Global Resource Distribution Committee/Creation of the interim GRDC/Candidates/Kheng Singye Dorji (KSD)

Singye Dorji (Kheng Singye Dorji (KSD))

Preferred name	Singye Dorji
Language capabilities (native or professional / advanced / basic)	Advanced (English), Can speak Hindi, Nepali and Read Write Dzongkha
Region and country you identify with	South Asia/Bhutan
Interim GRDC seats you are running for and why (regional volunteer/thematic volunteer)	I am running for an Interim GRDC seat for South Asia because I believe strongly in fostering transparent, inclusive, and effective governance within our Wikimedia communities. My background in community engagement, conflict resolution, and digital collaboration has given me firsthand insight into the challenges we face as our projects continue to grow and evolve. I see the Interim GRDC as a crucial body for ensuring that decisions are made with both fairness and responsiveness to the diverse needs of our global community
Do you have any topic or area of specialization within the Wikimedia movement? (max 1000 characters)	My primary area of specialization within the Wikimedia movement is community engagement and digital literacy. Over the years, I’ve worked closely with local Wikimedia chapters and projects to develop initiatives that encourage underrepresented groups to contribute. I’ve been involved in organizing training sessions, mentorship programs, and outreach events aimed at demystifying editing and content creation on our platforms. This experience has given me a deep understanding of the challenges new contributors face and the importance of inclusive community practices. In addition, I’ve contributed to discussions and projects related to policy development and digital governance, which have further enriched my perspective on how we can support sustainable growth and robust community standards in our movement.
Have you ever held any role or position, either current or past, in the Wikimedia movement? (max 1000 characters)	I have worked for Established a Community in Bhutan - https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Programs/Wikimedia_Community_Fund/Rapid_Fund/Establishing_a_Community_(ID:_22830550) you can also visit https://w.wiki/D8jB as a Project Manager in Wikimedia for Rapid Fund Grant tasked with organizing events, coordinating teams, managing resources, planning, communicating with stakeholders, ensuring deadlines, aligning outcomes with organizational goals, budgeting, risk management, and promoting collaboration, all while advancing Wikimedia's mission.
Why are you interested in the interim GRDC and what can you contribute? (max 1000 characters)	I’m interested in the interim GRDC because I believe in the power of transparent, inclusive governance to strengthen the Wikimedia movement. My experience as a Project Manager within Wikimedia has given me firsthand insight into the operational challenges and opportunities that our community faces. I see the GRDC as a vital forum where diverse voices can shape policy and strategy in a way that aligns with our core mission—free and open knowledge for everyone.
Please share any volunteering or professional experience relevant for the interim GRDC (role, organization, years) (max 1000 characters)	I’m demonstrating how my experience as a Rapid Fund Manager, including fund allocation and project oversight, aligns with the Wikimedia interim GRDC's core needs, showcasing clear responsibilities and their relevance to the role. As a GRDC role, I can play in a fair manner in supporting Wikimedia's movement. I’m detailing my abilities in budget management, risk assessment, and quick decision-making, which are all critical for the Wikimedia interim GRDC's dynamic needs and agile governance.
Describe your skills and experience relevant to the interim GRDC (max 1500 characters)	I have no specific experiences on GRDC but I am confident for coordination and fund distribution know-how, however, given a chance I can learn from expert and contribute to it and ability to plan, execute, and monitor projects efficiently, including setting clear objectives, managing timelines, and coordinating diverse teams. Also experience in managing budgets, allocating resources, or serving in roles like Rapid Fund Manager, ensuring that funds are distributed transparently and effectively.
Describe your understanding of the Wikimedia Movement's current resource distribution process. (max 1500 characters)	The Wikimedia Movement’s resource distribution process is designed to align funding with the movement’s mission of free knowledge while ensuring transparency, accountability, and community involvement. Wikimedia Foundation plays a central role in overseeing the allocation of resources, especially for large-scale initiatives and core operational needs. This includes reviewing and approving budgets in a fair and transparent manner. Local chapters, user groups, and other community bodies also have a significant voice in identifying priorities. Their input helps ensure that resource distribution reflects the diverse needs of different regions and projects within the movement.
How do you think the GRDC could improve the current situation and which priorities do you think it should have? (max 1500 characters)	The GRDC has the potential to significantly improve the current resource distribution process by enhancing transparency, boosting community engagement, modernizing operational procedures, aligning decisions with Wikimedia’s mission, and fostering a collaborative environment. Prioritizing these areas will help ensure that resources are not only allocated efficiently and equitably but also strategically positioned to drive the Wikimedia movement forward in a rapidly changing digital landscape.
By the end of the pilot in two years, what should the GRDC have accomplished and how should we measure its success? (max 1500 characters)	By the end of the two-year pilot, the interim Governance, Representation, and Decision-making Committee (GRDC) should have demonstrated tangible improvements in transparency, efficiency, inclusivity, and strategic alignment within the Wikimedia movement’s resource distribution process. Clear policies and frameworks for resource distribution decision-making. A structured and transparent reporting system that communicates funding decisions and outcomes effectively. Improved publication of clear funding guidelines, criteria, and workflows available to all stakeholders. Improved Equity and Inclusivity in Resource Distribution. And increased participation of underrepresented regions, languages, and communities in Wikimedia funding processes with fairer and more decentralized decision-making structures.