Foundation wiki feedback/Archive/2017

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.


This is an email just to state a view of Wikipedia from a user and not an everyday user but one that uses the website any time I want to get get the true and accurate facts about anything I mad looking for. To me Wikipedia gives the unbiased true and accurate information of anyone source on the Internet and I am writing this note just to show my appreciation to you for maintaining thise site open to,the public. I do make a small donation every year to this site, even though it is small it is all I can afford at this time, however when I am able you will be the first I will reward with my donations as your importance to the public for information is valuable to all from students to CEO's and all in between. Thank you for your continued effort to provide us with your services.


Gerald Bailey —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 14:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)


I would like to thank you for all you do to give the public factual information. Your publication to me personally is priceless. Please keep up the great work you do on behalf of all of us. My name is Dave Berry have a great day and a fantastic 2017. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 04:00, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Template:Recentchangestext

{{The error of judgement vesus focus'consentration,vision,version, plagarism,copyrights,vandalism,violation and freedom of commitement to,associate determine action,congregate sugget on,common consensus with good faith also fear to fil/feel cowardish/blamed/acussed of the guil/offending the editorial masses/myraids,the silent majority panic.The foundation should not be puting most work on Bots as they are mechanical and might loose power,energy elecrified for nuclea perplex in this perilious mo }} —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 18:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Talk:Home

كرة القدم

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 19:33, 14 January 2017 (UTC)



تمثلت —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 19:51, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Special:CreateAccount

{{The exclamation,YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO EXCUTE/edit or not logged in is a total sabotage to the intrest/entres of authontic/inthusiastic ,editors of our modern day world/universe as it hempers ,impede and adjudicate the sharing of important imformation received online/timeline to valued editors,and gives prejudicial judgement to suggestions of the latter and the organization.Please harmonise these edits and never be offended by spiling/speling.The system of things may halt, }}[Dikgosi Sejabodile] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 14:00, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Regarding wikipedia decision to delete articles

To Whom it may concern:

I am stunned that Wikipedia has deleted two articles, "The People's Cube" and "Communists For Kerry." These two websites are a part of Americana and both have received widespread and international recognition. From the discussion pages regarding the deletions, it is clear that the decision to delete was made for entirely political purposes; the editors disagree with the positions espoused by these satirical websites and so decided to cut them. Shame.

I am a professor of history at the University of the Cumberlands in Williamsburg, KY. I have informed my students that they are to avoid your websites at all costs because you cannot be trusted to be objective.

Melvin C. Smith Professor of History University of the Cumberlands —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 20:10, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Talk:Home


Pelan Suara Hati Johor merupakan satu pelan pencapaian berlandaskan pemantauan, ukuran dan berstrategi bagi menangani fokus utama keperluan dan kehendak rakyat seperti keselamatan, perumahan mampu milik, kos sara hidup dan kesejahteraan rakyat, infrastruktur, agama islam, kesihatan, ekonomi, keusahawanan dan telah dilancarkan pada 31 Mei 2014.

Pelan ini adalah kesinambungan dari inisiatif rundingan rakyat Kajian Suara Hati Johor yang telah dijalankan hasil kerjasama antara Kerajaan Negeri dan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia bagi mendapatkan maklumbalas permasalahan pembangunan rakyat di negeri Johor.

Ia perlu dilaksanakan demi mempertingkatkan keyakinan rakyat terhadap keupayaan dan kecekapan Kerajaan Negeri mentadbir serta menyokong setiap usaha-usaha yang telah dirancang demi kebaikan rakat dan generasi yang akan datang.

Matlamat Pelan adalah membentuk Kerajaan Negeri berteraskan pencapaian dengan halatuju yang jelas berpegang pada muafakat pembangunan dan pengagihan, keterangkuman berkerajaan sambil mendukung tiga gagasan utama.

Kajian telah dihasilkan daripada kesinambungan dari inisiatif rundingan rakyat Kajian Suara Hati Johor yang telah dijalankan hasil kerjasama antara Kerajaan Negeri dan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia bagi mendapatkan maklumbalas permasalahan pembangunan rakyat di negeri Johor.

