Connected Open Heritage/Get Involved/Logo

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
    Home     Timeplan     Countries     Partners     Get Involved     Documentation     Exhibitions     FAQ     Discussion


Help decide our official logo from the designs created by the Wikimedia community by:

  1. Supporting a specific design by adding your name and signature to the support section of a design.
  2. Commenting on the logos.
  3. Adding your own designs to the competition using the same format as the logos below (until the 6th of November).

Dates:

  • 28 October - 6 November – New entries accepted
  • 28 October - 11 November – Community input

The final decision will be made by Connected Open Heritage staff based on the votes and comments made by the community.

Logo 1[edit]

Creator[edit]

Support[edit]

Comment[edit]

  • Add comment here

Logo 2[edit]

Creator[edit]

Support[edit]

Comment[edit]

  • It's a nice design, but it's a little bit too close to UNESCO's logo for me. I realise it's a fairly generic shape, but UNESCO's logo is probably quite recognisable to people working in the heritage sector. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 14:27, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Logo 3[edit]

Creator[edit]

Support[edit]

Comment[edit]

  • Add comment here

Logo 4[edit]

Creator[edit]

Support[edit]

  • Sign name here

Comment[edit]

  • Add comment here

Logo 5[edit]

Creator[edit]

Support[edit]

Comment[edit]

  • Add comment here

Logo 6[edit]

Creator[edit]

Support[edit]

  • My favorite so far, everything is in it : the ⌘ knot which works both for Heritage (even if it's more common in the nordic countries, but there is no universal symbol anyways) and Connected and a reminder of Wikidata (which is a connerstone tool). Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 15:04, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Cristian Cenci (WMI) (talk)
  • Sign name here

Comment[edit]

  • Add comment here

Logo 7[edit]

Creator[edit]

Support[edit]

  • Sign name here

Comment[edit]

  • a little political and rough, but the concept is strong
  • I really like the idea behind the design and I think it links back to the ideas behind Connected Open Heritage. But it's not immediately clear what the outline is and I had to look at the file description before I realised that it is one of the Buddhas of Bamiyan. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 12:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Interresting but I'm not really sure I understand the idea (and the outline is unrecognizable). Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 14:55, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]