Grants:Programs/Wikimedia Community Fund/General Support Fund/LSP funding request 2024/Final Report
|
|
Part 1: Understanding your work
[edit]Per the recent update on the Wikimedia Foundation Affiliates Strategy process, Wikimedia Affiliates that are General Support Fund grantees will fulfill their affiliate reporting requirements through their final or yearly grantee report.
If you are a Wikimedia Affiliate, you will use this form for your affiliate reporting and to address the affiliate health criteria. You do not need to submit a separate report to AffCom. Follow the guidance in the green boxes to report on how you met the corresponding affiliate health criteria.
If you are not a Wikimedia Affiliate, aligning your responses with the affiliate criteria is optional and not required.
1. Please share to what extent your programs, approaches, and strategies contributed to addressing the challenges you shared in your proposal. If they did not contribute as you believed they would, please share what obstacles you faced and what, if anything, you learned from them? (required)
For affiliates, use this space (Question 1.) to address Affiliate Health Criterion 1.1 (Goal delivery). Describe how you actively delivered on mission goals, e.g. content creation.
We continued our threefold strategic axes detailed in our 2023 grant and have detailed our 2024 strategic plan that we wish to pursue in year 2025 and 2026
The strategic axes are defined for 2024 in our action plan here : https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Les_sans_pagEs/Plan_d%27action_2024#Plan_d'actions_2024
STRATEGIC AXIS 1 improve diversity and inclusion in the Francophone community
Our second annual survey has confirmed (76 respondents) that our project strives and achieves to have a diverse representation of contributors in the francophone community who expressed a satisfaction globally with our strategic goals that were defined for the next 3 years during our annual convention in may 2024 and presented to our community for confirmation. What has emerged is that our contributors think LSP has achieved a level of competence in best practices that they wish to be recognized as bringing best practices in organizing, financing and documenting a wikimedian project, although they wished the atmosphere on Wikipedia was more friendly towards new contributors.
57 % of our contributors come from France, 16% from Switzerland and 13% from Africa, this later is growing fast and is represented at board level in the association. 36% of the LSP community is between 26 and 35 of age, 20% between 36 and 45, but we have people from all ages participating. 50% have been contributing for more than 5 years, but 16% are totally new in 2024. 51 % are women, 39% are men and 10 % express other gender identification. In contrast the exact same survey conducted on the bistrot showed more men and less people from Africa, while expressing less satisfaction for the LSP project.
Together with the wikipedian francophone community, we achieved 20% of women biography in July 2024 and the community was happy about this positive outcome.
survey results : [1]
STRATEGIC AXIS 2 improve the representativeness of content
The Francophone Wikipedia achieved 20% of women biographies in July 2024. Measuring the representativity of content requires to have metrics that we do not have since Denelezeh went down. A young developer of our community, Wyslpj16 is working on a python script to reproduce Denelezeh with an automated refresh of the data to enable us to have a more specific action. In the meantime, we continued actions like the Quinzaine des autrices francophones to tackle the lack of african contributors and african related subjects to women. Experienced contributors held an LGBT camp dedicated to LGBT content. Basically though we followed the wish of our communtity to organize editathons along what they feel passionate about : new projects have emerged tackling women documentary film makers, and we continued to work with WMCH to work on historical content of executed witches in Switzerland.
We welcomed the results of one of the first academic research in French led by two prolific members of our community, Hamuli and Alwenno, who had previously worked on women geographers and moved on with an academic research named Wikif focusing on the representation of scientific women. One of these contributors became a wikipedian in residence in 2024.
In short having more refined metrics is vital to be able to thematically address the gap in content representation, and this not only in English. This is a big and exciting challenge for the future.
more about Wikif : [2]
STRATEGIC AXIS 3: Sustainability
We slightly slowed the quantity of events to be able to train existing contributors and invite them to contribute more in the movement and in the various projects. We had very new board members to the movement and they experienced a high learning curve : participated in the Wikiconcours contest (achieving the podium) and had they first featured articles.
We also strengthened our partnerships with The Francophonies achieving a nice collaboration with their photographer to download pictures of african women theater writers. We sent our members to Wikimania, the francophone wikiconvention and the general assembly of Wikimedia France.
We worked hard to improve our financial autonomy and are proud of our business model : renowned institutions buy training days all year round, the only limit being the availability of our members to attend these. This was used to close our 2023 deficit caused partly by the defection of one of our financial sponsor.