Tempoh perlaksanaan berterusan sehingga tahun 2018. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Anonymousleo (talk) 04:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Special:CreateAccount

My name is kirish Laxman.I'm 24 years old. I'm coming from srilanka.I'm living in Germany —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 22:14, 18 January 2017 (UTC


{The wiki foundation has been the best platfom/forum past year,althou little space is given for editing.we aproch the relevent athourity to take heed of this challenge/problem and give us the promised harmony of editing/writing the wiki adventure as the world passby.its uniquely adoured by the universal majority,but question might not be answered for a sow eye,dumb ear andvocal tongue:freedom of speech/expresion and editing as a hobby for the elderly is spiritual enhancement.[Dikgosi Sejabodile] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 15:35, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Contact us

how do i delete you do not want wilkimedia —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 2a02:c7d:31d4:f100:d57e:c79a:2e2b:26a9 (talk) 15:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)


Suggestions to your information pages:

1. Put a search box at the bottom of the page. I am lazy. On long articles I have to scroll back to the top of the page to do another search.

2. Has there been any discussion to put an audio link on each page to help users actually hear the correct pronunciation of a word, name or phrase in their respective language?

Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 15:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Special:CreateAccount

Keny presisa da vosa ajuda para criar uma conta no commos —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 22:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Privacy policy/Glossary of key terms

Link to Linux website in "Operating System" should be this one, the present one is broken. Thanks. --Lluis tgn (talk) 14:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Talk:Thank You/de

"Finden Sie heraus, ob Ihre Firma ein Matching Gift Programhat."

Ein Leerzeichen fehlt vor "hat". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 13:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

I m creaitive comminons Of the Executive Director. It is never subjected to such abuse here.

提出は、2017 年 3 月 6 日Happysailor (話) で、下落しました。

このサブミッションはウィキペディアに適していません。詳細については'何ウィキペディアではない'をお読みください。 あなたはこのページの上部にある「編集」タブをクリックして改善をするよう奨励されます。追加が必要な場合ください記事作成のヘルプ デスク、校閲者を求めるあなたの提出を拒否した質問をまたは経験豊富な編集者から私たちのライブ チャットのヘルプでヘルプを得る。 源を見つける: 「サンド ボックス」 -ニュース ·新聞·書籍·学者·HighBeam·JSTOR·無料画像·無料のニュース ソース·ウィキペディア ライブラリ·ニューヨークタイムズ·WP 参照。 減Happysailor 9 分前。9 分前にHappysailorによって編集最終更新。レビュワー:通知著者。 再送信 問題が修正されない場合案は拒否されること再度注意してください。

提出は、2017 年 3 月 6 日MatthewVanitas (話) で、下落しました。

これは、英語の言語版ウィキペディア;英語で書かれた記事のみ受け付けております。サブミッションの高品質の英語翻訳を提供してください。ウィキペディアのホームページを訪れたか。おそらくあなたの言語版の Wikipedia を検索できます。 17 時間前MatthewVanitas減。—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nitta12n (talk) 20:46, 6 March 2017 (UTC)


Good evening,I believe my coming online everyday is a non-profitable action,if you have anything to say about this please, tell me.Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hamad olatunde (talk) 19:24, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Regarding File:Rosana Fiengo v. Wikimedia Foundation lower court dismissal.pdf

In the description, it says "Portuguese judgment ...", but this is not a Portuguese judgment, this is a Brazilian judgment (written in Brazilian Portuguese). --Diego Queiroz (talk) 14:44, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Social media

<There is nothing like anti competive editing here,moreover the monopoly ofcomplynce my not be over emphasised>{Djs} —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 06:06, 15 March 2017 (UTC)


寄付します その上で、寄付しようとしているものに「Waning」とか、失敬にもほどがある。とはおもわないのか。 ここでLoginを後でするがhackerにじゃまさせないように。元白い箱 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 08:17, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Talk:Wikipedia Zero

The page on the Wikipedia Zero project is lacking a concise explanation of what Wikipedia Zero actually is all about.

