Grants:Programs/Conference Fund/test111/Final Report
Part 1: Understanding your work
[edit]1. What do you think will be the short and long-term impact of this conference on participants, Wikimedia contributions, and your broader community? (required)
Test 1 d<djncjn<wjs
2. Did this conference improve participants’ ability to learn new skills, knowledge or build relationships in their Wikimedia work? (required)
Yes
3. If yes or no, please briefly explain why, and what evidence or feedback informed your reflection. (required)
Test 3 activities
4. Documentation of your impact (optional). Please use the two spaces below to share files and links that help tell your story and impact. This can be documentation that shows your results through testimonies, survey results, videos, sound files, images (photos and infographics, etc) social media posts, dashboards, etc.
- Upload Documents and Files
- Screenshot 2026-05-21 at 09.54.35.png
- Here is an additional field to type in URLs.
Test 4.2. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Portada
5. To what extent do you agree with the following statements regarding the work carried out with the support of this Fund? (required)
| A. Conduct the event in a safe and friendly environment. | Strongly agree |
| B. Diversity of participants contributing to Wikimedia projects, including geographic, gender, and other relevant demographics. | Agree |
| C. Newcomers to the movement gained useful knowledge, skills, or relationships that helped them start or continue contributing to Wikimedia projects. | Neither agree nor disagree |
| D. Participants experienced a more inclusive and connected community, and felt better able to collaborate with others after the event. | Disagree |
| E. Participants found the event content relevant and useful for their Wikimedia work. | Strongly disagree |
| F. The event contributed to the creation or improvement of Wikimedia content from underrepresented perspectives. | Strongly disagree |
| G. The event contributed to the improvement of the Wikimedia technical ecosystem through tools, demos, hacking etc. | Not applicable |
| H. Participants have a plan for continued engagement for contributing to Wikimedia projects after the event. | Strongly disagree |
| I. Created new partnerships or relationships with other non-Wikimedia groups as supporters and stakeholders. | Not applicable |
| J. Organizing and executing the conference was a positive experience for the COT and sub-committee members. | Strongly agree |
6. Documentation of resources (optional). Please share resources that would be useful to share with other Wikimedian organizations so that they can learn from, adapt or build upon your work. (please include links to any blogs, commons files here)
- Upload Documents and Files
- Here is an additional field to type in URLs.
- Test 6.2. jjjj
7. As an organizer, what would you like to share as key learnings which could help future organizers, what information or learnings would you like to pass on? (required)
Test 7. f9ugtu
Part 2: Your impact/Recommendations
[edit]8. What were the major challenges or limitations, if any, that impacted attendees or the organizers? What would you do differently next time? (required)
Test 8.
9. Can you describe your learning on the scholarship selection? Please include any information on how the team was able to bring the right participant group, particularly for underrepresented communities or newcomers. (required)
Test 9.
10. Please describe your learnings regarding the conference program, including how sessions and activities were designed and selected to benefit attendees. (required)
Test 10.
11. Can you share your observations about how the program impacted attendees’ knowledge, skills, collaboration, or future engagement within the Wikimedia movement. (required)
Test 11.
12. How do you plan to build on the key successes of this conference? (required)
Test 12.
13. Did you collaborate with any WMF teams to support the event? If yes, please indicate which teams you worked with and the type of support they provided. (required)
Test 13.
Part 3: Metrics
[edit]14. Open Metrics reporting.
In your application, you defined some open metrics and targets (goals). You will see a table like the one below with your metric in the title and the target you set in your proposal automatically filled in.
| Open Metrics | Description | Target | Results | Comments | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | N/A | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
15. Based on the metrics you reported in your proposal and the eventual results, what do these results suggest about the impact of this conference for your community and Wikimedia projects? (required).
Test 15.
16. Please indicate if you applied any of the following survey and registration tools. Please select all that apply. (required)
1. Standard Registration Form, 2. Post-event participant survey
17. Please share the result(s) with us, provide the link(s) or summarize the main result(s) and insight(s) from them. (optional)
Test 17.
18. If you used other forms, please share them with us, as these forms might be useful for others to use. (optional)
Test 18.
19. Based on the findings of the post event survey what were the main findings and take aways, how can they be helpful for future organisers. (required)
Test 19.
Part 4: Financial reporting and compliance
[edit]20. & 21. State the total amount spent in your local currency. (required)
20 AMD
22. State the total amount spent in USD.
20 USD
23. Report the funds received and spending in the currency of your fund (required). You can upload it or give a link to it below.
Test 23
As required in the fund agreement, please report any deviations from your fund proposal here. Note that, among other things, any changes must be consistent with our WMF mission, must be for charitable purposes as defined in the grant agreement, and must otherwise comply with the grant agreement.
24. If you have not already done so in your budget report, please provide information on changes in the budget in relation to your original proposal. (optional)
Test 24
25. Do you have any unspent funds from the Grant? (required)
Yes
25.1. Please list the amount you did not use and explain why. Make sure to specify the currency. (required)
Test 25.1
25.2. What are you planning to do with the underspent funds?
A. Propose to use the underspent funds within this Fund period with PO approval
25.3. Please provide details of hope to spend these funds.
Test 25.3
26. Are you in compliance with the terms outlined in the fund agreement? (required)
Yes
27. Are you in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations as outlined in the grant agreement? (required)
Yes
28. Are you in compliance with provisions of the United States Internal Revenue Code (“Code”), and with relevant tax laws and regulations restricting the use of the Funds as outlined in the grant agreement? In summary, this is to confirm that the funds were used in alignment with the WMF mission and for charitable/nonprofit/educational purposes.
Yes
29. If you have additional public recommendations or reflections that don’t fit into the above sections, please write them here. (optional)
Test 29