruslik (talk) 17:32, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support Martin Kraft (talk) 17:59, 11 December 2017 (UTC)