While this can probably be gleaned from studying all of the text provided on the page, it would save time and probably be appropriate for a non-profit organisation to cut some of the promotional language in favor of a more matter-of-factly and comprehensible description of the project, such as:

"Wikipedia Zero is a project of the Wikimedia Foundation aiming to establish a collaboration with mobile service providers (in the global south?) to provide free access to Wikimedia sites for all ... "

At least that's how I've understood the concept.

Also adding a short statement of the current state of affairs would be helpful to clarify whether the project is actually still being continued. The last major contributions to the page seem to have happened some years ago.

Otherwise simply transcluding the English Wikipedia page on Wikipedia Zero might be a good alternative as this seems to be more up to date and distinctly more to the point.

thank you for your efforts, --KaiKemmann (talk) 21:23, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Regarding File talk:Screenshot of a map on Wikivoyage displaying San Francisco's Financial District.png

jollyzte —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 09:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Template:Middot

<\delete/all/opt-out/permanenet> <\delete/all/opt-out/permanenet> —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 2600:8804:190a:f000:3484:fcff:5555:27e2 (talk) 19:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Talk:Problems donating

Sorry, didn't get a direct page to issue my comment. My question is: why cant i pay with iDeal without submitting billing information, like names and adress, is there any way tyo just donate anonymously? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 20:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Suggestion for mr. Director ms. Director or responsible of Wikipedia

I don't speak English(i'm form South America), but i will try to speak something:

I suggest, I think Wikipedia should bring some excellent ideas to make easier the Wikipedia in the World. There is examples, models like German Wikipedia, another some regions, graphics, layout, caracthers, strings to improve Wikipedia etc...

  • In some countries some people thinks the encyclopedia is left-wing ou right-wing depending of the text but i think there are some controversial material. I don't know if these affirmations are true, but i think Wikipedia should study about the subject.
  • Wikipedia in EU and another countries, for example, there are different ideas, solutions, skills. I know: that all costs something, no one is obligated to agree about my suggestions including mr. Director ms. Director or writer i only suggest study about change, but i know there are logistics, structure, "one philanthropic supply and demand" in these cases and study layout in Wikipedia, fonts in Wikipedia, but study typeface, resolution, etc... I think all versions of Wikipedia could try to learn and learn solutions, layout, fonts
  • Editing on Wikipedia is difficult, because the grafics, layout, the fonts should(suggestion) be larger and sober like Encyclopedias by date, bring some new excellent ideas we can see different ideas on German Wikipedia, Britanica, and another languages, countries and you can change experiences. I don't think the Wikipedia should change rules about editing, but there are examples in versions of Wikipedia and we(the Wikipedia) can improve. Why don't Wikipedia study those stuffs(i said one time there are costs, logistics, sometimes it looks unreal, but...). More spell checker to edit texts in any language. I talk about Nobody is obligated to agree about the subjects that i wrote. I suggested the Wikipedia became easier(easy to find articles, editing articles without problems, control problems, bring some innovation, why not Wikipedia? Thank you!--Ultragp7 (talk) 04:16, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi there is a user named Sarah Peres she is illegally posting personal information about me please help me —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 2605:e000:d2c6:f700:fd2f:9c52:caaa:e2c0 (talk) 04:07, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Press/Contact/Chapters

Our organization is network of women living with HIV/AIDS,Our organization it be work in region.


To include human rights the community to get knowledge. To include important community to get skills about relationship. To include the community to get knowledge against business.

So we are submit our request to your office i wish to get answer from you thank you.


Lucy Sadock Maguru Executive secretary —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 14:44, 11 April 2017 (UTC)


on Dean Ambrose's Wikipedia page the middle name is wrong. His real middle name is Lee not David. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by, 05:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC) (talk)

Regarding Legacy Gift



This document defines "Free Cultural Works" as works or expressions which can be freely studied, applied, copied and/or modified, by anyone, for any purpose. It also describes certain permissible restrictions that respect or protect these essential freedoms. The definition distinguishes between free works, and free licenses which can be used to legally protect the status of a free work. The definition itself is not a license; it is a tool to determine whether a work or license should be considered "free."


