Community Wishlist Survey 2017/Wikisource/Offer PDF export of original pagination of entire books

Random proposal ►◄ Wikisource

Offer PDF export of original pagination of entire books

Problem: Presently PDF conversion of proofread wikisource books doesn't mirrors original pagination and page design of original edition, since it comes from ns0 transclusion.

Who would benefit: Offline readers.

Proposed solution: To build an alternative PDF coming from conversion, page for page, of nsPage namespace.

More comments: Some wikisource contributors think that nsIndex and nsPage are simply "transcription tools"; I think that they are much more - they are the true digitalization of a edition, while ns0 transclusioni is something like a new edition.

Phabricator tickets: T179790

Proposer: Alex brollo (talk) 21:21, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Translations: none yet

Discussion[edit]

I've renamed this (to make it more distinct from e.g. Community Wishlist Survey 2017/Wikisource/Improve export of electronic books; hope that's correct @Alex brollo? This is about creating somewhat facsimile editions of books, yes? Sam Wilson 23:29, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Samwilson: Yes, perfect, thank you! --Alex brollo (talk) 07:49, 22 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Voting[edit]

Support VIGNERON * ^discut. 08:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Mahir256 (talk) 08:21, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support —viciarg⁴¹⁴ 08:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:32, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Ninovolador (talk) 20:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Thomas Obermair 4 (talk) 23:19, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Libcub (talk) 05:56, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Laurent Jerry (talk) 10:11, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Donald Trung (Talk 🤳🏻) (My global lock 🔒) (My global unlock 🔓) 13:29, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 17:23, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Mathieugp (talk) 19:38, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Marcus.linneberg (talk) 06:57, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Accurimbono (talk) 08:47, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support would make it easier to reference the sources in wikipedia afterwards Exilexi (talk) 15:16, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Tom-L (talk) 10:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Jayantanth (talk) 14:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:11, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Afnecors (talk) 10:01, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --EusebiaP (talk) 10:13, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Artem.komisarenko (talk) 23:59, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Bertrand GRONDIN → ^(Talk) 17:37, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Support Jahl de Vautban (talk) 19:26, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Also epub export should take that in consideration Psychoslave (talk) 08:50, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support — Luchesar • T/C 14:36, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support X:: black ::X (talk) 17:41, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]