We continued to expand our outreach on social media thanks to the hard work of our board member Celine Assemat, but were not able to publish as many blog entries as we had planned due to the lack of time of our members, who already document every editathon on our actuality feed,
We also worked hard to open up communication channels within our project members and the association to be able to communicate more efficiently and with a higher level of security.
To maintain current level of implication it is probable we will need an administrator taking care of financial flows and keeping the documentation of the accounts in check as the amount of work exceeds what a volunteer treasurer can do. => This is becoming even more challenging as our revenue stream grow but we do not have currently the capacity to employ an administrator although this would be badly needed
We continued efforts to provide different levels of training during our annual convention, and the LSP project expressed the desire to have different levels of training in the future, To retain contributors who are no longer newbies, we need to offer more technical training and dedicated events.
We continued helping contributors from Africa and possibly francophone Carrabean regions to emerge as driving forces in our movement with the Quinzaine des autrices francophone campaign + mentoring and training during the online regular events and the “Renforcement des capacités” initiated by the african community in RDC.
We will continue to collaborate with GLAM and Universities, notably this year the prestigious Ecole Nationale Supérieure in Paris and with the university of Grenoble, Lyon and the EHESS in Paris.
We consolidated of our collaborations with the open source movement in France : April. Premier Samedi du Libre and Parilinux, Framasoft as well as the Interhack in Strasburg and the Communs du numérique conferences in Strasburg.
Obstacles
Criticism in the French press with doxxing, threats and anti inclusive approach. This has been recurrent around the board election of Wikimedia France. It had some positive impact too : some renowned scientific institutions contacted us to plan editathons as a way of encouragement after reading about these critics formulated by journalist from 3 medias, and other journalists responded by publishing positive reviews,
Criticism from some members of the community Along this some recurrent critics from the part of the French press who is ideologically opposed to promoting inclusivity, some criticism were addressed on a recurrent basis on the bistrot from some members of the community. also around the board election of Wikimedia France.
We responded to this by extending our annual survey to the bistrot and the results are interesting : the majority are neutral (those who admit not knowing a lot about our activities) or satisfied, with 10 to 12 contributors expressing critics, among which 5 in a derogative way.
The constructive take away critics are similar to those addressed to chapters and the foundation : wish to have no association taking lead in editorial context.
We identified areas where the French community shares identic goals : acquiring more technical competences on the project (coding, wikidata queries, ect). This is one aspect we can push forward to provide a win-win approach satisfying to the community.
All - wether belonging to the project LSP or the community on the bistrot express tiredness about the various dramas that unfolded around the survey about representation of transidentity on Wikipedia.
Concerns about wikitracking on Fr-wp that fall just beneath the community rules are often evoked by members of the project saying it impacts their level of commitment to contribute. However, apart from providing moral support and encouragements, there is nothing that can be done as these tracking behaviors are justified by numerous and sometimes contradictory rules to review new articles, and the tracking is hard to prove. We encouraged newbies to not contribute around biographies of living persons in certain geographical areas where some contributors are virtually sitting on projects and discouraging people from contributing by extensively and massively “improving” articles sometimes just minutes after a stub has been published by a new contributor. We have retorted also to publishing articles together so that the reviews could not affect massively just one contributor, alleviating the impact. We have also trained newbies to resort to changing their pseudos to diminish the tracking (or make it all the more obvious) and encouraged them to publish and let the article live its life, not responding to what is sometimes perceived as provocation. The strategy is to help them to continue contributing and becoming more knowledgeable about the different guidelines to help them improve their articles.
2. Is there a plan to build on the key successes you had? If yes, please describe the plan and if no, please share the limitations to do so. For instance, did the activities lead to any new priorities, ideas for activities, or goals for the future? (required)
We held a strategy workshop during our annual convention to help us reflect collectively on the future goals we should be pursuing with Presence Active, and we want to continue this activity which proved satisfying and rewarding for everyone involved. This is detailed in our annual activity report on meta.
