Grants:IEG/Learning/round 1 2013/Surveys

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page contains the list of survey questions used in the IEG round 1 feedback surveys.

Note: These surveys were deployed with skip logic. Participants were only asked certain questions if they had given a particular answer to previous questions. For example, a participant might only be asked Was there anything in particular you disliked about the selection and/or setup process? Tell us about it. (Q2.1a) if they had rated their experience in Q2 as "very dissatisfied or "dissatisfied". If a question uses skip logic, the criteria for displaying that question are listed directly beneath the question.

Survey questions[edit]

IEG reviewer survey[edit]

Intro. Thank you for reviewing proposals for the Individual Engagement Grants program! You are receiving this survey because you signed up to participate in the IEG Committee that reviews proposals for Individual Engagement Grants. We would like to hear about your experience as a committee member so far. Your feedback is important to us as we look for ways to expand and improve the program. Please help us out by completing this brief survey, which should take less than 10 minutes.

Some legal stuff: By answering these questions, you permit us to record your responses and agree to donate them to the public domain. This allows us to freely share your answers with others for the purpose of open analysis, research, and study. We will not share publicly your name, address, phone number, or email except as required by law. This commitment assumes you do not incorporate your personal information in response to a question that doesn't ask for it.
Thanks again for your feedback! We look forward to working with you again.
Ready to get started? Click on the arrow below!

Q1. How did you find out about the IEG program?

  • a banner on a wiki (1)
  • a post on the Village Pump (2)
  • a mailing list (3)
  • a WMF blog post (4)
  • a friend or colleague told me (5)
  • other (please specify below) (6) ____________________

Q2. How satisfied were you with how the IEG Committee was selected and organized?

  • Very Dissatisfied (1)
  • Dissatisfied (2)
  • Neutral (3)
  • Satisfied (4)
  • Very Satisfied (5)

Q2.1a. Was there anything in particular you disliked about the selection and/or setup process? Tell us about it.

Answer If how satisfied were you with how the review committee was ... Very Dissatisfied Is Selected Or how satisfied were you with how the review committee was ... Dissatisfied Is Selected Or how satisfied were you with how the review committee was ... Neutral Is Selected

Q2.1b. Was there anything in particular you liked about the selection and/or setup process? Tell us about it.

Answer If how satisfied were you with how the review committee was ... Satisfied Is Selected Or how satisfied were you with how the review committee was ... Satisfied Is Selected

Q3. Did you participate all the way through the review process in this first round?

  • Yes (1)
  • No (2)

Q3.1. Why did you stop participating in the review process?

  • I recused myself from reviewing because I submitted an IEG proposal. (1)
  • I was too busy to continue participating (2)
  • I was no longer interested in participating (3)
  • I chose to stop participating for some other reason (please specify below) (4) ____________________
Answer If Did you participate all the way through the review process? No Is Selected

Q4. How satisfied were you with the process of reviewing and scoring proposals?

  • Very Dissatisfied (1)
  • Dissatisfied (2)
  • Neutral (3)
  • Satisfied (4)
  • Very Satisfied (5)
Answer If Did you participate all the way through the review process? Yes Is Selected

Q4.1a. Was there anything in particular you disliked about the review process or the way proposals were scored? Tell us about it.

Answer If How satisfied were you with the process of reviewing and ... Very Dissatisfied Is Selected Or How satisfied were you with the process of reviewing and ... Dissatisfied Is Selected Or How satisfied were you with the process of reviewing and ... Neutral Is Selected

Q4.1b. Was there anything in particular you liked about the review process or the way proposals were scored? Tell us about it.

Answer If How satisfied were you with the process of reviewing and ... Satisfied Is Selected Or How satisfied were you with the process of reviewing and ... Very Satisfied Is Selected

Q5. Was the review criteria, rubric, and other guidance that the staff provided helpful and easy to understand?

  • Yes (1)
  • No (2)
Answer If Did you participate all the way through the review process? Yes Is Selected

Q5.1. Please tell us about anything you can think of in these materials that should be clarified, improved, or added.

Answer If Did you participate all the way through the review process? Yes Is Selected

Q6. Was the review workload more or less than you expected?

  • Much more work than I expected (1)
  • More work than I expected (2)
  • About as much work as I expected (3)
  • Less work than I expected (4)
  • Much less work than I expected (5)
Answer If Did you participate all the way through the review process? Yes Is Selected

Q6.1. Do you have any suggestions for how we can balance the workload or make it easier for reviewers to perform their work?

Answer If Was the reviewer workload more or less than you expected? Much more work than I expected Is Selected Or Was the reviewer workload more or less than you expected? More work than I expected Is Selected

Q7. How satisfied were you with the review process over all?

  • Very Dissatisfied (1)
  • Dissatisfied (2)
  • Neutral (3)
  • Satisfied (4)
  • Very Satisfied (5)

Q7.1. What did you enjoy most about serving on the committee during round 1 review?

Q7.2. What did you enjoy least about serving on the committee during round 1 review?

Q8. How could we improve the IEG review process to make it easier or more rewarding for reviewers?

Q9. Will you participate as a reviewer for IEG again in a future round?