Social and technological advances make it possible for a growing part of humanity to access, create, modify, publish and distribute various kinds of works - artworks, scientific and educational materials, software, articles - in short: anything that can be represented in digital form. Many communities have formed to exercise those new possibilities and create a wealth of collectively re-usable works.

Most authors, whatever their field of activity, whatever their amateur or professional status, have a genuine interest in favoring an ecosystem where works can be spread, re-used and derived in creative ways. The easier it is to re-use and derive works, the richer our cultures become.

To ensure the graceful functioning of this ecosystem, works of authorship should be free, and by freedom we mean:

  • the freedom to use the work and enjoy the benefits of using it
  • the freedom to study the work and to apply knowledge acquired from it
  • the freedom to make and redistribute copies, in whole or in part, of the information or expression
  • the freedom to make changes and improvements, and to distribute derivative works

If authors do not take action, their works are covered by existing copyright laws, which severely limit what others can and cannot do. Authors can make their works free by choosing among a number of legal documents known as licenses. For an author, choosing to put their work under a free license does not mean that they lose all their rights, but it gives to anyone the freedoms listed above.

It is important that any work that claims to be free provides, practically and without any risk, the aforementioned freedoms. This is why we hereafter give a precise definition of freedom for licenses and for works of authorship.

Identifying Free Cultural Works

This is the Definition of Free Cultural Works, and when describing your work, we encourage you to make reference to this definition, as in, "This is a freely licensed work, as explained in the Definition of Free Cultural Works." If you do not like the term "Free Cultural Work," you can use the generic term "Free Content," or refer instead to one of the existing movements that express similar freedoms in more specific contexts. We also encourage you to use the Free Cultural Works logos and buttons, which are in the public domain.

Please be advised that such identification does not actually confer the rights described in this definition; for your work to be truly free, it must use one of the Free Culture Licenses or be in the public domain.

We discourage you to use other terms to identify Free Cultural Works which do not convey a clear definition of freedom, such as "Open Content" and "Open Access." These terms are often used to refer to content which is available under "less restrictive" terms than those of existing copyright laws, or even for works that are just "available on the Web".

Defining Free Culture Licenses

Licenses are legal instruments through which the owner of certain legal rights may transfer these rights to third parties. Free Culture Licenses do not take any rights away -- they are always optional to accept, and if accepted, they grant freedoms which copyright law alone does not provide. When accepted, they never limit or reduce existing exemptions in copyright laws.

Essential freedoms

In order to be recognized as "free" under this definition, a license must grant the following freedoms without limitation:

  • The freedom to use and perform the work: The licensee must be allowed to make any use, private or public, of the work. For kinds of works where it is relevant, this freedom should include all derived uses ("related rights") such as performing or interpreting the work. There must be no exception regarding, for example, political or religious considerations.
  • The freedom to study the work and apply the information: The licensee must be allowed to examine the work and to use the knowledge gained from the work in any way. The license may not, for example, restrict "reverse engineering".
  • The freedom to redistribute copies: Copies may be sold, swapped or given away for free, as part of a larger work, a collection, or independently. There must be no limit on the amount of information that can be copied. There must also not be any limit on who can copy the information or on where the information can be copied.
  • The freedom to distribute derivative works: In order to give everyone the ability to improve upon a work, the license must not limit the freedom to distribute a modified version (or, for physical works, a work somehow derived from the original), regardless of the intent and purpose of such modifications. However, some restrictions may be applied to protect these essential freedoms or the attribution of authors (see below).

Permissible restrictions

Not all restrictions on the use or distribution of works impede essential freedoms. In particular, requirements for attribution, for symmetric collaboration (i.e., "copyleft"), and for the protection of essential freedom are considered permissible restrictions.