New ideas :
1 to have different levels of training to propose to institutions and volunteers who are getting tired of listening to the presentation of the 5 fundamental pillars and want to acquire more technical skills (how to find reliable sources to get a featured article for exemple, how to set up metrics and dashboards and use them to analyse activities ect)
2 gamification : Le deuxième texte presented a game based on the books that were uploaded and corrected by volunteers on Wikisource during the Premier Samedi du Libre XXL in Paris, and this activity had a great impact on their stand. Association stands in the open source movement tend to be stuffed with open computers and stickers and we would like to work on how to improve this.
3 work within the wikipedia community to have the project recognized as a ressource and not a problem. This idea was presented during the convention by contributors of Le Deuxième Text who learned a lot from les sans pagEs in the past.
4 To reflect more on effective immediate strategies to stop harassment and provide comfort. Expressing a dedication and a wish is not enough, and we are often at loss about how to tackle harassment.However, we often dedicate too much time on the perceived aggressor, and need to spend more time in repairing the perceived victim. We need more brainstorming and appliable strategies that do not rely on the sole invocation of Trust and Safety or the foundation. We have worked with a theater improvisation troop to make people laugh about their lived experience and also had a theater workshop called “forum theatre” to replay the problem and gain agency in the replay. To be continued …
3. Please provide a link to reports that detail the activities that took place in the last year. This can include an annual report, Meta pages, and websites. If there are no links available, briefly describe the implemented activities and programs below or upload any files. (required)
For affiliates, use this space (Question 3.) to address Affiliate Health Criteria 2.1 (Affiliate health & resilience), 4.1 (Internal engagement), 4.2 (Community connection), and 4.3 (Partnerships and collaboration):
- Describe your activities engaging new users, new members for your decision-making body(ies), and developing leaders and organizers (2.1).
- Describe your activities creating or hosting spaces to encourage greater collaboration and engagement among your members (4.1).
- Describe how you engage with the contributing community that you serve and/or support (4.2).
- Describe your partnerships with other affiliates or with non-Wikimedia entities (4.3).
Annual activity report on Meta : [3]
Actuality feed documenting on wikipedia all our activities for 2024 : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projet:Les_sans_pagEs/Actualit%C3%A9s/Archives/2024/Q1#
website : [4]
4. Are you interested in sharing what you achieved or learned this year with the wider community through different peer learning programs (e.g. Let's Connect program, Diff)? (optional)
We would gladly share what we learned with the Let's Connect program and deliver a digest diff report on our activities based on our 2024 meta report and our strategy workshop, as well as our annual poll results if asked to do so.
5. Did you collect feedback from your community or target groups on how the activities implemented impacted them? If yes, please attach/provide information on the results (e.g. community surveys, stories, impact booklets/reports, interviews with partner institutions, etc). Did you collect other impact-specific data? (required)
For affiliates, the response to Question 5. also partially addresses Affiliate Health Criteria 4.1 (Internal Engagement), 4.2 (Community Connection), or 4.3 (Partnerships & collaboration), where applicable.
We made our second community survey and coupled it with a community survey.
The results are still being analyzed as the last survey finished in february, but the main results can be seen here : [5]
![[5]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sondage_de_satisfaction_LSP_2024_01.png){kind=link}
The final analysis will be available here once finished and a summary is allready available on our annual activity report here.
6. During the fund period, did your efforts do any of the following? (required):
For affiliates, the response to Question 6. also partially addresses Affiliate Health Criterion 2.2 (Diversity balance).
- 6.1 Bring in participants from the following groups: women, LGBTQ+ groups, speakers of minority languages, underrepresented geographical regions (ESEAP, LATAM, SSA, MENA, SA)
- 6.2 Develop content about the following underrepresented topics or groups of people: women, LGBTQ+ groups, speakers of minority languages, underrepresented geographical regions (ESEAP, LATAM, SSA, MENA, SA)
- 6.3 Support the retention of: Editors, Organizers, Partnerships
7. What, if any, effective tactics or approaches can you share that worked well when dealing with the programs under points 6.1-6.3 that you selected? (optional)
1 Propose events that are thematically linked to the targeted groups like Quinzaine des autrices francophones for an african and francophone target and instead of pushing a theme on people, asking proactively what they would like to work on
2 Support leaders of underrepresented groups by helping them to finance their events
3 propose that groups translate articles in their own underrepresented languages (exemple in Swahili, Creole or Fon)
4 provide regular weekly online sessions to answer questions that people may have on the go
5 provide extra training on sourcing and notability criteria to African groups to help them understand
6 Help people feeling targeted or rejected to feel more welcome by taking care of what is happening to them in between events
7 have a tailored training presentation for each event
8 have a annual meeting to tackle strategy and governance issues
9 offer food refreshment systematically to create a welcoming atmosphere during events
10 coordinate events through independant telegram channels so that people can exchange in between events
11 have regular weekly maintainance sessions to review the created articles with a group of experienced wikipedians
8. If you developed partnerships, which of the following factors most helped you to build partnerships? Please pick a MAXIMUM of the three most relevant factors (optional):
Staff hired through the fund, Institutional support from the Wikimedia Foundation, Partners proactive interest
Part 2: Metrics
[edit]| Metrics name | Target | Result | Comments and tools used |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of all participants | 660 | 890 | We used the dashboards for this figure and we did not count participants who did not register to the dashboards. Unfortunately we did not meet this target which was maybe set too high. This is because we had many more events but smaller than in 2023.
