Grants:Programs/Wikimedia Community Fund/Rapid Fund/Using Award Anthology Short Stories Data for Advanced Editor Training (ID: 22763030)/Final Report
Report Status: Draft
Due date: 2025-03-31T00:00:00Z
Funding program: Rapid Fund
Report type: Final
This is an automatically generated Meta-Wiki page. The page was copied from Fluxx, the grantmaking web service of Wikimedia Foundation where the user has submitted their midpoint report. Please do not make any changes to this page because all changes will be removed after the next update. Use the discussion page for your feedback. The page was created by CR-FluxxBot.General information
[edit]- Applicant username: phibeatrice
- Organization name: N/A
- Amount awarded: 3000
- Amount spent: USD,
Part 1: Project and impact
[edit]1. Describe the implemented activities and results achieved. Additionally, share which approaches were most effective in supporting you to achieve the results. (required)
2. Documentation of your impact. Please use space below to share links that help tell your story, impact, and evaluation. (required)
Share links to:
- Project page on Meta-Wiki or any other Wikimedia project
- Dashboards and tools that you used to track contributions
- Some photos or videos from your event. Remember to share access.
You can also share links to:
- Important social media posts
- Surveys and their results
- Infographics and sound files
- Examples of content edited on Wikimedia projects
Additionally, share the materials and resources that you used in the implementation of your project. (required)
For example:
- Training materials and guides
- Presentations and slides
- Work processes and plans
- Any other materials your team has created or adapted and can be shared with others
3. To what extent do you agree with the following statements regarding the work carried out with this Rapid Fund? You can choose “not applicable” if your work does not relate to these goals. Required. Select one option per question. (required)
A. Bring in participants from underrepresented groups | |
B. Create a more inclusive and connected culture in our community | |
C. Develop content about underrepresented topics/groups | |
D. Develop content from underrepresented perspectives | |
E. Encourage the retention of editors | |
F. Encourage the retention of organizers | |
G. Increased participants' feelings of belonging and connection to the movement | |
F. Other (optional) |
Part 2: Learning
[edit]4. In your application, you outlined some learning questions. What did you learn from these learning questions when you implemented your project? How do you hope to use this learnings in the future? You can recall these learning questions below. (required)
You can recall these learning questions below: In addition to teaching more advanced editors, we would layer the table creation skill on to other training that we are already doing for female and diverse editors.
We believe that organizations with a strong identity centered on diverse writers are an ideal pool for Wikipedia to recruit from since they both are comfortable with prose and have a mission of elevating underrepresented voices.
While editathons are good for “top of the funnel” recruiting, these don’t always turn into long-term engagement. We believe that the mission-oriented nature of the diverse arts and letters organizations can create a strong enough bond so that the participants reinforce involvement in Wikipedia.
The advanced model for training looks like this:
1) “Training.” This is a “come learn about Wikipedia and eat yummy lunch.” This is largely a social experience and we help people who are already Wikicurious. 2) Then the bulk of the training is remote in groups on Zoom. Interested people sign up for a few sessions to become proficient on editing/formatting tables and cleaning/uploading data (we have another grant that helps with this). 3) Everyone has to produce an edited article and also add a table. 4) We have an “editathon” which again is people eating yummy food, but is mostly a social experience, where they may add links or new article drafts based on the added tables.
Note: this format may change depending on what the partners feel is most conducive for engagement.
5. Did anything unexpected or surprising happen when implementing your activities? This can include both positive and negative situations. What did you learn from those experiences? (required)
6. What is your plan to share your project learnings and results with other community members? If you have already done it, describe how. (required)
Part 3: Metrics
[edit]7. Wikimedia Metrics results. (required)
In your application, you set some Wikimedia targets in numbers (Wikimedia metrics). In this section, you will describe the achieved results and provide links to the tools used.
Target | Results | Comments and tools used | |
---|---|---|---|
Number of participants | 15 | ||
Number of editors | 15 | ||
Number of organizers | 4 |
Wikimedia project | Target | Result - Number of created pages | Result - Number of improved pages |
---|---|---|---|
Wikipedia | 600 | ||
Wikimedia Commons | |||
Wikidata | |||
Wiktionary | |||
Wikisource | |||
Wikimedia Incubator | |||
Translatewiki | |||
MediaWiki | |||
Wikiquote | |||
Wikivoyage | |||
Wikibooks | |||
Wikiversity | |||
Wikinews | |||
Wikispecies | |||
Wikifunctions or Abstract Wikipedia |
8. Other Metrics results.
In your proposal, you could also set Other Metrics targets. Please describe the achieved results and provide links to the tools used if you set Other Metrics in your application.
Other Metrics name | Metrics Description | Target | Result | Tools and comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
9. Did you have any difficulties collecting data to measure your results? (required)
9.1. Please state what difficulties you had. How do you hope to overcome these challenges in the future? Do you have any recommendations for the Foundation to support you in addressing these challenges? (required)
Part 4: Financial reporting
[edit]10. Please state the total amount spent in your local currency. (required)
11. Please state the total amount spent in US dollars. (required)
12. Report the funds spent in the currency of your fund. (required)
12.2. If you have not already done so in your financial spending report, please provide information on changes in the budget in relation to your original proposal. (optional)
13. Do you have any unspent funds from the Fund?
13.1. Please list the amount and currency you did not use and explain why.
N/A
13.2. What are you planning to do with the underspent funds?
N/A
13.3. Please provide details of hope to spend these funds.
N/A
14.1. Are you in compliance with the terms outlined in the fund agreement?
Your response to the review feedback.
14.2. Are you in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations as outlined in the grant agreement?
14.3. Are you in compliance with provisions of the United States Internal Revenue Code (“Code”), and with relevant tax laws and regulations restricting the use of the Funds as outlined in the grant agreement? In summary, this is to confirm that the funds were used in alignment with the WMF mission and for charitable/nonprofit/educational purposes.
15. If you have additional recommendations or reflections that don’t fit into the above sections, please write them here. (optional)
Review notes
[edit]Review notes from Program Officer:
N/A
Applicant's response to the review feedback.
N/A