Defining Free Cultural Works

In order to be considered free, a work must be covered by a Free Culture License, or its legal status must provide the same essential freedoms enumerated above. It is not, however, a sufficient condition. Indeed, a specific work may be non-free in other ways that restrict the essential freedoms. These are the additional conditions in order for a work to be considered free:

  • Availability of source data: Where a final work has been obtained through the compilation or processing of a source file or multiple source files, all underlying source data should be available alongside the work itself under the same conditions. This can be the score of a musical composition, the models used in a 3D scene, the data of a scientific publication, the source code of a computer application, or any other such information.
  • Use of a free format: For digital files, the format in which the work is made available should not be protected by patents, unless a world-wide, unlimited and irrevocable royalty-free grant is given to make use of the patented technology. While non-free formats may sometimes be used for practical reasons, a free format copy must be available for the work to be considered free.
  • No technical restrictions: The work must be available in a form where no technical measures are used to limit the freedoms enumerated above.
  • No other restrictions or limitations: The work itself must not be covered by legal restrictions (patents, contracts, etc.) or limitations (such as privacy rights) which would impede the freedoms enumerated above. A work may make use of existing legal exemptions to copyright (in order to cite copyrighted works), though only the portions of it which are unambiguously free constitute a free work.

In other words, whenever the user of a work cannot legally or practically exercise his or her basic freedoms, the work cannot be considered and should not be called "free."

Further reading

  • See Licenses for discussion of individual licenses, and whether they meet this definition or not.
  • See History for acknowledgments and background on this definition.
  • See the FAQ for some questions and answers.
  • See Portal:Index for topic-specific pages about free cultural works.


New versions of this definition shall be released as soon as a consensus (achieved directly or through a vote, as per the authoring process) has developed around suggested changes. Numbering shall be 0.x for initial draft releases, 1.x, 2.x .. for major releases, x.1, x.2 .. for minor releases. A minor release is made when the text is modified in ways which do not have an impact on the scope of existing or hypothetical licenses covered by this definition. - Non discrimination policy

I see that in this edit to Non discrimination policy, Jrogers (WMF) removed the commitment of the Foundation "to prohibit discrimination against current or prospective users". This statement was a valuable measure to ensure that discrimination against users would not occur on any WMF project. If that is a true reflection of the Board's intentions, I am disappointed that the Board of Trustees should choose to retreat from their commitments to the disabled, as well as to other disadvantaged minorities. Conversely, if the Board has not stepped back from that commitment, then I request that Jacob Rogers reconsider his edit, in light of the unintended implied change to WMF policy. --RexxS (talk) 17:29, 15 April 2017 (UTC)


"Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge"

Do you honestly believe in this Thecopaedea? Why do you behave us like in dark ages? Why you do not respect us and protect us from yours unprofessional, uneducated and above all unpolite administrators...

My first attempt to contribute three years ago it was about Paedia. Check the page... and then read again your "vision" for your Paedia... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Logeion (talk) 23:00, 16 April 2017 (UTC) (edited 23:03, 23:08, 23:13, 23:19)

Regarding Terms of Use/nl

Maggie Dennis (whose talk page I can't edit) has completely messed up the page here from section 7b onwards. Kind regards, ErikvanB (talk) 11:46, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

I want my room and my chair.--N64INOUE (talk) 05:23, 23 April 2017 (UTC)


Dear Wikipedia workers, I am not 'signed in', but am a scholar of Religion at a public university in New Jersey (USA!).

I'd be happy to share more with you. However, I just wanted to tell you about a very odd 'transfer,' that I wish you would remove:

I was looking up CASTE, as I am teaching Hinduism, with a focus in the Hindu (and world thinkers, and religious figues who influenced) Mahatma Gandhi him (teaching it now).

I clicked on OCCUPATION, and it redirected me to the BOOK OF JOB!


I wanted to help my students understand the caste system better, and know which parts of it Gandhi REJECTED...that is--inequality, poor treatment of lower caste people, and, if course, OUTCASTING.