However the number of total participation is higher (890 compared to 849 in 2023) meaning that we were able to retain our regular contributors more in the course of the year. This is due to the sucess of the online weekly sessions, which enable also long distance participation. Source : https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/campaigns/lsp_2024/overview |
| Number of all editors | 314 | 385 | Editors : source used : Dashboard LSP 2024, Quarry for editors having proactively added their created articles on the project page (not automatic) https://quarry.wmcloud.org/query/90679,
Participants : we do not count people who do not one way or another register on dashboards or contribute to Wikipédia. For this figure we used the "participants" of the dashboards, Retention : We don't know how to calculate the retention of users one month after. We used eventmetrics to calculate the 7 day retention rate and are putting this figure here. Source : https://eventmetrics.wmcloud.org/programs/918 New editors : we used the eventmetrics tools entering all the events organized, irl and online. |
| Number of new editors | 160 | 185 | |
| Number of retained editors | 10 | 32 | |
| Number of all organizers | 44 | 56 | Number of new organizers identified by :
|
| Number of new organizers | 22 | 29 |
| Wikimedia project | Target - Number of created pages | Target - Number of improved pages | Result - Number of created pages | Result - Number of improved pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wikipedia | 1256 | 2870 | 6140 | |
| Wikimedia Commons | 2660 | 6050 | ||
| Wikidata | 2150 | 1500 | ||
| Wiktionary | ||||
| Wikisource | 20 | 20 | 52 | |
| Wikimedia Incubator | ||||
| Translatewiki | ||||
| MediaWiki | ||||
| Wikiquote | ||||
| Wikivoyage | ||||
| Wikibooks | ||||
| Wikiversity | ||||
| Wikinews | ||||
| Wikispecies | ||||
| Wikifunctions or Abstract Wikipedia |
11. Did you set other quantitative and qualitative targets for your project (other metrics)? (required): No
11.1. Other Metrics.
In your application, you outlined some other open metrics that you would like to measure. Please fill out the achieved results for each of the open metrics you defined.
| Other Metrics name | Metrics Description | Target | Result | Tools and comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Part 3: Skill Development / Capacity Building
[edit]12. Reflecting on your programmatic (external) and organizational (internal) work, did your grant support you to undergo any skill development that made a difference to your success? If yes, what skill was developed, and how did it lead to success? (e.g. received coaching on public speaking, attended training on nonviolent communication, hosted professional development conversations on leadership, learned and used a new tool for project management, etc.)? Can you share any materials? (required)
For affiliates, use this space (Question 12.) to address Affiliate Health Criteria 2.2 (Diversity balance) and 3.1 (Diverse, Skilled, and Accountable Leadership):
- Describe actions taken to prioritize gender balance in affiliate leadership, as well as any areas of diversity relevant to your affiliate's context (2.2).
- Describe the management, financial, or other leadership skills of your affiliate leaders. If you have a succession plan, please include it here (3.1).
- Describe any training or skill development (as outlined in the question above) (3.1).
- Incorporate into the annual report a disclosure of conflict of interests (if any) from the leadership (3.1).
Our grant obliged us to develop a more strategical approach to metrics, to choose fewer metrics, to use event metrics and qualtrix and document more precisely who is contributing to the project and why, as well as to develop a annual survey. The annual survey proved useful to communicate with the volunteers of our project and improve some governance aspects and communicating with the basis of active contributors to the project.