  • Yes, definitely (1)
  • Maybe (2)
  • No, definitely not (3)
  • I'm not sure/I haven't decided (4)

Q10. Would you recommend serving on the IEG Committee to others?

  • Yes, definitely (1)
  • Maybe (2)
  • No, definitely not (3)
  • I'm not sure/I haven't decided (4)

Q11. Have you served on review committees for any other Wikimedia Foundation grant-funding projects (such as the FDC) or any Wikimedia community projects (such as Mediation committees) or other on-wiki review processes? If so, please list the names of these committees below.

Q12. Do you have any other questions, comments or concerns? Please share them below.

Outro. Thank you for participating in our survey! You may email IEG program coordinator Siko Bouterse at sbouterse@wikimedia.org if you would like more information.

IEG Participant survey[edit]

Intro. Thank you for participating in the Individual Engagement Grants program! We would like to hear about your experience. Your feedback is important to us as we look for ways to expand and improve the program. Please help us out by completing this brief survey, which should take less than 10 minutes to complete.

Some legal stuff: By answering these questions, you permit us to record your responses and agree to donate them to the public domain. This allows us to freely share your answers with others for the purpose of open analysis, research, and study. We will not share publicly your name, address, phone number, or email except as required by law. This commitment assumes you do not incorporate your personal information in response to a question that doesn't ask for it.
Thanks again for your feedback!
Ready to get started? Click on the arrow below!

Q1. How did you find out about the IEG program?

  • a banner on a wiki (1)
  • a post at the Village Pump (2)
  • a mailing list (3)
  • a WMF blog post (4)
  • a friend or colleague told me (5)
  • other (please specify below) (6) ____________________

Q2. How satisfied were you with the process of creating and submitting your proposal?

  • Very Dissatisfied (1)
  • Dissatisfied (2)
  • Neutral (3)
  • Satisfied (4)
  • Very Satisfied (5)

Q2.1a. Was there anything in particular you disliked about the process of creating and submitting your proposal? Tell us about it.

Answer If how satisfied were you with the process of writing your p... Very Dissatisfied Is Selected Or how satisfied were you with the process of writing your p... Dissatisfied Is Selected Or how satisfied were you with the process of writing your p... Neutral Is Selected

Q2.1b. Was there anything in particular you liked about the process of creating and submitting your proposal? Tell us about it.

Answer If how satisfied were you with the process of writing your p... Satisfied Is Selected Or how satisfied were you with the process of writing your p... Very Satisfied Is Selected

Q3. How satisfied were you with the review process and/or the feedback you received from reviewers, program staff or other community members?

  • Very Dissatisfied (1)
  • Dissatisfied (2)
  • Neutral (3)
  • Satisfied (4)
  • Very Satisfied (5)

Q3.1a. Was there anything in particular you disliked about the review process or the feedback? Tell us about it.

Answer If How satisfied were you with the review process and/or the... Very Dissatisfied Is Selected Or How satisfied were you with the review process and/or the... Dissatisfied Is Selected Or How satisfied were you with the review process and/or the... Neutral Is Selected

Q3.1b. Was there anything in particular you liked about the review process or the feedback? Tell us about it.

Answer If How satisfied were you with the review process and/or the... Satisfied Is Selected Or How satisfied were you with the review process and/or the... Very Satisfied Is Selected.

Q4. Did you participate in the IdeaLab?

  • Yes (1)
  • No (2)

Q4.1. Was there anything in particular you liked OR disliked about your experience in the IdeaLab? Tell us about it.

Answer If Did you participate in the IdeaLab? Yes Is Selected.

Q5. Was your proposal selected?

  • Yes (1)
  • No (2)

Q5.1a. Do you feel like you have been provided with the information you need about reporting requirements, financial requirements, and how to set up your project? If not, please tell us about anything in these instructions that should be clarified.

Answer If Was your proposal selected? Yes Is Selected

Q5.1b. Was the feedback provided to you useful for making changes to your project for future endeavors?

Answer If Was your proposal selected? No Is Selected

Q6. Would you apply to the program again?

  • Yes, definitely (1)
  • Maybe (2)
  • No, definitely not (3)
  • I'm not sure/I haven't decided (4)

Q7. Would you recommend the IEG program to others?

  • Yes, definitely (1)
  • Maybe (2)
  • No, definitely not (3)
  • I'm not sure/I haven't decided (4)

Q8. How could we improve the Individual Engagement Grants program to make it easier or more rewarding for editors who submit proposals?

Q9. The IEG program is intended to support editors from all Wikimedia projects. If you feel comfortable doing so, please share the project you work on most (for example, "pt.wikipedia.org") in the box below.

Q10. The IEG program is intended to support editors from all over the world. If you feel comfortable doing so, please share the country where you live (for example, "Indonesia") in the box below.

Q11. The IEG program is intended to provide resources and opportunities for all Wikimedians, but we are particularly interested in finding out how many female editors, who are underrepresented within the Wikimedia community, are participate in IEG.If you're comfortable telling us, what is your gender?

  • Male (1)
  • Female (2)
  • I'd rather not say (3)

Q12. Do you have any other questions, comments or concerns? If so, please share them below.

Outro. Thank you for participating in our survey! You may email IEG program head Siko Bouterse at sbouterse@wikimedia.org if you would like more information.