Book of Job, in the Old Testament! Yes, it's an important study in trusting God, even if you suffer and suffer, as a test of God...

But as an OCCUPATION link in Wikipedia? no!...thank you! Please fix? Delete the link! Many thanks to you. Wikipedia is an ever-developing resource. This I would fix myself, but you all know how to do it and why. Better that you do it. JOB was a shock!

Dr. Lise Vail Religion Department Montclair State University Montclair, NJ 07043 (

p.s. I have donated twice, 2 years in a row, when you requested. Not much, but the more I use Wikipedia, the more I love it. So, maybe I will donate more in the future. The NO ADS makes you superior to Encyclopedia Britanica, since ads, well, you know... add a 4-letter word, a word beginning with an S...! 😊😎🕉☯️✝️😇⭐️💫🍎🍚🏫🕍🕌🕋⛩📱🖥📓🗃🗂☸️🕎💟✨✨✨= my world! Have a great Sunday, today 4-23-17, and every single day, minute, hour, moment.... bye —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 17:45, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Code of conduct policy

Please change All Wikimedia staff and members of the Board of Trustees are required to abide by this Code of Conduct. to All Wikimedia Foundation staff and members of the Board of Trustees are required to abide by this Code of Conduct. as this is a “Wikimedia Foundation Code of Conduct”. Best, —DerHexer (Talk) 13:00, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

NTymkiv (WMF), could you take a look? --Base (talk) 04:55, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Talk:Expense reimbursement

What program or app do I open the .ods file with? (i.e. might be worth adding as a note on that page..) Casliber (talk) 08:14, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

.ods is usually OpenOffice. Yes there ought to be a link! QuiteUnusual (talk) 15:43, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
thanks! Casliber (talk) 15:26, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

OpenDocument is supported by default with any modern office suite and any decent OS since about a decade ago. --Nemo 16:43, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Terms of Use/de

oder inform einer anderen Darstellungsmethode -> in Form lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:18, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Contact us#Local chapters, in all languanges

Hi, The address of Wikimedia France on page is wrong : no more "26-28 rue de Londres 75009 Paris", but "40 rue de Cléry 75002 Paris". and same error in all languages (ex: See their website. Thanks! Zetud (talk) 09:59, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

I made the change on the template so it should permeate. Killiondude (talk) 23:50, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Regarding DMCA Policy

Please change the link from this to Wikipedia:DMCA. UpsandDowns1234 (🗨) 15:37, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

UpsandDowns1234, I assume you mean w:Wikipedia:DMCA|Wikipedia:DMCA]]? Both your links point to the same page. --Base (talk) 04:58, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Linking to team home pages for teams listed on "Staff and contractors"

Could more teams please link to their corresponding information pages from their headings, to make it easier for anyone to find more information what each team works on plus potential contact information? (The information is available anyway, it's just about linking...)

Thanks in advance. --Malyacko (talk) 22:49, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Ways to Give/nl

Not sure where the translations can be edited these days - but the Dutch translation of the bank transfer is slightly confusing according to one donor. I would suggest to change "Zolang u stortte op het juiste rekeningnummer zal uw betaling correct ontvangen zijn." (in the future past tense) to "Zolang u stort op het juiste rekeningnummer zal uw betaling correct ontvangen worden." (future tense).

I also noticed a minor interpunction error at the end of the first paragraph (two full stops in immediate succession). Thanks! Effeietsanders (talk) 14:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done --Base (talk) 04:51, 22 August 2017 (UTC)


We should have an option to give reading to the people or events on wiki.. I mean If the is shakespeare so we shoulde have right to rate him out of 10 or 5 and we should also have right to rate anything on wiki. So we should get the result that what people actually think. Thank you Muzammil ahmad —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 2405:204:a50d:540f:316c:73c6:68c8:72c2 (talk) 00:17, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


the new logo for the foundation is not on the wikipedia article please fix —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 10:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done please ask on the correct language Wikipedia and/or on Commons to have the logo up-to-date. Zppix (talk) 19:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)