The activity report on meta, has obliged board members to have a more global knowledge of the movement and of the people involved in the project, which increased in turn their activities as wikimedians and contributors.
The professionalisation has pushed board members and volunteers to become more proficient in areas they previously had never tackled, which was challenging but also rewarding.
We were induced to reflect on strategical goals in the future and also analyze risks and opportunities as well as structuring the processes internal and external. There is is a lot of work to be done in the area of governance and stabilisation of finances in the future, but we feel we are heading towards an improvement of our processes as an association and a user group.
13. What is one capacity/skill area that you would like to focus on for the next year? And how do you plan to achieve this capacity? (required)
We plan to continue developing our financial fundraising capacities to be able to hire an administrative person to help the treasurer and the director in the completion of the documentation needed for accounting and financial reports as the increase in administrative work with more board members and a hired staff is limiting operational growth. We also plan to continue transferring know how to our basis of volunteers for them to be able to take on more responsibilities. We have identified that we need to design more train the trainers workshops as well as documentation for board members and members of the association, who are often willing to help but need training before thy can find their place and have a feeling of efficiency and recognition.
We do not have for the moment a map of skills and plan to do it in our next convention. The skill we are most in need of is accounting and administrative management as the director needs to do fundraising, coaching, and networking as well as handling the various institutional partners. We would need a second employee, but for that need to do more fundraising. A volunteer treasurer cannot handle the amount of work need de alone as in the past when the association weighed 30 000 CHF per year.
We have a plan with our partner Wikimedia France to upgrade our partnership to a consortium agreement that is underway and also have identified potential institutions in Switzerland who could provide further grants.
We also are continuing to develop our autonomy by being recognized as leaders in training institutions to editing Wikipedia with the aim of a better content representation and diminution of the gender gap. Next step would be to acquire a professional label in training such as EduQa in Switzerland, but we need to further reflect on this.
14. If you have additional information or reflections that don’t fit into the above sections, please write them here. Use the space below to upload any additional documents that would be useful to understand your report.
For affiliates, also use this section (Question 14) to fulfill the Affiliate Health Criteria requirements.
- Describe and link to any public-facing documentation for affiliate governance, including affiliate leadership and membership with a breakdown of the demographics; how elections are conducted; how conflicts of interest are declared; and how decisions are made and communicated (2.2, 2.3, 3.1).
- Describe and link to any public-facing documentation for activities incorporating, promoting awareness about, or enforcing the Universal Code of Conduct in your affiliate's activities (3.3).
- Describe and link to any public-facing documentation for internal membership engagement, such as notes from your regular meetings and how you communicate to or involve your membership (4.1).
Public information governance is available on our meta page here [6] which documents the elected board of members and how to reach out to them. We are aiming in the future at publishing our financial accounts. The results of our general assembly are sent by mail to the members of the association. We are moving gradually towards more transparency, and need to work more in this area but are limited by the availability of our volunteer board members who have been on a steep learning curve, and the one staffed person. Other chapters have more staffing ressources to do this properly and not under pressure, but we are aware we need to improve this.
Governance and communication
List of volunteers in the board :
- Sinkra, président
- Aimeabibis, treasurer
- AlacoolWiki secretary of the board
- Celinea33, member of the board
- Laugriville, member of the board
- Myrelionis,member of the board
Number of persons in the association : 27 persons as of 31.12.2024
Activities taken on by board members : the board has met 10 times over 2024 to take operational decisions and get an update on the financial situation. Board members have attended Wikimania in Katowice (2), the francophone Wikiconvention in Quebec (1), and Wikimedia France general assembly (2) as well as some activities organised by Wikimedia France (conflict management workshop (1) and Wikicamp (1), Wikifranca (1). One of our board members, Celinea is also active in the Chilean wikimedia chapter. Another Myrelionis, took up activities with Wikimedia CH (SAPA editathon).
Board members review the grants, follow up the various events of the association and the Wikipedian project. They have a steep learning curve as most of them apart from the president were new to the movement in 2022. One o
One member of the association is also a wikimedian in residence and we benefit from jointly organized activities.
All members of the association are encouraged to participate in the LSP convention held each summer, where for the first time we held a strategic workshop. The strategic options decided there were handed off to the wider community to have them validated (76 persons answered).
The members of the association have a telegram channel where thy are able to communicate and share. We also have regular online meetings that our community uses to communicate and ask questions.
The board is currently working on writing guidelines to new board members. It should be achieved in 2025. The challenge is coming with a rising number of board members that are located in different continents.
We still need to be more transparent on our financial documents and are working with our accounting compagny to adress this issue and also to make sure this does not lead to doxxing people who wish to remain known by their pseudo. We are going to adress the publicaiton of the accounts in the next general assembly, as this is also a community request. At the same time, members of the association are incresingly worried about harrassment issues from various parts of the net and the media agencies, explaining their caution to do so thoughtfully and carefully.
Code of conduct : we have reflected on how to bring awareness at every level of the code of conduct and are publishing links to the code of conduct and our internal charter on every event that we organize. Furthermore, every editathon begins with a reminder that the activity is under the provision of the Ucoc and our charter, and we specifically design a volunteer to be responsible of their application. This volunteer writes a report at the end of the event to signal if there has been a problem or not. That way, we are able to reflect and document any problem and criticism.
Part 4: Financial reporting
[edit]For affiliates, also use this section (Part 4: Financial reporting) to address Affiliate Health Criterion 3.2 (Financial & Legal Compliance).
| Description | Planned / received budget for this category (CHF) | Amount spent (CHF) |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel costs | 135130 | 117170 |
| Operational costs | 4870 | 11358 |
| Programmatic costs | 0 | 11405 |
| Total General Support Fund | 140000 | 139933 |
| Other revenue | 37403 | 37403 |
| Remaining funds from General Support Fund | 67 |
15. Please state the total amount spent from this fund in your local currency. (required)
139933 CHF
16. Please provide an overview of the amount spent from this fund in the following budget categories in your local currency. (required)
- Operational costs: 11358 CHF
- Programmatic costs: 117170 CHF
- Staff and contractor costs: 11405 CHF
17. Did you have any other revenue sources (e.g. other funding, membership contributions, donations)? (required): Yes
- 17.1. Provide the total amount received from other revenue sources in your local currency. (required): 37403 CHF
- 17.2. Provide the total amount spent from other revenue sources in your local currency. (required): 37403 CHF
18. Provide a financial report document which will provide the details of funds received and spent in the currency of your fund. (required)
- Upload Documents, Templates, and Files.
- Report funds received and spent, if template not used.
18.2. If you have not already done so in your financial spending report, provide information on changes in the budget in relation to your original proposal. (optional)
The budget changes are listed in the financial reporting document and more details are available upon request. Basically we did not make any pay rise as planned and reused the funds to finance the project of La Quinzaine des Autrices Francophone and some events in Paris that we initially planned to finance through Wikimedia France through a Wikifranca grant that was not operationnal enough in time for us which explains why we added a programmatic section to this grant.
19. Do you have any unspent funds from this funding?: Yes
- 19.1. Please list the amount of unspent funds in your local currency. (required)
- 67
- 19.2. Explain why you did not use the amount. (required)
- 67 CHF discrepancy due to budget changes that we propose to reimburse on the next grant to avoid bank transfer costs
- 19.3. What are you planning to do with the underspent funds?
- B. Propose to use them to partially or fully fund a new/future request with PO approval
- 19.4. Please provide details of hope to spend these funds.
- To avoid bank transfer costs we propose to deduct this amount from the next grant if this is possible
20. Final confirmations (required)
- 20.1. Are you in compliance with the terms outlined in the fund agreement? You must be in compliance with relevant tax laws and regulations restricting the use of the Funds as outlined in the grant agreement. In summary, this is to confirm that the funds were used in alignment with the Wikimedia Foundation mission and for charitable/nonprofit/educational purposes.
- Yes
- 20.2. Are you in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations as outlined in the grant agreement?
- Yes
- 20.3. Are you in compliance with provisions of the United States Internal Revenue Code (“Code”), and with relevant tax laws and regulations restricting the use of the Funds as outlined in the grant agreement? In summary, this is to confirm that the funds were used in alignment with the WMF mission and for charitable/nonprofit/educational purposes.
- Yes
This is an automatically generated Meta-Wiki page. The page was copied from Fluxx, the web service of Wikimedia Foundation Funds, where the user has submitted their report. Please do not make any changes to this page because all changes will be removed after the next update. Use the discussion page for your feedback. The page was created by CR-FluxxBot.